Birgit Volgger
Innsbruck Medical University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Birgit Volgger.
The Lancet | 2000
Reinhard Höpfl; K. Heim; Neil D. Christensen; Klaus Zumbach; Ulrike Wieland; Birgit Volgger; Sandra Haimbuchner; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Michael Pawlita; Herbert Pfister; Peter Fritsch
We investigated delayed-type hypersensitivity to human papillomavirus (HPV) in women with cervical dysplasia or cancer. Women were challenged by skin tests with synthetic HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein peptides. 11 women were regressors (cleared disease without treatment) and 37 were progressors (required surgery). Antibodies to early antigens (markers for progression) were detectable in a higher proportion of cancer patients than all other patients, particularly progressors with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). By contrast, cellular immunity to HPV-16 E7, measured by skin test, was significantly (p=0.0001) associated with clinical and cytological resolution of HPV-induced CIN, indicating that E7-specific T-helper cells have a role in control of HPV.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2010
Christian Zuchna; Martina Hager; Barbara Tringler; Alexander Georgoulopoulos; Alexandra Ciresa-Koenig; Birgit Volgger; Alfons Staudach
OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the validity of colposcopically directed cervical biopsies as a diagnostic test to define the degree of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). STUDY DESIGN In a prospective multicenter trial, patients undergoing excisional procedures of the transformation zone additionally had colposcopy and up to 3 guided cervical biopsies in a single procedure. Cervical biopsies were regarded as a diagnostic test to detect high-grade lesions (CIN 2,3), with the cone specimen as reference standard. RESULTS In all, 488 biopsies were performed in 244 cases, with 2 biopsies done in 192 cases. Cervical biopsies underestimated the severity of lesions in 46.7% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 66.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.4-72.3), 95.0% (95% CI, 83.5-98.6), 98.5% (95% CI, 94.8-99.6), and 35.5% (95% CI, 27.1-44.9), respectively. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that cytologically suspected high-grade lesions (CIN 2,3) can be confirmed by biopsy in many cases, but they cannot be excluded.
Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau | 1996
Birgit Volgger; A. Alge; Gudrun Windbichler; Alain G. Zeimet; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Ch. Marth
OBJECTIVE The measurement of the endometrial thickness by means of transvaginal sonography has been discussed as a tool for cancer screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate such a sonomorphological characterization of the endometrium performed by physicians in training. METHODS A transvaginal sonography was performed in 400 patients before histological examination (dilatation and curettage or hysterectomy). The endometrial thickness measured as double layer and the sonographic patterns were determined. RESULTS The endometrial thickness correlated with the histological findings: the median thickness was 6 mm for the normal endometrium and increased to 9 mm for polypiform hyperplasias 9.5 for cervical mucous polyps, and to 14 mm for glandular-cystic hyperplasias and carcinomas (p < 0.001 vs. normal). The sonomorphological grading score was also associated with the histology. For the sonomorphological grading, the sensitivity decreased to 80%, but the specificity increased to 62%. CONCLUSIONS The sonomorphological pattern is superior to the sole determination of the endometrial thickness. This method is practicable under routine conditions performed by physicians in training. However, the specificity of both methods is too low to recommend them for cancer screening.Fragestellung: Ziel der Studie war eine Evaluierung der Wertigkeit einer Gradeinteilung des sonographischen Erscheinungsbildes des postmenopausalen Endometriums unter Routine- und Ausbildungsbedingung
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2015
Birgit Volgger; Alain G. Zeimet; Alexander Reinthaller; Edgar Petru; Christian Schauer; Michaela Klein; Ursula Sevelda-Schwarzgruber; Gerhard Bogner; Gerhard Wolfram; Christian Marth
Objective Recurrent/advanced endometrial carcinoma carries a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy usually consists of cisplatin/doxorubicin and paclitaxel or the doublet of carboplatin and paclitaxel. We report on final results of the Austrian phase 2 AGO trial of nonpegylated doxorubicin citrate and carboplatin in 39 patients with primary advanced or relapsed endometrial cancer. The main primary end point is response rate, and the main secondary end point is feasibility. Methods Thirty-nine patients received 60 mg/m2 nonpegylated doxorubicin citrate and carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) every 3 weeks for 6 to 9 cycles or until progression. Best response during therapy, progression-free survival, and the toxicity profile were recorded. Results Thirteen patients (33%) had primary advanced disease, and 26 patients (67%) had recurrent disease. Seventy-five percent of the tumors were adenocarcinomas, 15% were serous carcinomas, and 5% were clear cell and mixed müllerian carcinomas. We observed 1 complete response (3%) and 16 partial responses (41%) in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months, and the median overall survival was 14.7 months. Overall, 177 cycles were administered; the mean number of cycles per patient was 4.5. Ten percent of patients received 9 cycles of chemotherapy, and 44% of patients received 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 17%, grade 3/4 anemia in 5%, and grade 3/4 thrombopenia in 12% of the cycles. In 6% of the cycles, febrile neutropenia was noticed. Grade 3/4 nausea was seen in 5% of cycles. One patient (3%) experienced cardiac toxicity and had a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction to below 50%. Conclusions The reported combination demonstrates considerable activity and should be evaluated further.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2006
Edgar Petru; L. Angleitner-Boubenizek; Alexander Reinthaller; M. Deibl; Alain G. Zeimet; Birgit Volgger; A. Stempfl; Christian Marth
Gynecologic Oncology | 1997
Birgit Volgger; Christian Marth; Alain G. Zeimet; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Norman Ruth; O. Dapunt
Anticancer Research | 2010
Birgit Volgger; Katharina Kurz; Kathrin Zöschg; Igor Theurl; Alexandra Ciresa-König; Christian Marth; Günter Weiss
Cancer Letters | 2008
Birgit Volgger; Coskun Aspisirengil; Elisabeth Genser-Krimbacher; Alexandra Ciresa-Koenig; Günter Daxenbichler; Dietmar Fuchs; Gudrun Windbichler; Christian Marth
Reproductive Sciences | 2007
K. Heim; Gernot Hudelist; Andrea Geier; Hannes Szedenik; Neil D. Christensen; Nicole Concin; Anton Bergant; Birgit Volgger; Klaus Czerwenka; Reinhard Höpfl
Anticancer Research | 2008
Birgit Volgger; Edgar Petru; Lukas Angleitner-Boubenizek; Monika Weigert; Alexander Reinthaller; Harald Lass; Anita Stempfl; Christian Gamper; Martina Deibl; Christian Marth