Bill Sugden

Epstein–Barr virus maintains lymphomas via its miRNAs

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has evolved exquisite controls over its host cells, human B lymphocytes, not only directing these cells during latency to proliferate and thereby expand the pool of infected cells, but also to survive and thereby persist for the lifetime of the infected individual. Although these activities ensure the virus is successful, they also make the virus oncogenic, particularly when infected people are immunosuppressed. Here we show, strikingly, that one set of EBV’s microRNAs (miRNAs) both sustain Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) cells in the absence of other viral oncogenes and promote the transformation of primary B lymphocytes. BL cells were engineered to lose EBV and found to die by apoptosis and could be rescued by constitutively expressing viral miRNAs in them. Two of these EBV miRNAs were found to target caspase 3 to inhibit apoptosis at physiological concentrations.

The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) oncogene of Epstein-Barr virus can simultaneously induce and inhibit apoptosis in B-cells

ABSTRACT The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) regulates its own expression and the expression of human genes via its two functional moieties; the transmembrane domains of LMP1 are required to regulate its expression via the unfolded protein response (UPR) and autophagy in B cells, and the carboxy-terminal domain of LMP1 activates cellular signaling pathways that affect cellular proliferation and survival. An apparent anomaly in the complex regulation of the UPR and autophagy by LMP1 is that the induction of either pathway can lead to cellular death, yet neither EBV-infected B cells nor B cells expressing only LMP1 die. Thus, we sought to understand how B cells that express LMP1 survive. The transmembrane domains of LMP1 activated apoptosis in B cells, the apoptosis required the UPR, and the carboxy-terminal domain of LMP1 blocked this apoptosis. The expression of the mRNA of Bcl2a1, encoding an antiapoptotic homolog of BCL2, correlated directly with the expression of LMP1 in EBV-positive B-cell strains, and its expression inhibited the apoptosis induced by the transmembrane domains of LMP1. These findings illustrate how the carboxy-terminal domain of LMP1 supports survival of B cells in the presence of the deleterious effects of the complex regulation of this viral oncogene.

Replication of Epstein–Barr Viral DNA

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a paradigm for human tumor viruses: it is the first virus recognized to cause cancer in people; it causes both lymphomas and carcinomas; yet these tumors arise infrequently given that most people in the world are infected with the virus. EBV is maintained extrachromosomally in infected normal and tumor cells. Eighty-four percent of these viral plasmids replicate each S phase, are licensed, require a single viral protein for their synthesis, and can use two functionally distinct origins of DNA replication, oriP, and Raji ori. Eighty-eight percent of newly synthesized plasmids are segregated faithfully to the daughter cells. Infectious viral particles are not synthesized under these conditions of latent infection. This plasmid replication is consistent with survival of EBVs host cells. Rare cells in an infected population either spontaneously or following exogenous induction support EBVs lytic cycle, which is lethal for the cell. In this case, the viral DNA replicates 100-fold or more, uses a third kind of viral origin of DNA replication, oriLyt, and many viral proteins. Here we shall describe the three modes of EBVs replication as a function of the viral origins used and the viral and cellular proteins that mediate the DNA synthesis from these origins focusing, where practical, on recent advances in our understanding.

Potential Cellular Functions of Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen 1 (EBNA1) of Epstein-Barr Virus

Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen 1 (EBNA1) is a multifunctional protein encoded by EBV. EBNA1’s role in maintaining EBV in latently proliferating cells, by mediating EBV genome synthesis and nonrandom partitioning to daughter cells, as well as regulating viral gene transcription, is well characterized. Less understood are the roles of EBNA1 in affecting the host cell to provide selective advantages to those cells that harbor EBV. In this review we will focus on the interactions between EBNA1 and the host cell that may provide EBV-infected cells selective advantages beyond the maintenance of EBV.

Epstein–Barr virus microRNAs reduce immune surveillance by virus-specific CD8+ T cells

