Bernhard Kriegleder

All-Arthroscopic Implant-Free Iliac Crest Bone Grafting: New Technique and Case Report

Glenoid bone loss is a recognized risk for recurrent instability. Open J-graft augmentation has been reported as a well-established procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Few data are available on arthroscopic techniques for the repair of bony Bankart lesions. We describe an all-arthroscopic implant-free iliac crest bone grafting technique and present the case of a 32-year-old hockey player who underwent glenoid reconstruction using this novel arthroscopic repair technique after 2 failed soft-tissue procedures. After 13 months, the patient reached nearly full range of motion with a slight loss of external rotation. The computed tomography scan showed a restoration of the glenoid cavity and complete healing of the graft.

Erratum to: Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA

Purpose The aim of this prospective study was to compare early clinical outcome, radiological limb alignment, and three-dimensional (3D)-component positioning between conventional and computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Arthroscopic Implant-Free Bone Grafting for Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss Clinical and Radiological Outcome at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background: Posttraumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocations with concomitant glenoid bone loss show high recurrence rates. The open J-bone graft technique for implant-less anatomic restoration of bony glenoid structure has previously been described, whereas results of arthroscopic techniques are currently not available. Purpose: To evaluate clinical and radiological outcome after arthroscopic anatomic reconstruction of the glenoid for recurrent anteroinferior glenohumeral instability. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Fifteen shoulders of 14 patients with recurrent anteroinferior shoulder instability were prospectively followed after glenoid reconstruction with a modified arthroscopic, implant-free J-bone graft. Preoperatively, the instability severity index score was documented. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years using the Rowe score and the Constant score. Subjective outcome was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the subjective shoulder value for sports (SSVS); satisfaction with procedure outcome was also rated. Range of motion was recorded. Incidence of recurrent instability, defined as dislocation, subluxation, or persistent apprehensiveness, was documented. Pre- and postoperative (1 day and 3, 12, and 24 months) computed tomographic images were used to evaluate glenoid bone loss, reconstruction of the glenoid, and graft remodeling. Results: All preoperative scores (Rowe score: 57.6 ± 14.4; Constant score: 70.9 ± 8.9; VAS: 4.4 ± 2.6; SSVS: 31.4% ± 19.5%) were significantly (P ≤ .02) improved at final follow-up (Rowe score: 98.6 ± 1.5; Constant score: 96.3 ± 3.9; VAS: 0.2 ± 0.6; SSVS: 95.6% ± 3.8%). The preoperative glenoid area (82.1% ± 4.5%) was significantly increased immediately after surgery to 99.2% ± 6.6% (P < .001). After a physiological remodeling process, the glenoid area remained significantly increased at the latest follow-up (89.5 ± 3.2%, P < .001). J-bone grafting successfully restored glenoid concavity by significantly increasing concavity extent and depth from preoperative (19.8 ± 2.1 and 0.9 ± 0.6 mm, respectively) to postoperative (24.0 ± 2.1 and 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, respectively) (P < .001). There were no recurrent instabilities. One traumatic graft fracture occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The arthroscopic J-bone graft technique permits minimally invasive reconstruction of anteroinferior glenoid defects and provided excellent early clinical outcome without recurrent instability in posttraumatic shoulder dislocations. A physiological remodeling process leads to restoration of a more natural glenoid anatomy.

Longitudinal Long-term Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Follow-up After Single-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Clinical Superiority of Structural Tendon Integrity

