Björn Hegemann

BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals

The interpretation of genome sequences requires reliable and standardized methods to assess protein function at high throughput. Here we describe a fast and reliable pipeline to study protein function in mammalian cells based on protein tagging in bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs). The large size of the BAC transgenes ensures the presence of most, if not all, regulatory elements and results in expression that closely matches that of the endogenous gene. We show that BAC transgenes can be rapidly and reliably generated using 96-well-format recombineering. After stable transfection of these transgenes into human tissue culture cells or mouse embryonic stem cells, the localization, protein-protein and/or protein-DNA interactions of the tagged protein are studied using generic, tag-based assays. The same high-throughput approach will be generally applicable to other model systems.NOTE: In the version of this article initially published online, the name of one individual was misspelled in the Acknowledgments. The second sentence of the Acknowledgments paragraph should read, “We thank I. Cheesman for helpful discussions.” The error has been corrected for all versions of the article.

Systematic Analysis of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins

Division Machinery Tagged An international consortium of labs has been testing the feasibility of large-scale screening for insights into the function of mammalian proteins by expressing a tagged version of proteins from bacterial artificial chromosomes harbored in mammalian cells. Depending on the tag used, Hutchins et al. (p. 593, published online 1 April) were able to monitor localization of tagged proteins by microscopy or to isolate interacting proteins and subsequently identify the binding partners by mass spectrometry. Applying the technology to proteins implicated in control of cell division revealed about 100 protein machines required for mitosis. A strategy designed to decipher the function of proteins identified in RNA interference screens reveals new insights into mitosis. Chromosome segregation and cell division are essential, highly ordered processes that depend on numerous protein complexes. Results from recent RNA interference screens indicate that the identity and composition of these protein complexes is incompletely understood. Using gene tagging on bacterial artificial chromosomes, protein localization, and tandem-affinity purification–mass spectrometry, the MitoCheck consortium has analyzed about 100 human protein complexes, many of which had not or had only incompletely been characterized. This work has led to the discovery of previously unknown, evolutionarily conserved subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex and the γ-tubulin ring complex—large complexes that are essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The approaches we describe here are generally applicable to high-throughput follow-up analyses of phenotypic screens in mammalian cells.

Wapl Controls the Dynamic Association of Cohesin with Chromatin

Cohesin establishes sister-chromatid cohesion from S phase until mitosis or meiosis. To allow chromosome segregation, cohesion has to be dissolved. In vertebrate cells, this process is mediated in part by the protease separase, which destroys a small amount of cohesin, but most cohesin is removed from chromosomes without proteolysis. How this is achieved is poorly understood. Here, we show that the interaction between cohesin and chromatin is controlled by Wapl, a protein implicated in heterochromatin formation and tumorigenesis. Wapl is associated with cohesin throughout the cell cycle, and its depletion blocks cohesin dissociation from chromosomes during the early stages of mitosis and prevents the resolution of sister chromatids until anaphase, which occurs after a delay. Wapl depletion also increases the residence time of cohesin on chromatin in interphase. Our data indicate that Wapl is required to unlock cohesin from a particular state in which it is stably bound to chromatin.

Systematic Localization and Purification of Human Protein Complexes Identifies Chromosome Segregation Proteins

Division Machinery Tagged An international consortium of labs has been testing the feasibility of large-scale screening for insights into the function of mammalian proteins by expressing a tagged version of proteins from bacterial artificial chromosomes harbored in mammalian cells. Depending on the tag used, Hutchins et al. (p. 593, published online 1 April) were able to monitor localization of tagged proteins by microscopy or to isolate interacting proteins and subsequently identify the binding partners by mass spectrometry. Applying the technology to proteins implicated in control of cell division revealed about 100 protein machines required for mitosis. A strategy designed to decipher the function of proteins identified in RNA interference screens reveals new insights into mitosis. Chromosome segregation and cell division are essential, highly ordered processes that depend on numerous protein complexes. Results from recent RNA interference screens indicate that the identity and composition of these protein complexes is incompletely understood. Using gene tagging on bacterial artificial chromosomes, protein localization, and tandem-affinity purification–mass spectrometry, the MitoCheck consortium has analyzed about 100 human protein complexes, many of which had not or had only incompletely been characterized. This work has led to the discovery of previously unknown, evolutionarily conserved subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex and the γ-tubulin ring complex—large complexes that are essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The approaches we describe here are generally applicable to high-throughput follow-up analyses of phenotypic screens in mammalian cells.

