Beth Lyman

A.S.P.E.N. Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations

Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations Task Force: Robin Bankhead, CRNP, MS, CNSN, Chair; Joseph Boullata, PharmD, BCNSP; Susan Brantley, MS, RD, LDN, CNSD; Mark Corkins, MD, CNSP; Peggi Guenter, PhD, RN, CNSN; Joseph Krenitsky, MS, RD; Beth Lyman, RN, MSN; Norma A. Metheny, PhD, RN, FAAN; Charles Mueller, PhD, RD, CNSD; Sandra Robbins, RD, CSP, LD; Jacqueline Wessel, MEd, RD, CSP, CNSD, CLE; and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors.

Defining Pediatric Malnutrition A Paradigm Shift Toward Etiology-Related Definitions

Lack of a uniform definition is responsible for underrecognition of the prevalence of malnutrition and its impact on outcomes in children. A pediatric malnutrition definitions workgroup reviewed existing pediatric age group English-language literature from 1955 to 2011, for relevant references related to 5 domains of the definition of malnutrition that were a priori identified: anthropometric parameters, growth, chronicity of malnutrition, etiology and pathogenesis, and developmental/ functional outcomes. Based on available evidence and an iterative process to arrive at multidisciplinary consensus in the group, these domains were included in the overall construct of a new definition. Pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition) is defined as an imbalance between nutrient requirements and intake that results in cumulative deficits of energy, protein, or micronutrients that may negatively affect growth, development, and other relevant outcomes. A summary of the literature is presented and a new classification scheme is proposed that incorporates chronicity, etiology, mechanisms of nutrient imbalance, severity of malnutrition, and its impact on outcomes. Based on its etiology, malnutrition is either illness related (secondary to 1 or more diseases/injury) or non-illness related, (caused by environmental/behavioral factors), or both. Future research must focus on the relationship between inflammation and illness-related malnutrition. We anticipate that the definition of malnutrition will continue to evolve with improved understanding of the processes that lead to and complicate the treatment of this condition. A uniform definition should permit future research to focus on the impact of pediatric malnutrition on functional outcomes and help solidify the scientific basis for evidence-based nutrition practices.

Enteral feeding in the hypoalbuminemic patient.

Previous studies have correlated intolerance of isotonic, intact protein enteral solutions with hypoalbuminemia. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether the level of serum albumin (SA) influenced tolerance of such an enteral nutrient solution (ENS). All patients who received Entrition during 1987 for a minimum of 48 hr were studied for the first 10 days of enteral feeding. Documentation included SA, medications, stool frequency, gastric residuals (GR), and daily caloric intake. ENS intolerance was defined as greater than 3 stools/day for greater than 48 hr or GR greater than twice the hourly infusion rate for greater than 48 hr. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with SA greater than or equal to 2.5 g/dl (group I) and those with SA less than 2.5 g/dl (group II). Of 88 patients studied, 48 (86%) in group I and 28 (88%) in group II tolerated the ENS. Eight (14%) in group I and 4 (12%) in group II experienced ENS intolerance. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of ENS intolerance between these two groups (p less than 0.05). Also, 97% of all those with a SA less than 2.5 g/dl were fed 80% or more of their estimated caloric requirements. We concluded that ENS tolerance was not affected by the SA level and patients with hypoalbuminemia (SA less than 2.5 g/dl) could be fed enterally.

Characteristics of a Cohort of Home Parenteral Nutrition Patients at the Time of Enrollment in the Sustain Registry

