Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bradley Alexander McGregor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bradley Alexander McGregor.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015

SWOG S0221: A Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy Schedules in High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer

G. T. Budd; William E. Barlow; Halle C. F. Moore; Timothy J. Hobday; James A. Stewart; Claudine Isaacs; Muhammad Salim; Jonathan K. Cho; Kristine Rinn; Kathy S. Albain; Helen K. Chew; Gary V. Burton; Timothy David Moore; Gordan Srkalovic; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Lawrence E. Flaherty; Robert B. Livingston; Danika L. Lew; Julie R. Gralow; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

PURPOSE To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40). CONCLUSION Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor-negative/HER2-negative tumors.


American Journal of Hematology | 2009

The use of higher dose clofarabine in adults with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Bradley Alexander McGregor; Alexander W. Brown; Michael B. Osswald; Michael R. Savona

The standard dose of clofarabine is 52 mg/m2 for pediatrics and 40 mg/m2 in adults. Clofarabine dosed at 52 mg/m2 was used in adult patients with refractory ALL to maximize response before allo‐HSCT. All patients had a significant response to therapy. Published pharmacokinetic analysis revealed no difference in peak plasma or intracellular concentrations at clofarabine dosed above 40 mg/m2, yet inhibition of replication in leukemia cells was only sustained over 24 hr at 55 mg/m2. Despite this, there have been no reports of high dose clofarabine used in this setting. Our experience implies that there may be a niche role for clofarabine in reducing disease burden before allo‐HSCT for adults with relapsed ALL. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. Published 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013

S0221: Comparison of two schedules of paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

G. Thomas Budd; William E. Barlow; Halle C. F. Moore; Timothy J. Hobday; James A. Stewart; Claudine Isaacs; Muhammad Salim; Jonathan K. Cho; Kristine Rinn; Kathy S. Albain; Helen K. Chew; Gary V. Burton; Timothy David Moore; Gordan Srkalovic; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Lawrence E. Flaherty; Robert B. Livingston; Danika Lew; Julie R. Gralow; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

CRA1008 Background: S0221 is a SWOG-coordinated phase III adjuvant chemotherapy intergroup trial in node-positive and high-risk node-negative operable breast cancer which hypothesized that 1) the weekly AC+G regimen is superior to ddAC x 6 and 2) 12 weeks of weekly paclitaxel (wP) is superior to q 2 week paclitaxel x 6 (ddP). METHODS Between December 2003 and November 2010, 2,716 patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to 1) AC+G vs ddAC and 2) P 80 mg/m2/week x 12 vs P 175 mg/m2 q 2 weeks x 6. If there was no significant interaction between the factors, the trial was powered to find a disease-free survival hazard ratio (HR) ≤ 0.82 for weekly vs q 2 week for each factor. At the first interim analysis, the AC randomization was halted for futility, and S0221 was closed to accrual 10 November 2010. S0221 reopened 15 December 2010, after which time all patients received 4 cycles of ddAC and randomization to P weekly x 12 and ddP x 6 continued. Accrual halted at a total of 3,294 in January 2012. RESULTS By September 7, 2012, 487 events and 340 deaths had occurred, prompting the third planned interim analysis. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended reporting the results since the futility boundary was crossed. A Cox model adjusting for the AC arms had a HR = 1.08 (95% CI 0.90-1.28; p=0.42), with the 99.5% CI excluding the original alternative hypothesis that the HR=0.82. There was no significant interaction of the two factors. Estimated 5-year progression-free survivals were 82% for weekly P and 81% for ddP. Toxicity data were available for 1,385 patients treated with ddP and 1,367 treated with weekly P. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 4 patients on ddP and 2 on weekly P. Percent grade 3-4 toxicity per arm are shown in the Table. CONCLUSIONS Either ddPx6 or weekly P x 12 are acceptable schedules of P administration. The differences in leukopenia likely reflect ascertainment bias against weekly P. If this is accepted, weekly P x 12 produces less overall toxicity than 6 cycles of ddP. Support: NCI grants CA32102, CA38926, CA21115, CA21076, CA77597, CA25224, CA77202, CCSRI15469, and Amgen, Inc. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT00070564. [Table: see text].


