Bethann M. Pflugeisen

Brief Video-Module Administered Mindfulness Program for Physicians: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a video-module-based mindfulness pilot program intended to reduce stress, improve well-being, and develop mindfulness skills in physicians in a community hospital setting. Preliminary findings are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a single-sample, pre-post study design, we administered an eight-week mindfulness training offered as part of a wellness initiative for medical staff in a suburban community hospital. Participants enrolled on a first-come, first-served basis. Participants engaged in three 90-min in-person trainings, weekly online video-module trainings, and weekly teleconference coaching calls. Video-module trainings were available at all times, to be accessed at the participants׳ convenience. Journals and a guided meditation audio library were also provided. Physician stress, well-being (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization of patients, and sense of personal accomplishment), and mindfulness skills (observing, describing, acting with awareness, and accepting without judgment) were evaluated at baseline, end-of-program, and eight weeks post-intervention using well-validated instruments. RESULTS A total of 23 physicians enrolled and 19 completed the program. Compared to baseline, statistically significant decreases in stress, personal accomplishment, and emotional exhaustion were observed at end-of-program and eight weeks post-intervention (all P < .05). Significant increases in all mindfulness skills were observed at end-of-program; these increases persisted for describing, acting with awareness, and accepting without judgment at eight weeks post-intervention (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS This study provides preliminary evidence that a flexible, video-module-based mindfulness program can decrease stress, increase well-being, and develop lasting mindfulness skills in physicians.

Fructose intolerance/malabsorption and recurrent abdominal pain in children.

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to ascertain whether pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain had concurrent fructose intolerance as determined by a standardized dose breath hydrogen test (BHT), and whether symptoms would improve with a low-fructose diet. Methods: The fructose BHT test was administered to patients evaluated in clinic with unexplained chronic abdominal pain alone or associated with constipation, gas or bloating, and/or diarrhea. The patients were given a standard dose of 1 g/kg fructose to maximum of 25 g. Hydrogen and methane were measured at 8 time points. The test was presumed positive if breath hydrogen exceeded 20 ppm above baseline. If positive, patients were given a dietitian-prescribed low-fructose diet. Results: A total of 222 patients were part of the study. Ages ranged from 2 to 19 years with a mean of 10.5. BHT for fructose was performed in all of the patients and it was positive for fructose intolerance in 121 of 222 patients (54.5%). A total of 101 of 222 (45.5%) patients had negative BHT for fructose intolerance. All BHT-positive patients had a nutrition consult with a registered dietitian and were placed on a low-fructose diet. Using a standard pain scale for children, 93 of 121 patients (76.9%) reported resolution of symptoms on a low-fructose diet (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, 55 of 101 patients (54.4%) with negative BHT for fructose reported resolution of symptoms without a low-fructose diet (P = 0.37). Conclusions: Fructose intolerance/malabsorption is common in children with recurrent/functional abdominal pain and a low-fructose diet is an effective treatment.

Quality Improvement Measures in Pulse-Oximetry Newborn Heart Screening: A Time Series Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of pulse-oximetry screening to detect critical congenital heart defects in newborns has gained national and international momentum in the past decade. Our hospital system began screening in 2008. Since then, our program has undergone leadership changes and multiple quality improvement interventions. The aims of this study are to evaluate the evolution of our pulse-oximetry program and to provide insights from lessons learned over the course of a long-standing program. METHODS: We reviewed 6 years of screening data and evaluated trends of missed screens, false-positives, protocol violations, and parental decline of screening. We implemented 3 quality improvement interventions (change in protocol, redesign of an electronic medical record documentation system to autocalculate results, and transition from research to standard-of-care) and reviewed the impact of a rigorous quality assurance review process. We used linear regression and statistical process control charts to evaluate the data. RESULTS: A total of 18 363 newborns were screened; we identified 5 critical cases. We observed a significant decrease in missed (P < .001) and false-positive (P = .03) screens over time but found no significant trend in the rate of percentage of protocol violations (P = .26) or decline of screening (P = .99). Each metric showed behavior attributable to at least 1 quality improvement intervention. CONCLUSIONS: We established a sustainable pulse-oximetry screening program in our community hospital system, and the screening has now become routine. The quality of our screening was influenced by choice of screening protocol, rigor of quality assurance reviews, and the process used to interpret screening results.

