Bipin Chandra Pal

Retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic kidney transplantation: experience of initial 72 cases.

Background To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcome of laparoscopic kidney transplantation (LKT) after retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Methods Between February 2010 and January 2012, a total of 217 renal transplantations were performed from living donors by a single surgical unit. All living-donor nephrectomies were performed by retroperitoneoscopic approach. Recipient surgery was performed either laparoscopically (n=72) or by conventional open approach (n=145). In the LKT group, a 5 to 6 cm Pfannenstiel incision was placed and the kidney was dropped into abdomen. Renal vessels were anastomosed by freehand suturing technique. Calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppressants were given. Results The mean operative time was 223.8 and 175.7 min (P=0.07) and the rewarming time was 60.3 and 30.3 min (P=0.03) in the LKT and open kidney transplantation (OKT) groups, respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate value on days 7 and 30 was significantly less in the LKT group, but no difference was found at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The mean wound length was 5.5 and 17.8 cm (P=0.0001) and the analgesic requirement was 1.4 and 3.2 mg morphine equivalent in first 24 hr (P=0.005) in the LKT and OKT groups, respectively. In the LKT group, four cases required conversion to open surgery due to vascular complications and one for urinary leak. Kaplan-Meier curve shows 86.5% and 94.6% (P=0.086) and patient survival is 94.1% and 94.7% (P=0.745) at 22.3 months of follow-up. Conclusions LKT after living-donor nephrectomy is feasible, but it has steep learning curve. Graft fixation with peritoneal fold is necessary to avoid torsion and related graft loss. Pain after LKT is significantly less compared with conventional OKT.

Impact of single centre kidney paired donation transplantation to increase donor pool in India: a cohort study

In a living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) dominated transplant programme, kidney paired donation (KPD) may be a cost‐effective and valid alternative strategy to increase LDKT in countries with limited resources where deceased donation kidney transplantation (DDKT) is in the initial stages. Here, we report our experience of 300 single‐centre KPD transplantations to increase LDKT in India. Between January 2000 and July 2016, 3616 LDKT and 561 DDKT were performed at our transplantation centre, 300 (8.3%) using KPD. The reasons for joining KPD among transplanted patients were ABO incompatibility (n = 222), positive cross‐match (n = 59) and better matching (n = 19). A total of 124 two‐way (n = 248), 14 three‐way (n = 42), one four‐way (n = 4) and one six‐way exchange (n = 6) yielded 300 KPD transplants. Death‐censored graft and patient survival were 96% (n = 288) and 83.3% (n = 250), respectively. The mean serum creatinine was 1.3 mg/dl at a follow‐up of 3 ± 3 years. We credit the success of our KPD programme to maintaining a registry of incompatible pairs, counselling on KPD, a high‐volume LDKT programme and teamwork. KPD is legal, cost effective and rapidly growing for facilitating LDKT with incompatible donors. This study provides large‐scale evidence for the expansion of single‐centre LDKT via KPD when national programmes do not exist.

Past, present and future of kidney paired donation transplantation in India

One third of healthy willing living kidney donors are rejected due to ABO blood group incompatibility and donor specific antibody. This increases pre-transplant dialysis duration leading to increased morbidity and mortality on the kidney transplantation waiting list. Over the last decade kidney paired donation is most rapidly increased source of living kidney donors. In a kidney transplantation program dominated by living donor kidney transplantation, kidney paired donation is a legal and valid alternative strategy to increase living donor kidney transplantation. This is more useful in countries with limited resources where ABO incompatible kidney transplantation or desensitization protocol is not feasible because of costs/infectious complications and deceased donor kidney transplantation is in initial stages. The matching allocation, ABO blood type imbalance, reciprocity, simultaneity, geography were the limitation for the expansion of kidney paired donation. Here we describe different successful ways to increase living donor kidney transplantation through kidney paired donation. Compatible pairs, domino chain, combination of kidney paired donation with desensitization or ABO incompatible transplantation, international kidney paired donation, non-simultaneous, extended, altruistic donor chain and list exchange are different ways to expand the donor pool. In absence of national kidney paired donation program, a dedicated kidney paired donation team will increase access to living donor kidney transplantation in individual centres with team work. Use of social networking sites to expand donor pool, HLA based national kidney paired donation program will increase quality and quantity of kidney paired donation transplantation. Transplant centres should remove the barriers to a broader implementation of multicentre, national kidney paired donation program to further optimize potential of kidney paired donation to increase transplantation of O group and sensitized patients. This review assists in the development of similar programs in other developing countries.

International kidney paired donation transplantations to increase kidney transplant of O group and highly sensitized patient: First report from India

AIM To report the first international living related two way kidney paired donation (KPD) transplantation from India which occurred on 17th February 2015 after legal permission from authorization committee. METHODS Donor recipient pairs were from Portugal and India who were highly sensitized and ABO incompatible with their spouse respectively. The two donor recipient pairs had negative lymphocyte cross-matching, flow cross-match and donor specific antibody in two way kidney exchange with the intended KPD donor. Local KPD options were fully explored for Indian patient prior to embarking on international KPD. RESULTS Both pairs underwent simultaneous uneventful kidney transplant surgeries and creatinine was 1 mg/dL on tacrolimus based immunosuppression at 11 mo follow up. The uniqueness of these transplantations was that they are first international KPD transplantations in our center. CONCLUSION International KPD will increases quality and quantity of living donor kidney transplantation. This could be an important step to solving the kidney shortage with additional benefit of reduced costs, improved quality and increased access for difficult to match incompatible pairs like O blood group patient with non-O donor and sensitized patient. To the best of our knowledge this is first international KPD transplantation from India.

Seventy-seven kidney paired donation transplantations at a single transplant centre in India led to an increase in living donor kidney transplantations in 2015

Abstract Background To ascertain the validity of kidney paired donations (KPDs) as an alternative strategy for increasing living donor kidney transplantations (LDKTs) in an LDKT-dominated transplant programme since directed kidney transplantation, ABO-incompatible or crossmatch-positive pairs are not feasible due to costs and infectious complications. Methods This was a prospective single-centre study of 77 KPD transplantations (25 two-way, 7 three-way and 1 six-way exchange) from 1 January 2015 to 1 January 2016 of 158 registered donor recipient pairs. During this period, a total of 380 kidney transplantations [71 deceased donor kidney transplantations (DDKTs), 309 LDKTs] were performed. The reasons for opting for KPD were ABO incompatibility (n = 45), sensitization (n = 26) and better matching (n = 6). Results KPD matching was facilitated in 62% (n = 98) of transplants. In all, 48.7% (n = 77) of the transplants were completed in 2015, whereas 13.3% (n = 21) of the matched patients were to undergo transplant surgery in early 2016 after getting legal permission. The waiting time for KPD was shorter compared with DDKT. The death-censored graft survival and patient survival were 98.7% (n = 76) and 93.5% (n = 72), respectively. In all, 14.2% (n = 11) of patients had acute rejection. Match rates among sensitized (n = 60) and O group patients (n = 62) were 58.3% (n = 35) and 41.9% (n = 26), respectively. Of these, 43.3% (n = 26) and 29% (n = 18) of transplants were completed and 15% (n = 9) and 12.9% (n = 8), respectively, are waiting for legal permission. Conclusions LDKT increased by 25% in 1 year in our single-centre KPD programme. Our key to success was the formation of a KPD registry, awareness and active counselling programs and developing a dedicated team.

Increasing access to kidney transplantation for sensitized recipient through three-way kidney paired donation with desensitization: The first Indian report.

The combination of kidney paired donation (KPD) with desensitization represents a promising method of increasing the rate of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) in immunologically challenging patients. Patients who are difficult to match and desensitize due to strong donor specific antibody are may be transplanted by a combination of desensitization and KPD protocol with more immunologically favorable donor. We present our experience of combination of desensitization protocol with three-way KPD which contributed to successful LDKT in highly sensitized end stage renal disease patient. All recipients were discharged with normal and stable allograft function at 24 mo follow up. We believe that this is first report from India where three-way KPD exchange was performed with the combination of KPD and desensitization. The combination of desensitization protocol with KPD improves access and outcomes of LDKT.

Single-Stage Correction of Urinary Incontinence and Vaginoplasty in a Case of Urethral Coitus with Vaginal Agenesis

Urethral coitus is a very rare entity which usually presents as urethral incontinence during intercourse and is most commonly seen with intact vagina. Only about 24 cases have been reported in the literature. A presentation in vaginal agenesis is exceedingly rare and poses the surgical challenge of restoring continence without interfering with sex life. Here we report a case of urethral intercourse with vaginal agenesis presenting with incontinence that we treated with McIndoe’s vaginoplasty and urethral plication in a single stage, with satisfactory result. To the best of our knowledge, this method of reconstruction has not yet been reported for this condition.

Generalized seizure: A rare etiology of intraperitoneal rupture of the urinary bladder

Seizures can lead to different types of injuries which can be as simple as minor lacerations and at times as serious as fractures and head injuries. We are reporting a case wherein a female patient presented with a history of abdominal pain and not passing urine for 24h following an attack of seizure. After catheterization the urine drained was blood-stained. On clinical suspicion a cystogram was done which showed intraperitoneal rupture of the bladder. At laparotomy an isolated rent in the dome of the bladder was found which was repaired in three layers. Postoperative period was uneventful. To our knowledge this is the second case of its kind reported in the literature. Our case illustrates that a thorough abdominal examination is desirable while examining a patient following an episode of generalized seizure.

Spontaneous closure of urethrovaginal fistula associated with pelvic fracture.

Female urethral injury following pelvic fracture is a rare entity. Due to the absence of large series, management guidelines are still not standardized. Patients can have associated urethrovaginal or vesicovaginal fistula, management of which poses a major challenge to the reconstructive urologist. Spontaneous closure of fistula produced by gynecological or obstetrical injuries have been described in the literature. Spontaneous closure of fistula caused due to pelvic fracture has not been described in the literature.

Outcome of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Kidney Transplantation with and Without Regional Hypothermia

Introduction During vascular anastomosis the kidney graft slowly gain temperature and becomes warm. Regional hypothermia is shown to be effective to reduce rewarming of the kidney during robotic assisted laparoscopic kidney transplantation (RKT). Currently there is no study available to compare impact of regional hypothermia versus no hypothermia during RKT. Here we present data of RKT with and without regional hypothermia. Material and methods RKT was carried out in 100 patients; the first 50 cases had regional hypothermia and later 50 cases did not have hypothermia. Regional hypothermia was created by introducing 250-300 ml of ice slush around the kidney before carrying out vascular anastomosis. Body surface warming was carried out in all cases of regional hypothermia. Living donor kidney with single renal artery and vein was used in all cases. Results No case was converted to open operation. Longer anastomosis time and operative time in initial 50 cases represents learning curve of RKT.No delayed graft function was observed in any case and graft function was measured in terms of serum creatinine. (Figure-1). At 3 years there was no difference in graft and patient survival in either group (Figure-2a and 2b). Three patients in regional hypothermia group developed severe systemic hypothermia (temp. 94 degree F) and needed extubation in intensive care unit 6-12 hours after completion of surgery. Conclusion Regional hypothermia using ice slush may be useful during learning of RKT; however, once anastomosis time is reduced to less than 40 minutes, outcome of RKT without reginal hypothermia are similar to RKT with regional hypothermia. Severe systemic hypothermia may occur and intra-operative warming is required in patients subjected to regional hypothermia. Table. No title available. Figure. No caption available. Figure. No caption available. Figure. No caption available.