Berrin Dayangaç

In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.

OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of two conditioning methods, phosphoric acid and XeCl laser application on microleakage at composite resin restorations. METHODS Class II MOD (mesio-occluso-distal) cavities were prepared on 90 extracted human wisdom teeth with one proximogingival margin on enamel and the other on dentin. Phosphoric acid (37%) and a XeCl excimer laser system were used for the etching procedure. The prepared teeth were randomly assigned to six groups: In group 1, acid-etching of the enamel margins was followed by application of enamel bonding, in group 2 additionally a dentin bonding system was used. In group 3, acid-etching of the enamel and dentin (total etch) was followed by the application of dentin bonding. In group 4, laser-etching of enamel margins was followed by the application of enamel bonding, in group 5 dentin bonding was used additionally. In group 6, laser-etching of enamel and dentin margins was followed by the application of dentin bonding. All restorations were placed incrementally and polymerized with a halogen light source. After restoration, all samples were thermocycled and stained in 0.5% basic fuchsin and sectioned longitudinally in a mesio-distal plane. Microleakage was scored by means of a stereomicroscope. The margins of the restorations at tooth-resin interface were examined with a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS In all groups, marginal leakage was more extensive at the gingival margin that was in dentin than at the gingival margin in enamel. Microleakage scores and the gap at the tooth-resin interface were significantly lower in all acid-etched groups than in laser-etched groups. CONCLUSION Acid-etch technique is more effective than the investigated laser-etch technique at 308nm concerning the reduction of marginal leakage in composite restorations.

Clinical evaluation of different adhesives used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare after 24 months the clinical performance of cervical restorations placed with the use of an etch-and-rinse and an all-in-one adhesive. METHODS Twenty-four patients with at least one pair of non-carious cervical lesions participated in this study. One hundred and twenty-three cervical lesions were restored (62 etch-and-rinse adhesive, Solobond M; 61 all-in-one adhesive, Futurabond NR). A nanohybrid resin composite, Grandio, was used as the restorative material. Restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria by two independent examiners. The survival rates of the restorations were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test. The restorations in each category were compared using the Pearson chi-square test, while the performance of restorations at the baseline and at each recall time was evaluated by McNemars test (p < 0.05). RESULTS The recall rate of patients was 100%. The retention rates were 82% and 75% at 6 months and 77% and 62% at 12 months for Solobond M and Futurabond NR, respectively. At the 24-month recall, the retention rate was 69% for Solobond M and 49% for Futurabond NR, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found for colour match, marginal staining, or marginal adaptation between the adhesives (p > 0.05). None of the restorations had secondary caries, loss of anatomical form, or surface texture changes. CONCLUSIONS Cervical restorations placed with an etch-and-rinse adhesive showed higher retention than an all-in-one adhesive.

Comparison of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser with a chemical vapour deposition bur and conventional techniques for cavity preparation: a microleakage study

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser using chemical vapour deposition (CVD) bur cavity preparation with conventional preparation methods including a diamond bur and a carbide bur on the microleakage with two different adhesive systems. A total of 40 extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to four experimental groups according to the cavity preparation technique: group I diamond bur (Diatech); group II carbide bur (Diatech); group III Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Biolase Millennium II); and group IV CVD bur (CVDentUS). Using the different preparation techniques, Class V standardized preparations were performed on the buccal and lingual surfaces with gingival margins on the dentin and occlusal margins on the enamel. Each preparation group was randomly assigned to two subgroups (five teeth, ten preparations) according to the type of adhesive: an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond), and a single-step self-etch adhesive (AdheSE One). All preparations were restored with a nanohybrid composite resin in a single increment. Following thermocycling (×500; 5–55°C), the teeth were immersed in basic fuchsin and sectioned in the orovestibular direction. Dye penetration was evaluated under a light microscope by two blinded examiners. Data were statistically analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the preparation techniques with either of the two adhesive systems (p>0.05). Comparing the enamel and dentin leakage scores within each group, no statistically significant differences were found (p>0.05). The Er,Cr:YSGG laser cavity preparation did not differ from preparation with CVD, diamond or carbide bur in terms of microleakage with the different adhesive systems.

Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 standardized Class V cavities were prepared on facial and lingual of 90 extracted human premolar teeth and randomly assigned to five groups according to the adhesive systems used (n = 36): Prime and Bond NT (PB), Single Bond (SB), Futura Bond NR, Xeno III (XE) and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (LP). The adhesive groups were then further subdivided into three operator groups according to level of clinical experience (n = 12): An undergraduate student, a research assistant and a faculty member. All cavities were restored with same composite resin. The restored teeth were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5-55°C) then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin and measured for leakage under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Significant inter-operator variation was found in the enamel margins in the XE group with significantly higher microleakage when used by the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences in microleakage were found between adhesive systems for the research assistant and faculty member (P > 0.05), significant differences were observed between PB and LP, PB and XE, SB and LP and SB and XE in the enamel margins for the undergraduate student (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Microleakage of adhesive systems is more dependent on interactions between the operator and adhesive material than on the choice of adhesive material.

Antimicrobial Effect of Ozone on Cariogenic Microorganisms In Vitro

The aim of this study was to examine the antibacterial effect of ozone on cariogenic microorganisms. Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Actinomyces viscosus were used to test the antimicrobial activity of ozone. The microorganisms were exposed to power levels 2, 3, or 4 of an ozone device for 20, 40, 60, or 120 s. CFU numbers of bacteria were counted after the ozone application; as a result, the number of bacterial cells was decreased. The bacterial cells were also evaluated with a fluorescence microscope. This analysis revealed that some bacterial cells were killed instantaneously in ozone. The electron microscopic analysis showed no difference in surface morphology between bacteria to which ozone had been applied and those to which it had not.