BACKGROUND Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a vital lifesaving therapy for patients who are unable to maintain weight, fluid balance, nutrition, and functional status via oral or enteral nutrition alone. There are few current data sources describing HPN prevalence, patient demographics, or long-term outcomes in the United States. OBJECTIVE To describe demographics and baseline characteristics of patients receiving HPN therapy. METHODS This is a descriptive analysis of data from the first cohort of HPN patients at time of enrollment in the SustainTM Registry between August 2011 and February 2014. RESULTS There were 1251 patients enrolled from 29 sites. Eighty-five percent of patients were adults, with a mean age of 51.3 ± 15.3 years. Fifteen percent were pediatric, with a mean age of 4.9 ± 4.9 years. For both age groups, short-bowel syndrome was the most frequently reported HPN indication (24%). Adults most commonly had a peripherally inserted central catheter (47%) or a tunneled catheter (43%) for HPN administration. In contrast, most pediatric patients (72%) had a tunneled catheter. Most patients received parenteral nutrition daily and consumed some oral nutrition. Twenty-eight percent of all patients were expected to require HPN indefinitely. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of descriptive data from the Sustain Registry. The data reveal important characteristics of patients receiving HPN in 29 U.S. sites.

Caring for Tube-Fed Children A Review of Management, Tube Weaning, and Emotional Considerations

Enteral nutrition is the practice of delivering nutrition to the gut either orally or through a tube or other device. Many children are reliant on enteral feedings to either supplement their nutrition or as a complete source of their nutrition. Managing children on tube feedings requires a team of providers to work through such dilemmas as feeding schedules, weaning from tube feeding, sensory implications of tube feeding, treatment of pain or nausea associated with eating, oral-motor issues, and behavioral issues in the child and family. The purpose of the current review is to summarize the multidisciplinary aspects of enteral feeding. The multidisciplinary team consists of a variable combination of an occupational therapist, speech-language pathologist, gastroenterologist, psychologist, nurse, pharmacist, and dietitian. Children who have minimal oral feeding experience and are fed via a nasogastric or gastrostomy tube often develop oral aversions. Limited data support that children with feeding disorders are more likely to have sensory impairment and that early life pain experiences contribute to feeding refusal. There are inpatient and outpatient programs for weaning patients from tube feeding to eating. The parent-child interaction is an important part of the assessment and treatment of the tube-fed child. This review also points out many information gaps, including data on feeding schedules, blenderized tube feedings, the best methods for weaning children off enteral feedings, the efficacy of chronic pain medications with tube-fed children, and, finally, the necessity of the assessment of parental stress among all parents of children who are tube fed.

Nasogastric Tube Placement and Verification in Children: Review of the Current Literature

Placement of a nasogastric enteral access device (NG-EAD), often referred to as a nasogastric tube, is common practice and largely in the domain of nursing care. Most often an NG-EAD is placed at the bedside without radiographic assistance. Correct initial placement and ongoing location verification are the primary challenges surrounding NG-EAD use and have implications for patient safety. Although considered an innocuous procedure, placement of an NG-EAD carries risk of serious and potentially lethal complications. Despite acknowledgment that an abdominal radiograph is the gold standard, other methods of verifying placement location are widely used and have success rates from 80% to 85%. The long-standing challenges surrounding bedside placement of NG-EADs and a practice alert issued by the Child Health Patient Safety Organization on this issue were the stimuli for the conception of The New Opportunities for Verification of Enteral Tube Location Project sponsored by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Its mission is to identify and promote best practices with the potential of technology development that will enable accurate determination of NG-EAD placement for both the inpatient and outpatient pediatric populations. This article presents the challenges of bedside NG-EAD placement and ongoing location verification in children through an overview of the current state of the science. It is important for all health care professionals to be knowledgeable about the current literature, to be vigilant for possible complications, and to avoid complacency with NG-EAD placement and ongoing verification of tube location.

Nasogastric tube placement and verification in children: review of the current literature.

