Bohuslava Kokoskova

Aggressive and nonaggressive translocation t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma: comparative study of 6 cases and review of the literature

UNLABELLED t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been recognized as a rare and mostly nonaggressive tumor (NAT). The criteria for distinguishing aggressive tumors (AT) from NATs are not well established. A total of 6 cases were selected for the study. Five cases of t(6;11) RCCs behaved nonaggressively, and 1 was carcinoma with aggressive behavior. The tumors were analyzed morphologically using immunohistochemistry and by molecular-genetic methods. The specimen of aggressive t(6;11) RCC was from a 77-year-old woman who died of the disease 2.5 months after diagnosis. The specimens of nonaggressive t(6;11) RCCs were from 3 women and 2 men whose ages range between 15 and 54 years. Follow-up was available in all cases (2.5 months-8 years). The tumor size ranged from 3 to 14 cm in nonaggressive t(6;11) RCC. In the aggressive carcinoma, the tumor size was 12 cm. All tumors (6/6) were well circumscribed. Aggressive t(6;11) RCC was widely necrotic. Six (100%) of 6 all tumors displayed a solid/alveolar architecture with occasional tubules and pseudorosettes. Pseudopapillary formations lined by bizarre polymorphic cells were found focally in the aggressive t(6;11) RCC case. Mitoses, though rare, were found as well. All cases (AT and NAT) were positive for HMB-45, Melan-A, Cathepsin K, and cytokeratins. CD117 positivity was seen in 4 of 5 NATs, as well as in the primary and metastatic lesions of the AT. mTOR was positive in 2 of 5 NATs and vimentin in 4 of 5 NATs. Vimentin was negative in the primary lesion of the AT, as well as in the metastasis found in the adrenal gland. Translocation t(6;11)(Alpha-TFEB) or TFEB break was detected in 4 of 5 NATs and in the AT case. Aggressive tumor showed amplification of TFEB locus. Losses of part of chromosome 1 and chromosome 22 were found in 1 of 5 NATs and in the AT. CONCLUSIONS (1) Aggressive t(6;11) RCCs generally occur in the older population in comparison with their indolent counterparts. (2) In regard to the histologic findings in ATs, 3 of 5 so far published cases were morphologically not typical for t(6;11) RCC. Of the 3 cases, 2 cases lacked a small cell component and 1 closely mimicked clear cell-type RCC. (3) Necroses were only present in aggressive t(6;11) RCC. (4) Amplification of TFEB locus was also found only in the aggressive t(6;11) RCC.

The leiomyomatous stroma in renal cell carcinomas is polyclonal and not part of the neoplastic process

Some renal epithelial neoplasms, such as renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor, clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma with smooth muscle stroma, contain a variably prominent smooth muscle stromal component. Whether or not this leiomyomatous stroma is part of the neoplastic proliferation has not been firmly established. We studied the clonality status of 14 renal cell carcinomas with a prominent smooth muscle stromal component (four renal angiomyoadenomatous tumors/clear cell papillary carcinomas, five clear cell carcinomas, two papillary carcinomas, and three renal cell carcinomas with smooth muscle rich stroma) using the human androgen receptor assay (HUMARA). We found the leiomyomatous stromal component in all analyzable (8/14) cases to be polyclonal and therefore reactive rather than neoplastic. Based on morphological observations, we propose that the non-neoplastic leiomyomatous stromal component is likely derived from smooth muscle cells of large caliber veins located at the peripheral capsular region or within the collagenous septae of the tumors.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine and neuroendocrine-like features. Morphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 18 cases and review of the literature.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) with neuroendocrine differentiation (CRCCND) has only recently been described. Eighteen cases of CRCC with morphologic features suggestive of neuroendocrine differentiation were selected from among 624 CRCCs in our registry. The tissues were fixed in neutral formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into 4- to 5-μm-thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. As CRCC with neuroendocrine features, tumors with following morphology were suggested: (1) trabecular/palisading/ribbon-like, gyriform, insular, glandular, and solid pattern; (2) uniform polygonal cells formed in small islets; and (3) cribriform pattern in combination with palisading. Selected cases were further analyzed using immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, array comparative genomic hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cases were classified as CRCCND or CRCC with neuroendocrine-like features (CRCCND-L) based on the immunohistochemical expression of neuroendocrine markers: CRCCND, 4 cases, age range 49 to 79 years, size ranged from 2.2 to 22 cm, and CRCCND-L, 14 cases, age range 34 to 74 years, size range 3.8 to 16.5 cm. Follow-up information was available for 11 of 18 patients aged 0.5 to 12 years. Two of 4 CRCCNDs showed aggressive clinical course with metastatic spreading. Chromophobe renal cell carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation were focally positive for CD56 (4/4), synaptophysin (4/4), chromogranin A (1/4), and neuron-specific enolase (3/4). All 14 CRCCND-Ls were mostly negative or very weakly focally positive for some of the aforementioned markers. All 18 tumors were positive for cytokeratin 7 and CD117. Ultrastructural analysis showed poorly preserved neuroendocrine granules only in 2 of 4 analyzed CRCCNDs. Losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, and 10 were found in all analyzable CRCCNDs, whereas multiple losses (chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21) and gains (chromosomes 4, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, and 20) were found in CRCCND-L.

