Bjørn Edwin

Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

OBJECTIVE This review aims to assess the impact of implementing dedicated emergency surgical services, in particular acute care surgery, on clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND The optimal model for delivering high-quality emergency surgical care remains unknown. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) is a health care model combining emergency general surgery, trauma, and critical care. It has been adopted across the United States in the management of surgical emergencies. METHOD A systematic review was performed after PRISMA recommendations using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Psych-Info databases. Studies assessing different care models and institutional factors affecting the delivery of emergency general surgery were included. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies comprising 744,238 patients were included in this review. In studies comparing ACS with traditional practice, mortality and morbidity were improved. Moreover, time to senior review, delays to operating theater, and financial expenditure were often reduced. The elements of ACS models varied but included senior clinicians present onsite during office hours and dedicated to emergency care while on-call. Referrals were made to specialist centers with primary surgical assessments taking place on surgical admissions units rather than in the emergency department. Twenty-four-hour access to dedicated emergency operating rooms was also described. CONCLUSIONS ACS models as well as centralized units and hospitals with dedicated emergency operating rooms, access to radiology and intensive care facilities (ITU) are all factors associated with improved clinical and financial outcomes in the delivery of emergency general surgery. There is, however, no consensus on the elements that constitute an ideal ACS model and how it can be implemented into current surgical practice.

A comparative study of the short-term outcome following open and laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases

Background: Laparoscopic resection of liver tumors is feasible, but few studies have compared short-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach to that of a conventional technique. Methods: Eighteen tumor resections performed during 14 procedures (14 patients) by conventional surgery were compared to 21 similar resections performed laparoscopically during 15 procedures (13 patients). All patients had colorectal liver metastases. Results: No perioperative mortality occurred. Surgical time, peroperative bleeding and blood transfusion requirement were similar in the two groups. The resection margin was involved by tumor tissue in one specimen laparoscopically resected and in two specimens conventionally resected (p = 0.58). Patients operated laparoscopically remained in hospital for median 4 days, while patients operated conventionally stayed median 8.5 days (p <0.001). Patients operated laparoscopically required less opioid medication than patients having conventional surgery (median 1 vs 5 days; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Short-term outcome of laparoscopic liver resection compares to that of conventional surgery, with the additional benefits derived from minimal invasive therapy.

Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas: a feasibility study of the short-term outcome

Background: Laparoscopic resection is not an established treatment for tumors of the pancreas. We report our preliminary experience with this innovative approach to pancreatic disease. Methods: Thirty two patients with pancreatic disease were included in the study on an intention-to-treat basis. The preoperative indications for surgery were as follows: neuroendocrine tumors (n=13), unspecified tumors (n=11), cysts (n=2), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with ectopic spleen (n=2), annular pancreas (n=1), trauma (n=1), aneurysm of the splenic artery (n=1), and adenocarcinoma (n=1). Results: Enucleations (n=7) and distal pancreatectomy with (n=12) and without splenectomy (n=5) were performed. Three patients underwent laparoscopic exploration only. Four procedures (13%) were converted to an open technique. One resection was converted to a hand-assisted procedure. The mortality rate for patients undergoing laparoscopic resection was 8.3% (two of 24). Complications occurred after resection in nine of 24 procedures (38%). The median hospital stay was 5.5 days (range, 2–22). Postoperatively, opioid medication was given for a median of 2 days (range, 0–13). Conclusion: Resection of the pancreas can be performed safely via the laparoscopic approach with all the potential benefits to the patients of minimally invasive surgery.

Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions: ten-year Norwegian single-center experience.

BACKGROUND The introduction of laparoscopic liver resection has been challenging because new and safe surgical techniques have had to be developed, and skepticism remains about the use of laparoscopy for malignant neoplasms. We present herein a large-volume single-center experience with laparoscopic liver resection. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Rikshospitalet University Hospital. PATIENTS One hundred thirty-nine patients who underwent 177 laparoscopic liver resections in 149 procedures from August 18, 1998, through October 14, 2008. One hundred thirteen patients had malignant lesions, of whom 96 had colorectal metastases. INTERVENTION Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Perioperative and oncologic outcomes and survival. RESULTS Five procedures (3.4%) were converted to laparotomy and 1 (0.7%) to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation. The remaining 143 procedures were completed laparoscopically, during which 177 liver resections were undertaken, including 131 nonanatomic and 46 anatomic resections. The median operative time and blood loss were 164 (50-488) minutes and 350 (<50-4000) mL, respectively. There were 10 intraoperative (6.7%) and 18 postoperative (12.6%) complications. One patient (0.7%) died. The median postoperative stay and opioid requirement were 3 (1-42) and 1 (0-11) days, respectively. Tumor-free resection margins determined by histopathologic evaluation were achieved in 140 of 149 malignant specimens (94.0%). The 5-year actuarial survival for patients undergoing procedures for colorectal metastases was 46%. CONCLUSIONS In experienced hands, laparoscopic liver resection is a favorable alternative to open resection. Perioperative morbidity and mortality and long-term survival after laparoscopic resection of colorectal metastases appear to be comparable to those after open resections.