Impact on Hospital Resources of Systematic Evaluation and Management of Suspected Nonaccidental Trauma in Patients Less Than 4 Years of Age

OBJECTIVE There has been an increasing movement worldwide to create systematic screening and management procedures for atypical injury patterns in children with the hope of better detecting and evaluating nonaccidental trauma (NAT). A legitimate concern for any hospital considering implementation of a systematic evaluation process is the impact on already burdened hospital resources. We hypothesized that implementation of a guideline that uses red flags related to history, physical, or radiologic findings to trigger a standardized NAT evaluation of patients <4 years would not negatively affect resource utilization at our level II pediatric trauma center. METHODS NAT cases were evaluated retrospectively before and prospectively after implementation of the NAT guideline (n = 117 cases before implementation, n = 72 cases postimplementation). Multiple linear and logistic regression, χ2, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate human, laboratory, technology, and hospital resource usage between cohorts. RESULTS Human (child abuse intervention department, ophthalmology, and evaluation by a pediatric surgeon for admitted patients), laboratory (urine toxicology and liver function tests), and imaging (skeletal survey and head or abdominal computed tomography) resource use did not differ significantly between cohorts (all P > .05). Emergency department and hospital lengths of stays also did not differ between cohorts. A significant 13% decrease in the percentage of patients admitted to the hospital was observed (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Structured evaluation and management of pediatric patients with injuries atypical for their age does not confer an added burden on hospital resources and may reduce the percentage of such patients who are hospitalized.

Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action

BackgroundAs patient satisfaction scores become increasingly relevant in today’s health care market, we sought to evaluate satisfaction of the unique subset of patients enrolling in clinical trials in a research facility embedded within a community hospital system.MethodsWe developed and deployed a patient satisfaction survey tailored to clinical trial patients who consented to and/or completed a clinical trial in our research institute in the prior year. The survey was distributed to 222 patients. Likert scale responses were analyzed using top box and percentile rank procedures. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations between the clinical trial experience and intent to return to our system for routine care.ResultsNinety surveys were returned in the 6 months following the mailing for a 41 % response rate; the bulk of these (N = 81) were returned within 6 weeks of the mailing. The questions with the highest ranking responses were related to interactions with staff (84th percentile or higher). Fifty-one point one percent of patients (64th percentile) strongly agreed that they would seek future care in our system. Patient intent to return to the provider seen during the clinical trial was most highly correlated with intent to seek future care within our system (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Reasons cited for clinical trial enrollment were generally altruistic.ConclusionsQuerying this special patient population is feasible and yields valuable insight into their experience with healthcare system-based clinical trials and the relationship between clinical trial participation and perception of the healthcare system as a desirable resource for routine medical care. We argue that this work is invaluable to the research community and submit a call to action to our peers to begin systematic evaluation of clinical trial patient satisfaction.

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care

Introduction The importance of patient satisfaction in US healthcare is increasing, in tandem with the advent of new patient care modalities, including virtual care. The purpose of this study was to compare the satisfaction of obstetric patients who received one-third of their antenatal visits in videoconference (“Virtual-care”) compared to those who received 12–14 face-to-face visits in-clinic with their physician/midwife (“Traditional-care”). Methods We developed a four-domain satisfaction questionnaire; Virtual-care patients were asked additional questions about technology. Using a modified Dillman method, satisfaction surveys were sent to Virtual-care (N = 378) and Traditional-care (N = 795) patients who received obstetric services at our institution between January 2013 and June 2015. Chi-squared tests of association, t-tests, logistic regression, and ANOVA models were used to evaluate differences in satisfaction and self-reported demographics between respondents. Results Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in the Virtual-care cohort (4.76 ± 0.44 vs. 4.47 ± 0.59; p < .001). Parity ≥ 1 was the sole significant demographic variable impacting Virtual-care selection (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5–3.8; p < .001). Satisfaction of Virtual-care respondents was not significantly impacted by the incorporation of videoconferencing, Doppler, and blood pressure monitoring technology into their care. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency as measured by domain-based correlations and Cronbach’s alpha. Discussion Respondents from both models were highly satisfied with care, but those who had selected the Virtual-care model reported significantly higher mean satisfaction scores. The Virtual-care model was selected by significantly more women who already have children than those experiencing pregnancy for the first time. This model of care may be a reasonable alternative to traditional care.

