Bin Pei
Clemson University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bin Pei.
Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2014
Bin Pei; Firat Yener Testik; Mekonnen Gebremichael
Motivated bythefieldobservations offallvelocity andaxis ratio deviationsfrom predictedterminal velocity and equilibrium axis ratio values, the combined effects of raindrop fall velocity and axis ratio deviations on dual-polarization radar rainfall estimations were investigated. A radar rainfall retrieval algorithm [Colorado State University‐Hydrometeor Identification Rainfall Optimization (CSU-HIDRO)] served as the test bed. Subsequentinvestigationsdeterminedthattheavailablefieldmeasurements,whichwereverylimitedinscope, of the fall velocity and axis ratio deviations indicated rain-rate estimation errors of approximately 20%. Based on these findings, a sensitivity study was then performed using uncorrelated fall velocity and axis ratio deviations around the predicted values. Significant rain-rate estimation errors were observed for the realistic combinations of fall velocity and axis ratio deviations. It was shown that the maximum rain-rate estimation errorcanreachuptoapproximately200%forcombinationsoffallvelocityandaxisratiodeviations(5000drop size distribution samples were simulated for each combination) between 210% and 110% of the predicted values for each. The maximum standard deviation of errors was as great as 75% for the same combinations of fall velocity and axis ratio deviations. The authors found that use of dual-polarization radars to accurately estimaterainfall,duringnaturalrainevents,alsorequiresareanalysisoftheparameterizationsforraindropfall velocity and axis ratio. These parameterizations should consider both the coupling between these two parameters and factors that may introduce any possible deviations of the predicted values of these parameters.
ATC & SEI Conference on Advances in Hurricane Engineering 2012 | 2012
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran
Major coastal cities, which have large populations and economies, are easily suffered from the losses due to hurricane wind and storm surge hazards. Although current design codes consider the joint occurrence of high wind and surge, information on site specific joint distributions of hurricane wind and storm surge along the U.S. Eastern Coast and Gulf of Mexico is still sparse and limited. In this paper, joint probability distributions of combined hurricane wind and storm surge for the City of Charleston, SC is developed. A stochastic hurricane model was used to simulate 5,000 years of synthetic hurricanes. The simulated hurricanes were inputted into the ADCIRC (Advanced Circulation) surge prediction model to compute the surge heights at selected locations. The calculated peak wind speeds and surge heights were employed to generate the joint probability distributions at each location. These joint distributions developed can be used in a multi-hazard design or risk assessment framework to consider the combined effects of hurricane wind and storm surge hazards.
Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2017
Firat Yener Testik; Bin Pei
AbstractThe wind effects on the shape of drop size distribution (DSD) and the driving microphysical processes for the DSD shape evolution were investigated using the dataset from the Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E). The quality-controlled DSD spectra from MC3E were grouped for each of the rainfall events by considering the precipitation type (stratiform vs convective) and liquid water content for the analysis. The DSD parameters (e.g., mass-weighted mean diameter) and the fitted DSD slopes for these grouped spectra showed statistically significant trends with varying wind speed. Increasing wind speeds were observed to modify the DSD shapes by increasing the number of small drops and decreasing the number of large drops, indicating that the raindrop breakup process governs the DSD shape evolution. Both spontaneous and collisional raindrop breakup modes were analyzed to elucidate the process responsible for the DSD shape evolution with varying wind speed. The analysis revealed th...
12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP 2012 | 2015
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran
To evaluate the effectiveness of different incentives for mitigating regional hurricane hazards, an agent-based hurricane mitigation framework was developed. This framework, which consists of six essential components, is able to consider stakeholders’ points of view on the selections of hurricane retrofit measures and the dynamic evolutions of building inventories (i.e. constructions and demolitions). Based on the findings of this study, among different levels of property tax reduction, a reduction between 50% and 75% was found to be the most effective one that leads to the highest hurricane cost reduction the study region can get in a 25-year timeframe. Agent-based modeling (ABM), which has a rapid growth in the past few decades, is a relatively new computational method (Gilbert 2007). The ABM is known as a “bottom-up” model. In ABM, the behavior of a complex system is studied without having to define the global behavior of the system. Rather, the behavior of individuals or subcomponents (hereafter referred as “agents”) is defined and the interactions between the agents are modeled to unveil the global behavior (Borshchev and Filippov 2004). Agents’ behaviors are defined using certain rules. Their interactions with each other as well as the environment can affect these rules and in turn influence agents’ behaviors (Macal and North 2010). By modeling agents’ behaviors and interactions individually, the behavior of the entire system can be revealed. Nevertheless, the ABM is seldom used in hurricane related studies. Chen et al. (2006) developed an agent-based hurricane evacuation model for the Florida Keys using survey data. This model was able to estimate not only the minimum clearance time of the evacuation, but also the accommodations needed if the evacuation is interrupted by a landfall hurricane. A dynamic ABM system was developed by Dawson et al. (2011) for flood incident management. This system is able to estimate the vulnerability of individual agents in coastal communities, subject to different flood conditions, defense scenarios, warning times and evacuation strategies. The flood inundation, traffic condition, flood risk, agent’s vulnerability and agent’s behavior were modeled to evaluate the effectiveness of different FIM measures. One of the key challenges in the ABM is the modeling of individual agent (Crooks et al. 2008). Specifically, it is the modeling of agent’s demographic and psychological attributes, and their relations with agent’s behaviors. The psychological attributes usually include risk perception, subjective knowledge, hazard experience, etc. Using data from the 2003 Hurricane Loss Mitigation Baseline Survey (HLMBS) (Peacock 2003b), Peacock et al. conducted three studies in analyzing the influences of Florida residents’ demographic and psychological characteristics on (1) the status of hurricane mitigation (Peacock 2003a), (2) the hurricane risk perception (Peacock et al. 2005), and (3) the household responses to hurricane mitigation incentives (Ge et al. 2011). The influences were modeled using probabilistic models through logistic regressions. The outcomes of their studies are valuable resources for the modeling of agents’ behaviors in hurricane mitigations. In this study, an agent-based hurricane mitigation framework was developed for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of different incentives for 12 International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12 Vancouver, Canada, July 12-15, 2015 2 mitigating the combined effects of hurricane wind and flood hazards. A case study hurricane mitigation domain (Miami, Florida) was constructed to mimic the real configuration of the existing building stock and the attributes of residents in the study domain. The occurrence of the new building constructions, demolitions and hurricane hazards over time was modeled using historical data. Agents’ responses to hazards and incentives for retrofitting their homes, and decision-makings with regard to building retrofits were modeled using the survey data. Finally, the combined wind and flood loss estimations were performed to evaluate the cost-benefit of the hazard mitigation incentives. This paper is organized such that an overview of the agent-based hurricane mitigation framework is presented in Section 1, followed by a case study in Section 2, and preliminary findings and conclusions are given in Section 3. 1. OVERVIEW OF THE AGENT-BASED HURRICANE MITIGATION FRAMEWORK The proposed framework for agent-based regional hurricane mitigation is presented in . This framework, which is composed of six modules, accounts for agents’ responses to incentives and natural hazards in hurricane mitigations through modeling of agents’ behaviors. The six modules are Buildings, Agents, Retrofits, Hazards, Constructions & Demolitions, and Incentives (see ). The behaviors of the six modules are defined individually and the connections between them are defined using a set of rules or functional relationships. These connections are marked as arrows, which indicate directional impacts from one module to the other, in . For instance, hazards can impart damages to buildings and cause losses, and hazards are also able to influence agents’ psychological attributes or behaviors. The Retrofits module, marked as a circle, requires agents’ decision making, which is affected by both hazards and incentives. In this hurricane mitigation framework, the initial locations and characteristics of individual buildings as well as the initial locations and attributes of individual agents were first determined using historical survey data. Then, given selected incentives, simulations were performed at a fixed time interval (e.g. one month) to evaluate the performance of the entire system (i.e. all six modules and the connections). At every time step, the building characteristics and the agent attributes were updated. Agents responded to incentives and hazards, and decided if they wanted to retrofit their buildings. New constructions and demolitions occurred at every time step as well. When affected by a hurricane in a time step, the combined wind and flood losses was computed using a loss estimation framework adapted from the HAZUS-MH methodology. The updates of building characteristics, including demolitions, and agent attributes were simulated after the hurricane. The following subsections are organized to describe this process in detail. 1.1. Building locations and characteristics As mentioned above, a key feature of the agent-based modeling is to model each individual from the bottom. This requires specific modeling of each individual building that exists in the study domain. For simplicity and as an illustrative example, only residential buildings were taken into account in this study. Buildings were modeled as individual dots (dimensionless) on a map (see Figure 2) containing location and characteristic information, which are adequate for regional hurricane mitigations . Figure 2: Comparison between modeled and actual -80.358 -80.357 -80.356 -80.355 -80.354 25.616 25.617 25.618 25.619 25.62 Longitude (deg) L a t it u d e (d eg ) Figure 1: Framework for agent-based regional hurricane mitigation 12 International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12 Vancouver, Canada, July 12-15, 2015 3 locations of buildings 1.1.1. Locations of buildings The numbers of buildings in each Census block were first determined using the 2010 U.S. Census (U.S. Census Bureau 2010) and the 2011 American Community Survey (ACS) (U.S. Census Bureau 2011) data through a probabilistic method. Then, the buildings were placed along the roads but with a distance to the roads in the Census blocks. A comparison between the modeled building locations and their actual locations on a Google map is presented in Figure 2. It can be clearly seen that the modeled locations (solid circles) agree well with their actual locations. 1.1.2. Characteristics of buildings After the locations of buildings were determined, their characteristics could be assigned. The 20 building characteristics considered in this study include year structure built, household income, building square footage, number of stories, flood zone, base flood elevation, foundation type, foundation height, building replacement value, corresponding wind and flood damage functions, etc. These characteristics were selected because they are essential in hurricane loss estimation and hazard mitigation. It should be noted that these characteristics were assigned to every building using survey data. Among others, the ACS data, which is a typical source available, only provides data at Census block group (i.e. a group of Census blocks) level. Therefore, in order to assign characteristics to each individual building, we used the probability mass functions (PMFs) obtained from the survey data (e.g. ACS data) at the Census block group level. The PMF for a particular characteristic represents the discrete probability of every category in that characteristic. For instance, there are 9 categories for year structure built (2005-2010, 2000-2004, 1990-1999, ..., 1940-1949, 1910-1939). Each of them is associated with a distribution probability corresponding to a Census block group. For each building in that Census block group, the year built was randomly sampled following the PMF. In this framework, similar concept was utilized in the assignment of characteristics. The correlations between characteristics were also considered. Because the assignments heavily rely on the above-mentioned probabilistic method, statistics of the assigned characteristics were checked to ensure the accuracy in terms of capturing the trends of the PMFs used to develop the mitigation framework. PMFs were checked for the entire hurricane mitigation domain and all of them agreed well with the assigned statistics. One example is given in Figure 3. 1.2. Agent attri
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | 2018
Bin Pei; Firat Yener Testik
AbstractIn this study a new radar rainfall estimation algorithm—rainfall estimation using simulated raindrop size distributions (RESID)—was developed. This algorithm development was based upon the ...
Natural Hazards | 2014
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran; Fangqian Liu
2012 ATC and SEI Conference on Advances in Hurricane Engineering: Learning from Our Past | 2013
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran
12th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering 2013: Wind Effects on Structures, Communities, and Energy Generation, ACWE 2013 | 2013
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran
Natural Hazards | 2018
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran; Fangqian Liu
12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP 2012 | 2015
Bin Pei; Weichiang Pang; Firat Yener Testik; Nadarajah Ravichandran