Bradley R. Schmerl
Carnegie Mellon University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bradley R. Schmerl.
IEEE Computer | 2004
David Garlan; Shang-Wen Cheng; An-Cheng Huang; Bradley R. Schmerl; Peter Steenkiste
While attractive in principle, architecture-based self-adaptation raises a number of research and engineering challenges. First, the ability to handle a wide variety of systems must be addressed. Second, the need to reduce costs in adding external control to a system must be addressed. Our rainbow framework attempts to address both problems. By adopting an architecture-based approach, it provides reusable infrastructure together with mechanisms for specializing that infrastructure to the needs of specific systems. The specialization mechanisms let the developer of self-adaptation capabilities choose what aspects of the system to model and monitor, what conditions should trigger adaptation, and how to adapt the system.
dagstuhl seminar proceedings | 2013
Rogério de Lemos; Holger Giese; Hausi A. Müller; Mary Shaw; Jesper Andersson; Marin Litoiu; Bradley R. Schmerl; Gabriel Tamura; Norha M. Villegas; Thomas Vogel; Danny Weyns; Luciano Baresi; Basil Becker; Nelly Bencomo; Yuriy Brun; Bojan Cukic; Ron Desmarais; Schahram Dustdar; Gregor Engels; Kurt Geihs; Karl M. Göschka; Alessandra Gorla; Vincenzo Grassi; Paola Inverardi; Gabor Karsai; Jeff Kramer; Antónia Lopes; Jeff Magee; Sam Malek; Serge Mankovskii
The goal of this roadmap paper is to summarize the state-of-the-art and identify research challenges when developing, deploying and managing self-adaptive software systems. Instead of dealing with a wide range of topics associated with the field, we focus on four essential topics of self-adaptation: design space for self-adaptive solutions, software engineering processes for self-adaptive systems, from centralized to decentralized control, and practical run-time verification & validation for self-adaptive systems. For each topic, we present an overview, suggest future directions, and focus on selected challenges. This paper complements and extends a previous roadmap on software engineering for self-adaptive systems published in 2009 covering a different set of topics, and reflecting in part on the previous paper. This roadmap is one of the many results of the Dagstuhl Seminar 10431 on Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems, which took place in October 2010.
workshop on self-healing systems | 2002
David Garlan; Bradley R. Schmerl
Traditional mechanisms that allow a system to detect and recover from errors are typically wired into applications at the level of code where they are hard to change, reuse, or analyze. An alternative approach is to use externalized adaptation: one or more models of a system are maintained at run time and external to the application as a basis for identifying problems and resolving them. In this paper we provide an overview of recent research in which we use architectural models as the basis for such problem diagnosis and repair. These models can be specialized to the particular style of the system, the quality of interest, and the dimensions of run time adaptation that are permitted by the running system.
systems man and cybernetics | 2006
João Pedro Sousa; Vahe Poladian; David Garlan; Bradley R. Schmerl; Mary Shaw
An important domain for autonomic systems is the area of ubiquitous computing: users are increasingly surrounded by technology that is heterogeneous, pervasive, and variable. In this paper we describe our work in developing self-adapting computing infrastructure that automates the configuration and reconfiguration of such environments. Focusing on the engineering issues of self-adaptation in the presence of heterogeneous platforms, legacy applications, mobile users, and resource variable environments, we describe a new approach based on the following key ideas: 1) explicit representation of user tasks allows us to determine what service qualities are required of a given configuration; 2) decoupling task and preference specification from the lower level mechanisms that carry out those preferences provides a clean engineering separation of concerns between what is needed and how it is carried out; and 3) efficient algorithms allow us to calculate in real time near-optimal resource allocations and reallocations for a given task
Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Self-adaptation and self-managing systems | 2006
Shang-Wen Cheng; David Garlan; Bradley R. Schmerl
In the world of autonomic computing, the ultimate aim is to automate human tasks in system management to achieve high-level stakeholder objectives. One common approach is to capture and represent human expertise in a form executable by a computer. Techniques to capture such expertise in programs, scripts, or rule sets are effective to an extent. However, they are often incapable of expressing the necessary adaptation expertise and emulating the subtleties of trade-offs in high-level decision making. In this paper, we propose a new language of adaptation that is sufficiently expressive to capture the subtleties of choice, deriving its ontology from system administration tasks and its underlying formalism from utility theory.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science | 2003
David Garlan; Shang-Wen Cheng; Bradley R. Schmerl
The invention relates to an article suitable for making an electrical connection between two electrical conductors, for example an earth conductor and the outer conductor of a coaxial cable. The article comprises a heat-shrinkable sleeve and a quantity of solder which is positioned eccentrically within the sleeve and is held by and/or on the sleeve. The sleeve also comprises or has guide means capable of locating a portion of the earth conductor in proximity to the quantity of solder. On shrinking of the sleeve and fusing of the solder, an electrical connection can be made between an earth conductor received in the guide means and the outer conductor of a coaxial cable received in the sleeve.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science | 2013
Danny Weyns; Bradley R. Schmerl; Vincenzo Grassi; Sam Malek; Raffaela Mirandola; Christian Prehofer; Jochen Wuttke; Jesper Andersson; Holger Giese; Karl M. Göschka
Self-adaptation is typically realized using a control loop. One prominent approach for organizing a control loop in self-adaptive systems is by means of four components that are responsible for the primary functions of self-adaptation: Monitor, Analyze, Plan, and Execute, together forming a MAPE loop. When systems are large, complex, and heterogeneous, a single MAPE loop may not be sufficient for managing all adaptation in a system, so multiple MAPE loops may be introduced. In self-adaptive systems with multiple MAPE loops, decisions about how to decentralize each of the MAPE functions must be made. These decisions involve how and whether the corresponding functions from multiple loops are to be coordinated (e.g., planning components coordinating to prepare a plan for an adaptation). To foster comprehension of self-adaptive systems with multiple MAPE loops and support reuse of known solutions, it is crucial that we document common design approaches for engineers. As such systematic knowledge is currently lacking, it is timely to reflect on these systems to: (a) consolidate the knowledge in this area, and (b) to develop a systematic approach for describing different types of control in self-adaptive systems. We contribute with a simple notation for describing interacting MAPE loops, which we believe helps in achieving (b), and we use this notation to describe a number of existing patterns of interacting MAPE loops, to begin to fulfill (a). From our study, we outline numerous remaining research challenges in this area.
automation, robotics and control systems | 2002
Shang-Wen Cheng; David Garlan; Bradley R. Schmerl; João Pedro Sousa; Bridget Spitznagel; Peter Steenkiste; Ningning Hu
An important requirement for pervasive computing systems is the ability to adapt at runtime to handle varying resources, user mobility, changing user needs, and system faults. In this paper we describe an approach in which dynamic adaptation is supported by the use of software architectural models to monitor an application and guide dynamic changes to it. The use of externalized models permits one to make reconfiguration decisions based on a global perspective of the running system, apply analytic models to determine correct repair strategies, and gauge the effectiveness of repair through continuous system monitoring. We illustrate the application of this idea to pervasive computing systems, focusing on the need to adapt based on performance-related criteria and models.
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering | 2006
Bradley R. Schmerl; Jonathan Aldrich; David Garlan; Rick Kazman; Hong Yan
One of the challenging problems for software developers is guaranteeing that a system as built is consistent with its architectural design. In this paper, we describe a technique that uses runtime observations about an executing system to construct an architectural view of the system. In this technique, we develop mappings that exploit regularities in system implementation and architectural style. These mappings describe how low-level system events can be interpreted as more abstract architectural operations and are formally defined using colored Petri nets. In this paper, we describe a system, called DiscoTect, that uses these mappings and we introduce the DiscoSTEP mapping language and its formal definition. Two case studies showing the application of DiscoTect suggest that the tool is practical to apply to legacy systems and can dynamically verify conformance to a preexisting architectural specification
international conference on software engineering | 2004
Hong Yan; David Garlan; Bradley R. Schmerl; Jonathan Aldrich; Rick Kazman
One of the challenging problems for software developers is guaranteeing that a system as built is consistent with its architectural design. In this paper, we describe a technique that uses run time observations about an executing system to construct an architectural view of the system. With this technique, we develop mappings that exploit regularities in system implementation and architectural style. These mappings describe how low-level system events can be interpreted as more abstract architectural operations. We describe the current implementation of a tool that uses these mappings, and show that it can highlight inconsistencies between implementation and architecture.