Cancer immunology research | 2018

Durable clinical benefit in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who discontinue PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for immune-related adverse events (irAEs)

Dylan J. Martini; Lana Hamieh; Rana R. McKay; Lauren C. Harshman; Raphael Brandao; Craig Norton; John A. Steinharter; Katherine M. Krajewski; Xin Gao; Fabio A.B. Schutz; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Dominick Bossé; Aly-Khan A. Lalani; Guillermo Velasco; M. Dror Michaelson; David F. McDermott; Toni K. Choueiri

mRCC patients who had a clinical response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and discontinued treatment due to irAE continued to derive prolonged clinical benefit after treatment was stopped. Current clinical trials are exploring customized approaches to application of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. The current standard of care for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients is PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors until progression or toxicity. Here, we characterize the clinical outcomes for 19 mRCC patients who experienced an initial clinical response (any degree of tumor shrinkage), but after immune-related adverse events (irAE) discontinued all systemic therapy. Clinical baseline characteristics, outcomes, and survival data were collected. The primary endpoint was time to progression from the date of treatment cessation (TTP). Most patients had clear cell histology and received anti–PD–1/PD-L1 therapy as second-line or later treatment. Median time on PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was 5.5 months (range, 0.7–46.5) and median TTP was 18.4 months (95% CI, 4.7–54.3) per Kaplan–Meier estimation. The irAEs included arthropathies, ophthalmopathies, myositis, pneumonitis, and diarrhea. We demonstrate that 68.4% of patients (n = 13) experienced durable clinical benefit off treatment (TTP of at least 6 months), with 36% (n = 7) of patients remaining off subsequent treatment for over a year after their last dose of anti–PD-1/PD-L1. Three patients with tumor growth found in a follow-up visit, underwent subsequent surgical intervention, and remain off systemic treatment. Nine patients (47.4%) have ongoing irAEs. Our results show that patients who benefitted clinically from anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy can experience sustained beneficial responses, not needing further therapies after the initial discontinuation of treatment due to irAEs. Investigation of biomarkers indicating sustained benefit to checkpoint blockers are needed. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(4); 402–8. ©2018 AACR.


European urology focus | 2017

Immunotherapy in the Elderly

Aly-Khan A. Lalani; Dominick Bossé; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Toni K. Choueiri

CONTEXT Immunotherapy has historic and contemporary presence in prostate, urothelial (UC), and renal cell (RCC) carcinomas. However, robust data on utility and generalizability of these treatments in older patients are lacking. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in elderly patients with prostate cancer, UC, or RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to October 2017 and according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A narrative review of studies was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-one reports were included regarding prostate cancer (four studies), UC (eight), and RCC (nine). In prostate cancer, sipuleucel-T improves survival (median age >70 yr) and similar results were seen in the PROSTVAC phase 2 trial. Ipilimumab has not improved survival independent of age; data for programmed cell death 1 inhibition is evolving. In metastatic UC, ≥50% of patients enrolled in pivotal checkpoint inhibitor studies were aged ≥65 yr. Three studies reported similar objective response rates (ORRs) in patients aged <65 versus ≥65 yr, whereas one study reported comparable ORRs in patients <80 versus ≥80 yr. In metastatic RCC, cytokine studies showed no efficacy difference by age; one study reported more ≥grade 3 toxicity in patients aged ≥65 yr. One vaccine-based study suggests that older age was associated with shorter survival. The benefit of nivolumab in second-line therapy was more apparent for patients aged 65-<75 yr than for those aged ≥75 yr. Across tumor subtypes, immunotherapy was well tolerated with minimal data stratifying toxicity by age. CONCLUSIONS Contemporary immunotherapy has informed practice in genitourinary malignancies independent of patient age. Trial reporting of outcomes by age will be important to understand the generalizability of ongoing investigations for elderly patients. PATIENT SUMMARY With the growing use of immunotherapy in genitourinary malignancies, benefits appear to apply independent of age. As the field advances, detailed reporting on outcomes and toxicities by age will be informative for both patients and physicians when discussing treatment options.


Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2009

Pseudoaneurysm in the muscular artery of the right gluteal region following a BM harvest

Bradley Alexander McGregor; D W Ririe; Michael B. Osswald

BM harvesting is generally accepted as a safe procedure with minimal complications and is often performed as an ambulatory surgery. In addition to bleeding and infection, rarer complications have been reported to include air or fat embolism and fracture of the ilium.1, 2, 3 We report a patient who suffered a pseudoaneurysm of the muscular artery of the right gluteal region following BM harvest with massive blood loss.


