Beverly C. Walters

Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Stroke is a common and serious disorder, with an incidence of ≈795 000 each year in the United States alone. Worldwide, stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) was approved a decade ago for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The guidelines for its use include stroke onset within 3 hours of intravenous drug administration, preceded by a computed tomographic (CT) scan to exclude the presence of hemorrhage, which is a contraindication to the use of the drug. Although randomized, controlled studies in Europe and North America demonstrated the efficacy of this treatment, it also was associated with an incidence of intracranial hemorrhage of 6.4%,1,2⇓ which was shown on subsequent studies to be even greater if there was not strict adherence to the administration protocol.3 The goal of these controlled studies was to evaluate patient outcome. There was no attempt to determine the site, or even the actual presence, of a vascular occlusion, the degree of tissue injury, or the amount of tissue at risk for further injury that might be salvageable. More than a decade later, progress for treating acute ischemic stroke has been slow,4,5⇓ yet the goals for treating this common disease have expanded. First, there is the need to extend the therapeutic window from 3 to ≥6 hours. Even with the rapid communication and transportation in our societies today, very few patients present for treatment within 3 hours.6 Second, there is the desire to improve the efficacy of treatment. It had been shown even before the randomized, controlled studies that intravenous rtPA works better in small peripheral vessels than in the large vessels at the skull base.7 Third, there is a need to decrease the complication rate, especially if patients are to be …

Pharmacological Therapy for Acute Spinal Cord Injury

• Administration of methylprednisolone (MP) for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is not recommended. Clinicians considering MP therapy should bear in mind that the drug is not Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for this application. There is no Class I or Class II medical evidence supporting the clinical benefit of MP in the treatment of acute SCI. Scattered reports of Class III evidence claim inconsistent effects likely related to random chance or selection bias. However, Class I, II, and III evidence exists that high-dose steroids are associated with harmful side effects including death. • Administration of GM-1 ganglioside (Sygen) for the treatment of acute SCI is not recommended.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for cerebrospinal fluid shunts: a metanalysis.

The value of antibiotic prophylaxis for clean neurosurgical procedures without the implantation of a foreign body has been conclusively demonstrated. Attempts to confirm its efficacy for cerebrospinal fluid shunt operations have produced confusing and inconclusive results. The objective of this study was to combine the results of high-quality controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis for cerebrospinal fluid shunt operations and to determine if there is evidence for the efficacy of this policy. Randomized clinical trials identified from presentations at national meetings and in the published literature were subjected to a metanalysis. The pooled data suggest a statistically significant effect favoring antibiotic prophylaxis (approximately a 50% reduction in infection risk when antibiotic prophylaxis is used). The effect is strongly related to the baseline infection rate when prophylaxis is not used and disappears when the baseline infection rate is at or below about 5%.

Guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries: 2013 update.

In 2002, an author group selected and sponsored by the Joint Section on Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons published the first evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with acute cervical spinal cord injuries (SCIs). In the spirit of keeping up with changes in information available in the medical literature that might provide more contemporary and more robust medical evidence, another author group was recruited to revise and update the guidelines. The review process has been completed and is published and can be once again found as a supplement to Neurosurgery. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the changes in the recommendations as a result of new evidence or broadened scope.

Blood Pressure Management after Acute Spinal Cord Injury

RECOMMENDATIONS STANDARDS: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES: There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS: • Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) should be avoided if possible or corrected as soon as possible after acute spinal cord injury. • Maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure at 85 to 90 mm Hg for the first 7 days after acute spinal cord injury to improve spinal cord perfusion is recommended.STANDARDS There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) should be avoided if possible or corrected as soon as possible after acute spinal cord injury. Maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure at 85 to 90 mmHg for the first 7 days after acute spinal cord injury to improve spinal cord perfusion is recommended.STANDARDS There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) should be avoided if possible or corrected as soon as possible after acute spinal cord injury.Maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure at 85 to 90 mm Hg for the first 7 days after acute spinal cord injury to improve spinal cord perfusion is recommended.

The Acute Cardiopulmonary Management of Patients With Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

M anagement of patients with an acute cervical spinal cord injury in an intensive care unit or similar monitored setting is recommended. • Use of cardiac, hemodynamic, and respiratory monitoring devices to detect cardiovascular dysfunction and respiratory insufficiency in patients following acute spinal cord injury is recommended. • Correction of hypotension in spinal cord injury (systolic blood pressure , 90 mm Hg) when possible and as soon as possible is recommended. • Maintenance of mean arterial blood pressure between 85 and 90 mm Hg for the first 7 days following an acute spinal cord injury is recommended.

