Brad Ridoutt
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brad Ridoutt.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | 2013
Anna Kounina; Manuele Margni; Jean-Baptiste Bayart; Anne-Marie Boulay; Markus Berger; Cécile Bulle; Rolf Frischknecht; Annette Koehler; Llorenç Milà i Canals; Masaharu Motoshita; Montserrat Núñez; Gregory Peters; Stephan Pfister; Brad Ridoutt; Rosalie van Zelm; Francesca Verones; Sebastien Humbert
PurposeIn recent years, several methods have been developed which propose different freshwater use inventory schemes and impact assessment characterization models considering various cause–effect chain relationships. This work reviewed a multitude of methods and indicators for freshwater use potentially applicable in life cycle assessment (LCA). This review is used as a basis to identify the key elements to build a scientific consensus for operational characterization methods for LCA.MethodsThis evaluation builds on the criteria and procedure developed within the International Reference Life Cycle Data System Handbook and has been adapted for the purpose of this project. It therefore includes (1) description of relevant cause–effect chains, (2) definition of criteria to evaluate the existing methods, (3) development of sub-criteria specific to freshwater use, and (4) description and review of existing methods addressing freshwater in LCA.Results and discussionNo single method is available which comprehensively describes all potential impacts derived from freshwater use. However, this review highlights several key findings to design a characterization method encompassing all the impact pathways of the assessment of freshwater use and consumption in life cycle assessment framework as the following: (1) in most of databases and methods, consistent freshwater balances are not reported either because output is not considered or because polluted freshwater is recalculated based on a critical dilution approach; (2) at the midpoint level, most methods are related to water scarcity index and correspond to the methodological choice of an indicator simplified in terms of the number of parameters (scarcity) and freshwater uses (freshwater consumption or freshwater withdrawal) considered. More comprehensive scarcity indices distinguish different freshwater types and functionalities. (3) At the endpoint level, several methods already exist which report results in units compatible with traditional human health and ecosystem quality damage and cover various cause–effect chains, e.g., the decrease of terrestrial biodiversity due to freshwater consumption. (4) Midpoint and endpoint indicators have various levels of spatial differentiation, i.e., generic factors with no differentiation at all, or country, watershed, and grid cell differentiation.ConclusionsExisting databases should be (1) completed with input and output freshwater flow differentiated according to water types based on its origin (surface water, groundwater, and precipitation water stored as soil moisture), (2) regionalized, and (3) if possible, characterized with a set of quality parameters. The assessment of impacts related to freshwater use is possible by assembling methods in a comprehensive methodology to characterize each use adequately.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | 2014
Olivier Jolliet; Rolf Frischknecht; Jane C. Bare; Anne-Marie Boulay; Cécile Bulle; Peter Fantke; Shabbir H. Gheewala; Michael Zwicky Hauschild; Norihiro Itsubo; Manuele Margni; Thomas E. McKone; Llorenç Mila y Canals; Leo Postuma; Valentina Prado-Lopez; Brad Ridoutt; Guido Sonnemann; Ralph K. Rosenbaum; Thomas P. Seager; Jaap Struijs; Rosalie van Zelm; Bruce Vigon; Annie Weisbrod
Olivier Jolliet & Rolf Frischknecht & Jane Bare & Anne-Marie Boulay & Cecile Bulle & Peter Fantke & Shabbir Gheewala & Michael Hauschild & Norihiro Itsubo & Manuele Margni & Thomas E. McKone & Llorenc Mila y Canals & Leo Postuma & Valentina Prado-Lopez & Brad Ridoutt & Guido Sonnemann & Ralph K. Rosenbaum & Tom Seager & Jaap Struijs & Rosalie van Zelm & Bruce Vigon & Annie Weisbrod & with contributions of the other workshop participants
Nutrients | 2014
Gilly A. Hendrie; Brad Ridoutt; Thomas Wiedmann; Manny Noakes
Nutrition guidelines now consider the environmental impact of food choices as well as maintaining health. In Australia there is insufficient data quantifying the environmental impact of diets, limiting our ability to make evidence-based recommendations. This paper used an environmentally extended input-output model of the economy to estimate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) for different food sectors. These data were augmented with food intake estimates from the 1995 Australian National Nutrition Survey. The GHGe of the average Australian diet was 14.5 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) per person per day. The recommended dietary patterns in the Australian Dietary Guidelines are nutrient rich and have the lowest GHGe (~25% lower than the average diet). Food groups that made the greatest contribution to diet-related GHGe were red meat (8.0 kg CO2e per person per day) and energy-dense, nutrient poor “non-core” foods (3.9 kg CO2e). Non-core foods accounted for 27% of the diet-related emissions. A reduction in non-core foods and consuming the recommended serves of core foods are strategies which may achieve benefits for population health and the environment. These data will enable comparisons between changes in dietary intake and GHGe over time, and provide a reference point for diets which meet population nutrient requirements and have the lowest GHGe.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | 2016
Rolf Frischknecht; Peter Fantke; Laura Tschümperlin; Monia Niero; Assumpció Antón; Jane C. Bare; Anne-Marie Boulay; Francesco Cherubini; Michael Zwicky Hauschild; Andrew Henderson; Annie Levasseur; Thomas E. McKone; Ottar Michelsen; Llorenç Milà i Canals; Stephan Pfister; Brad Ridoutt; Ralph K. Rosenbaum; Francesca Verones; Bruce Vigon; Olivier Jolliet
