Bernhard Grasemann
Medical University of Vienna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bernhard Grasemann.
The Journal of Geology | 2004
Bernhard Grasemann; G. Wiesmayr; Erich Draganits; Florian Fusseis
Structural geology textbooks distinguish among four end members of three‐dimensional refold structures established from their two‐dimensional interference patterns. Here it is shown that six different end members of three‐dimensional refold structures exist. These end members can be described by a reduced direction cosines matrix ndocumentclass{aastex}nusepackage{amsbsy}nusepackage{amsfonts}nusepackage{amssymb}nusepackage{bm}nusepackage{mathrsfs}nusepackage{pifont}nusepackage{stmaryrd}nusepackage{textcomp}nusepackage{portland,xspace}nusepackage{amsmath,amsxtra}nusepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc}nnewcommandcyr{nrenewcommandrmdefault{wncyr}nrenewcommandsfdefault{wncyss}nrenewcommandencodingdefault{OT2}nnormalfontnselectfont}nDeclareTextFontCommand{textcyr}{cyr}npagestyle{empty}nDeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}nbegin{document}nlandscapen
73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition - Workshops 2011 | 2011
Daniel Reif; Bernhard Grasemann; Robert Faber
73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition - Workshops 2011 | 2011
Bernhard Bretis; Nikolaus Bartl; Bernhard Grasemann
mathbf{L}^{mathbf{*}}
Archive | 2004
Tethyan Himalaya; Gerhard Wiesmayr; Julian Neumayer; Christoph Janda; Bernhard Grasemann; Erich Draganits
HASH(0x7f331b051318) | 2007
Bernhard Grasemann; M. A. Edwards; Konstantin Petrakakis; Christoph Iglseder; David A. Schneider
nend{document} . The classical types 1–3 are extended to have three new counterparts types 01–03, which are derived by 90° rotation of the superposed fold around its fold axis. The matrix ndocumentclass{aastex}nusepackage{amsbsy}nusepackage{amsfonts}nusepackage{amssymb}nusepackage{bm}nusepackage{mathrsfs}nusepackage{pifont}nusepackage{stmaryrd}nusepackage{textcomp}nusepackage{portland,xspace}nusepackage{amsmath,amsxtra}nusepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc}nnewcommandcyr{nrenewcommandrmdefault{wncyr}nrenewcommandsfdefault{wncyss}nrenewcommandencodingdefault{OT2}nnormalfontnselectfont}nDeclareTextFontCommand{textcyr}{cyr}npagestyle{empty}nDeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}nbegin{document}nlandscapen
Archive | 2008
Ulrike Exner; Alexander Rath; Bernhard Grasemann; Erich D Raganits
Archive | 2010
A. Hugh N. Rice; Bernhard Grasemann; David A. Schneider; Iris Lenauer; G. Laner
mathbf{L}^{mathbf{*}}
Archive | 2010
Christoph Tuitz; Ulrike Exner; Bernhard Grasemann; Alexander Preh
Archive | 2009
Hans J. Vogel; David A. Schneider; Bernhard Grasemann; Ch. Iglseder; Daniel F. Stockli; Matthew T. Heizler
nend{document} can be used to characterize the angles between the two fold generations in a simple triangle plot illustrating the six end members and even any intermediate refold structure.
Archive | 2010
Nikolaus Bartl; Bernhard Bretis; Bernhard Grasemann; Duncan Lockhart
With the increasing quality and resolution of digital elevation models (DEM) and with the enormousnadvantage of the almost global coverage and free availability of such data, mapping of threedimensionalninformation from true-to-scale, three-dimensional images provides an efficient andnaccurate alternative to stereoscopic mapping using aerial photographs and satellite images. Recently,nit has been demonstrated that the integration of regional to outcrop digital data can be used tonvisualize three-dimensional multi-scale structural geological models. Following these ideas, wenpresent here a practical application of a newly developed add-on tool (PlaneTrace) for the softwarenWinGeol. This allows interactive mapping, visualization and calculation of the spatial orientations ofnplanar surfaces from digital elevation models. The strength of this tool is that the geological feature isntraced by a virtual transparent plane, which allows visual approximation of the planar structure. Thenaccuracy of the PlaneTrace tool has been tested in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt (Kurdistan, NEnIraq) by comparing computed bedding orientation with field data.