Betty Willems

Analysis of memory B cell responses and isolation of novel monoclonal antibodies with neutralizing breadth from HIV-1-infected individuals.

Background The isolation of human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that neutralize a broad spectrum of primary HIV-1 isolates and the characterization of the human neutralizing antibody B cell response to HIV-1 infection are important goals that are central to the design of an effective antibody-based vaccine. Methods and Findings We immortalized IgG+ memory B cells from individuals infected with diverse clades of HIV-1 and selected on the basis of plasma neutralization profiles that were cross-clade and relatively potent. Culture supernatants were screened using various recombinant forms of the envelope glycoproteins (Env) in multiple parallel assays. We isolated 58 mAbs that were mapped to different Env surfaces, most of which showed neutralizing activity. One mAb in particular (HJ16) specific for a novel epitope proximal to the CD4 binding site on gp120 selectively neutralized a multi-clade panel of Tier-2 HIV-1 pseudoviruses, and demonstrated reactivity that was comparable in breadth, but distinct in neutralization specificity, to that of the other CD4 binding site-specific neutralizing mAb b12. A second mAb (HGN194) bound a conserved epitope in the V3 crown and neutralized all Tier-1 and a proportion of Tier-2 pseudoviruses tested, irrespective of clade. A third mAb (HK20) with broad neutralizing activity, particularly as a Fab fragment, recognized a highly conserved epitope in the HR-1 region of gp41, but showed striking assay-dependent selectivity in its activity. Conclusions This study reveals that by using appropriate screening methods, a large proportion of memory B cells can be isolated that produce mAbs with HIV-1 neutralizing activity. Three of these mAbs show unusual breadth of neutralization and therefore add to the current panel of HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies with potential for passive protection and template-based vaccine design.

International Network for Comparison of HIV Neutralization Assays: The NeutNet Report

Background Neutralizing antibodies provide markers for vaccine-induced protective immunity in many viral infections. By analogy, HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies induced by immunization may well predict vaccine effectiveness. Assessment of neutralizing antibodies is therefore of primary importance, but is hampered by the fact that we do not know which assay(s) can provide measures of protective immunity. An international collaboration (NeutNet) involving 18 different laboratories previously compared different assays using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and soluble CD4 (Phase I study). Methods In the present study (Phase II), polyclonal reagents were evaluated by 13 laboratories. Each laboratory evaluated nine plasmas against an 8 virus panel representing different genetic subtypes and phenotypes. TriMab, a mixture of three mAbs, was used as a positive control allowing comparison of the results with Phase I in a total of nine different assays. The assays used either uncloned virus produced in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (Virus Infectivity Assays, VIA), or Env (gp160)-pseudotyped viruses (pseudoviruses, PSV) produced in HEK293T cells from molecular clones or from uncloned virus. Target cells included PBMC and genetically engineered cell lines in either single- or multiple-cycle infection format. Infection was quantified by using a range of assay read-outs including extra- or intra-cellular p24 antigen detection, luciferase, beta-galactosidase or green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene expression. Findings Using TriMab, results of Phase I and Phase II were generally in agreement for six of the eight viruses tested and confirmed that the PSV assay is more sensitive than PBMC (p = 0.014). Comparisons with the polyclonal reagents showed that sensitivities were dependent on both virus and plasma. Conclusions Here we further demonstrate clear differences in assay sensitivities that were dependent on both the neutralizing reagent and the virus. Consistent with the Phase I study, we recommend parallel use of PSV and VIA for vaccine evaluation.

Identification and characterization of sera from HIV-infected individuals with broad cross-neutralizing activity against Group M (env clade A-H) and Group O primary HIV-1 isolates.

