Blažen Marijić

Serum IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and beta2-microglobulin in association with International Prognostic Index in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Aims and Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma displays striking heterogeneity at clinical, genetic and molecular levels. The International Prognostic Index is useful to predict the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. However, patients with identical International Prognostic Index values in clinical practice exhibit marked variability in survival, suggesting the presence of significant residual heterogeneity within each category. Since cytokines such as interleukin-6, -8 and -10 play important roles in the pathogenesis of lymphomas, and plasma level of beta2-microglobulin is associated with the outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the aim of the present study was to determine whether these parameters combined with the International Prognostic Index would better stratify these patients to predict their prognosis. Patients and Methods The study included 46 untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Results All study parameters (International Prognostic Index, Ann Arbor stage, extra-nodal involvement, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, beta2-microglobulin, interleukin-6 and -10, and response to therapy) except for patient age and serum interleukin-8 level were associated with overall survival. In addition, the International Prognostic Index was strongly correlated with beta2-microglobulin, interleukin-6, -8 and -10, and when combined these parameters significantly better stratified patients according to survival. On multivariate analysis, therapeutic response to the primary treatment, elevated interleukin-6 and -10 levels, and the International Prognostic Index were significant predictors of overall survival. Conclusions Our data imply that interleukins and beta2-microglobulin evaluation should be used in association with the International Prognostic Index to define prognostic subgroups in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.

Predicting the Likelihood of Additional Nodal Metastases in Breast Carcinoma Patients With Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is an important procedure in the staging of breast cancer patients. However, it is associated with a significant morbidity rate. In addition, using early diagnosis a high number of cases with negative lymph nodes can be identified. A lymph node defined as sentinel lymph node (SLN) would be the first to receive tumoral drainage. A less morbid but accurate staining procedure using mapping and SLN biopsy has been introduced. The aim of this study was to estimate the likelihood of additional disease in the axilla after SLN analysis. A total of 259 breast carcinomas and SLN biopsies followed by ALND were examined. The patient median age was 59 years, approximately 75% of them postmenopausal. Tumor size was 1.4 ± 0.8 cm (almost 80% in pT1). SLNs were positive in 59 of 259 (22.8%) carcinomas, 30 (11.6%) with micrometastases (<2.0 mm) and 29 (11.2%) with metastases. Tumor size ( P = .004) and presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI; P = .034) were found to be significant predictors of pathologically positive SLN. Following ALND, positive non-SLNs were present mostly in patients with metastasis >2 mm in SLN (P = .003), in carcinoma with higher nuclear grade ( P = .044), decreased estrogen receptor (ER; P = .042), and progesterone receptor (PR; P = .042). Finally, lymph node status (pN) following SLN and ALND was found to be significantly associated with tumor size ( P = .006), LVI (P = .037), PR (P = .023), and Her-2 status (P < .001). These results point to detailed analysis of primary tumor and SLN that may increase the precision of patient selection for further axillary surgery or radiotherapy.

Predicting sentinel lymph node metastases in infiltrating breast carcinoma with vascular invasion

Sentinel lymph node and clinically negative axillary node status was compared with well-known clinicopathological characteristics such as tumor size, histologic and nuclear grade, lymphovascular invasion, steroid receptor, and HER-2 status in patients with breast cancer (pT1 and pT2). Positive sentinel lymph nodes were found in 29 of 100 patients: 19 with metastases detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining and 10 with micrometastases confirmed by immunohistochemistry with cytokeratin. Positive sentinel lymph nodes were present in larger carcinomas (P < 0.03), more frequently in tumors with negative PR status (P < 0.037) and evident lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.002). Lymphovascular invasion was also associated with breast cancer of higher histologic (P = 0.011) and nuclear grade (P = 0.039). Tumor size and the presence of lymphovascular invasion were found to be significant predictors of pathologically positive sentinel lymph node in T1 and T2.