Nature Reviews Urology | 2018

Immunotherapy for advanced penile cancer — rationale and potential

Bradley Alexander McGregor; Guru Sonpavde

Penile carcinoma is a rare disease that is associated with substantial morbidity. Advances in cytotoxic chemotherapy have been disappointing in the first-line and salvage settings, but the association with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and a tumour-site agnostic approach form the basis of ongoing clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy strategies.In this Comment, McGregor and Sonpavde discuss the rationale and potential for immunotherapy in advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma, highlighting associations with human papillomavirus infection and a tumour-site agnostic immunotherapy indication, which form the basis of ongoing clinical trials.


JCO Precision Oncology | 2018

Enrichment of FGFR3-TACC3 Fusions in Patients With Bladder Cancer Who Are Young, Asian, or Have Never Smoked

Amin Nassar; Kevin Lundgren; Mark Pomerantz; Eliezer M. Van Allen; Lauren C. Harshman; Atish D. Choudhury; Mark A. Preston; Graeme S. Steele; Kent W. Mouw; Xiao X. Wei; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Toni K. Choueiri; Joaquim Bellmunt; David J. Kwiatkowski; Guru Sonpavde

PurposeFGFR3-TACC3 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 3–transforming acidic coiled coil-containing protein 3) fusions have recently been identified as driver mutations that lead to the activation of FGFR3 in bladder cancer and other tumor types and are associated with sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We examined the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions and hypothesized that they are enriched in a subset of patients with bladder cancer.Materials and MethodsWe correlated somatic FGFR3-TACC3 fusions with clinical and molecular features in two cohorts of patients with bladder cancer. The first cohort consisted of the muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) data set (n = 412) from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The second cohort consisted of patients with MIBC or high-grade non-MIBC at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute that had targeted capture sequencing of a selected panel of cancer genes (n = 356). All statistical tests were two sided. The clinical response of one pat...


European Urology | 2018

Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2018: Current Paradigms, Use of Immunotherapy, and Future Directions

Aly-Khan A. Lalani; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Laurence Albiges; Toni K. Choueiri; Robert J. Motzer; Thomas Powles; Christopher G. Wood; Axel Bex

CONTEXT Systemic therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) has greatly evolved over the last 15yr. More recently, combination strategies involving contemporary immunotherapy have emerged as key opportunities to further shift the treatment landscape. OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of standard therapeutic options in mccRCC as well as combination immunotherapy options on the horizon. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to February 2018 and according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. A narrative review of studies was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-six studies were included regarding therapies for metastatic RCC including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapy (n=9), mTOR inhibitors (n=2), cytokines (n=3), vaccines (n=3), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs, n=9). VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy had been the standard therapy, and its use is evolving in the front-line setting with ICIs; cabozantinib provides superior progression-free survival versus sunitinib in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria. The mTOR therapy is largely inferior to VEGF-directed therapy, although it has a role in combination strategies. Cytokines have largely been replaced in current practice throughout most regions, and vaccines have failed to show improved survival in phase III studies to date. ICIs have now become standard care in untreated patients with intermediate and poor risks, given overall survival benefit seen with CheckMate-214 study; survival data from IMmotion 151 are not yet mature. Several ongoing phase III combination trials, with promising early-phase data, are due to be read out. CONCLUSIONS The treatment landscape for mccRCC has evolved since the introduction of VEGF inhibitors. Combination therapies involving checkpoint inhibitors could be the next standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY With the expanding role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the treatment paradigm has shifted to include combination therapy in the untreated setting. As the field advances, the bar has been raised in evaluating ongoing combination strategies.


European Urology | 2017

Evolution of Circulating Tumor DNA Profile from First-line to Subsequent Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Sumanta K. Pal; Guru Sonpavde; Neeraj Agarwal; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Sandy Srinivas; Naomi B. Haas; Sabina Signoretti; Bradley Alexander McGregor; Jeremy O. Jones; Richard B. Lanman; Kimberly C. Banks; Toni K. Choueiri

Collaboration


Dive into the Bradley Alexander McGregor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Toni K. Choueiri

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge