Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Beverley French is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Beverley French.


Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine | 2010

DOES REPETITIVE TASK TRAINING IMPROVE FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITY AFTER STROKE? A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Beverley French; Lois Helene Thomas; Michael John Leathley; Christopher J Sutton; Joanna J McAdam; Anne Forster; Peter Langhorne; Christopher Price; Andrew Walker; Caroline Leigh Watkins

OBJECTIVE To determine if repetitive task training after stroke improves functional activity. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing repetitive task training with attention control or usual care. DATA SOURCES The Cochrane Stroke Trials Register, electronic databases of published, unpublished and non-English language papers; conference proceedings, reference lists, and trial authors. REVIEW METHODS Included studies were randomized/quasi-randomized trials in adults after stroke where an active motor sequence aiming to improve functional activity was performed repetitively within a single training session. We used Cochrane Collaboration methods, resources, and software. RESULTS We included 14 trials with 17 intervention-control pairs and 659 participants. Results were statistically significant for walking distance (mean difference 54.6, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 17.5, 91.7); walking speed (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% CI 0.04, 0.53); sit-to-stand (standard effect estimate 0.35, 95% CI 0.13, 0.56), and activities of daily living: SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07, 0.51; and of borderline statistical significance for measures of walking ability (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.00, 0.51), and global motor function (SMD 0.32, 95% CI -0.01, 0.66). There were no statistically significant differences for hand/arm functional activity, lower limb functional activity scales, or sitting/standing balance/reach. CONCLUSION Repetitive task training resulted in modest improvement across a range of lower limb outcome measures, but not upper limb outcome measures. Training may be sufficient to have a small impact on activities of daily living. Interventions involving elements of repetition and task training are diverse and difficult to classify: the results presented are specific to trials where both elements are clearly present in the intervention, without major confounding by other potential mechanisms of action.


Implementation Science | 2009

What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context

Beverley French; Lois Helene Thomas; Paula Baker; Christopher R Burton; Lindsay Pennington; Hazel Roddam

BackgroundGiven the current emphasis on networks as vehicles for innovation and change in health service delivery, the ability to conceptualise and measure organisational enablers for the social construction of knowledge merits attention. This study aimed to develop a composite tool to measure the organisational context for evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare.MethodsA structured search of the major healthcare and management databases for measurement tools from four domains: research utilisation (RU), research activity (RA), knowledge management (KM), and organisational learning (OL). Included studies were reports of the development or use of measurement tools that included organisational factors. Tools were appraised for face and content validity, plus development and testing methods. Measurement tool items were extracted, merged across the four domains, and categorised within a constructed framework describing the absorptive and receptive capacities of organisations.ResultsThirty measurement tools were identified and appraised. Eighteen tools from the four domains were selected for item extraction and analysis. The constructed framework consists of seven categories relating to three core organisational attributes of vision, leadership, and a learning culture, and four stages of knowledge need, acquisition of new knowledge, knowledge sharing, and knowledge use. Measurement tools from RA or RU domains had more items relating to the categories of leadership, and acquisition of new knowledge; while tools from KM or learning organisation domains had more items relating to vision, learning culture, knowledge need, and knowledge sharing. There was equal emphasis on knowledge use in the different domains.ConclusionIf the translation of evidence into knowledge is viewed as socially mediated, tools to measure the organisational context of EBP in healthcare could be enhanced by consideration of related concepts from the organisational and management sciences. Comparison of measurement tools across domains suggests that there is scope within EBP for supplementing the current emphasis on human and technical resources to support information uptake and use by individuals. Consideration of measurement tools from the fields of KM and OL shows more content related to social mechanisms to facilitate knowledge recognition, translation, and transfer between individuals and groups.


Nurse Education Today | 1998

Developing the skills required for evidence-based practice

Beverley French

The current health care environment requires practitioners with the skills to find and apply the best currently available evidence for effective health care, to contribute to the development of evidence-based practice protocols, and to evaluate the impact of utilizing validated research findings in practice. Current approaches to teaching research are based mainly on gaining skills by participation in the research process. Emphasis on the requirement for rigour in the process of creating new knowledge is assumed to lead to skill in the process of using research information created by others. This article reflects upon the requirements for evidence-based practice, and the degree to which current approaches to teaching research prepare practitioners who are able to find, evaluate and best use currently available research information. The potential for using the principles of systematic review as a teaching and learning strategy for research is explored, and some of the possible strengths and weakness of this approach are highlighted.


BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | 2013

The challenges of implementing a telestroke network: a systematic review and case study

Beverley French; Elaine Day; Caroline Leigh Watkins; Alison McLoughlin; Jane Fitzgerald; Michael John Leathley; Paul Davies; Hedley C. A. Emsley; Gary A. Ford; Damian Jenkinson; Carl May; Mark O’Donnell; Christopher Price; Christopher J Sutton; Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody

BackgroundThe use of telemedicine in acute stroke care can facilitate rapid access to treatment, but the work required to embed any new technology into routine practice is often hidden, and can be challenging. We aimed to collate recommendations and resources to support telestroke implementation.MethodsSystematic search of healthcare databases and the Internet to identify descriptions of the implementation of telestroke projects; interviews with key stakeholders during the development of one UK telestroke network. Supporting documentation from existing projects was analysed to construct a framework of implementation stages and tasks, and a toolkit of documents. Interviews and literature were analysed with other data sources using Normalisation Process Theory as described in the e-Health Implementation Toolkit.Results61 telestroke projects were identified and contacted. Twenty projects provided documents, 13 with published research detailing four stages of telestroke system development, implementation, use, and evaluation. Interviewees identified four main challenges: engaging and maintaining the commitment of a wide range of stakeholders across multiple organisations; addressing clinicians perceptions of evidence, workload, and payback; managing clinical and technical workability across diverse settings; and monitoring how the system is used and reconfigured by users.ConclusionsInformation to guide telestroke implementation is sparse, but available. By using multiple sources of data, sufficient information was collated to construct a web-based toolkit detailing implementation tasks, resources and challenges in the development of a telestroke system for assessment and thrombolysis delivery in acute care. The toolkit is freely available online.


Trials | 2014

Identifying continence options after stroke (ICONS): a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial

Lois Helene Thomas; Caroline Leigh Watkins; Christopher J Sutton; Denise Forshaw; Michael John Leathley; Beverley French; Christopher R Burton; Francine M Cheater; Brenda Roe; David Britt; Joanne Booth; Elaine McColl

BackgroundUrinary incontinence (UI) affects half of patients hospitalised after stroke and is often poorly managed. Cochrane systematic reviews have shown some positive impact of conservative interventions (such as bladder training) in reducing UI, but their effectiveness has not been demonstrated with stroke patients.MethodsWe conducted a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of a systematic voiding programme (SVP) for the management of UI after stroke. Stroke services were randomised to receive SVP (n = 4), SVP plus supported implementation (SVP+, n = 4), or usual care (UC, n = 4).Feasibility outcomes were participant recruitment and retention. The main effectiveness outcome was presence or absence of UI at six and 12 weeks post-stroke. Additional effectiveness outcomes included were the effect of the intervention on different types of UI, continence status at discharge, UI severity, functional ability, quality of life, and death.ResultsIt was possible to recruit patients (413; 164 SVP, 125 SVP+, and 124 UC) and participant retention was acceptable (85% and 88% at six and 12 weeks, respectively). There was no suggestion of a beneficial effect on the main outcome at six (SVP versus UC: odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.94; SVP+ versus UC: OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.37) or 12 weeks (SVP versus UC: OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.93; SVP+ versus UC: OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.54 to 2.09).No secondary outcomes showed a strong suggestion of clinically meaningful improvement in SVP and/or SVP+ arms relative to UC at six or 12 weeks. However, at 12 weeks both intervention arms had higher estimated odds of continence than UC for patients with urge incontinence.ConclusionsThe trial has met feasibility outcomes of participant recruitment and retention. It was not powered to demonstrate effectiveness, but there is some evidence of a potential reduction in the odds of specific types of incontinence. A full trial should now be considered.Trial registrationISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN08609907, date of registration: 7 July 2010.


Trials | 2011

Study protocol: ICONS: Identifying continence options after stroke: A randomised trial

Lois Helene Thomas; Caroline Leigh Watkins; Beverley French; Christopher J Sutton; Denise Forshaw; Francine M Cheater; Brenda Roe; Michael John Leathley; Christopher R Burton; Elaine McColl; Jo Booth

BackgroundUrinary incontinence following acute stroke is common, affecting between 40%-60% of people in hospital after a stroke. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for urinary incontinence and urinary incontinence after stroke, national audit data suggest incontinence is often poorly managed. Conservative interventions (e.g. bladder training, pelvic floor muscle training and prompted voiding) have been shown to have some effect with participants in Cochrane systematic reviews, but have not had their effectiveness demonstrated with stroke patients.Methods/DesignA cluster randomised controlled pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility of a full-scale cluster randomised trial and to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme for the management of continence after stroke. Stroke services will be randomised to receive the systematic voiding programme, the systematic voiding programme plus supported implementation, or usual care. The trial aims to recruit at least 780 participants in 12 stroke services (4 per arm). The primary outcome is presence/absence of incontinence at six weeks post-stroke. Secondary outcomes include frequency and severity of incontinence, quality of life and cost-utility. Outcomes will be measured at six weeks, three months and (for participants recruited in the first three months) twelve months after stroke. Process data will include rates of recruitment and retention and fidelity of intervention delivery. An integrated qualitative evaluation will be conducted in order to describe implementation and assist in explaining the potential mediators and modifiers of the process.Trial RegistrationISRCTN: ISRCTN08609907


