Boris Draznin

Pathways to Quality Inpatient Management of Hyperglycemia and Diabetes: A Call to Action

Currently patients with diabetes comprise up to 25–30% of the census of adult wards and critical care units in our hospitals. Although evidence suggests that avoidance of hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) is beneficial for positive outcomes in the hospitalized patient, much of this evidence remains controversial and at times somewhat contradictory. We have recently formed a consortium for Planning Research in Inpatient Diabetes (PRIDE) with the goal of promoting clinical research in the area of management of hyperglycemia and diabetes in the hospital. In this article, we outline eight aspects of inpatient glucose management in which randomized clinical trials are needed. We refer to four as system-based issues and four as patient-based issues. We urge further progress in the science of inpatient diabetes management. We hope this call to action is supported by the American Diabetes Association, The Endocrine Society, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Heart Association, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, the International Diabetes Federation, and the Society of Hospital Medicine. Appropriate federal research funding in this area will help ensure high-quality investigations, the results of which will advance the field. Future clinical trials will allow practitioners to develop optimal approaches for the management of hyperglycemia in the hospitalized patient and lessen the economic and human burden of poor glycemic control and its associated complications and comorbidities in the inpatient setting.

Comparison of 70/30 biphasic insulin with glargine/lispro regimen in non-critically ill diabetic patients on continuous enteral nutrition therapy.

Despite significant advances in inpatient diabetes management, it is still a challenge to choose the safest and most efficacious subcutaneous insulin regimen for diabetic patients on continuous enteral nutrition (EN) therapy. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of glycemic control in 22 non-critically ill diabetic patients, receiving at least 3 days of continuous EN. Patients received different insulin regimens while on continuous EN, including a basal/bolus glargine/lispro regimen (group 1, n = 8), 70/30 biphasic insulin twice daily (group 2, n = 8), and 70/30 biphasic insulin 3 times a day (group 3, n = 6). The glucose data from 72 hours from the initiation of EN were analyzed (12 point-of-contact glucose measurements per patient). Overall, the degree of control was comparable in all groups, with target range maintained more consistently in group 3 (70/30 insulin administered 3 times daily). In this group, 69% of values were in the target range (140-180 mg/dL) as compared with 24% in glargine/lispro group and 22% in the 70/30 insulin bid group. Eight hypoglycemic episodes occurred among the 3 groups: 5 episodes in group 1 (5.4%), 2 episodes in group 2 (2.1%), and 1 episode in group 3 (1.4%) (P = .05, groups 2 and 3 vs group 1). Administration of 70/30 biphasic insulin 3 times daily is a safe therapeutic regimen in diabetic patients on continuous EN as it maintains glycemia in the target range and might produce fewer episodes of hypoglycemia.

Subcutaneous Administration of Glargine to Diabetic Patients Receiving Insulin Infusion Prevents Rebound Hyperglycemia

CONTEXT Transition of diabetic patients from iv insulin infusion to s.c. insulin frequently results in rebound hyperglycemia. OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that initiation of a long-acting insulin therapy concurrently with i.v. insulin infusion would decrease the rate of rebound hyperglycemia after discontinuation of the insulin infusion. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION Sixty-one diabetic patients receiving i.v. insulin therapy participated in this prospective randomized study. Subjects in the intervention group received daily injections of glargine s.c. (0.25 U/kg body weight) starting within 12 h of initiation of i.v. insulin infusion. Capillary blood glucose measurements were obtained up to 12 h after discontinuation of insulin infusion. Rebound hyperglycemia was defined as a blood glucose level greater than 180 mg/dl. SETTING The study was conducted at the University of Colorado Hospital. PATIENTS Sixty-one hospitalized patients with known type 1 or type 2 diabetes receiving i.v. insulin infusion participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME The primary outcome of this study was to compare the rates of rebound hyperglycemia between the control and the intervention groups after i.v. insulin infusion is discontinued. RESULTS Overall, 29 subjects in the control group (93.5%) had at least one glucose value above 180 mg/dl during the 12-h follow-up period. This was significantly greater than the rate of rebound hyperglycemia in the intervention group (10 subjects or 33.3%, P < 0.001). The effect of the intervention was apparent in subjects who presented with diabetic ketoacidosis, after solid organ transplantation, and in patients with other surgical and medical diagnoses. There were three hypoglycemic measurements in two control subjects (68, 62, and 58 mg/dl) and none in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS Once-daily s.c. insulin glargine administered during i.v. insulin infusion is a safe method for preventing future rebound hyperglycemia, without increased risk of hypoglycemia.

Pilot study of using neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin to counteract the effect of methylprednisolone in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

Patients and Methods We conducted a pilot study in 20 patients with cystic fibrosis–related diabetes (CFRD), after bone marrow or solid organ (liver, kidney, or lung) transplantation, who received methylprednisolone intravenously (10-60 mg) during admissions to the University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, Colorado. All patients received basal glargine and premeal lispro insulins. A total of 10 patients (randomized 1:1) received neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin at the time of administration of methylprednisolone between 8 and 11 am (Group 1). The dose of NPH insulin was selected as follows: 1 unit (U) for 1 mg methylprednisolone for the first 20 mg of steroid; 0.5 U of insulin for 1 mg of methylprednisolone for the next 20 mg of steroid; and 0.25 U of insulin for each subsequent milligram of steroid. The average dose of NPH was 23 6 5 U. In the remaining 10 patients, the doses of glargine and lispro were increased according to the University of Colorado Hospital’s standard protocols for use of subcutaneous insulin to achieve the best possible control (Group 2). Point-of-contact glycemia immediately prior to initiation of steroids and for the 3 days of methylprednisolone administration was compared. Results are expressed as mean 6 standard deviation and compared using the Student t test with P value < 0.05 considered significant.

Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in adults: inpatient management of 121 patients during 410 admissions.

Background: With improved longevity, cystic fibrosis (CF)-related diabetes (CFRD) has emerged as the most common nonpulmonary complication of CF. Patients with CFRD are frequently admitted to the hospital with infections and deterioration of pulmonary function, during which time glycemic control might have an impact on pulmonary function, recovery from infection, and survival. Methods and Results: In an attempt to share our insight into inpatient management of CFRD, this article summarizes the experience of our inpatient glucose management team with hospital management of 121 adult CFRD patients who were hospitalized on 410 occasions at the University of Colorado Hospital between January 2009 and September 2011. This is a retrospective chart review descriptive study of inpatient management of CFRD in our center. Our cohort includes CFRD patients treated with basal and mealtime insulin through multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), as well as patients receiving steroids or enteral nutrition, which adds complexity to the management of CFRD during hospitalization. Conclusions: Multiple hospitalizations and intensive inpatient management of CF are integral elements of treatment. Inpatient therapy for CFRD requires a customized approach that is uniquely different from that of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Our experience highlights clinical circumstances such as irregular food intake, high dose steroid therapy, and supplemental tube feeding. For many patients, it is possible to continue CSII therapy during hospitalization through a combination of mutual trust between the patient and hospital staff and oversight provided by the glucose management team.

Effect of glargine insulin delivery method (pen device versus vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study. METHODS Thirty-one patients discharged from the hospital were recruited for this study. In the hospital, all patients were treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Upon discharge, 21 patients received glargine by pen device for 3 months and were then switched to vial/syringe for the next 3 months (group 1). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients discharged on vial/syringe and converted to pen device after 3 months. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months. A questionnaire assessing patient preference was administered at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Groups 1 and 2 had similar baseline HbA1c (10.7 ± 2.2% and 11.2 ± 2.5%, respectively) and similar reduction in HbA1c at 3 months (7.8 ± 1.7% and 7.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; P<.001 vs. baseline). However, after crossover, the changes in HbA1c from 3 to 6 months were significantly different between groups. HbA1c increased to 8.5 ± 2.0% at 6 months in group 1 after switching to the vial/syringe but remained unchanged (7.1 ± 1.6%) in group 2 after switching to a pen device (P<.01, group 1 vs. group 2). Patient questionnaires after each phase of the trial revealed that patients found the pen device more convenient and were more likely to recommend this insulin delivery method to someone else. CONCLUSION Patients switching to a glargine pen device achieved lower HbA1c at the 6-month follow-up. Patients in both groups overwhelmingly preferred glargine pens over vials/syringes.

Transitional care clinic for uninsured and medicaid-covered patients with diabetes mellitus discharged from the hospital: a pilot quality improvement study.

Abstract Transitioning from the inpatient to outpatient setting is often a problematic aspect of diabetes mellitus (DM) care. Different factors during hospitalization may adversely affect glycemic control in patients, who are frequently discharged on regimens that differ markedly from prehospitalization outpatient regimens. Moreover, the discharge recommendations may not have been tested adequately during a relatively short hospital length of stay and pose a significant threat to patient safety upon discharge. Our pilot study evaluated the effect on hospital utilization of the transitional care clinic (TCC), where patients with DM are seen within 2 to 5 days of hospital discharge. One hundred patients with DM, who were either medically indigent (no insurance or Medicaid and no primary care providers) or covered by Medicaid, and who did not have a primary care provider, were randomized into either a control or an intervention group upon discharge from the hospital. Subjects from the intervention group (n = 50) were seen in the TCC. All subjects were contacted 90 days after discharge to collect information about emergency department visits and readmissions. Thirteen subjects from the control group and 13 from the intervention group visited the emergency department within 90 days of discharge. Fourteen control subjects (28%) and 10 intervention patients (20%) were rehospitalized for various medical conditions during the follow-up period (P = not significant). Among patients originally admitted for DM-related issues, 6 of 14 in the control group (42.9%) and 2 out of 16 in the intervention group (12.5%) were readmitted during follow-up (P < 0.05). We conclude that the TCC may be effective for the prevention of rehospitalizations in indigent patients admitted for DM-related problems and who did not have primary care providers. The benefit of the TCC was not seen when patients with DM were admitted for other medical problems. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary finding.

IMPACT OF GLUCOSE MANAGEMENT TEAM ON OUTCOMES OF HOSPITALIZARON IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES ADMITTED TO THE MEDICAL SERVICE

OBJECTIVE To improve glycemic control of hospitalized patients with diabetes and hyperglycemia, many medical centers have established dedicated glucose management teams (GMTs). However, the impact of these specialized teams on clinical outcomes has not been evaluated. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 440 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to the medical service for cardiac or infection-related diagnosis. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of several well-recognized markers of morbidity, consisting of: death during hospitalization, transfer to intensive care unit, initiation of enteral or parenteral nutrition, line infection, new in-hospital infection or infection lasting more than 20 days of hospitalization, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, rise in plasma creatinine, and hospital re-admissions. RESULTS Medical housestaff managed the glycemia in 79% of patients (usual care group), while the GMT managed the glycemia in 21% of patients (GMT group). The primary outcome was similar between cohorts (0.95 events per patient versus 0.99 events per patient in the GMT and usual care cohorts, respectively). For subanalysis, the subjects in both groups were stratified into those with average glycemia of <180 mg/dL versus those with glycemia >180 mg/dL. We found a significant beneficial impact of glycemic management by the GMT on the composite outcome in patients with average glycemia >180 mg/dL during their hospital stay. The number of patients who met primary outcome was significantly higher in the usual care group (40 of 83 patients, 48%) than in the GMT-treated cohort (8 of 33 patients, 25.7%) (P<.02). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that GMTs may have an important role in managing difficult-to-control hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting. ABBREVIATIONS BG = blood glucose GMT = glucose management team HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c ICU = intensive care unit POC = point of care T2D = type 2 diabetes.

Glycemic Control and Outcomes of Hospitalization in Noncritically Ill Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Admitted with Cardiac Problems or Infections

OBJECTIVE Although the importance of glycemic control is well established for patients with diabetes hospitalized for surgical problems, it has not been supported by clinical studies for patients with diabetes hospitalized on the medical floors. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of 378 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for cardiac or infectious disease (ID) diagnosis between September 1, 2011, and August 1, 2012. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), hospital stay shorter than 3 days, and daily glucocorticoid dose >20 mg of methylprednisolone. The primary composite outcome included death during hospitalization, ICU transfer, initiation of enteral or parenteral nutrition, line infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, rise in plasma creatinine by 1 or >2 mg/dL, new infection, an infection lasting for more than 20 days, and readmission within 30 days and between 1 and 10 months after discharge. RESULTS Patients were stratified by mean blood glucose (BG) level: group 1 had mean BG of <180 mg/dL (n = 286; mean BG, 142 ± 23 mg/dL), whereas group 2 had mean BG levels >181 mg/dL (n = 92; mean BG, 218 ± 34 mg/dL; P<.0001). Group 2 had a 46% higher occurrence of the primary outcome (P<.0004). The rate of unfavorable events was greater in cardiac and ID patients with worse glycemic control (group 2). CONCLUSION Our data strongly support a positive influence of better glycemic control (average glycemia <180 mg/dL or 10 mmol/L) on outcomes of hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Practical approach to management of inpatient hyperglycemia in select patient populations.

Abstract Hospitalized patients frequently transition between various levels of care and changing clinical situations. Optimal management of hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia includes awareness of situations that may significantly affect glucose and/or insulin metabolism. A review of published clinical trials reveals practical approaches to the management of hyperglycemia in select patient populations that may prove useful for the hospital clinician. We outline approaches to the management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients receiving glucocorticoids, patients with severe or end-stage renal disease undergoing hemo- or peritoneal dialysis, and patients receiving total parenteral or enteral feeding, in addition to patients transitioning from intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneously administered insulin. Key considerations underlying these management methods include a proactive approach, frequent blood glucose monitoring, daily review of blood glucose patterns, and daily reassessment of the insulin regimen and associated orders.