A previous study on cross‐clade neutralization activity, identified three key isolates, MNlab (envB/gagB; X4 coreceptor), VI525 (envG/gagH, envA/gagA; R5X4) and CA9 (Group O; R5), that allowed discrimination of sera, likely or unlikely to neutralize primary HIV‐1 isolates belonging to Group M (env clades A–H) and Group O. The prognostic ability of these three isolates was verified by means of an external validation on a different and larger set of sera. A total of 79 different sera (66 HIV‐1, 10 HIV‐2, 1 HIV‐1+2 and 2 SIVcpz) were examined first for their capacity to neutralize the three key isolates, next sera were challenged against 12 other primary HIV‐1 isolates of Group M (env A–H) and 2 isolates of Group O. Sera that neutralized all three isolates with an ID50 titer of ≥1/40, also neutralized the 14 other primary isolates belonging to different genetic groups and clades. Sera that did not neutralize all three isolates did not exert broad cross‐neutralizing activity. The neutralizing activity was antibody‐mediated because it was absorbed and eluted from a Prot‐G column. Competition‐neutralization experiments using recombinant gp120 (HIV‐1 MNlab) reduced the neutralizing capacity, suggesting that the neutralizing antibodies were directed against the Env protein. Remarkably, the broad cross‐neutralization activity was found primarily in African female patients. In conclusion, this study confirms that three isolates are sufficient to allow identification of broad cross‐neutralizing sera. J. Med. Virol. 61:14–24, 2000.

Design and evaluation of an in-house HIV-1 (group M and O), SIVmnd and SIVcpz antigen capture assay.

An enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVcpz/SIVmnd) antigens was designed using immunoreagents from naturally infected individuals, and compared to the commercially available Vironostika HIV-1 Antigen Microelisa System (Organon Teknika). The in-house assay proved to be specific for HIV-1 isolates belonging to group M (A-H) and group O and for SIVcpz and SIVmnd isolates, but was less sensitive than the Vironostika HIV-1 Antigen Microelisa System, except for SIVmnd. For the strains belonging to HIV-2, SIVmac and SIVagm, the in-house assay could not detect antigen to an appreciable degree. This study shows that a considerably less expensive but sufficiently accurate HIV-1 antigen capture assay can be developed to monitor HIV-1 (group M and O), SIVcpv and SIVmnd antigen in the supernatants of virus cultures.

Interpatient genetic variability of HIV-1 group O.

OBJECTIVE To analyse the genetic and phylogenetic characteristics of HIV-1 group O viruses. MATERIALS AND METHODS The env gene, encoding the gp160 glycoprotein, and a partial p24-encoding gag gene fragment of a Cameroonian (CA9) and a Gabonese (VI686) HIV-1 group O virus, isolated from cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells of symptomatic patients, were sequenced, aligned with other representatives of group O for which the same region has been documented, and genetically and phylogenetically analysed. RESULTS Phylogenetic analysis of the env gene (gp160) revealed that CA9, VI686, ANT70, and four Ha strains formed a separate cluster, which was supported by 100% of all bootstrap trees. In addition, these seven isolates were part of the same clade in the p24 phylogeny. VAU and MVP5180 may represent two other subtypes. CONCLUSION We have characterized two group O viruses, originating from Cameroon and Gabon, which show a close evolutionary relationship to ANT70 and four Ha strains based on the entire env gene, suggestive of a first group O subgroup, tentatively named the HIV-1 group O env ANT70 clade or subtype.

Modeling HIV transfer between dendritic cells and T cells: importance of HIV phenotype, dendritic cell-T cell contact and T-cell activation.

ObjectiveTo study the requirements for HIV transfer between dendritic cells (DC) and CD4 T cells, using an in vitro model, combined with flow cytometry. MethodsImmature DC and macrophages (MA) were generated from monocytes. After infection, DC or MA were cultured alone or with purified CD4 T cells. Intracellular HIV was measured, using (1) the monocyte (MO)-tropic AD8 HIV, endowed with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP); and (2) intracellular staining of laboratory HIV strains and clones from primary isolates. Results(1) Clone AD8-EGFP infected DC and MA with equal efficiency, but the virus was preferentially transferred from DC to autologous T cells. (2) DC were more productively infected with R5/NSI, as compared to X4/SI, HIV, but both HIV phenotypes were easily transmitted to autologous T4 cells. (3) HIV-infected DC transferred the virus to T cells across a semi-permeable membrane, if the T cells were in contact with non-infected DC. (4) Co-culture of T cells with autologous non-infected DC induced T-cell activation. HIV-infected DC selectively increased HLA-DR on T cells and HLA-DR (+) T cells were preferential targets for HIV transfer. (5) Resting Ba-L-infected CD4 T cells were able to transmit the virus ‘inversely’ to co-cultured DC. ConclusionHIV transfer between monocyte-derived dendritic cells and autologous CD4 T cells was directly demonstrated using flow cytometry. The transfer proceeded in both directions, depended on cellular contact and was associated with partial T-cell activation. This model, representing relevant in vivo targets of HIV, is useful to further investigate interactions between HIV, DC and T cells, without the need for primary ex vivo DC.

