Blaine E. Cribbs
Emory University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Blaine E. Cribbs.
Ophthalmology | 2011
Robin Ray; David E. Barañano; Jorge A. Fortun; Bryan J. Schwent; Blaine E. Cribbs; Chris S. Bergstrom; G. Baker Hubbard; Sunil K. Srivastava
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of microscope mounted spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to detect changes in retinal anatomy during macular surgery. DESIGN Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS We included 25 eyes of 24 consecutive patients who underwent SD-OCT during macular surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of operative techniques, outcomes, and imaging for all patients who underwent intraoperative microscope mounted SD-OCT during surgery for macular hole or epiretinal membrane (ERM) from April 2009 to April 2010 was performed. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of intraoperative and postoperative changes in retinal anatomy were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intraoperative change in macular hole dimensions and retinal thickness in patients with ERM owing to surgical manipulation measured using SD-OCT. RESULTS Intraoperative SD-OCT from 13 eyes of 13 patients undergoing surgery for macular hole was reviewed. Two cases had images of suboptimal quality and were excluded. The remaining 11 eyes were subjected to quantitative analysis, which revealed stability of macular hole height and central hole diameter after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, but an increase in the diameter of subretinal fluid under the macula in ten of 11 eyes (average 87% wider). Intraoperative imaging from 12 eyes of 11 patients undergoing surgery for ERM was analyzed. Quantitative analysis revealed an average increase of retinal thickness after ILM peel of <2%. Ten of 12 eyes developed a new subretinal hyporeflectance, which likely represents shallow detachment of the macula, after uncomplicated membrane peel. CONCLUSIONS Use of intraoperative SD-OCT has provided new insight into the changes to retinal anatomy during macular surgery and may prove to be a useful tool for vitreoretinal surgery. Further study is warranted to determine whether intraoperative changes such as the creation of shallow retinal detachments during uncomplicated macular surgery affects visual recovery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Archives of Ophthalmology | 2008
Stephen J. Kim; Wayne R. Lo; G. Baker Hubbard; Sunil K. Srivastava; John P. Denny; Daniel F. Martin; Jiong Yan; Chris S. Bergstrom; Blaine E. Cribbs; Bryan J. Schwent; Thomas M. Aaberg
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of topical ketorolac in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery. METHODS One hundred nine patients undergoing vitrectomies were randomized to receive either topical ketorolac tromethamine, 0.4%, or placebo. Patients were instructed to begin taking the study medication 3 days preoperatively (4 times daily) and to continue taking it 4 weeks postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intraoperative pupil diameter, postoperative day 1 pain and inflammation, 1-month postoperative retinal thickness, and preoperative and 1-month postoperative best-corrected visual acuities. RESULTS The difference in mean pupil diameters between patients using ketorolac and those taking placebo was 0.06 mm (P = .39). Patients taking ketorolac and those taking placebo had mean pain scores (scale, 1-10) of 0.24 (SD, 0.6) and 1.06 (SD, 2) (P = .03) and mean inflammation grades (grade, 0-4) of 0.59 (SD, 0.7) and 1.16 (SD, 0.9) (P < .001), respectively. Ketorolac reduced central subfield thickness by 8%, but this was not statistically significant. At 1 month, mean visual acuities improved to 0.40 logMAR units (mean Snellen, 20/50; SD, 0.28 logMAR units) in the ketorolac group from 0.83 logMAR units (20/150(+2); SD, 0.60 logMAR units) at baseline and to 0.67 logMAR units (20/100(+1); SD, 0.46 logMAR units) in the placebo group from 0.92 logMAR units (20/150(-2); SD, 0.62 logMAR units) at baseline (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Topical ketorolac was well tolerated and safe, reduced postoperative pain and inflammation, and improved visual recovery in this prospective, double-masked trial. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Topical ketorolac may benefit patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00576329.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 2013
Vincent Y. Ho; Steven Yeh; Timothy W. Olsen; Chris S. Bergstrom; Jiong Yan; Blaine E. Cribbs; G. Baker Hubbard
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2010
David E. Barañano; Jorge A. Fortun; Robin Ray; Leon D. Charkoudian; Carl T. Bergstrom; Blaine E. Cribbs; Bryan J. Schwent; G. Hubbard; Sunil K. Srivastava
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Cecilia S. Jung; John F. Payne; Chris S. Bergstrom; Blaine E. Cribbs; Jiong Yan; G. Hubbard; Timothy W. Olsen; Steven Yeh
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Johnstone M. Kim; Sunil K. Srivastava; Bryan J. Schwent; Chris S. Bergstrom; Blaine E. Cribbs; Jiong Yan; G. Baker Hubbard; Timothy W. Olsen; Steven Yeh
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2010
Robin Ray; Jorge A. Fortun; David E. Barañano; Bryan J. Schwent; Blaine E. Cribbs; G. Hubbard; Sunil K. Srivastava
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2008
Blaine E. Cribbs; G. Hubbard