The discriminative power of STOP-Bang as a screening tool for suspected obstructive sleep apnea in clinically referred patients: considering gender differences

PurposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most commonly seen clinical sleep disorder. STOP-Bang, a widely used screening tool, yields a composite score based on eight dichotomized items including male gender. This study was designed to validate STOP-Bang among clinically referred patients and tested alternative scoring designs on tool performance, with a focus on gender differences in OSA.MethodSTOP-Bang was administered to 403 female and 532 male subjects, followed by comprehensive sleep evaluation that included measurement of apnea-hypopnea indexes. Gender differences in STOP-Bang scores, OSA diagnosis, and severities were explored, and gender-specific alternative score cutoffs evaluated. Optimal operating points (OOP) were tested for female body mass index (BMI) and male neck circumference to inform STOP-Bang threshold refinement. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare conventional and modified STOP-Bang.ResultsSTOP-Bang performance by gender showed extremely low specificity in males at the recommended cutoff of ≥3. Better utility was presented at a cutoff of 4 or 5 among clinically referred patients irrespective of gender differences. Screening performance was improved by modifying BMI and/or neck circumference thresholds using gender-triaged OOP estimation. Three gender-based model revisions outperformed conventional STOP-Bang.ConclusionOur study suggests that gender-specific consideration needs to be incorporated into the application of STOP-Bang in a clinically referred patient population with a higher risk of OSA. Alternative scoring systems may improve predictive performance of STOP-Bang.

Functional electrical stimulation improves quality of life by reducing intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVE To determine if Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) would improve ischemic pain, walking distance, and quality of life of patients with intermittent claudication. DESIGN Single blind, randomized block, two factorial design. PATIENTS Patients diagnosed with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and intermittent claudication (IC). Ankle Brachial Index ranged 0.4-0.9 on at least one leg. Patients were randomly assigned to experimental (FES+Walk, N=13) or control (WALK, N=14) groups. INTERVENTION Experimental group patients received FES to the dorsiflexor and plantarflexor muscles while walking for 1h/day, six days/week for eight weeks. Control group patients received similar intervention without FES. A Follow-up period of both groups lasted eight weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures were taken at baseline (T0), after intervention (T1), and after follow-up (T2). Primary measures included Perceived Pain Intensity (PPI), Six minute walk (6MW), and Peripheral Arterial Disease Quality of Life (PADQOL). Secondary measures included Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) and Timed Up and Go (TUG). RESULTS Group by time interactions in PPI were significant (P<0.001) with differences of 27.9 points at T1 and 36.9 points at T2 favoring the FES+Walk group. Groups difference in Symptoms and Limitations in Physical Function of the PADQOL reached significance (T1=8.9, and T2=8.3 improvements; P=0.007). ICQ was significant (T1=9.3 and T2=13.1 improvements; P=0.003). Improvement in 6MW and TUG tests were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Walking with FES markedly reduced ischemic pain and enhanced QOL compared to just walking. FES while walking may offer an effective treatment option for the elderly with PAD and Intermittent Claudication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NIH-NIA 1R21AG048001 https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=8748641&icde=30695377&ddparam=&ddvalue=&ddsub=&cr=1&csb=default&cs=ASC. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02384980?term=David+Embrey&rank=1.