Molecular Genetic Alterations in Renal Cell Carcinomas With Tubulocystic Pattern: Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma, Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Heterogenous Component and Familial Leiomyomatosis-associated Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Analysis of 15 Cases.

The characteristic morphologic spectrum of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (TC-RCC) may include areas resembling papillary RCC (PRCC). Our study includes 15 RCCs with tubulocystic pattern: 6 TC-RCCs, 1 RCC-high grade with tubulocystic architecture, 5 TC-RCCs with foci of PRCC, 2 with high-grade RCC (HGRCC) not otherwise specified, and 1 with a clear cell papillary RCC/renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor-like component. We analyzed aberrations of chromosomes 7, 17, and Y; mutations of VHL and FH genes; and loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 3p. Genetic analysis was performed separately in areas of classic TC-RCC and in those with other histologic patterns. The TC-RCC component demonstrated disomy of chromosome 7 in 9/15 cases, polysomy of chromosome 17 in 7/15 cases, and loss of Y in 1 case. In the PRCC component, 2/3 analyzable cases showed disomy of chromosome 7 and polysomy of chromosome 17 with normal Y. One case with focal HGRCC exhibited only disomy 7, whereas the case with clear cell papillary RCC/renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor-like pattern showed polysomies of 7 and 17, mutation of VHL, and loss of heterozygosity 3p. FH gene mutation was identified in a single case with an aggressive clinical course and predominant TC-RCC pattern. The following conclusions were drawn: (1) TC-RCC demonstrates variable status of chromosomes 7, 17, and Y even in cases with typical/uniform morphology. (2) The biological nature of PRCC/HGRCC-like areas within TC-RCC remains unclear. Our data suggest that heterogenous TC-RCCs may be associated with an adverse clinical outcome. (3) Hereditary leiomyomatosis-associated RCC can be morphologically indistinguishable from “high-grade” TC-RCC; therefore, in TC-RCC with high-grade features FH gene status should be tested.

Cystic Renal Oncocytoma and Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Comparative Study.

Renal oncocytoma (RO) may present with a tubulocystic growth in 3% to 7% of cases, and in such cases its morphology may significantly overlap with tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (TCRCC). We compared the morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of these tumors, aiming to clarify the differential diagnostic criteria, which facilitate the discrimination of RO from TCRCC. Twenty-four cystic ROs and 15 TCRCCs were selected and analyzed for: architectural growth patterns, stromal features, cytomorphology, ISUP nucleolar grade, necrosis, and mitotic activity. Immunohistochemical panel included various cytokeratins (AE1-AE3, OSCAR, CAM5.2, CK7), vimentin, CD10, CD117, AMACR, CA-IX, antimitochondrial antigen (MIA), EMA, and Ki-67. The presence of at least focal solid growth and islands of tumor cells interspersed with loose stroma, lower ISUP nucleolar grade, absence of necrosis, and absence of mitotic figures were strongly suggestive of a cystic RO. In contrast, the absence of solid and island growth patterns and presence of more compact, fibrous stroma, accompanied by higher ISUP nucleolar grade, focal necrosis, and mitotic figures were all associated with TCRCC. TCRCC marked more frequently for vimentin, CD10, AMACR, and CK7 and had a higher proliferative index by Ki-67 (>15%). CD117 was negative in 14/15 cases. One case was weakly CD117 reactive with cytoplasmic positivity. All cystic RO cases were strongly positive for CD117. The remaining markers (AE1-AE3, CAM5.2, OSCAR, CA-IX, MIA, EMA) were of limited utility. Presence of tumor cell islands and solid growth areas and the type of stroma may be major morphologic criteria in differentiating cystic RO from TCRCC. In difficult cases, or when a limited tissue precludes full morphologic assessment, immunohistochemical pattern of vimentin, CD10, CD117, AMACR, CK7, and Ki-67 could help in establishing the correct diagnosis.

Utility of immunohistochemical investigation of SDHB and molecular genetic analysis of SDH genes in the differential diagnosis of mesenchymal tumors of GIT

Loss of expression of beta subunit of succinate dehydrogenase (SDHB) was proved to be present in a subgroup of KIT/PDGFRA wt gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). To evaluate possible diagnostic utility of SDHB immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnostics of mesenchymal tumors of gastrointestinal tract (GIT), 11 cases of KIT/PDGFRA wt GISTs, 12 gastric schwannomas (GSs), 20 solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs), 4 leiomyomas (LMs), 16 leiomyosarcomas (LMSs), 5 synovial sarcomas (SSs), 3 endometrioid stromal sarcomas (ESSs), and 1 ileal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) were investigated for SDHB immunoexpression together with molecular genetic analysis of genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase (SDH). Three recent cases of KIT/PDGFRA mutant GISTs were used as controls. Among the 11 KIT/PDGFRA wt GISTs, 6 expressed SDHB, 1 of them harboring a sequence change of SDHD. All SDHB-negative cases were SDHB-D wt. In 1 of the control GIST cases molecular genetic analysis revealed an SDHD sequence change in addition to a mutation in KIT exon 11. No SFT was truly SDHB-negative, but in 2 of them the staining was impossible to analyze. Furthermore, 1 SFT carried an SDHB and another 1 SDHD sequence change. All GSs, LMs, LMSs, SSs, ESSs, and IMT were SDHB-positive or non-analyzable, and SDHB-D wt. Additional factors may play a role in regulating expression of SDHB. Furthermore, SDHB immunohistochemistry alone may be misleading in excluding tumors other than GIST (especially SFT) in the differential diagnosis of KIT/PDGFRA wt mesenchymal tumors of GIT.

Choriogonadotropin positive seminoma—a clinicopathological and molecular genetic study of 15 cases

The presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) positive syncytiotrophoblastic cells (STC) in classic seminoma (CS) is well documented. CS with extensive hCG positive, non-syncytiotrophoblastic tumour cells (without STC) is exceptionally rare. In this study, we present 15 such cases. 168 CSs were retrieved from the Plzen Tumor registry. Cases of mixed germ cell tumors (with CS) and CSs with typical STC were excluded. Cases with completely embedded tumor mass were selected for further study and immunohistochemically examined with anti-hCG. Positive cases were further analyzed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Two groups of hCG-positive CSs were identified. Group 1 comprised 10 patients with a mean patient age of 37.7 years and mean tumor size of 4.96 cm. Eight cases were pT1 (TMN 2009) and 2 cases pT3a. Blood levels of hCG were elevated in 6 of the 10 patients preoperatively. In 2 patients the blood level of hCG was not tested. Mean follow-up period was 6.1 years. No metastatic behavior was noted. All tumors were extensively immunoreactive for hCG in more than 60% of tumor cells. The expression of hCG beta subunit (CGB)-mRNA in tumor tissue was documented. Group 2: Comprised 5 patients with a mean age was 34 years. Mean tumor size was 4.7 cm. Four cases were stage pT1 and 1 case was pT2. The mean follow-up period was 3.1 years. No metastatic behavior was noted. Preoperative blood levels of hCG were elevated in 1/5 of the patient. Strong hCG positivity was limited to scattered single tumor cells distributed throughout the entire tumor. Only weak expression of CGB mRNA was detected. We can conclude that immunohistochemical detection of expression of hCG in CS is not limited to syncytiotrophoblastic cells. In this study, we report two immunohistochemical patterns of hCG expression in classic seminomas: diffuse hCG staining in the majority of tumor cells and scattered hCG-positive cells within the tumor.

[Lynch Syndrome - the Pathologist's Diagnosis].

Lynch syndrome (formerly known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) is the most com-mon hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome. The syndrome is caused by a germline mutation of one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes responsible for DNA replication error repair. Impaired function of the proteins encoded by these genes leads to microsatellite instability (MSI), which is associated with increased incidence of neoplasms: mainly colorectal cancer. According to recent estimates, up to 5% of all colorectal cancers are associated with Lynch syndrome. Due to this relatively high frequency, familial occurence, absence of premorbid phenotype, and development of malignant tumors at a reproductive age, a correct diagnosis is important not only from an ethical but also from an economical point of view. Unfortunately, clinical means of diagnosis, namely, the revised Bethesda guidelines designed to detect patients suitable for genetic testing for Lynch syndrome, lack sufficient sensitivity. The methods associated with modern pathology are more sensitive than the clinical criteria used to detect patients suspected of having Lynch syndrome. Pathological diagnostics are based on direct or indirect detection of MSI. Indirect methods include analysis of morphological signs associated with MSI in histological samples from colorectal carcinoma patients and immunohistochemical investigation of MMR protein expression. To rule out sporadic cases caused by epigenetic inactivation of an MMR gene, molecular genetic investigation of the BRAF gene and methylation analysis of the MLH1 promoter are performed during diagnostic workup. A suspicion of Lynch syndrome based on the results of the methods mentioned above should be proven by detection of a germline mutation in an MMR gene in peripheral blood leukocytes.

Thread-like bridging strands in the adenomatoid tumor of the small intestine.

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the current article by Lao and Wang titled “Adenomatoid Tumor of the Small Intestine: The First Case Report and Review of the Literature.” They described a case of a 44-year-old woman affected by an adenomatoid tumor arising primarily in the small intestine. The tumor involved all layers of the intestinal wall, and it was composed of variably sized tubules and gland-like spaces lined by bland cuboidal to flattened epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and small inconspicouos nucleoli. The authors correctly emphasize the importance of “familiarity with the morphology and immunophenotype” of this type of tumor to differentiate it from more common neoplasms with different behavior, in the intestinal location mainly adenocarcinomas. Although the immunohistochemical model used by the authors (positive “mesothelial” markers AE1/AE3, CK7, HBME-1, CK5/6, calretinin, D2-40 and WT1, negative “adenocarcinomatous” markers Ber-EP4 and MOC-31, negative “intestinal epithelial” markers CK20, CDX2 and CEA, and negative “endothelial” markers CD31 and CD34) is indubitable, we miss description of basic hematoxylin and eosin histological pattern that should prompt a pathologist to consider the diagnosis of adenomatoid tumor even in the intestinal or other unusual locations, which is a condition necessary for targeting the immunohistochemical investigation. Such a simple, sensitive, and specific histological sign of adenomatoid tumor was depicted as early as in 1962, although inaccurately recognized. This phenomenon, regarded as “thread-like bridging strands” (and referred to as the Hes’s bridges by some pathologists), was studied in detail 41 years later by Hes et al. It consists of thready strands bridging the lumina of numerous tubular and slitlike structures and frequently forming a fine, inconspicuous network (Figure 1). Ultrastructurally, they are formed by apposition of attenuated cytoplasm of 2 adjacent mesothelial cells. As the presence of thin intraluminal threadlike bridging strands within adenomatoid tumor was found to be a constant morphologic feature independent on gender and localization, we strongly advocate recognition of the Hes’s bridges as a major diagnostic criterion for the inclusion of adenomatoid tumor in the differential diagnostic considerations.