Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brad C. Venuto is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brad C. Venuto.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2012

Effects of year-round stocking rates and stocking methods on performance of cow-calf pairs grazing dallisgrass-common bermudagrass pastures overseeded with annual ryegrass1

W.E. Wyatt; Brad C. Venuto; Jeffrey M. Gillespie; D.C. Blouin; Daren D. Redfearn

Beef producers throughout the United States frequently are restricted to a fixed land area that varies considerably in carrying capacity throughout the year. Much of the research that has focused on stocking rate and methods (continuous, rotational) has failed to recognize the inability of most producers to use a variable stocking rate. Two sets of 4 adjacent pastures, each containing a mixed warm-season, perennial grass sod [common bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.; dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum Poir.] were overseeded to ‘Marshall’ annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in the autumn of 3 consecutive years. Within each set of 4 pastures, one of the following grazing treatments was randomly assigned each pasture: continuous stocked at a low, medium, or high stocking rate (CL, CM, and CH) and rotational stocked (8 paddocks) at a high stocking rate (RH). Low, medium, and high stocking rates were 1.25, 2, and 2.75 cows/ha, respectively. Brangus cows and their suckling calves were stocked on treatment pastures in February 1999. Available forage mass tended to be greater (P = 0.10) for CL than CM in the late spring and was greater (P < 0.05) for CL than CM in the summer grazing season. Differences in forage nutritive value were largely associated with the stocking method comparison, favoring CH in the early spring (percent CP, percent in vitro true digestibility, and percent ADF; P < 0.01) and summer (percent CP and percent ADF; P < 0.01) grazing seasons. Cow-calf productivity, as measured by kilograms of calf wean weight per hectare, increased (P < 0.01) in response to increases in stocking rate, but was similar between the continuous and rotational stocking methods at the high stocking rate.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2012

Effects of year-round stocking methods and stocking rates on seasonal forage response and cow-calf weight gain in the gulf coast region of the United States1

W.E. Wyatt; Brad C. Venuto; Jeffrey M. Gillespie; D.C. Blouin; M.E. McCormick

The present research is the second phase (2 yr) of a multiyear cow-calf study employing fixed stocking rates and examining the effect of stocking method, i.e., continuous and rotational, and stocking rate on beef cattle production. Two sets of 4 adjacent pastures, each containing a mixed warm-season, perennial grass sod [common bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.; dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum Poir.], were overseeded to ‘Marshall’ annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in the autumn of 2 consecutive years. Within each set of 4 pastures, one of the following grazing treatments was randomly assigned each pasture: rotationally stocked (8 paddocks) at a low, medium, or high stocking rate and continuously stocked at a moderate stocking rate. Low, medium, and high stocking rates were 1.25, 2, and 2.75 cows/ha. Brangus cows and their suckling calves were stocked on treatment pastures in March 2004. Stocking treatment affected prebreeding cow BW (P < 0.01) and tended to affect precalving (P = 0.13), postbreeding (P = 0.07), weaning (P = 0.11), and subsequent precalving cow BW (P = 0.08). Stocking-method treatments were similar in forage allowance in the early- and late-spring periods (P = 0.67 and P = 0.65, respectively), but in the summer period, rotationally stocking at a medium stocking rate was greater (P < 0.01) than continuously stocking at a moderate stocking rate. There was a consistent trend across seasons for the percent CP in the simulated bite sample DM to be greater (P < 0.1) for the continuously stocking at a moderate stocking rate compared with the rotationally stocking at a medium stocking rate stocking methods. Based upon cow BW outcomes in this research, stocking rate is the most important consideration in design of a grazing program.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2013

Effects of year-round stocking rate and stocking method systems on cow-calf production in the gulf coast region of the United States: Costs, returns, and labor considerations1

W.E. Wyatt; Jeffrey M. Gillespie; D.C. Blouin; Brad C. Venuto; R.W. Boucher; B. Qushim