HAUS, the 8-Subunit Human Augmin Complex, Regulates Centrosome and Spindle Integrity

BACKGROUND The assembly of a robust microtubule-based mitotic spindle is a prerequisite for the accurate segregation of chromosomes to progeny. Spindle assembly relies on the concerted action of centrosomes, spindle microtubules, molecular motors, and nonmotor spindle proteins. RESULTS Here we use an RNA-interference screen of the human centrosome proteome to identify novel regulators of spindle assembly. One such regulator is HAUS, an 8-subunit protein complex that shares homology to Drosophila Augmin. HAUS localizes to interphase centrosomes and to mitotic spindle microtubules, and its disruption induces microtubule-dependent fragmentation of centrosomes along with an increase in centrosome size. HAUS disruption results in the destabilization of kinetochore microtubules and the eventual formation of multipolar spindles. These severe mitotic defects are alleviated by codepletion of NuMA, indicating that both factors regulate opposing activities. HAUS disruption alters NuMA localization, suggesting that mislocalized NuMA activity contributes to the spindle and centrosome defects observed. CONCLUSION The human Augmin complex (HAUS) is a critical and evolutionary conserved multisubunit protein complex that regulates centrosome and spindle integrity.

Spatial Exclusivity Combined with Positive and Negative Selection of Phosphorylation Motifs Is the Basis for Context-Dependent Mitotic Signaling

Mitotic kinases that localize to the same compartment show negative selectivity for residues in each other’s recognition motifs. Motifs and Antimotifs Mitosis is a complex process controlled by multiple kinases, such as the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1/cyclin B, the Aurora kinases Aurora A and B, the kinase Nek2, and the Polo-like kinases, especially Plk1 (Polo-like kinase 1). Alexander et al. used in vitro assays and a peptide library screening method to refine the phosphorylation site selectivity of each of these kinases and found that those that were located in similar compartments within the cell during mitosis showed a strong negative selection for residues that were positively selected by other kinases in the same compartment. In contrast, those that were located in distinct compartments tended to recognize similar phosphorylation site motifs. These results led the authors to propose that mitotic kinase selectivity is determined by two factors—spatial exclusivity and “antimotif” specificity. The timing and localization of events during mitosis are controlled by the regulated phosphorylation of proteins by the mitotic kinases, which include Aurora A, Aurora B, Nek2 (never in mitosis kinase 2), Plk1 (Polo-like kinase 1), and the cyclin-dependent kinase complex Cdk1/cyclin B. Although mitotic kinases can have overlapping subcellular localizations, each kinase appears to phosphorylate its substrates on distinct sites. To gain insight into the relative importance of local sequence context in kinase selectivity, identify previously unknown substrates of these five mitotic kinases, and explore potential mechanisms for substrate discrimination, we determined the optimal substrate motifs of these major mitotic kinases by positional scanning oriented peptide library screening (PS-OPLS). We verified individual motifs with in vitro peptide kinetic studies and used structural modeling to rationalize the kinase-specific selection of key motif-determining residues at the molecular level. Cross comparisons among the phosphorylation site selectivity motifs of these kinases revealed an evolutionarily conserved mutual exclusion mechanism in which the positively and negatively selected portions of the phosphorylation motifs of mitotic kinases, together with their subcellular localizations, result in proper substrate targeting in a coordinated manner during mitosis.

Systematic Phosphorylation Analysis of Human Mitotic Protein Complexes

Analysis of the phosphorylation of mitotic protein complexes suggests that specific members of the complexes relay regulatory signals to these molecular machines. Regulating Mitotic Machines Most proteins do not function in isolation; they are part of large macromolecular complexes. Hegemann et al. used information available about the protein complexes involved in mitosis and then performed mass spectrometry to determine the phosphoproteome of these mitotic machines. Certain proteins in each complex were phosphorylated at many more sites than other proteins in the complex and thus may represent master regulators of the activities of these mitotic machines. Experiments with specific inhibitors of Polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora kinase B enabled the identification of specific targets of these mitotic kinases, providing insight into the mechanism by which these two kinases regulate the activity of mitotic complexes to control progression through the complicated process of cell division. Progression through mitosis depends on a large number of protein complexes that regulate the major structural and physiological changes necessary for faithful chromosome segregation. Most, if not all, of the mitotic processes are regulated by a set of mitotic protein kinases that control protein activity by phosphorylation. Although many mitotic phosphorylation events have been identified in proteome-scale mass spectrometry studies, information on how these phosphorylation sites are distributed within mitotic protein complexes and which kinases generate these phosphorylation sites is largely lacking. We used systematic protein-affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry to identify 1818 phosphorylation sites in more than 100 mitotic protein complexes. In many complexes, the phosphorylation sites were concentrated on a few subunits, suggesting that these subunits serve as “switchboards” to relay the kinase-regulatory signals within the complexes. Consequent bioinformatic analyses identified potential kinase-substrate relationships for most of these sites. In a subsequent in-depth analysis of key mitotic regulatory complexes with the Aurora kinase B (AURKB) inhibitor Hesperadin and a new Polo-like kinase (PLK1) inhibitor, BI 4834, we determined the kinase dependency for 172 phosphorylation sites on 41 proteins. Combination of the results of the cellular studies with Scansite motif prediction enabled us to identify 14 sites on six proteins as direct candidate substrates of AURKB or PLK1.

A systematic comparative and structural analysis of protein phosphorylation sites based on the mtcPTM database

mtcPTM is an online repository of human and mouse phosphosites in which data are hierarchically organized to preserve biologically relevant experimental information, thus allowing straightforward comparisons of phosphorylation patterns found under different conditions. The database also contains the largest available collection of atomic models of phosphorylatable proteins. Detailed analysis of this structural dataset reveals that phosphorylation sites are found in a heterogeneous range of structural and sequence contexts. mtcPTM is available on the web http://www.mitocheck.org/cgi-bin/mtcPTM/search .AbstractmtcPTM is an online repository of human and mouse phosphosites in which data are hierarchically organized to preserve biologically relevant experimental information, thus allowing straightforward comparisons of phosphorylation patterns found under different conditions. The database also contains the largest available collection of atomic models of phosphorylatable proteins. Detailed analysis of this structural dataset reveals that phosphorylation sites are found in a heterogeneous range of structural and sequence contexts. mtcPTM is available on the web http://www.mitocheck.org/cgi-bin/mtcPTM/search.

A new acid mix enhances phosphopeptide enrichment on titanium- and zirconium dioxide for mapping of phosphorylation sites on protein complexes.

The selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides prior to reversed-phase separation and mass spectrometric detection significantly improves the analytical results in terms of higher number of detected phosphorylation sites and spectra of higher quality. Metal oxide chromatography (MOC) has been recently described for selective phosphopeptide enrichment (Pinkse et al., 2004; Larsen et al., 2005; Kweon and Hakansson, 2006; Cantin et al., 2007; Collins et al., 2007). In the present work we have tested the effect of a modified loading solvent containing a novel acid mix and optimized wash conditions on the efficiency of TiO(2)-based phosphopeptide enrichment in order to improve our previously published method (Mazanek et al., 2007). Applied to a test mixture of synthetic and BSA-derived peptides, the new method showed improved selectivity for phosphopeptides, whilst retaining a high recovery rate. Application of the new enrichment method to digested purified protein complexes resulted in the identification of a significantly higher number of phosphopeptides as compared to the previous method. Additionally, we have compared the performance of TiO(2) and ZrO(2) columns for the isolation and identification of phosphopeptides from purified protein complexes and found that for our test set, both media performed comparably well. In summary, our improved method is highly effective for the enrichment of phosphopeptides from purified protein complexes prior to mass spectrometry, and is suitable for large-scale phosphoproteomic projects that aim to elucidate phosphorylation-dependent cellular processes.

Erratum: Corrigendum: BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals

Ina Poser, Mihail Sarov, James R A Hutchins, Jean-Karim Hériché, Yusuke Toyoda, Andrei Pozniakovsky, Daniela Weigl, Anja Nitzsche, Björn Hegemann, Alexander W Bird, Laurence Pelletier, Ralf Kittler, Sujun Hua, Ronald Naumann, Martina Augsburg, Martina M Sykora, Helmut Hofemeister, Youming Zhang, Kim Nasmyth, Kevin P White, Steffen Dietzel, Karl Mechtler, Richard Durbin, A Francis Stewart, Jan-Michael Peters, Frank Buchholz & Anthony A Hyman Nat. Methods 5, 409–415 (2008).