PurposeThe life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) guidance flagship project of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative aims at providing global guidance and building scientific consensus on environmental LCIA indicators. This paper presents the progress made since 2013, preliminary results obtained for each impact category and the description of a rice life cycle assessment (LCA) case study designed to test and compare LCIA indicators.MethodsThe effort has been focused in a first stage on impacts of global warming, fine particulate matter emissions, water use and land use, plus cross-cutting issues and LCA-based footprints. The paper reports the process and progress and specific results obtained in the different task forces (TFs). Additionally, a rice LCA case study common to all TF has been developed. Three distinctly different scenarios of producing and cooking rice have been defined and underlined with life cycle inventory data. These LCAs help testing impact category indicators which are being developed and/or selected in the harmonisation process. The rice LCA case study further helps to ensure the practicality of the finally recommended impact category indicators.Results and discussionThe global warming TF concludes that analysts should explore the sensitivity of LCA results to metrics other than GWP. The particulate matter TF attained initial guidance of how to include health effects from PM2.5 exposures consistently into LCIA. The biodiversity impacts of land use TF suggests to consider complementary metrics besides species richness for assessing biodiversity loss. The water use TF is evaluating two stress-based metrics, AWaRe and an alternative indicator by a stakeholder consultation. The cross-cutting issues TF agreed upon maintaining disability-adjusted life years (DALY) as endpoint unit for the safeguard subject “human health”. The footprint TF defined main attributes that should characterise all footprint indicators. “Rice cultivation” and “cooking” stages of the rice LCA case study contribute most to the environmental impacts assessed.ConclusionsThe results of the TF will be documented in white papers and some published in scientific journals. These white papers represent the input for the Pellston workshop™, taking place in Valencia, Spain, from 24 to 29 January 2016, where best practice, harmonised LCIA indicators and an update on the general LCIA framework will be discussed and agreed on. With the diversity in results and the multi-tier supply chains, the rice LCA case study is well suited to test candidate recommended indicators and to ensure their applicability in common LCA case studies.
Nutrients | 2016
Gilly A. Hendrie; Danielle Baird; Brad Ridoutt; Michalis Hadjikakou; Manny Noakes
Population dietary guidelines have started to include information about the environmental impacts of food choices, but more quantifiable evidence is needed, particularly about the impacts associated with discretionary foods. This paper utilised the 2011–2012 Australian Health Survey food intake data along with a highly disaggregated input–output model to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe) of Australians’ dietary intake, and compare current patterns of eating which vary in diet quality and GHGe to the recommended diet. The average dietary GHGe were 18.72 ± 12.06 and 13.73 ± 8.72 kg CO2e/day for male and female adults, respectively. The correlation between total energy and GHGe was r = 0.54 (p < 0.001). Core foods contributed 68.4% and discretionary foods 29.4%. Within core foods, fresh meat and alternatives (33.9%) was the greatest contributor. The modelling of current dietary patterns showed the contribution of discretionary foods to GHGe was 121% greater in the average diet and 307% greater in the “lower quality, higher GHGe” diet compared to the recommended diet. Reducing discretionary food intake would allow for small increases in emissions from core foods (in particular vegetables, dairy and grains), thereby providing a nutritional benefit at little environmental expense. Public health messages that promote healthy eating, eating to one’s energy needs and improved diet quality will also contribute to lowering GHGe.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2013
Enli Wang; Brad Ridoutt; Zhongkui Luo; M. E. Probert
Enhanced citrate release from crop roots has been one of the recent breeding targets for increased phosphorus (P) use efficiency (PUE), due to the potential of root citrate to solubilise soil P. However, it is unclear about the level of citrate efflux required to significantly impact on crop PUE in different soils. This paper presents a modelling approach to assess the field level impact of root exudates on crop PUE. The farming systems model, APSIM, was modified to include the effect of root citrate efflux on P availability in soil, crop P uptake and growth. With parameters derived from literature, the model was used to simulate the long-term impact of root citrate across soil and climatic conditions. Preliminary results showed contrasting long-term and short-term impacts due to either the accumulated effect of solubilisation or the depletion of soil P reserve. The major impact of enhanced citrate efflux is to increase the efficiency of applied P. The enhanced model enables simulations of a wide range of combinations of Genotype by Environment by Management (GxExM) scenarios, to address knowledge gaps, and to assist in design of field testing for validating the performance of new wheat varieties across environments. Highlights? Citrate release from plant roots can solubilize phosphorus (P) bonded in soil. ? It is unclear how much citrate is required to significantly impact on crop P use efficiency (PUE). ? A modelling approach is developed to assess impact of citrate efflux on crop PUE. ? It enables to explore short and long-term impact of citrate efflux on crop PUE. ? Results show major impact of enhanced citrate efflux is to increase the PUE of applied P.