ABSTRACT The present research examines the effect of stocking method, i.e., continuous and rotational, and set (fixed) stocking rate on labor requirements, costs, and profits in cow-calf beef production. Two replicates of 4 adjacent pastures each, containing a mixed warm-season, perennial grass sod [common bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.; dallisgrass, Paspalum dilatatum Poir.], were overseeded to ‘Marshall’ annual ryegrass [Lolium multiflorum (Lam.)] in the autumn of 2 consecutive years. Within each replicate of 4 pastures, one of the following grazing treatments was randomly assigned each pasture: rotationally stocked (8 paddocks) at a low, medium, or high stocking rate (RL, RM, and RH) and continuously stocked at a moderate stocking rate (CM). Labor activities, expenditures, sales, and equipment usages were recorded throughout the study. On a per-cow basis, total labor usage declined (P 0.90) and would not justify the additional labor associated with rotational grazing management.


Crop Management | 2003

Producing First-Season Alfalfa on Coastal Plain Soils

Christopher D. Wildman; Brad C. Venuto; Daren D. Redfearn; Montgomery W. Alison; Richard E. Joost

Multiple-year alfalfa production on coastal plain soils has been limited due to problems associated with stand persistence and post-harvest handling. One proposed management strategy is to maximize first-year alfalfa yield and quality, placing less importance on multiple-year alfalfa production. The objective of this study was to compare the effect on first-year alfalfa of four harvest intervals based on morphological stage and three harvest intervals based on a fixed harvest schedule. Dry matter (DM) yields, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and in vitro digestibility were measured. First-year alfalfa DM yield ranged from 9,880 to 13,230 lbs/acre when harvested by morphological stage and from 8,860 to 10,200 lbs/acre when harvested on a fixed schedule. Nutritive value measurements showed small, although inconsistent, improvement in forage quality when harvested at either an early morphological stage (10%) or a short fixed interval (4 weeks). With the adoption of balage harvest systems and high quality imported alfalfa hay often approaching


Crop Science | 2005

Biofuel Component Concentrations and Yields of Switchgrass in South Central U.S. Environments

K. A. Cassida; James P. Muir; M. A. Hussey; J. C. Read; Brad C. Venuto; William R Ocumpaugh

200 per ton, managing alfalfa as a high quality annual, with an expected yield of 5 tons/acre, should be an economically feasible option for many southern forage producers.


Biomass & Bioenergy | 2005

Switchgrass simulation by the ALMANAC model at diverse sites in the southern US

J.R. Kiniry; K. A. Cassida; M. A. Hussey; James P. Muir; W.R. Ocumpaugh; J.C. Read; R.L. Reed; Matt A. Sanderson; Brad C. Venuto; J.R. Williams


Crop Science | 2005

Biomass Yield and Stand Characteristics of Switchgrass in South Central U.S. Environments

K. A. Cassida; James P. Muir; M. A. Hussey; J. C. Read; Brad C. Venuto; William R Ocumpaugh


Crop Science | 2002

Cultivar and environment effects on annual ryegrass forage yield, yield distribution, and nutritive value

Daren D. Redfearn; Brad C. Venuto; W. D. Pitman; M. W. Alison; Jerry D. Ward


Grassland Science | 2008

Forage and biomass feedstock production from hybrid forage sorghum and sorghum–sudangrass hybrids

Brad C. Venuto; Bryan Kindiger


Crop Science | 2005

Multilocation annual ryegrass cultivar performance over a twelve-year period

Daren D. Redfearn; Brad C. Venuto; W. D. Pitman; David C. Blouin; M. W. Alison

Collaboration


Dive into the Brad C. Venuto's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey M. Gillespie

Louisiana State University Agricultural Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.E. Wyatt

Louisiana State University Agricultural Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D.C. Blouin

Louisiana State University Agricultural Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. D. Pitman

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. A. Cassida

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David C. Blouin

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. W. Alison

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge