Bradley J. Scott
GNS Science
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bradley J. Scott.
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research | 1999
Steven Sherburn; C.J Bryan; A.W Hurst; J.H Latter; Bradley J. Scott
Abstract From 1971 until 1995, the style of seismicity at Ruapehu changed little, reflecting a period of relatively low eruptive activity and consequent long-term stability within the vent system. Volcanic earthquakes and volcanic tremor were both dominated by a frequency of about 2 Hz. Volcanic earthquakes accompanied all phreatic and phreatomagmatic eruptions, but not small hydrothermal eruptions that originated within Crater Lake. Furthermore, more than half of the ML>3 volcanic earthquakes and changes in the reduced displacement of 2 Hz volcanic tremor by as much as a factor of 20 occurred without any accompanying eruptive activity. Three and 7 Hz volcanic tremor were also recorded, although never at lower-elevation seismometers. At times, this tremor was stronger at the summit seismometer than the 2 Hz tremor. Their source regions were independent of the 2 Hz source, and located at shallower depths. Volcano-tectonic earthquakes were generally unrelated to eruptive activity. The seismicity accompanying the 1995–1996 eruptive activity was significantly different from that of the period 1971 to 1995, and included volcanic tremor with a frequency of less than 1 Hz, simultaneous changes in the amplitude of the previously independent 2 Hz and 7 Hz volcanic tremor, and finally a change in the frequency content of volcanic earthquakes and volcanic tremor from 2 Hz to wideband. Path transmission effects play an important role in determining the characteristics of seismograms at Ruapehu. The presence of Crater Lake affects both the style of eruptions and the accompanying seismicity.
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research | 1998
Steven Sherburn; Bradley J. Scott; Yuji Nishi; Mituhiko Sugihara
The classification of earthquakes at White Island volcano, New Zealand, has been revised to address problems in existing classification schemes, to better reflect new data and to try to focus more on source processes. Seismicity generated by the direct involvement of magmatic or hydrothermal fluids are referred to as volcanic, and that generated by fault movement in response to stresses caused by those fluids, regional stresses, thermal effects and so on are referred to as volcano-tectonic. Spasmodic bursts form a separate category, as we have insufficient information to classify them as volcanic or volcano-tectonic. Volcanic seismicity is divided into short-duration, long-period volcanic earthquakes, long-duration volcanic earthquakes, and harmonic- and non-harmonic volcanic tremor, while volcano-tectonic seismicity is divided into shallow and deep volcano-tectonic earthquakes. Harmonic volcanic tremor is related to sub-surface intrusive processes, while non-harmonic volcanic tremor originates close to active craters at shallow depth, and usually occurs during eruptive activity. Short-duration, long-period volcanic earthquakes come from a single source close to the active craters, but originate deeper than non-harmonic volcanic tremor, and are not related to eruptive activity. Long-duration volcanic earthquakes often accompany larger discrete eruptions. The waveform of these events consists of an initial low-frequency part from a deep source, and a later cigar-shaped part of mixed frequencies from a shallow crater source.
New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2007
Steven Sherburn; Bradley J. Scott; Jane Olsen; Craig Miller
Abstract The Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) in New Zealand is monitored by a network of five telemetered, vertical‐component, short‐period seismographs. Between 1995 and 2005, 24 earthquakes were located in the Auckland region. Ten of these were located reasonably reliably (position and depth uncertainty ≤10 km) and all of these were <15 km deep. Only one of these earthquakes occurred within the AVF. Magnitudes ranged from ML 1.6 to 3.3, and five earthquakes of ML ≥ 2.4 were felt. There were few reliably located earthquakes because most were not recorded by the whole network owing to their relatively low magnitude and a high level of background noise. The Auckland earthquakes are believed to represent normal background seismicity and are not thought to be eruption precursors. All earthquakes were of high‐frequency, tectonic type; no low‐frequency, volcanic earthquakes were recorded. Based on seismic precursors to eruptions from historically active volcanic fields, we estimate that precursory earthquakes could occur as little as 2 weeks before an Auckland eruption and they could be as large as ML 4.5–5.5. Based on the depth of the background seismicity in Auckland, and previous estimates of the ascent rate and source depth of AVF magmas, we calculate a precursory period as short as a few days. Our best estimate of the length of preeruption seismicity is therefore a few days to a few weeks. The largest precursory earthquakes could be large enough to be felt by most of the population who live in Auckland City. During a magmatic intrusion, deep long‐period earthquakes might occur at c. 30 km as magma ascends into the crust. Earthquakes would probably have to be a lot shallower, perhaps only 5 km, before their epicentres might be useful for estimating the location of any eruption. Geodetic monitoring methods (GPS and InSAR) might perform as well as seismic monitoring for identifying unrest, but they have significant limitations. To better monitor and interpret precursory seismicity from the AVF, an increase in the number of seismographs and an improvement in our understanding of the local crustal structure are needed.
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union | 2007
Bruce Christenson; Cynthia A. Werner; Agnes G. Reyes; Steve Sherburn; Bradley J. Scott; Craig Miller; Michael J. Rosenburg; Anthony W. Hurst; K. Britten
The 17 March 2006 eruption from Raoul Island (Kermadec arc, north of New Zealand) is interpreted as a magmatic-hydrothermal event triggered by shaking associated with a swarm of local earthquakes. The eruption, which tragically claimed the life of New Zealand Department of Conservation Ranger Mark Kearney, occurred without significant volcanic seismicity or any of the precursory responses the volcanic hydrothermal system exhibited prior to a similarly sized eruption in 1964. Preliminary evidence suggests that the absence of precursory behavior is probably the consequence of hydrothermal sealing of the volcanic conduit since the 1964 eruption, and points to potential hazards associated with quiescent oceanic island volcanoes.
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research | 1996
Yuji Nishi; Steven Sherburn; Bradley J. Scott; Mituhiko Sugihara
Abstract Volcano-tectonic earthquakes at White Island are concentrated in a single seismically active zone, southeast of the active vents and at depths of less than 1 km. A few deeper earthquakes also occur beneath the active vents. A composite focal mechanism indicates that the stress regime in the shallow seismic zone is N-S extensional. Shallow seismicity occurs within the main volume of the volcano-hydrothermal system that underlies the Main Crater floor, and we interpret this as a region where the rocks have been weakened by past magmatic intrusions, elevated pore fluid pressure and physico-chemical effects of acid volcanic fluids, thereby allowing preferential seismic failure. Brittle seismic failure within this region requires a temperature less than about 400 °C, and implies high horizontal temperature gradients close to the active craters and fumaroles. Spasmodic bursts events are also a result of brittle failure, but occur close to zones of significant permeability in response to changes in local fluid pressure.
Journal of Applied Volcanology | 2014
Sally H. Potter; Gill Jolly; Vincent E. Neall; David Johnston; Bradley J. Scott
The communication of scientific information to stakeholders is a critical component of an effective Volcano Early Warning System. Volcanic Alert Level (VAL) systems are used in many countries as a tool within early warning systems to communicate complex volcanic information in a simple form, from which response decisions can be made. Such communication tools need to meet the requirements of a wide range of end-users, including emergency managers, the aviation industry, media, and the public. They also need to be usable by scientists who determine the alert levels based on integration and interpretation of volcano observations and monitoring data.This paper presents an exploratory review of New Zealand’s 20-year old VAL system, and for the first time globally, describes the development of a VAL system based on a robust qualitative ethnographic methodology. This involved semi-structured interviews of scientists and VAL end-users, document analysis, and observations of scientists over three years as they set the VAL during multiple unrest and eruption crises. The transdisciplinary nature of this research allows the system to be revised with direct input by end-users of the system, highlighting the benefits of using social science methodologies in developing or revising warning systems. The methodology utilised in this research is applicable worldwide, and could be used to develop warning systems for other hazards.It was identified that there are multiple possibilities for foundations of VAL systems, including phenomena, hazard, risk, and magmatic processes. The revised VAL system is based on the findings of this research, and was implemented in collaboration with New Zealand’s Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management in July 2014. It is used for all of New Zealand’s active volcanoes, and is understandable, intuitive, and informative. The complete process of exploring a current VAL system, revising it, and introducing it to New Zealand society is described.
Bulletin of Volcanology | 2015
Sally H. Potter; Bradley J. Scott; Gill Jolly; Vince Neall; David Johnston
Accurately observing and interpreting volcanic unrest phenomena contributes towards better forecasting of volcanic eruptions, thus potentially saving lives. Volcanic unrest is recorded by volcano observatories and may include seismic, geodetic, degassing and/or geothermal phenomena. The multivariate datasets are often complex and can contain a large amount of data in a variety of formats. Low levels of unrest are frequently recorded, causing the distinction between background activity and unrest to be blurred, despite the widespread usage of these terms in unrest literature (including probabilistic eruption-forecasting models) and in Volcanic Alert Level (VAL) systems. Frequencies and intensities of unrest episodes are not easily comparable over time or between volcanoes. Complex unrest information is difficult to communicate simply to civil defence personnel and other non-scientists. The Volcanic Unrest Index (VUI) is presented here to address these issues. The purpose of the VUI is to provide a semi-quantitative rating of unrest intensity relative to each volcano’s past level of unrest and to that of analogous volcanoes. The VUI is calculated using a worksheet of observed phenomena. Ranges for each phenomenon within the worksheet can be customised for individual volcanoes, as demonstrated in the companion paper for Taupo Volcanic Centre, New Zealand (Potter et al. 2015). The VUI can be determined retrospectively for historical episodes of unrest based on qualitative observations, as well as for recent episodes with state-of-the-art monitoring. This enables a long time series of unrest occurrence and intensity to be constructed and easily communicated to end users. The VUI can also assist with VAL decision-making. We present and discuss two approaches to the concept of unrest.
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research | 1993
Steven Sherburn; Bradley J. Scott
Abstract B-type volcanic earthquakes at White Island have almost all their energy in the band 0.5–4 Hz, around a dominant spectral peak of about 2 Hz. A high degree of similarity in the waveforms suggests that the earthquakes originate from a volume of about 100 m 3 , and that the process that generates them is repetitive. At a distance of 1 km from the active crater the particle motion of B-type events suggests an initial P-wave, followed 0.5 seconds later by a horizontally polarised S-wave and then a wave of unknown type. The exact mechanism for B-type events is unknown, however, the absence of higher harmonics implies they cannot be caused by the resonance of gas or magma within a pipe-like structure, and the P- and S-waves suggest a simple shear-induced rock fracture in a hot ductile medium.
New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 1989
Debbie L. Fellows; Bradley J. Scott
Abstract A portion of the Edgecumbe Fault scarp has been fenced and protected to provide a record of the major surface rupture. The site will be monitored to observe the natural degradation of the fault scarp, and it is also the sole remaining record, unmodified by humans or stock, of the surface rupture formed during the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake. Measurements of the degradation are being made across seven profile lines perpendicular to the rupture at regular intervals. At present the monitoring results have not indicated any change in the free faces. The diffusion model has been shown by a number of workers to be applicable to scarps and is assumed to be the appropriate model for fault-scarp degradation in the Rangitaiki Plains. An assumption of this model is that the time taken for the free face of the scarp to degrade to an angle of repose is short compared with the time span over which diffusion occurs. Data obtained from monitoring of the site over a significant time period, combined with the known ...
New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 1996
Steven Sherburn; Bradley J. Scott; A. W. Hurst
Abstract A short, intense sequence of volcano‐tectonic earthquakes preceded a period of strong volcanic tremor at White Island volcano, New Zealand, in July—September 1991. The tremor was initially harmonic with clear higher harmonics, but after 3 days was gradually replaced by broadband non‐harmonic tremor. Good examples of both harmonic and non‐harmonic tremor were recorded. Shock waves were observed in the eruption column of May 91 vent from early August, coinciding with the period of non‐harmonic tremor. The harmonic tremor is interpreted to have been due to a standing wave vibration in vesicular magma in the conduit beneath May 91 Vent, and the non‐harmonic tremor to open‐vent degassing activity near the top of the vent.