Management of Pediatric Cervical Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries

DIAGNOSTIC STANDARDS There is insufficient evidence to support diagnostic standards. GUIDELINES In children who have experienced trauma and are alert, conversant, have no neurological deficit, no midline cervical tenderness, and no painful distracting injury, and are not intoxicated, cervical spine x-rays are not necessary to exclude cervical spine injury and are not recommended. In children who have experienced trauma and who are either not alert, nonconversant, or have neurological deficit, midline cervical tenderness, or painful distracting injury, or are intoxicated, it is recommended that anteroposterior and lateral cervical spine x-rays be obtained. OPTIONS In children younger than age 9 years who have experienced trauma, and who are nonconversant or have an altered mental status, a neurological deficit, neck pain, or a painful distracting injury, are intoxicated, or have unexplained hypotension, it is recommended that anteroposterior and lateral cervical spine x-rays be obtained. In children age 9 years or older who have experienced trauma, and who are nonconversant or have an altered mental status, a neurological deficit, neck pain, or a painful distracting injury, are intoxicated, or have unexplained hypotension, it is recommended that anteroposterior, lateral, and open-mouth cervical spine x-rays be obtained. Computed tomographic scanning with attention to the suspected level of neurological injury to exclude occult fractures or to evaluate regions not seen adequately on plain x-rays is recommended. Flexion/extension cervical x-rays or fluoroscopy may be considered to exclude gross ligamentous instability when there remains a suspicion of cervical spine instability after static x-rays are obtained. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine may be considered to exclude cord or nerve root compression, evaluate ligamentous integrity, or provide information regarding neurological prognosis. TREATMENT STANDARDS There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS Thoracic elevation or an occipital recess to prevent flexion of the head and neck when restrained supine on an otherwise flat backboard may allow for better neutral alignment and immobilization of the cervical spine in children younger than 8 years because of the relatively large head in these younger children and is recommended. Closed reduction and halo immobilization for injuries of the C2 synchondrosis between the body and odontoid is recommended in children younger than 7 years. Consideration of primary operative therapy is recommended for isolated ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine with associated deformity.

Radiographic Assessment of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Trauma Patients

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a potentially devastating consequence of acute trauma and can occur with improper immobilization of an unstable cervical spine fracture. Immobilization of an injured patient’s cervical spine after trauma is now standard care in most emergency medical services (EMS) systems. Immobilization of the cervical spine is maintained until spinal cord or spinal column injury is ruled out by clinical assessment and/or radiographic survey. Radiographic study of the cervical spine of every trauma patient is costly and results in significant radiation exposure to a large number of patients, few of whom will have a spinal column injury. The purpose of this review is to define which radiographic studies are necessary in the assessment of the cervical spine in asymptomatic patients after trauma.STANDARDS Radiographic assessment of the cervical spine is not recommended in trauma patients who are awake, alert, and not intoxicated, who are without neck pain or tenderness, and who do not have significant associated injuries that detract from their general evaluation.STANDARDS Radiographic assessment of the cervical spine is not recommended in trauma patients who are awake, alert, and not intoxicated, who are without neck pain or tenderness, and who do not have significant associated injuries that detract from their general evaluation.

Cervical Spine Immobilization before Admission to the Hospital

STANDARDS There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS All trauma patients with a cervical spinal column injury or with a mechanism of injury having the potential to cause cervical spine injury should be immobilized at the scene and during transport by using one of several available methods.A combination of a rigid cervical collar and supportive blocks on a backboard with straps is effective in limiting motion of the cervical spine and is recommended. The long-standing practice of attempted cervical spine immobilization using sandbags and tape alone is not recommended.STANDARDS There is insufficient evidence to support treatment standards. GUIDELINES There is insufficient evidence to support treatment guidelines. OPTIONS All trauma patients with a cervical spinal column injury or with a mechanism of injury having the potential to cause cervical spine injury should be immobilized at the scene and during transport by using one of several available methods. A combination of a rigid cervical collar and supportive blocks on a backboard with straps is effective in limiting motion of the cervical spine and is recommended. The long-standing practice of attempted cervical spine immobilization using sandbags and tape alone is not recommended.

Venous Thromboembolism after Brain Tumor Surgery: A Retrospective Review

We retrospectively reviewed the incidence rate of clinical postoperative deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in 1703 patients undergoing initial craniotomy for meningioma, glioma, or cerebral metastasis. The incidence rate of clinical thromboembolic complications was 1.59% for all tumor groups within the first 4 weeks of surgery. Patients undergoing surgery for meningiomas had a statistically significant increased risk of thromboembolism despite fewer overall perioperative risk factors, when compared with the other tumor groups. The tumor-specific incidence rates of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism for meningioma, glioma, and metastasis were 3.09%, 0.97%, and 1.03%, respectively. Whether this difference was a result of increased surgical time or an inherent property of meningiomas could not be ascertained.