Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bo Pi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bo Pi.


Molecular Psychiatry | 2013

Assessment of a multi-assay, serum-based biological diagnostic test for major depressive disorder: a pilot and replication study.

George I. Papakostas; Richard C. Shelton; Gustavo Kinrys; Michael E. Henry; B R Bakow; Samuel Lipkin; Bo Pi; Linda M. Thurmond; John Bilello

Despite decades of intensive research, the development of a diagnostic test for major depressive disorder (MDD) had proven to be a formidable and elusive task, with all individual marker-based approaches yielding insufficient sensitivity and specificity for clinical use. In the present work, we examined the diagnostic performance of a multi-assay, serum-based test in two independent samples of patients with MDD. Serum levels of nine biomarkers (alpha1 antitrypsin, apolipoprotein CIII, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, cortisol, epidermal growth factor, myeloperoxidase, prolactin, resistin and soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor type II) in peripheral blood were measured in two samples of MDD patients, and one of the non-depressed control subjects. Biomarkers measured were agreed upon a priori, and were selected on the basis of previous exploratory analyses in separate patient/control samples. Individual assay values were combined mathematically to yield an MDDScore. A ‘positive’ test, (consistent with the presence of MDD) was defined as an MDDScore of 50 or greater. For the Pilot Study, 36 MDD patients were recruited along with 43 non-depressed subjects. In this sample, the test demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 91.7% and 81.3%, respectively, in differentiating between the two groups. The Replication Study involved 34 MDD subjects, and yielded nearly identical sensitivity and specificity (91.1% and 81%, respectively). The results of the present study suggest that this test can differentiate MDD subjects from non-depressed controls with adequate sensitivity and specificity. Further research is needed to confirm the performance of the test across various age and ethnic groups, and in different clinical settings.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2015

MDDScore: confirmation of a blood test to aid in the diagnosis of major depressive disorder.

John Bilello; Linda M. Thurmond; Katie M. Smith; Bo Pi; Robert Rubin; Suzin Wright; Floyd Taub; Michael E. Henry; Richard C. Shelton; George I. Papakostas

BACKGROUND Previously, a biomarker panel was developed for use as an aid to major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnosis; it consisted of 9 biomarkers associated with the neurotrophic, metabolic, inflammatory, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis pathways. This panel and associated algorithm produced good clinical sensitivity and specificity (92% and 81%, respectively) in differentiating MDD patients from individuals without MDD. To further validate the panel, we performed a prospective study using a larger set of new prospectively acquired MDD patients and a similarly collected population of nondepressed subjects. The addition of gender and body mass index (BMI) effects to the algorithm was also evaluated. METHOD Blood samples were obtained from MDD patients (n = 68) clinically evaluated at multiple sites in 2011 and 2012 using standard psychiatric assessment tools and structured clinical interviews according to DSM-IV criteria. Blood samples (n = 86) from nondepressed subjects were obtained as controls. MDD and nondepressed samples were randomized into independent training (n = 102) and validation sets (n = 52). Analytes in sera were quantified by immunoassay. RESULTS Training set biomarker data were used to develop a logistic regression model that included gender and BMI in a manner that allowed for their interaction with the biochemical analytes. For the training set, the sensitivity and specificity of the test (with 95% CI) were 93% (0.80-0.98) and 95% (0.85-0.99), respectively. This method (designated the MDDScore) was then applied to the independent validation set and had a sensitivity and specificity of 96% (0.77-0.98) and 86% (0.66-0.95), respectively. The overall accuracy for the training set was 94%; the validation set accuracy was 91%. CONCLUSION Examination of a randomized independent set of samples confirms the ability of the previously established biomarker panel to identify persons with MDD; the accuracy was over 90%. The improved model that adds gender and BMI to the previously established panel of 9 biomarkers is robust and simple; it provides the most rigorously tested, objective diagnostic test for MDD to date.


Archive | 2010

Biomarkers for monitoring treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases

Bo Pi; John Bilello


Archive | 2009

INFLAMMATORY BIOMARKERS FOR MONITORING DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS

John Bilello; Yiwu He; Bo Pi


Archive | 2009

Diagnosing and monitoring depression disorders based on multiple biomarker panels

John Bilello; Yiwu He; Bo Pi


Archive | 2012

Quantitative diagnostic methods using multiple parameters

Yiwu He; Bo Pi; John Bilello


Archive | 2009

Metabolic syndrome and hpa axis biomarkers for major depressive disorder

John Bilello; Bo Pi


Archive | 2009

HUMAN BIOMARKER HYPERMAPPING FOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS

Bo Pi; John Bilello


Archive | 2011

Multiple biomarker panels to stratify disease severity and monitor treatment of depression

John Bilello; Bo Pi


Archive | 2016

HUMAN BIOMARKER TEST FOR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER

John Bilello; Bo Pi; Linda M. Thurmond

Collaboration


Dive into the Bo Pi's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard C. Shelton

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge