Blasius Liss

Mucormycosis treated with posaconazole: review of 96 case reports.

Mucormycosis is an emerging invasive fungal infection, primarily affecting immunocompromised patients. The disease is difficult to diagnose and mortality reaches 40% even if treated adequately. Depending on site of infection and risk factors, surgical debridement in combination with systemically active antifungal drugs are the mainstay treatment strategies. Lipid-based amphotericin B is the treatment of choice for first-line therapy while posaconazole may be a promising alternative. We performed a PubMed search on reports of patients with mucormycosis treated with posaconazole. From 2003 to 2011, 96 cases have been published. Diagnosis was based on histology alone in 2 (2.1%) and microbiological evidence in 67 (69.8%), while no data on the diagnostic approach was reported in 27 (28.1%) patients. The most frequent pathogens were Rhizopus spp. (31.2%), followed by Mucor spp. (14.6%). The site of infection was predominantly rhino-orbital (38.5%, of which 43% also had central nervous system [CNS] involvement), followed by disseminated disease (22.1%). A complete response was achieved in 62 (64.6%), partial response in 7 (7.3%) patients, and stable disease in 1 (1%). Overall mortality was 24% (lacking data for three patients). In published case reports on posaconazole treatment for mucormycosis, the drug was frequently and successfully used in combination or as second line therapy.

Colonization and infection with extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae in high-risk patients – Review of the literature from a clinical perspective

Abstract Background: The prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) is increasing worldwide. ESBL-E are known to colonize different body sites and cause bloodstream infections (BSI), pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections and urinary tract infections. Even though ESBL-E-related morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients – patients receiving immunosuppressants or chemotherapy, as well as those treated in an ICU – is considerable, the management of ESBL-E in these populations has not been systematically reviewed. Methods: For the purpose of this review, ICU patients, patients in hematology and oncology wards and transplant recipients were considered high-risk. An English-language Medline search was conducted to identify literature on epidemiology, risk factors, clinical impact and measures of infection control regarding ESBL-E in high-risk patients published between June 2002 and May 2013. Results: Using the above described methodology, 43 relevant articles regarding high-risk patients and – for areas where literature on exclusively high-risk patients is scarce – 17 articles in standard risk settings were identified. The evidence on epidemiology, associated risk factors, treatment and hygiene measures were summarized. Discussion: This review gives a complete overview on the management of ESBL-E in the high-risk setting.

Our 2015 approach to invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

At the University Hospital of Cologne, in general two patient groups at high risk for invasive aspergillosis receive posaconazole prophylaxis: Acute myelogenous leukaemia patients during remission induction chemotherapy and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Other patients at risk undergo serum galactomannan testing three times weekly. At 72–96 h of persisting fever despite broad‐spectrum antibiotics, or at onset of lower respiratory tract symptoms a thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan is performed. Without lung infiltrates on CT, IPA is ruled out. In lung infiltrates not suggestive for IPA mycological confirmation is pursued. In patients without posaconazole prophylaxis empiric caspofungin will be considered. CT findings typical for IPA prompt targeted treatment, and mycological confirmation. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is most important for cultural identification and susceptibility testing, and facilitates diagnosing other pathogens. BAL performance is virtually independent of platelet counts. If despite suggestive infiltrates BAL does not yield the diagnosis, CT‐guided biopsy follows as soon as platelet counts allow. Surgery can also be beneficial in diagnosis and treatment of IPA. If the diagnosis of IPA is not established, mucormycosis is a valid concern. In patients with breakthrough IPA during posaconazole prophylaxis liposomal amphotericin B is the drug of choice. If no posaconazole prophylaxis was given, voriconazole is the treatment of choice for IPA.