Stroke | 2017

Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke: A Major Update of a Cochrane Review

Lois Helene Thomas; Beverley French; Jacqueline Coupe; Naoimh E McMahon; Louise Connell; Joanna Harrison; Christopher J Sutton; Svetlana Tishkovskaya; Caroline Leigh Watkins

Repetitive task training (RTT) involves the active practice of task-specific motor activities and is a component of current therapy approaches in stroke rehabilitation.1 Primary objective is to determine whether RTT improves upper limb function/reach and lower limb function/balance in adults after stroke. Secondary objectives are (1) to determine the effect of RTT on secondary outcome measures, including activities of daily living, global motor function, quality of life/health status, and adverse events, (2) to determine the factors that could influence primary and secondary outcome measures, including the effect of dose of task practice, type of task (whole therapy, mixed, or single task), and timing of the intervention and type of intervention. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group …


Stroke | 2009

Psychological Intervention Poststroke Ready for Action

Caroline Leigh Watkins; Beverley French

See related article, pages 3073–3078. Stroke is distressing and frequently affects mood and behavior.1 The negative impact of mood and adjustment disorders on physical recovery and reintegration is recognized2–4 and makes it even more imperative that early effective interventions are established. However, there has been a failure to respond to this distress at an early stage after stroke, perhaps due to staff viewing distress as an inevitable psychological reaction to a debilitating event or due to a lack of clear guidance around prevention and treatment of mood problems. Later on in the recovery process when this distress has become established as a mood disorder, there has been a failure to react, and care remains suboptimal. The lack of robust evidence to guide treatment is a major contributing factor. Thus far, the results of antidepressant studies in those with established depression have been disappointing with short-term gains not being …


Nurse Education in Practice | 2004

Sharing what works: adaptation programmes for overseas recruits

Sarla Gandhi; Beverley French

Many Trusts are considering overseas recruitment to cope with the current shortage of qualified nurses in the UK. The need to plan for and manage the socio-cultural process can divert attention from issues of professional adaptation. This article considers some of the legal, practical and theoretical guidance used by one Trust in developing its own adaptation programme for nurses recruited from overseas. Given the lack of detailed guidance or research available to identify factors which influence the success of adaptation programmes, learning theories were used to work out a set of guiding principles which were thought suitable for the particular challenges that overseas nurses face in learning to adapt their professional skills to a new environment.


Trials | 2013

Icons: identifying continence options after stroke trial: utility of a logic model in the design and implementation of a process evaluation

Lois Helene Thomas; Christopher R Burton; Beverley French; Michael John Leathley; Denise Forshaw; Christopher J Sutton; Brenda Roe; Brigit Chesworth; Caroline Leigh Watkins

Background: ICONS is a cluster randomised controlled pilot trial designed to provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme (SVP) for the management of continence after stroke. Stroke services were randomised to receive the SVP, the SVP plus supported implementation, or usual care. Process evaluations are designed to evaluate fidelity and provide explanatory evidence around trial outcomes; these need to be underpinned by a theoretical framework to explain linkages between intervention processes and outcomes. Process evaluation: We conducted an evaluation to describe SVP implementation and assist in explaining intervention outcomes. Reflecting best practice in complex intervention research, we developed a logic model to underpin the evaluation representing practitioners’ implementation activities. To increase explanatory power of the model, we synthesised principles from theoretical frameworks underpinning the study (e.g. the Normalisation Process Model) into mechanisms of action to explain conditions necessary for activities to impact on outcomes. Mechanisms were: • Understanding and agreeing: conceptual work associated with the SVP, e.g. increasing awareness. • Driving and aligning: organising systems or processes to align and drive new practice. • Building and supporting: enacting the SVP. • Learning and evaluation: reflecting on performance and progress. Findings: We will discuss the utility of the logic model in explaining conditions necessary for the intervention to work, the success of implementation strategies adopted and variations in patient outcome across trial arms. We will also consider the challenges of synthesising across multiple data sources to understand variation in intervention delivery, maintenance and outcome in cluster trials.

Collaboration


Dive into the Beverley French's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher J Sutton

University of Central Lancashire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Denise Forshaw

University of Central Lancashire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Barrett

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jo Booth

Glasgow Caledonian University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernadette Carter

University of Central Lancashire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge