Børge Holme

The protective effect of TiF4, SnF2 and NaF against erosion-like lesions in situ.

The aim of this in situ study was to compare the protective effect of TiF4, SnF2 and NaF on the development of erosion-like lesions in human enamel. Fourteen human molars were each divided into 4 specimens, mounted on acrylic mouth appliances and worn by 7 volunteers for 9 days. In order to mimic a feasible treatment procedure for patients with voluntary or involuntary gastric reflux, the specimens were etched for 2 min twice a day (0.01 M HCl) and fluoride applications were performed every third day (2 min). The controls were treated as the other specimens except for the fluoride applications. Etch depths and surface roughness changes (Rq) were measured by white light interferometry. Compared with the control, TiF4 and SnF2 reduced the etching depth by 100% (p < 0.001) and 91% (p < 0.001), respectively, and both treatments resulted in an observable surface layer. NaF had no significant protective effect (p = 0.46). It can be concluded that although SnF2 provided significant protection for the enamel surfaces, TiF4 showed the best protection against acid attack, while NaF had no significant protective effect in this study.

The Protective Effect of TiF4, SnF2 and NaF on Erosion of Enamel by Hydrochloric Acid in vitro Measured by White Light Interferometry

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the protective effect of TiF4, SnF2 and NaF (all 0.5 M F) on the development of erosion-like lesions in human dental enamel. Four enamel specimens from each of 6 extracted molars were polished and embedded in epoxy resin. The enamel surfaces of 3 specimens from each tooth were treated with the different fluoride solutions for 2 min. Following fluoride treatments, the specimens were immersed in 0.01 M HCl (pH 2.0), for 2, 4 and 6 min in order to mimic a gastric reflux situation. One specimen from each tooth was used as a control and was only exposed to acid. The etching depths (in micrometres) after 6 min were: TiF4 0.8 (SD 0.8), SnF2 3.5 (SD 0.7), NaF 5.3 (SD 0.4), and 7.0 (SD 0.3) for the control specimens. Compared to the control, TiF4 protected the enamel surface from acid attack almost completely (88%), while SnF2 reduced the etch depth after 6 min by 50% and NaF by 25%.

The erosion-inhibiting effect of TiF4, SnF2, and NaF solutions on pellicle-covered enamel in vitro

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the protective effect of TiF4, SnF2, and NaF treatment on the development of erosion-like lesions in pellicle-covered human enamel. Material and Methods. Twelve human molars were each divided into 5 specimens, 4 of which were immersed in saliva for 2 h. Three pellicle-covered specimens from each tooth were treated with a TiF4, SnF2, or NaF solution (all 0.5 M F) for 2 min. Control specimens, one with and one without pellicle, were included. Immersion in acid (0.01 M HCl) was carried out stepwise (2+2+2+2 min). The etching depths (in µm) were measured using white light interferometry. Results. Compared with the control with pellicle, TiF4 reduced enamel loss by 100% after 2 min and by 24% after 8 min of acid exposure. The corresponding values for SnF2 were 45% and 14%. NaF provided no significant protection of the surface. The pellicle-covered specimens showed reduced lesion depths after 6 and 8 min compared to the controls without pellicle. Conclusions. TiF4 gave the best protection against acid attack. SnF2 provided significant protection only after 2 min of acid exposure, while NaF had no significant protective effect.

Protective effect of TiF(4) solutions with different concentrations and pH on development of erosion-like lesions.

Aim: To evaluate how concentration and pH of TiF4 influence the erosion-protective effect. Methods: Specimens were treated with a TiF4 solution: (1) 0.5 M F, pH 1.2, (2) 0.05 M F, pH 2.1, (3) 0.5 M F, pH 2.1, or (4) 0.05 M F, pH 1.2; then, they were exposed to HCl. Results: After 2 min, the proportions of the area covered with the coating were 93, 71, 17 and 0% in groups 1–4. When present, the coating seemed to protect the surface. After 6 min, a coating could only be seen in group 1 (43%). Conclusion: Reducing the concentration of TiF4 and increasing the pH of the solution decreased the protective effect.

The Effect of Daily Fluoride Mouth Rinsing on Enamel Erosive/Abrasive Wear in situ

It is not known whether application of fluoride agents on enamel results in lasting resistance to erosive/abrasive wear. We investigated if one daily mouth rinse with sodium fluoride (NaF), stannous fluoride (SnF2) or titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4) solutions protected enamel against erosive/abrasive wear in situ (a paired, randomised and blind study). Sixteen molars were cut into 4 specimens, each with one amalgam filling (measurement reference surface). Two teeth (2 × 4 specimens) were mounted bilaterally (buccal aspects) on acrylic mandibular appliances and worn for 9 days by 8 volunteers. Every morning, the specimens were brushed manually with water (30 s) extra-orally. Then fluoride solutions (0.4% SnF2 pH 2.5; 0.15% TiF4 pH 2.1; 0.2% NaF pH 6.5, all 0.05 m F) were applied (2 min). Three of the specimens from each tooth got different treatment, and the fourth served as control. At midday, the specimens were etched for 2 min in 300 ml fresh 0.01 m hydrochloric acid and rinsed in tap water. This etch procedure was repeated in the afternoon. Topographic measurements were performed by a white-light interferometer. Mean surface loss (±SD) for 16 teeth after 9 days was: SnF2 1.8 ± 1.9 µm, TiF4 3.1 ± 4.8 µm, NaF 26.3 ± 4.7 µm, control 32.3 ± 4.4 µm. Daily rinse with SnF2, TiF4 and NaF resulted in 94, 90 and 18% reduction in enamel erosive/abrasive wear, respectively, compared with control (p < 0.05). The superior protective effect of daily rinse with either stannous or titanium tetrafluoride solutions on erosive/abrasive enamel wear is promising.

Comparing Different Methods to Assess Erosive Lesion Depths and Progression in vitro

The aim of this study was to compare the precision and accuracy of 5 different methods applied to assess surface substance loss or changes in surface microhardness (SMH) on the same enamel surfaces after repeated acid exposures. Ground specimens from human molars were exposed to 0.01 M HCl (pH 2.2) for 6 min × 2 and measurements performed 3 times to estimate precision. The accuracies (systematic errors) were calculated against the manufacturer’s calibration standard. Lesion depth progression was from 94 to 110%, related to repeated acid exposure. The precisions/accuracies were: WLI (white light interferometry), 0.5/0.4%; SP (stylus profilometry), 4.7/0.7%; OP (optical profilometry), 1.4/12%; AAS (atomic absorption spectroscopy), 0.4/17% (measured calcium loss was converted to lesion depth). The correlation between WLI and SP was R2 = 0.98, and between WLI and OP it was R2 = 0.85. SMH gave information on qualitative changes of the surface (precision: 5.5%, accuracy: 4.0%). WLI performed best in precision and accuracy, but SP, OP and AAS are all relevant methods for analysing lesion depths and progression, SMH seems suitable for analysing minor changes in surface enamel only.

Quantification of small, convex particles by TEM

It is shown how size distributions of arbitrarily oriented, convex, non-overlapping particles extracted from conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images may be determined by a variation of the Schwartz-Saltykov method. In TEM, particles cut at the surfaces have diminished projections, which alter the observed size distribution. We represent this distribution as a vector and multiply it with the inverse of a matrix comprising thickness-dependent Scheil or Schwartz-Saltykov terms. The result is a corrected size distribution of the projections of uncut particles. It is shown how the real (3D) distribution may be estimated when particle shape is considered. Computer code to generate the matrix is given. A log-normal distribution of spheres and a real distribution of pill-box-shaped dispersoids in an Al-Mg-Si alloy are given as examples. The errors are discussed in detail.

The Susceptibility to Dental Erosion Differs among Individuals.

Studies of wine tasters and patients with self-induced vomiting have revealed that 30-50% of individuals at high risk do not develop erosive lesions. The aim was to investigate this apparent individual susceptibility to enamel erosion. Two enamel specimens were made from each of 3 premolars from 8 persons (donors). Six acrylic mouth appliances were worn by 6 volunteers (carriers). One specimen from each donor was mounted on each appliance. The carriers wore the appliances for 9 days. The appliances were immersed in 0.01 M HCl for 3 min twice per day to imitate a vomiting/reflux situation. The enamel specimens were analysed by a white-light interferometer to measure enamel loss (in micrometres). The enamel loss varied significantly both between the donor teeth (p = 0.009) and the carriers (p = 0.004). The lesion in the specimen with the largest amount of enamel loss was 4 times as deep as in the specimen with the lowest. In 1 carrier, all specimens displayed enamel loss above the mean, including the specimen from the donor with the most resistant enamel. The variation in susceptibility to erosion among individuals appears to be influenced both by the sustainability of the enamel and by factors in the oral environment. This could explain the variation in prevalence and severity of dental erosions among patients exposed to similar acidic challenges. The results suggest that for certain individuals, only minimal acidic challenges may be sufficient to cause damage to the teeth, while others may never develop dental erosions despite extensive exposure to acid.

May caries-preventive fluoride regimes have an effect on dental erosive wear? An in situ study.

Abstract Objective. High and low concentration NaF regimes have shown caries protective properties, but the preventive effect against erosive/abrasive wear is unclear. Aim. To measure the inhibiting effect on enamel wear of low and highly concentrated sodium fluoride (NaF) toothpastes and a stannous (SnF2) fluoride gel in a single-blind, randomized in situ study, using a White Light Interferometer. Materials and methods. Sixteen human molars were each divided into four specimens, mounted on acrylic mouth appliances and worn by eight volunteers for 9 days. Experimental procedures were performed in the laboratory. The enamel specimens were brushed every day with fluoride-free toothpaste. Treatments; group 1: no fluoride treatment (control), group 2: SnF2 gel 2500 ppm F (5 min) every third day, group 3: NaF toothpaste 5000 ppm F 5 min every third day and 2 min the other days, group 4: NaF toothpaste 1450 ppm F (2 min) every day. In order to mimic gastric reflux/vomiting, the specimens were etched with 0.01 M HCl for 2 min twice a day. Results. The mean step height (µm) for the control specimens was −32.9 (SD = 6.8). The mean values for the other groups were −22.2 (SD = 8.4) (group 2), −30.8 (SD = 7.8) (group 3) and −31.4 (SD = 7.7) (group 4). Compared with the control, the SnF2 treated specimens showed significantly lower wear. The NaF toothpastes gave no significant protective effect. Conclusions. Application of SnF2 gel every third day gave protection against erosive–abrasive challenges. Daily application of both low concentration and high concentration NaF toothpaste provided no protection.

Microstructure of reduced magnetite as a function of aluminum content and reduction temperature

Abstract Samples of porous iron, made from reduction of alumina promoted magnetite (Fe 3− x Al x O 4 ), have been studied to investigate how reduction temperature and alumina content affect the pore structure of the resulting iron. There is a systematic change in structure of the porous iron with alumina concentration in the original magnetite phase and with reduction temperature. By choosing suitable values of alumina content and reduction temperature, one may obtain porous iron with any of the three dominant pore structures, each having characteristic orientations of the iron crystallites. The variations in pore structure with alumina content is attributed to epitaxy and the change in lattice parameter of the magnetite phase.