Background: The number of arthroscopic rotator cuff surgeries is consistently increasing. Although generally considered successful, the reported number of retears after rotator cuff repair is substantial. Short-term clinical outcomes are reported to be rarely impaired by tendon retears, whereas to our knowledge, there is no study documenting long-term clinical outcomes and tendon integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Purpose: To investigate longitudinal long-term repair integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Thirty patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with suture anchors for a full-tendon full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus or a partial-tendon full-thickness tear of the infraspinatus were included. Two and 10 years after initial arthroscopic surgery, tendon integrity was analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score and Constant score as well as subjective questions regarding satisfaction with the procedure and return to normal activity were used to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes. Results: At the early MRI follow-up, 42% of patients showed a full-thickness rerupture, while 25% had a partial rerupture, and 33% of tendons remained intact. The 10-year MRI follow-up (129 ± 11 months) showed 50% with a total rerupture, while the other half of the tendons were partially reruptured (25%) or intact (25%). The UCLA and Constant scores significantly improved from preoperatively (UCLA total: 50.6% ± 20.2%; Constant total: 44.7 ± 10.5 points) to 2 years (UCLA total: 91.4% ± 16.0% [P < .001]; Constant total: 87.8 ± 15.3 points [P < .001]) and remained significantly higher after 10 years (UCLA total: 89.7% ± 15.9% [P < .001]; Constant total: 77.5 ± 15.6 points [P < .001]). The Constant total score and Constant strength subscore, but not the UCLA score, were also significantly better at 10 years postoperatively in patients with intact tendons compared with patients with retorn tendons (Constant total: 89.0 ± 7.8 points vs 75.7 ± 14.1 points, respectively [P = .034]; Constant strength: 18.0 ± 4.9 points vs 9.2 ± 5.2 points, respectively [P = .006]). The majority of patients rated their satisfaction with the procedure as “excellent” (83.3%), and 87.5% returned to their normal daily activities. Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed good clinical long-term results despite a high rate of retears. Nonetheless, intact tendons provided significantly superior clinical long-term outcomes, making the improvement of tendon healing and repair integrity important goals of future research efforts.

Double-Layer Rotator Cuff Repair: Anatomic Reconstruction of the Superior Capsule and Rotator Cuff Improves Biomechanical Properties in Repairs of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.

Background: Delamination in rotator cuff tears has been identified as a prognostic factor for negative outcome after repair, with a reported prevalence between 38% and 88%. Purpose: To compare biomechanical properties of 3 repair techniques for delaminated rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used to evaluate rotator cuff footprint reconstruction, contact area and pressure, displacement under cyclical loading, and load to failure of 3 double-row repair configurations: double-row suture repair with medial row knots (medially knotted bridge, mkB); knotless double-row repair using suture tapes (knotless bridge, klB); and knotless double-row, double-layer-specific repair (double-layer, DL). Dynamic pressure sensors were used to assess contact patterns at the footprint region in 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction and 5 rotational positions (0°, 30° of internal rotation, 30° of external rotation, 60° of internal rotation, 60° of external rotation). Optical markers were used to document whole tendon and individual layer displacement after rotator cuff repair under cyclical loading for 200 cycles (10 N to 100 N at 1 Hz). Specimens were then loaded monotonically to failure at a rate of 33 mm/min. Results: Mean contact area and footprint restoration were highest in the DL group at 60° of glenohumeral abduction for all rotational positions (mkB mean ± SD, 195.4 ± 54.3 mm2, 66.7% ± 19.7%; klB, 250.6 ± 34.9 mm2, 76.2% ± 10.3%; DL, 318.4 ± 36.6 mm2, 109.1% ± 24.0%; P < .001). The double-layer-specific repair showed the least displacement under cyclical loading (mkB mean ± SD, 0.53 ± 0.18 mm; klB, 0.79 ± 0.37 mm; DL, 0.31 ± 0.24 mm; P = .029), most closely resembling the native tendon. Peak loads at failure were comparable between repair groups (mkB mean ± SD, 366.92 ± 70.59 N; klB, 280.05 ± 77.66 N; DL, 398.35 ± 109.04 N; P = .083). Conclusion: Anatomic restoration of the superior capsular and tendon insertion in delaminated rotator cuff tears with a double-layer-specific repair configuration demonstrated superior footprint restoration with increasing abduction, while providing construct displacement comparable to the native tendon under cyclical loading. Peak load at failure was comparable between repair constructs. Clinical Relevance: The prevalence and clinical importance of delaminated rotator cuff tears have long been underestimated. Anatomically correct individual reconstruction of the superior capsule and rotator cuff could restore near-native biomechanics and potentially reduce the risk of rotator cuff repair failure.