Frontiers in Nutrition | 2016
Geneviève S. Metson; Dana Cordell; Brad Ridoutt
Changes in human diets, population increases, farming practices, and globalized food chains have led to dramatic increases in the demand for phosphorus fertilizers. Long-term food security and water quality are, however, threatened by such increased phosphorus consumption, because the world’s main source, phosphate rock, is an increasingly scarce resource. At the same time, losses of phosphorus from farms and cities have caused widespread water pollution. As one of the major factors contributing to increased phosphorus demand, dietary choices can play a key role in changing our resource consumption pathway. Importantly, the effects of dietary choices on phosphorus management are twofold: First, dietary choices affect a person or region’s “phosphorus footprint” – the magnitude of mined phosphate required to meet food demand. Second, dietary choices affect the magnitude of phosphorus content in human excreta and hence the recycling- and pollution-potential of phosphorus in sanitation systems. When considering options and impacts of interventions at the city scale (e.g., potential for recycling), dietary changes may be undervalued as a solution toward phosphorus sustainability. For example, in an average Australian city, a vegetable-based diet could marginally increase phosphorus in human excreta (an 8% increase). However, such a shift could simultaneously dramatically decrease the mined phosphate required to meet the city resident’s annual food demand by 72%. Taking a multi-scalar perspective is therefore key to fully exploring dietary choices as one of the tools for sustainable phosphorus management.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management | 2016
Alison Rothwell; Brad Ridoutt; Girija Page; William D Bellotti
With urban areas responsible for a significant share of total anthropogenic emissions, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to land-use change (LUC) induced by peri-urban (PU) development have the potential to be considerable. Despite this, there is little research into the transition from PU cropland to housing in terms of contribution to global warming. This paper presents a cross-sectoral integrative method for prospective climate change evaluation of PU LUC. Specifically, direct LUC (dLUC) GHG emissions from converting PU cropland to greenfield housing were examined. Additionally, GHG emissions due to displaced crop production inducing indirect LUC (iLUC) elsewhere were assessed. GHG impacts of dLUC and iLUC were each determined to be approximately 8 per cent of total GHG emissions due to a greenfield housing development displacing PU cropland. This magnitude of dLUC and iLUC emissions suggests that both have importance in future land-use decision making with respect to PU environments.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | 2014
Olivier Jolliet; Rolf Frischknecht; Jane C. Bare; Anne Marie Boulay; Cécile Bulle; Peter Fantke; Shabbir H. Gheewala; Michael Zwicky Hauschild; Norihiro Itsubo; Manuele Margni; Thomas E. McKone; Llorenç Mila y Canals; Leo Posthuma; Valentina Prado-Lopez; Brad Ridoutt; Guido Sonnemann; Ralph K. Rosenbaum; Thomas P. Seager; Jaap Struijs; Rosalie van Zelm; Bruce Vigon; Annie Weisbrod
Olivier Jolliet & Rolf Frischknecht & Jane Bare & Anne-Marie Boulay & Cecile Bulle & Peter Fantke & Shabbir Gheewala & Michael Hauschild & Norihiro Itsubo & Manuele Margni & Thomas E. McKone & Llorenç Mila y Canals & Leo Posthuma & Valentina Prado-Lopez & Brad Ridoutt & Guido Sonnemann & Ralph K. Rosenbaum & Tom Seager & Jaap Struijs & Rosalie van Zelm & Bruce Vigon & Annie Weisbrod & with contributions of the other workshop participants
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2009
Brad Ridoutt; Sandra Eady; J. Sellahewa; L. Simons; R. Bektash
Collaboration
Dive into the Brad Ridoutt's collaboration.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
View shared research outputs