Lack of correlation between V3-loop peptide enzyme immunoassay serologic subtyping and genetic sequencing

Objective:To compare the performance of V3-loop peptide enzyme immunoassay (PEIA) methodologies from four different laboratories for subtyping HIV-1, and to determine the causes for the lack of correlation between V3-loop PEIA serotyping and subtyping by sequencing. Materials and methods:Synthetic peptides derived from the amino-acid consensus sequences of the V3-loop of group M strains representing genetic subtypes A–F as well as reference strains were evaluated in PEIA by four different laboratories for their ability to accurately determine the subtype in a panel of 85 sera obtained from persons infected with known HIV-1 subtypes (28 subtype A, 34 subtype B, four subtype C, 10 subtype D, seven subtype F, one each of subtype H and G). Furthermore, the V3 loop of the corresponding virus was compared with the V3 loop of the peptides used in PEIA. Results:The correlation between HIV-1 subtyping by sequencing and V3-loop PEIA from the different laboratories varied considerably for the different HIV-1 subtypes: subtype A (46–68%), B (38–85%), C (75–100%), D (29–50%), and F (17–57%). A 70% agreement between PEIA and sequencing subtypes was observed for samples with the concordant presence of the same octameric sequences in the V3 loop of the virus and the V3 loop of the peptide used in PEIA; however, only 42% of specimens with different V3-loop octameric viral and peptide sequences yielded concordant results in V3-loop serotyping and genetic subtyping. Conclusion:Our results indicate that V3-loop PEIA methodologies used in different laboratories correlate poorly with genetic subtyping, and that their accuracy to predict HIV-1 subtypes in sera of Belgian individuals infected with different HIV-1 subtypes (A, B, C, D, F, G and H) vary considerably. The poor correlation between serotyping and genetic subtyping was partly due to the simultaneous occurrence of subtype-specific octameric sequences at the tip of the V3 loop of viruses belonging to different genetic subtypes.

Cross-neutralizing antibodies against primary isolates in African women infected with HIV-1

Our results show that there is a difference in neutralization patterns between African and European plasma especially in African women. An attempt to generate human monoclonal antibodies from African women with broad cross-neutralizing capacity is ongoing. (excerpt)

Virologic, immunologic, and clinical follow-up of a couple infected by the human immunodeficiency virus type one, group O

The pathogenic course (virologic, immunologic, and clinical changes) of infection due to human immunodeficiency virus type one (HIV‐1) group O viruses is unknown at present. To address this issue, serial HIV‐1 isolates from a married couple (patients A and B) infected with a group O virus were analyzed to determine the temporal association between disease status and alterations in several parameters including plasma viral burden as measured by semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction, changes in CD4+ T cells, presence of neutralizing antibodies, and the ability to induce syncytia on the MT2 cells. For patient A who has been asymptomatic for at least 8 years, both the absence of syncytium‐inducing (SI) variants and the presence of autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibodies correlated with a clinically healthier status. In contrast, a switch from NSI to SI variants was observed in patient B in 1990, followed by an expanded in vitro host range, increased viral burden, and a sharp decrease in CD4+ T cells 4 years later. Moreover, plasma obtained from this patient uniformly failed to neutralize both autologous and heterologous viruses. These observations in patient B correlated with a slightly unfavorable clinical status. Based on our preliminary results, it appears that the pathogenic course of infections due to group O viruses is similar to that reported previously for infections due to group M viruses. J. Med. Virol. 51:202–209, 1997.

Longitudinal comparison of virus load parameters and CD8 T‐cell suppressive capacity in two SIVcpz‐infected chimpanzees

In a longitudinal study we address the hypothesis that resistance to disease progression in lentivirus‐infected chimpanzees is related to potent non‐cytotoxic suppression of virus replication. In a long‐term follow‐up, the viral suppressive capacity in two simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)cpz‐infected chimpanzees was correlated with two polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ and two culture‐based virus load measurements. In both animals, quantitative virus isolation (QVI) tended to decline slowly, whereas in vitro virus suppression was sustained or increased over time. In general, plasma virus loads in SIVcpz‐infected animals were maintained for extended periods of time. Based on current assays that measure virus suppressive capacity in peripheral blood, it was not possible to conclude that virus suppression played a major role in the maintenance of the disease‐free state in lentivirus‐infected chimpanzees.