Bijan J. Borah
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bijan J. Borah.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2012
Sean C. Dowdy; Bijan J. Borah; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez; Amy L. Weaver; Michaela E. McGree; Lindsey R. Haas; Gary L. Keeney; Andrea Mariani; Karl C. Podratz
OBJECTIVE Since 1999, patients with low risk endometrial cancer (EC) as defined by the Mayo criteria have preferably not undergone lymphadenectomy (LND) at our institution. Here we prospectively assess survival, sites of recurrence, morbidity, and cost in this low risk cohort. METHODS Cause-specific survival (CSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Complications were graded per the Accordion Classification. Thirty-day cost analyses were expressed in 2010 Medicare dollars. RESULTS Among 1393 consecutive surgically managed cases, 385 (27.6%) met inclusion criteria, accounting for 34.1% of type I EC. There were 80 LND and 305 non-LND cases. Complications in the first 30 days were significantly more common in the LND cohort (37.5% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). The prevalence of lymph node metastasis was 0.3% (1/385). Over a median follow-up of 5.4 years only 5 of 31 deaths were due to disease. The 5-year CSS in LND and non-LND cases was 97.3% and 99.0%, respectively (P=0.32). None of the 11 total recurrences occurred in the pelvic or para-aortic nodal areas. Median 30-day cost of care was
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2013
Eleftheria Kalogera; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez; Christopher J. Jankowski; Emanuel C. Trabuco; Jenna K. Lovely; Sarah Dhanorker; Pamela L. Grubbs; Amy L. Weaver; Lindsey R. Haas; Bijan J. Borah; April A. Bursiek; Michael T. Walsh; William A. Cliby; Sean C. Dowdy
15,678 for LND cases compared to
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2009
Bijan J. Borah; Xingyue Huang; Victoria Zarotsky
11,028 for non-LND cases (P<0.001). The estimated cost per up-staged low-risk case was
The Journal of Urology | 2012
Simon P. Kim; Nilay D. Shah; R. Jeffrey Karnes; Christopher J. Weight; Igor Frank; James P. Moriarty; Leona C. Han; Bijan J. Borah; Matthew K. Tollefson; Stephen A. Boorjian
327,866 to
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2013
Bijan J. Borah; Wanda K Nicholson; Linda D. Bradley; Elizabeth A. Stewart
439,990, adding an additional
Journal of Womens Health | 2013
Elizabeth A. Stewart; Wanda K Nicholson; Linda D. Bradley; Bijan J. Borah
1,418,189 if all 305 non-LND cases had undergone LND. CONCLUSION Lymphadenectomy dramatically increases morbidity and cost of care without discernible benefits in low-risk EC as defined by the Mayo criteria. In these low-risk patients, hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy alone is appropriate surgical management and should be standard of care.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2012
James P. Moriarty; Megan E. Branda; Kerry D. Olsen; Nilay D. Shah; Bijan J. Borah; Amy E. Wagie; Jason S. Egginton; James M. Naessens
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery (a multimodal perioperative care enhancement protocol) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. METHODS: Consecutive patients managed under an enhanced recovery pathway and undergoing cytoreduction, surgical staging, or pelvic organ prolapse surgery between June 20, 2011, and December 20, 2011, were compared with consecutive historical controls (March to December 2010) matched by procedure. Wilcoxon rank-sum, &khgr;2, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for comparisons. Direct medical costs incurred in the first 30 days were obtained from the Olmsted County Healthcare Expenditure and Utilization Database and standardized to 2011 Medicare dollars. RESULTS: A total of 241 enhanced recovery women in the case group (81 cytoreduction, 84 staging, and 76 vaginal surgery) were compared with women in the control groups. In the cytoreductive group, patient-controlled anesthesia use decreased from 98.7% to 33.3% and overall opioid use decreased by 80% in the first 48 hours with no change in pain scores. Enhanced recovery resulted in a 4-day reduction in hospital stay with stable readmission rates (25.9% of women in the case group compared with 17.9% of women in the control group) and 30-day cost savings of more than
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2012
Sean C. Dowdy; Bijan J. Borah; Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez; Sanjeev Kumar; Amy L. Weaver; Michaela E. McGree; Lindsey R. Haas; William A. Cliby; Karl C. Podratz
7,600 per patient (18.8% reduction). No differences were observed in rate (63% compared with 71.8%) or severity of postoperative complications (grade 3 or more: 21% compared with 20.5%). Similar, albeit less dramatic, improvements were observed in the other two cohorts. Ninety-five percent of patients rated satisfaction with perioperative care as excellent or very good. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of enhanced recovery was associated with acceptable pain management with reduced opioids, reduced length of stay with stable readmission and morbidity rates, good patient satisfaction, and substantial cost reductions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2010
Bijan J. Borah; Patricia Sacco; Victoria Zarotsky
ABSTRACT Objective: To examine adherence to adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETA) and health care costs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and to explore the association between adherence, utilization and costs. Research design and methods: Using administrative claims data from a large managed health care plan, RA patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab during the period from 01/01/2005 through 12/31/2005 were identified. The first dispensing date was defined as the index date. Patient adherence and costs were assessed during the 1 year post-index period. Main outcome measures: Nonadherence (medication possession ratio <80%) was modeled using logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HR) comparing time to discontinuation were estimated using Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. Propensity score matching with multivariate generalized linear modeling adjustment was done to assess cost difference between ADA and ETA. Results: Of 3829 eligible RA patients, 1292 (765 existing, 527 naïve) and 2537 (1834 existing, 703 naïve) patients used ADA and ETA, respectively. Compared with ADA users, ETA users had longer average treatment duration (316 vs. 291 days; p < 0.0001). Unadjusted adherence rates for naïve and existing users were 63% and 70% (ADA), and 65% and 73% (ETA). Logistic regression analysis indicated that compared with ETA users, ADA users were more likely to be nonadherent (OR, naïve 1.24; existing; 1.25). Cox PH models indicated that existing ADA users were more likely to discontinue (HR = 1.11; p = 0.06) their medication than existing ETA users. Compared with ADA users, ETA users had significantly lower RA-related pharmacy costs (naïve:
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2013
Prasad G. Iyer; Bijan J. Borah; Herbert Heien; Ananya Das; Gregory S. Cooper; Amitabh Chak
10,892 vs.