Beverly Ehrich
Brown University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Beverly Ehrich.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine | 1996
William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Catherine E. Dube; Deborah N. Pearlman; Michael G. Goldstein; Kristen K. Peterson; Barbara K. Rimer; Hugh Woolverton
The two purposes of this investigation were: (a) to examine whether an association existed between stages of adopting regular mammography and decision-making constructs from the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behavior change, and (b) to determine whether any such associations would be found for each of the two ways of defining the stages-of-adoption. One method integrated past screening history with a report of future intention for screening; the other method used a single item with predetermined response categories. Data were from the baseline survey of 1,323 women aged 50–74 who were recruited as part of an intervention study through a local Health Maintenance Organization. Results showed that both ways of defining stages of adopting regular mammography were associated with decisional balance and processes-of-change. The method that integrated past history plus intention provided somewhat better discrimination among stages. Women who were labeled as being at “Risk of Relapse,” and those who said they waited for a “Provider’s Recommendation,” may be useful groups to add to the set of stages that have been employed so far by the TTM. In addition, a tendency to avoid the health care system in general was used as a process-of-change to complement the mammography-specific processes.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2003
William Rakowski; Isaac M. Lipkus; Melissa A. Clark; Barbara K. Rimer; Beverly Ehrich; Pauline Lyna; Phyllis J. Kornguth
BACKGROUND The main benefits of mammography come from regular on-schedule screening. However, few studies have examined interventions to achieve repeat screening. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Participants were women aged 50 to 74, recruited through one setting in Rhode Island and another in North Carolina. Participants had a mammogram already scheduled at recruitment, and had to keep that appointment in order to be eligible for the repeat mammography intervention. A total of 1614 women were in the intervention sample. DESIGN A four-group randomized design was used: Group 1, a simple reminder letter; Group 2, a 2-month, tailored, stepped intervention delivered 2 months after the completed mammogram; Group 3, a 10-month, tailored, stepped intervention delivered 2 months before the repeat mammogram was due; and Group 4, self-choice of one of the above three strategies. INTERVENTION The intervention took place between June 1996 and May 1997. The reminder letter and two levels of the stepped intervention were delivered by mail. The third level of the stepped strategy was a counselor telephone call. Groups 2 and 3 were identical, except for timing. OUTCOME MEASURE Obtaining the next due mammogram within 15 months, based on clinic records. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences among the four groups, both in the total sample and at the two sites separately. CONCLUSIONS On average, a simple reminder may be as effective as more complex strategies for women with a prior on-schedule exam. However, attention is still needed to identify women at risk of lapsing from screening. Some women may require more-intensive interventions.
Journal of Health Psychology | 1998
Melissa A. Clark; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Deborah N. Pearlman; Michael G. Goldstein; Catherine E. Dube; Barbara K. Rimer; Hugh Woolverton
This study examined whether distinct subgroups of women could be identified within stages of adoption for screening mammography. These subgroups may represent differential readiness to move to the next stage of the adoption continuum. Data were from a baseline survey of 1323 women between the ages of 50 and 74 years who were recruited through a staff- model HMO for an intervention study to increase rates of mammography. Multiple regression models were used to identify correlates of positive decisional balance within each of four stages of adoption, and an index of positive indicators was developed from the significant correlates for each stage. Analysis of variance showed that the number of positive indicators discriminated women within each stage. This information can be used to develop more effective tailored interventions to increase the percentage of women receiving mammograms on a regular schedule.
Preventive Medicine | 1998
William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Michael G. Goldstein; Barbara K. Rimer; Deborah N. Pearlman; Melissa A. Clark; Wayne F. Velicer; Hugh Woolverton
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 1996
Deborah N. Pearlman; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Melissa A. Clark
Women & Health | 1999
Deborah N. Pearlman; Melissa A. Clark; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich
Preventive Medicine | 1999
William Rakowski; Melissa A. Clark; Beverly Ehrich
Preventive Medicine | 1997
William Rakowski; Melissa A. Clark; Deborah N. Pearlman; Beverly Ehrich; Barbara K. Rimer; Michael G. Goldstein; Catherine E. Dube; Hugh Woolverton
Preventive Medicine | 1995
William Rakowski; Deborah N. Pearlman; Barbara K. Rimer; Beverly Ehrich
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2002
Melissa A. Clark; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Barbara K. Rimer; Wayne F. Velicer; Catherine E. Dube; Deborah N. Pearlman; Kristen K. Peterson; Michael G. Goldstein