Placement of a nasogastric enteral access device (NG-EAD), often referred to as a nasogastric tube, is a common practice and largely in the domain of nursing care. Most often an NG-EAD is placed at the bedside without radiographic assistance. Correct initial placement and ongoing location verification are the primary challenges surrounding NG-EAD use and have implications for patient safety. Although considered an innocuous procedure, placement of an NG-EAD carries risk of serious and potentially lethal complications. Despite acknowledgment that an abdominal radiograph is the gold standard, other methods of verifying placement location are widely used and have success rates from 80% to 85%. The long-standing challenges surrounding bedside placement of NG-EADs and a practice alert issued by the Child Health Patient Safety Organization on this issue were the stimuli for the conception of The New Opportunities for Verification of Enteral Tube Location Project sponsored by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Its mission is to identify and promote best practices with the potential of technology development that will enable accurate determination of NG-EAD placement for both the inpatient and outpatient pediatric populations. This article presents the challenges of bedside NG-EAD placement and ongoing location verification in children through an overview of the current state of the science. It is important for all healthcare professionals to be knowledgeable about the current literature, to be vigilant for possible complications, and to avoid complacency with NG-EAD placement and ongoing verification of tube location.

Development of Sustain™ A.S.P.E.N.’s National Patient Registry for Nutrition Care

The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) developed a Web-based registry for nutrition care launched in early 2011, initially focusing on the home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patient population. The purpose of Sustain is to collect information regarding the patients and populations who require HPN in the United States, measure outcomes associated with HPN, allow institutional benchmarking against the aggregate data, and publish the findings to improve the quality of care for patients receiving HPN. The registry is open to all sites (hospital and home based) who care for new or existing HPN patients. Preliminary data should be available in early 2012.

Use of Temporary Enteral Access Devices in Hospitalized Neonatal and Pediatric Patients in the United States

BACKGROUND Temporary enteral access devices (EADs), such as nasogastric (NG), orogastric (OG), and postpyloric (PP), are used in pediatric and neonatal patients to administer nutrition, fluids, and medications. While the use of these temporary EADs is common in pediatric care, it is not known how often these devices are used, what inpatient locations have the highest usage, what size tube is used for a given weight or age of patient, and how placement is verified per hospital policy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a multicenter 1-day prevalence study. Participating hospitals counted the number of NG, OG, and PP tubes present in their pediatric and neonatal inpatient population. Additional data collected included age, weight and location of the patient, type of hospital, census for that day, and the method(s) used to verify initial tube placement. RESULTS Of the 63 participating hospitals, there was an overall prevalence of 1991 temporary EADs in a total pediatric and neonatal inpatient census of 8333 children (24% prevalence). There were 1316 NG (66%), 414 were OG (21%), and 261 PP (17%) EADs. The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) had the highest prevalence (61%), followed by a medical/surgical unit (21%) and pediatric intensive care unit (18%). Verification of EAD placement was reported to be aspiration from the tube (n = 21), auscultation (n = 18), measurement (n = 8), pH (n = 10), and X-ray (n = 6). CONCLUSION The use of temporary EADs is common in pediatric care. There is wide variation in how placement of these tubes is verified.

Safety of Decanted Enteral Formula Hung for 12 Hours in a Pediatric Setting

BACKGROUND Enteral nutrition has been an accepted mode of pediatric care for more than 40 years. Early reports in the literature documented high levels of bacterial contamination in enteral formulas delivered to patients. Safety standards for formula administration have not been universally followed. Evidence demonstrates that increased manipulation of the delivery system contributes to bacterial contamination. METHODS A prospective, descriptive study was conducted with 30 pediatric patients. They received continuous enteral feedings using decanted formula over a minimum hang time of 12 hours. Formula was delivered according to current practice recommendations. Cultures were obtained and sent to the laboratory initially and every 4 hours. RESULTS Cultures from 30 patients (average age 6.4 years) were obtained at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 hours. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, gastrostomy, or gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes were used. Formulas administered were polymeric and peptide based. Of the 119 cultures obtained, 8 were either collected improperly or revealed a contaminant. Of the 111 useable cultures, 100 showed no growth, 6 had growth below the Food and Drug Administration threshold for contamination (95% acceptable), and 5 (5%) in 2 patients were considered positive, with all cultures growing coliforms. No patient had any clinical signs of bacterial gastroenteritis (increased stool output, fever, or clinical deterioration) over the 48 hours after data collection. CONCLUSION Decanted enteral formula administered continuously over 12 hours in a pediatric hospital setting has a lower than expected rate of bacterial growth when recommended handling practices are followed.