Biykem Bozkurt

2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair , Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect , Nancy M. Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN, FAHA, Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA, Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC, Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA[§§][1], Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA, David DeMets, PhD,

Pathophysiologically Relevant Concentrations of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Promote Progressive Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Remodeling in Rats

BACKGROUND Although patients with heart failure express elevated circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in their peripheral circulation, the structural and functional effects of circulating levels of pathophysiologically relevant concentrations of TNF-alpha on the heart are not known. METHODS AND RESULTS Osmotic infusion pumps containing either diluent or TNF-alpha were implanted into the peritoneal cavity of rats. The rate of TNF-alpha infusion was titrated to obtain systemic levels of biologically active TNF-alpha comparable to those reported in patients with heart failure (approximately 80 to 100 U/mL), and the animals were examined serially for 15 days. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to assess changes in left ventricular (LV) structure (remodeling) and LV function. Video edge detection was used to assess isolated cell mechanics, and standard histological techniques were used to assess changes in the volume composition of LV cardiac myocytes and the extracellular matrix. The reversibility of cytokine-induced effects was determined either by removal of the osmotic infusion pumps on day 15 or by treatment of the animals with a soluble TNF-alpha antagonist (TNFR:Fc). The results of this study show that a continuous infusion of TNF-alpha led to a time-dependent depression in LV function, cardiac myocyte shortening, and LV dilation that were at least partially reversible by removal of the osmotic infusion pumps or treatment of the animals with TNFR:Fc. CONCLUSIONS These studies suggest that pathophysiologically relevant concentrations of TNF-alpha are sufficient to mimic certain aspects of the phenotype observed in experimental and clinical models of heart failure.

2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Nancy M. Albert, PhD, RN, FAHA Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH, MACC Lesley H. Curtis, PhD, FAHA David DeMets, PhD[¶¶][1] Lee A. Fleisher, MD, FACC, FAHA Samuel

Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (Compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline Recommendations) A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Thom W. Rooke, MD, FACC, Chair [†][1] Alan T. Hirsch, MD, FACC, Vice Chair [⁎][2] Sanjay Misra, MD, FAHA, FSIR, Vice Chair [⁎][2],[‡][3] Anton N. Sidawy, MD, MPH, FACS, Vice Chair [§][4] Joshua A. Beckman, MD, FACC, FAHA[⁎][2][∥][5] Laura Findeiss, MD[‡][3] Jafar Golzarian, MD

Basic mechanisms in heart failure: The cytokine hypothesis*

Although the development and progression of heart failure have traditionally been viewed as hemodynamic disorders, there is now an increasing awareness that the syndrome of heart failure cannot be simply and/or precisely defined solely in hemodynamic terms. The inability of the so-called hemodynamic hypothesis to explain the progression of heart failure has given rise to the notion that heart failure may progress as a result of the overexpression of an ensemble of biologically active molecules referred to generically as neurohormones. More recently, it has become apparent that in addition to neurohormones, another portfolio of biologically active molecules, termed cytokines, are also expressed in the setting of heart failure. This article reviews recent clinical and experimental material that suggests that the cytokines, much like the neurohormones, may represent another class of biologically active molecules that are responsible for the development and progression of heart failure.

Sex Differences in Medical Care and Early Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background— Women receive less evidence-based medical care than men and have higher rates of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear whether efforts undertaken to improve AMI care have mitigated these sex disparities in the current era. Methods and Results— Using the Get With the Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease database, we examined sex differences in care processes and in-hospital death among 78 254 patients with AMI in 420 US hospitals from 2001 to 2006. Women were older, had more comorbidities, less often presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and had higher unadjusted in-hospital death (8.2% versus 5.7%; P<0.0001) than men. After multivariable adjustment, sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates were no longer observed in the overall AMI cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.10) but persisted among STEMI patients (10.2% versus 5.5%; P<0.0001; adjusted OR=1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23). Compared with men, women were less likely to receive early aspirin treatment (adjusted OR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.90), early &bgr;-blocker treatment (adjusted OR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93), reperfusion therapy (adjusted OR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.80), or timely reperfusion (door-to-needle time ≤30 minutes: adjusted OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; door-to-balloon time ≤90 minutes: adjusted OR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95). Women also experienced lower use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization procedures after AMI. Conclusions— Overall, no sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates after AMI were observed after multivariable adjustment. However, women with STEMI had higher adjusted mortality rates than men. The underuse of evidence-based treatments and delayed reperfusion among women represent potential opportunities for reducing sex disparities in care and outcome after AMI.