Detection of a low-grade enteroviral infection in the islets of Langerhans of living patients newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes

The Diabetes Virus Detection study (DiViD) is the first to examine fresh pancreatic tissue at the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for the presence of viruses. Minimal pancreatic tail resection was performed 3–9 weeks after onset of type 1 diabetes in six adult patients (age 24–35 years). The presence of enteroviral capsid protein 1 (VP1) and the expression of class I HLA were investigated by immunohistochemistry. Enterovirus RNA was analyzed from isolated pancreatic islets and from fresh-frozen whole pancreatic tissue using PCR and sequencing. Nondiabetic organ donors served as controls. VP1 was detected in the islets of all type 1 diabetic patients (two of nine controls). Hyperexpression of class I HLA molecules was found in the islets of all patients (one of nine controls). Enterovirus-specific RNA sequences were detected in four of six patients (zero of six controls). The results were confirmed in various laboratories. Only 1.7% of the islets contained VP1+ cells, and the amount of enterovirus RNA was low. The results provide evidence for the presence of enterovirus in pancreatic islets of type 1 diabetic patients, which is consistent with the possibility that a low-grade enteroviral infection in the pancreatic islets contributes to disease progression in humans.

Pancreatic biopsy by minimal tail resection in live adult patients at the onset of type 1 diabetes: experiences from the DiViD study

Pancreatic biopsy by minimal tail resection in live adult patients at the onset of type 1 diabetes : experiences from the DiViD study

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases: surgical and long-term oncologic outcome.

Objective: To analyze the immediate and long-term outcome after laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases and difference between observed and predicted [Fongs and Basingstoke Predictive Index (BPI) scores] survivals. Background: Laparoscopic liver resection has been reported safe and feasible and improves postoperative course. The oncologic outcomes after resection of colorectal metastases are poorly reported. Methods: Between August 1998 and January 2010, 122 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases during 135 procedures at Rikshospitalet. Patients undergoing surgery between August 1998 and June 2009 were included in research analysis. The patients had median Fongs and BPIs scores of 2 (0–5) and 7 (0–23), respectively. Mainstream analysis of hospital data was done on intent-to-treat basis. Intraoperative incidents and postoperative complications were analyzed according to the Satava and Clavien-Dindo classifications. Median follow-up was 24 (0–100) months. Results: One hundred fifty-one liver resections were performed in 107 patients during 118 procedures: 117 nonanatomic and 34 anatomic liver resections. There were 5 conversions to laparotomy (4.2%). The resection margin was free of tumor tissue in 141 (93.4%) of 151 specimens, and the distance between the resection margin and tumor tissue was median 6 (0–40) mm. Intraoperative incidents occurred in 14 cases (11.9%), including 5 (4.2%), 8 (6.8%), and 1 (0.8%) cases of grades I, II, and III, respectively. Postoperative complications were observed in 16 cases (14.3%), including 2, 3, 7, 3, 0, and 1 cases of grades I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IV, and V, respectively. During follow-up, 21 patients received repeat liver resection of recurrences (11 by laparoscopy and 10 by laparotomy). The 5-year overall survival rates were 51% as laparoscopically completed cases and 47% as intent-to-treat. The observed actuarial survival values exceeded the values expected by Fongs and BPIs score, with 10.2% and 6.7% as laparoscopically completed cases and with 3.8% and 2.4% as intent-to-treat, respectively. Conclusions: Laparoscopic resection is a favorable alternative to open liver resection for patients with colorectal liver metastases. The observed actuarial survival values after laparoscopic resection surpass the values expected by major scoring systems.

Challenging expertise: On power relations within and across communities of practice in medical innovation

This article addresses the question of how practices perform power effects within and across communities of practice. It does so by drawing on a study of two medical innovation projects leading to radical changes of practice. Situated learning theory has to some degree acknowledged the asymmetry in power between masters and apprentices. Meanwhile, this study suggests that the novelty of new practices may lead to a contestation of the established master-apprentice relationship and even challenge the basis of the community of practice itself. We therefore argue that innovation processes may highlight the political processes and negotiations already at play in communities of practice. Hence, we investigate how communities of practice tried to control the new practices through mobilizing arguments, marginalizing opponents and building alliances. Consequently, the article argues that changing practices may be highly political.

Single-centre experience of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery†

Laparoscopic resection is regarded as safe and feasible in selected patients with benign pancreatic tumours. Few data exist on laparoscopic surgery for malignant lesions and larger neoplasms in unselected patients.

Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer

OBJECTIVES To compare the results of laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING Central hospital, Norway. SUBJECTS 74 patients (36 men, 38 women, median age 69.5 years (18-86)) admitted with perforated peptic ulcers from November 1991-May 1996. INTERVENTIONS Suture of the ulcer, patching with the greater omentum and lavage, in 49 by open operation and 25 laparoscopically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Duration of postoperative hospital stay, operating time, number of doses of analgesic, postoperative body temperature, complications, and mortality. RESULTS There was a significant difference (p = 0.0001) in median operating time: 100 minutes (range 48-160) in the laparoscopic group and 50 minutes (range 20-160) in the open group. The median hospital stay was 8 days in both groups: range 3-23 days in the laparoscopic group and 2-28 days in the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to median number of doses of analgesic, median body temperature, complications or mortality. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic operation for perforated peptic ulcer can be considered as safe as open operation.