A cohort study on breakthrough invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES Antifungal prophylaxis is recommended for haematological patients at high risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Incidence, optimal therapeutic management and outcome of breakthrough IFIs (bIFIs) are largely unknown. METHODS To assess bIFI incidence, treatment and outcomes, data on patients undergoing AML remission-induction and consolidation chemotherapy and from allogeneic HSCT recipients on antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole, micafungin or posaconazole were extracted from the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut). bIFIs were classified according to revised EORTC/MSG criteria. RESULTS From January 2004 to April 2013, 250 AML patients with 329 hospitalizations and 409 HSCT patients with 496 hospitalizations were identified. In AML patients, there were 16 (6.4%) proven or probable bIFIs and 44 (17.6%) possible bIFIs. In HSCT patients, there were 14 (3.4%) proven or probable bIFIs and 37 (9.0%) possible bIFIs. Proven cases included five candidaemias, two mucormycoses, three aspergilloses and one fusariosis. The most frequent choice for bIFI treatment was liposomal amphotericin B in AML patients (21/60; 35.0%) and continuation of posaconazole prophylaxis in HSCT patients (16/51; 31.4%). In HSCT recipients, survival on day 365 was significantly lower in bIFI patients (AML, 63.3% versus 70.0%; P = 0.297; HSCT, 49.0% versus 66.8%; P = 0.012). Comparison of continuation of prophylaxis versus switch of antifungal class as first-line treatment showed no significant difference regarding response to treatment and survival. CONCLUSIONS Rates of bIFIs observed in our population were comparable to previous data. There was no clear shift towards rare species, as previously reported. A high variety of treatment approaches was observed.

1,3-β-d-Glucan contamination of common antimicrobials

BACKGROUND 1,3-β-D-Glucan (BDG) is a fungal cell wall constituent used in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. BDG testing, although endorsed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, suffers from limited specificity. False-positive results have been linked to haemodialysis membranes, blood products, antineoplastic agents and antimicrobial use. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine whether false-positive BDG results in the context of antimicrobial use are caused by BDG present in infusion solutions. METHODS We obtained 35 antimicrobial drugs (30 antibiotics and 5 antifungals) and analysed their BDG content using two different assays. RESULTS Twenty-five antimicrobials (20 antibiotics and all the tested antifungals) contained enough BDG to trigger a positive test. Depending on the substance, BDG varied between 9 and 2818 pg/mL. CONCLUSIONS A majority of the available antimicrobial substances contained BDG, potentially limiting the utility of BDG testing in the context of prior exposure to these drugs. As the cumulative effects of repeated BDG exposure are unknown, efforts to reduce contamination should be considered.

1,3-ß-D-glucan concentrations in blood products predict false positive post-transfusion results.

1,3‐ß‐D‐glucan (BDG) is increasingly used to diagnose invasive fungal infections (IFI), although false positive results are a concern. To evaluate the potential interaction of blood products with the BDG assay, human albumin (HA), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), undiluted platelet transfusion (UPT) and packed red blood cells (PRBC) were tested for their BDG content using two different b‐D‐glucan tests. UPTs tested negative, FFP, PBRC and HA tested positive for BDG. In serial dilution, BDG concentration correlated with blood product concentration. To investigate the clinical impact of blood product transfusions, we measured BDG levels before and after the transfusion in three patients (2 PRBC, 1 HA). In the patients receiving PRBC transfusions, BDG values increased from 13 and 17 pg ml−1 to 183 and 361 pg ml−1, the HA transfusion increased the serum level from 42 to 58 pg ml−1. BDG concentrations measured in blood products can be used to predict false positive BDG results.

FungiScope™—Global Emerging Fungal Infection Registry

Rare invasive fungal diseases (IFD) are challenging for the treating physicians because of their unspecific clinical presentation, as well as the lack of standardised diagnostic and effective treatment strategies. Late onset of treatment and inappropriate medication is associated with high mortality, thus, urging the need for a better understanding of these diseases. The purpose of FungiScope™ is to continuously collect clinical information and specimens to improve the knowledge on epidemiology and eventually improve patient management of these orphan diseases. FungiScope™ was founded in 2003, and today, collaborators from 66 countries support the registry. So far, clinical data of 794 cases have been entered using a web‐based approach. Within the growing network of experts, new collaborations developed, leading to several publications of comprehensive analyses of patient subgroups identified from the registry. Data extracted from FungiScope™ have also been used as the sole control group for the approval of a new antifungal drug. Due to the rarity of these diseases, a global registry is an appropriate method of pooling the scarce and scattered information. Joining efforts across medical specialities and geographical borders is key for researching rare IFD. Here, we describe the structure and management of the FungiScope™ registry.