Significance Most humans are infected for their lifetime with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), which can cause cancer and other EBV-associated diseases. Infected individuals develop strong immune responses to this virus, in particular cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, but viral infection is never cleared nor is EBV eliminated from the body. This suggests that certain viral molecules might prevent effective elimination of EBV-infected cells by CD8+ T cells. EBV is rich in genes coding for microRNAs, many with unknown function. We show that viral microRNAs interfere with recognition and killing of EBV-infected cells by CD8+ T cells. Multiple mechanisms and molecules are targeted by microRNAs to achieve this immune evasion. Therefore, targeting of viral microRNAs may improve antiviral immunity and therapy. Infection with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) affects most humans worldwide and persists life-long in the presence of robust virus-specific T-cell responses. In both immunocompromised and some immunocompetent people, EBV causes several cancers and lymphoproliferative diseases. EBV transforms B cells in vitro and encodes at least 44 microRNAs (miRNAs), most of which are expressed in EBV-transformed B cells, but their functions are largely unknown. Recently, we showed that EBV miRNAs inhibit CD4+ T-cell responses to infected B cells by targeting IL-12, MHC class II, and lysosomal proteases. Here we investigated whether EBV miRNAs also counteract surveillance by CD8+ T cells. We have found that EBV miRNAs strongly inhibit recognition and killing of infected B cells by EBV-specific CD8+ T cells through multiple mechanisms. EBV miRNAs directly target the peptide transporter subunit TAP2 and reduce levels of the TAP1 subunit, MHC class I molecules, and EBNA1, a protein expressed in most forms of EBV latency and a target of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells. Moreover, miRNA-mediated down-regulation of the cytokine IL-12 decreases the recognition of infected cells by EBV-specific CD8+ T cells. Thus, EBV miRNAs use multiple, distinct pathways, allowing the virus to evade surveillance not only by CD4+ but also by antiviral CD8+ T cells.

Epstein-Barr viral miRNAs inhibit antiviral CD4+ T cell responses targeting IL-12 and peptide processing.

EBV reduces the activation of cytotoxic CD4+ effector T cells by inducing a state of reduced immunogenicity in infected B cells. EBV-derived miRNAs suppress release of proinflammatory cytokines, interfere with peptide processing and presentation on HLA class II, repress differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells to Th1 cells, and ultimately avoid killing of infected B cells.

Multiple functions are mediated by the miRNAs of Epstein-Barr virus

Epstein-Barr virus is a gammaherpes virus that is causally associated with several malignancies and expresses multiple miRNAs in both normal and tumor cells. Since the identification of virally encoded miRNAs, various mRNAs have been identified as targets for regulation by EBVs miRNAs in host cells. We shall summarize these targets, the robustness of their identification, and examine how the regulation of these targets by EBV contributes to the successful infection of its host.

Characterization and intracellular trafficking of Epstein-Barr virus BBLF1, a protein involved in virion maturation

ABSTRACT Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) BBLF1 shares 13 to 15% amino acid sequence identities with the herpes simplex virus 1 UL11 and cytomegalovirus UL99 tegument proteins, which are involved in the final envelopment during viral maturation. This study demonstrates that BBLF1 is a myristoylated and palmitoylated protein, as are UL11 and UL99. Myristoylation of BBLF1 both facilitates its membrane anchoring and stabilizes it. BBLF1 is shown to localize to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) along with gp350/220, a site where final envelopment of EBV particles takes place. The localization of BBLF1 at the TGN requires myristoylation and two acidic clusters, which interact with PACS-1, a cytosolic protein, to mediate retrograde transport from the endosomes to the TGN. Knockdown of the expression of BBLF1 during EBV lytic replication reduces the production of virus particles, demonstrating the requirement of BBLF1 to achieve optimal production of virus particles. BBLF1 is hypothesized to facilitate the budding of tegumented capsid into glycoprotein-embedded membrane during viral maturation.

Epstein-Barr Viral Productive Amplification Reprograms Nuclear Architecture, DNA Replication, and Histone Deposition

The spontaneous transition of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) from latency to productive infection is infrequent, making its analysis in the resulting mixed cell populations difficult. We engineered cells to support this transition efficiently and developed EBV DNA variants that could be visualized and measured as fluorescent signals over multiple cell cycles. This approach revealed that EBVs productive replication began synchronously for viral DNAs within a cell but asynchronously between cells. EBV DNA amplification was delayed until early S phase and occurred in factories characterized by the absence of cellular DNA and histones, by a sequential redistribution of PCNA, and by localization away from the nuclear periphery. The earliest amplified DNAs lacked histones accompanying a decline in four histone chaperones. Thus, EBV transits from being dependent on the cellular replication machinery during latency to commandeering both that machinery and nuclear structure for its own reproductive needs.

Epstein-Barr virus: the path from association to causality for a ubiquitous human pathogen.

Epstein-Barr virus is notorious for causing multiple kinds of cancer. It has also been increasingly linked to multiple sclerosis. What evidence now supports or can be sought potentially to strengthen this linkage?