Beth Faiman

The Role of Aspirin in the Prevention of Thrombotic Complications of Thalidomide and Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Multiple Myeloma

OBJECTIVEnTo study the efficacy of daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg orally) in decreasing the incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in patients with multiple myeloma receiving pegylated doxorubicin, vincristine, and decreased-frequency dexamethasone, plus thalidomide (DVd-T).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnIn this phase 2 clinical trial of DVd-T, conducted by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from August 2001 to October 2003, 105 patients were enrolled. The first 35 patients experienced increased numbers of VTEs. von Willebrand levels and platelet aggregation to ristocetin before and after treatment with DVd-T increased significantly, suggesting a pathophysiology involving platelet-endothelial interaction. Aspirin was added to the regimen, thus generating 3 patient groups: group 1 received aspirin from the start of DVd-T treatment before the study began (58 patients), group 2 received aspirin after the start of DVd-T treatment and after the study began (26 patients), and group 3 did not receive daily low-dose aspirin during the study (19 patients). Two patients being treated with warfarin for other indications were excluded from the study. The primary end point for this study was the incidence of VTE in the form of either deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Secondary end points were the time to the first VTE, time to the composite end point of death or first VTE, and incidence of bleeding complications.nnnRESULTSnAfter a median follow-up of 24 months, on an intent-to-treat basis, 26 posttreatment VTEs occurred after a median of 90 days, with 19% occurring in group 1, 15% in group 2, and 58% in group 3. Following multivariate time-to-event analysis, aspirin use continued to be associated with lower relative risk of VTE (hazard ratio, 0.22; confidence interval, 0.10-0.47; P<.001) and of the composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.28; confidence interval, 0.15-0.51; P<.001).nnnCONCLUSIONnDaily low-dose aspirin (81 mg orally) given to patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who were receiving DVd-T reduced the incidence of VTEs without an increase in bleeding complications.

Phase 2 study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, decreased-frequency dexamethasone, and thalidomide in newly diagnosed and relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding thalidomide to the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and decreased-frequency dexamethasone (DVd) regimen for multiple myeloma.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients newly diagnosed as having active multiple myeloma and those with relapsed-refractory disease were studied between August 2001 and October 2003. Patients received DVd as previously described. Thalidomide was given at 50 mg/d orally and the dose increased slowly to a maximum of 400 mg/d. At the time of best response, patients received maintenance prednisone, 50 mg orally every other day, and daily thalidomide at the maximum tolerated dose for each patient. The primary end point was the rate of complete responses plus very good partial responses as defined by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and the Intergroupe Français du Myélome, respectively.nnnRESULTSnOf 102 eligible patients, 53 were newly diagnosed as having multiple myeloma, and 49 had been previously treated for multiple myeloma. The complete response plus very good partial response rate was 49% and 45%, with an overall response rate of 87% and 90% for patients with newly diagnosed and previously treated multiple myeloma, respectively. Furthermore, better responses were associated with improved progression-free and overall survival. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were thromboembolic events (25%), peripheral neuropathy (22%), and neutropenia (14%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe addition of thalidomide to the DVd regimen significantly improves the response rate and quality of responses compared with the DVd regimen alone. This improvement is associated with longer progression-free and overall survival. The rate of observed quality responses is comparable to responses seen with high-dose therapy.

Identifying Professional Education Gaps and Barriers in Multiple Myeloma Patient Care: Findings of the Managing Myeloma Continuing Educational Initiative Advisory Committee

Advances in the past decade and a half have led to unprecedented improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and this disease appears to be transitioning to one more characteristic of a chronic disease in large part due to rapid translation of clinical insights into practice at the community level. Although evidence-based guidelines and consensus recommendations remain an important resource for managing cancer patients, they do not fill the gap between the principles of disease management today and the translation of tailoring treatment for individual patient needs. Thus, there is a continuing need for concise, focused educational activities and resources that facilitate improved knowledge and understanding of appropriate, individualized therapeutic strategies for assessing and caring for patients with MM. The next several years will truly be a time of shifting paradigms in the treatment of MM in which new agents will be approved, response criteria will be updated, and new approaches to risk assessment and monitoring minimal residual disease will evolve and enter practice. New groundbreaking therapeutic approaches, such as immunotherapy, might result in significant changes in how MM is treated and managed over the entire life cycle of the disease. Even the definition of the disease might be further amended as insights grow regarding who should be treated and who might benefit more from observation. As such, oncology clinicians will have to carefully review and update their management approaches accordingly even as they begin to focus even more on the survivorship needs of their MM patients.

Mature results of MM-011: A phase I/II trial of liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide combination therapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

A previous interim report of MM‐011, the first study that combined lenalidomide with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), showed promising safety and activity. We report the long‐term outcomes of all 76 treated patients with follow‐up ≥5 years. This single‐center phase I/II study administered lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1–21 of every 28‐day cycle), intravenous liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 on day 1), dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1–4), and intravenous vincristine (2 mg on day 1). After 4–6 planned induction cycles, lenalidomide maintenance therapy was given at the last tolerated dose until progression, with or without 50 mg prednisone every other day. The median number of previous therapies was 3 (range, 1–7); 49 (64.5%) patients had refractory disease. Forty‐three (56.6%) patients received maintenance therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred during induction and maintenance therapy in 48.7% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. Four (5.3%) treatment‐related deaths occurred during induction. Responses were seen in 53.0% (at least partial response) and 71.2% (at least minor response) of patients. Overall, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 10.5 and 19.0 months, respectively; in patients with refractory disease these values were 7.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. Lenalidomide with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy followed by maintenance lenalidomide provided durable control in patients with RRMM (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00091624). Am. J. Hematol. 89:349–354, 2014.

Prediction of response and progression in multiple myeloma with serum free light chains assay: corroboration of the serum free light chain response definitions.

BACKGROUNDnThe International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) proposed response and progression criteria using serum free light chain (sFLC) testing for patients with nonsecretory multiple myeloma (MM). We attempt to validate these criteria by comparing paraprotein responses with sFLC responses in patients with secretory myeloma.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnProspectively entered data for 89 patients with MM enrolled on various clinical trials at the Cleveland Clinic between April 2004 and December 2006 were reviewed.nnnRESULTSnBy standard paraprotein criteria, 4 patients had complete remission (CR), 22 had partial remission (PR), 34 had stable disease (SD), 26 had progressive disease (PD), and 3 were inevaluable. Only 43 patients (48%) had an involved sFLC > or = 10 mg/dL (which is considered evaluable by the IMWG), of which 14 had PR, 8 had SD, 18 had PD, and 3 were inevaluable. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for sFLC in predicting response were 81%, 83%, 64%, and 92% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for sFLC in predicting progression were 93%, 80%, 72%, and 95% respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONnsFLC reliably predicts response and progression in MM. However, half of the patients had inevaluable disease by sFLC, thus limiting the utility of sFLC testing in patients with nonmeasurable disease by electrophoretic methods.