Safety and Efficacy of a Soluble P75 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor (Enbrel, Etanercept) in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

BACKGROUND Although previous studies suggested that TNF may contribute to heart failure progression, it is unclear whether antagonizing TNF is beneficial in heart failure patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Eighteen NYHA class III heart failure patients were randomized into a double-blind dose-escalation study to examine the safety and potential efficacy of etanercept, a specific TNF antagonist (Enbrel). Patients received placebo (6 patients) or an escalating dose (1, 4, or 10 mg/m2) of etanercept (12 patients) given as a single intravenous infusion. Safety parameters and patient functional status were assessed at baseline and at days 1, 2, 7, and 14. There were no significant side effects or clinically significant changes in laboratory indices. There was, however, a decrease in TNF bioactivity and a significant overall increase in quality-of-life scores, 6-minute walk distance, and ejection fraction in the cohort that received 4 or 10 mg/m2 of etanercept; there was no significant change in these parameters in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS A single intravenous infusion of etanercept was safe and well tolerated in patients with NYHA class III heart failure. These studies provide provisional evidence that suggests that etanercept is sufficient to lower levels of biologically active TNF and may lead to improvement in the functional status of patients with heart failure.

Impact of noncardiac comorbidities on morbidity and mortality in a predominantly male population with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impacts of noncardiac comorbidities in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with those with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). BACKGROUND There is a paucity of information on the comparative prognostic significance of comorbidities between patients with HFpEF and those with HFrEF. METHODS In a national ambulatory cohort of veterans with HF, the comorbidity burden of 15 noncardiac comorbidities and the impacts of these comorbidities on hospitalization and mortality were compared between patients with HFpEF and those with HFrEF. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 2,843 patients with HFpEF and 6,599 with HFrEF with 2-year follow-up. Compared with patients with HFrEF, those with HFpEF were older and had higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, hypertension, psychiatric disorders, anemia, obesity, peptic ulcer disease, and cancer but a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease. Patients with HFpEF had lower HF hospitalization, higher non-HF hospitalization, and similar overall hospitalization compared with those with HFrEF (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.19, respectively). An Increasing number of noncardiac comorbidities was associated with a higher risk for all-cause admissions (p < 0.001). Comorbidities had similar impacts on mortality in patients with HFpEF compared with those with HFrEF, except for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which was associated with a higher hazard (1.62 [95% confidence interval: 1.36 to 1.92] vs. 1.23 [95% confidence interval: 1.11 to 1.37], respectively, p = 0.01 for interaction) in patients with HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS There is a higher noncardiac comorbidity burden associated with higher non-HF hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF compared with those with HFrEF. However, individually, most comorbidities have similar impacts on mortality in both groups. Aggressive management of comorbidities may have an overall greater prognostic impact in HFpEF compared to HFrEF.

Results of Targeted Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy With Etanercept (ENBREL) in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

Background —Previously, we showed that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonism with etanercept, a soluble TNF receptor, was well tolerated and that it suppressed circulating levels of biologically active TNF for 14 days in patients with moderate heart failure. However, the effects of sustained TNF antagonism in heart failure are not known. Methods and Results —We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose trial of etanercept in 47 patients with NYHA class III to IV heart failure. Patients were treated with biweekly subcutaneous injections of etanercept 5 mg/m2 (n=16) or 12 mg/m2 (n=15) or with placebo (n=16) for 3 months. Doses of 5 and 12 mg/m2 etanercept were safe and well tolerated for 3 months. Treatment with etanercept led to a significant dose-dependent improvement in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and LV remodeling, and there was a trend toward an improvement in patient functional status, as determined by clinical composite score. Conclusion —Treatment with etanercept for 3 months was safe and well-tolerated in patients with advanced heart failure, and it resulted in a significant dose-dependent improvement in LV structure and function and a trend toward improvement in patient functional status.

2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America

Glenn N. Levine, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Patrick T. O’Gara, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Immediate Past Chair [‡‡][1] Sana M. Al-Khatib, MD, MHS, FACC, FAHA Kim K. Birtcher, PharmD, MS, AACC Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, FACC, FAHA Ralph G. Brindis, MD,