Branca Cavaco

HRPT2, encoding parafibromin, is mutated in hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome.

We report here the identification of a gene associated with the hyperparathyroidism–jaw tumor (HPT–JT) syndrome. A single locus associated with HPT–JT (HRPT2) was previously mapped to chromosomal region 1q25–q32. We refined this region to a critical interval of 12 cM by genotyping in 26 affected kindreds. Using a positional candidate approach, we identified thirteen different heterozygous, germline, inactivating mutations in a single gene in fourteen families with HPT–JT. The proposed role of HRPT2 as a tumor suppressor was supported by mutation screening in 48 parathyroid adenomas with cystic features, which identified three somatic inactivating mutations, all located in exon 1. None of these mutations were detected in normal controls, and all were predicted to cause deficient or impaired protein function. HRPT2 is a ubiquitously expressed, evolutionarily conserved gene encoding a predicted protein of 531 amino acids, for which we propose the name parafibromin. Our findings suggest that HRPT2 is a tumor-suppressor gene, the inactivation of which is directly involved in predisposition to HPT–JT and in development of some sporadic parathyroid tumors.

TERT promoter mutations are a major indicator of poor outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinomas.

Context: Telomerase promoter mutations (TERT) were recently described in follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinomas (FCDTC) and seem to be more prevalent in aggressive cancers. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of TERT promoter mutations in thyroid lesions and to investigate the prognostic significance of such mutations in a large cohort of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs). Design: This was a retrospective observational study. Setting and Patients: We studied 647 tumors and tumor-like lesions. A total of 469 patients with FCDTC treated and followed in five university hospitals were included. Mean follow-up (±SD) was 7.8 ± 5.8 years. Main Outcome Measures: Predictive value of TERT promoter mutations for distant metastasization, disease persistence at the end of follow-up, and disease-specific mortality. Results: TERT promoter mutations were found in 7.5% of papillary carcinomas (PTCs), 17.1% of follicular carcinomas, 29.0% of poorly differentiated carcinomas, and 33.3% of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Patients with TERT-mutated tumors were older (P < .001) and had larger tumors (P = .002). In DTCs, TERT promoter mutations were significantly associated with distant metastases (P < .001) and higher stage (P < .001). Patients with DTC harboring TERT promoter mutations were submitted to more radioiodine treatments (P = .009) with higher cumulative dose (P = .004) and to more treatment modalities (P = .001). At the end of follow-up, patients with TERT-mutated DTCs were more prone to have persistent disease (P = .001). TERT promoter mutations were significantly associated with disease-specific mortality [in the whole FCDTC (P < .001)] in DTCs (P < .001), PTCs (P = .001), and follicular carcinomas (P < .001). After adjusting for age at diagnosis and gender, the hazard ratio was 10.35 (95% confidence interval 2.01–53.24; P = .005) in DTC and 23.81 (95% confidence interval 1.36–415.76; P = .03) in PTCs. Conclusions: TERT promoter mutations are an indicator of clinically aggressive tumors, being correlated with worse outcome and disease-specific mortality in DTC. TERT promoter mutations have an independent prognostic value in DTC and, notably, in PTC.

High Prevalence of RAS Mutations in RET-Negative Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinomas

CONTEXT Sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC) frequently harbor mutations in the RET protooncogene. We have earlier reported a series of 51 sporadic MTC with 64.7% of RET-positive and 35.3% of RET-negative cases. OBJECTIVE In the present study, we investigated the possible involvement of RAS and BRAF protooncogenes in the development of sporadic RET-negative MTC. PATIENTS AND DESIGN We performed PCR amplification and sequencing analysis of the three mutational hotspots (codons 12, 13, and 61) of the H-, K-, and N-RAS genes, and of the mutational hotspot (codon 600) and exon 11 of the BRAF gene in 65 sporadic MTC, of which 40 were RET positive and 25 were RET negative. RESULTS Somatic H-RAS and K-RAS mutations were detected in 14 of 25 (56.0%) and three of 25 (12.0%) of RET-negative sporadic MTC, respectively. On the other hand, only one of 40 (2.5%) RET-positive sporadic MTC had a RAS mutation, namely in H-RAS. One of the H-RAS mutations was novel (c.32_37dupCCGGCG). No mutations of N-RAS or BRAF were detected in all assessed tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our results showed that RAS mutations were present in 68.0% (17 of 25) of the RET-negative MTC and in only 2.5% of the RET-positive MTC (P < 0.0001), suggesting that activation of the protooncogenes RAS and RET represents alternative genetic events in sporadic MTC tumorigenesis.

A Study of MECT1-MAML2 in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma and Warthin's Tumor of Salivary Glands

The t(11;19)(q21;p13) chromosomal translocation has been described in two distinct types of salivary gland neoplasms: mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and Warthins tumor (WT). Since this translocation has been recently shown to generate a MECT1-MAML2 fusion gene, we evaluated 10 primary MEC and seven primary WT to further define the molecular association of these two entities using cytogenetic, as well as in situ hybridization (ISH) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses directed against the fusion gene. A karyotype was established in all neoplasms except for two MEC cases. Of the eight karyotyped MECs, five showed the t(11;19)(q21;p13), two had a normal karyotype, and one case presented a -Y and +X. Three of the WT revealed a normal karyotype and four had several abnormalities which did not involve chromosomes 11 and 19. ISH analysis performed in cytogenetic suspension and/or in tumor paraffin sections demonstrated MAML2 rearrangement in 7 of 10 cases of MEC: all five cases with t(11;19), one case with normal karyotype, and one unkaryotyped case. RT-PCR analysis confirmed the expression of the MECT1-MAML2 gene in all MEC cases that were positive by ISH analysis. Neither the t(11;19) nor MECT1-MAML2 was detected in any case of WT, nor in control samples from polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, or normal parotid gland tissue. We have demonstrated that ISH and RT-PCR are sensitive methods for detecting MECT1-MAML2 in MEC. In contrast, we did not detect the t(11;19) nor MECT1-MAML2 expression in seven cases of WT.

Uterine tumours are a phenotypic manifestation of the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumour syndrome

The hyperparathyroidism‐jaw tumour (HPT‐JT) syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by parathyroid tumours, which are frequently carcinomas, and ossifying jaw fibromas. In addition, some patients may develop renal tumours and cysts. The gene causing HPT‐JT, which is referred to as HRPT2 and is located on chromosome 1q31.2, encodes a 531 amino acid protein called PARAFIBROMIN. To date 42 mutations, of which 22 are germline, have been reported and 97% of these are inactivating and consistent with a tumour suppressor role for HRPT2. We have investigated another four HPT‐JT families for germline mutations, searched for additional clinical phenotypes, and examined for a genotype–phenotype correlation. Mutations were found in two families. One family had a novel deletional‐insertion at codon 669, and the other had a 2 bp insertion at codon 679, which has been reported in four other unrelated patients. These five unrelated patients and their families with the same mutation were not found to develop the same tumours, thereby indicating an absence of a genotype–phenotype correlation. An analysis of 33 HPT‐JT kindreds revealed that affected women in 13 HPT‐JT families suffered from menorrhagia in their second to fourth decades. This often required hysterectomy, which revealed the presence of uterine tumours. This resulted in a significantly reduced maternal transmission of the disease. Thus, the results of our analysis expand the spectrum of HPT‐JT‐associated tumours to include uterine tumours, and these may account for the decreased reproductive fitness in females from HPT‐JT families.

Parafibromin mutations in hereditary hyperparathyroidism syndromes and parathyroid tumours

Objective  To investigate two patients with the hyperparathyroidism‐jaw tumour (HPT‐JT) syndrome and three patients with familial isolated hyperparathyroidism (FIHP), together with 31 parathyroid tumours (2 HPT‐JT, 2 FIHP and 27 sporadic) for HRPT2 mutations. The HPT‐JT syndrome and FIHP are autosomal dominant disorders that may be caused by abnormalities of the HRPT2 gene, located on chromosome 1q31.2. HRPT2 encodes a 531 amino acid protein, parafibromin, which interacts with human homologues of the yeast Paf1 complex.

HYPERPROLACTINEMIA DUE TO BIG BIG PROLACTIN IS DIFFERENTLY DETECTED BY COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE IMMUNOASSAYS

Macroprolactinemia, i.e. sustained hyperprolactinemia where the predominant circulating form of prolactin (PRL) is of large molecular weight, is a common phenomenon comprising up to one-fourth of all cases of hyperprolactinemia. We measured serum PRL levels by four different immunoassay systems (PROL-CTK, RIAgnost, Delfia, ACS 180) and by the Nb2 bioassay in patients with prolactinomas/idiopathic hyperprolactinemias in whom monomeric PRL was the major species of PRL (n=11, group 1) and in patients with macroprolactinemia (n=12, group 2). In group 1, the results obtained with the different immunoassays and with the Nb2 assay were highly correlated (r=0.945−0.982). On the other hand, big big-PRL (bb-PRL) was differently recognized by the immunoassays, since measured serum PRL values from each patient were highly variable in group 2. RIA-gnost Prolactin and Delfia Prolactin detected bb-PRL similarly and they were highly correlated with each other (r=0.937, p<0.0001). ACS 180 detected bb-PRL somewhat differently from the RIA-gnost and Delfia systems, but likewise most of the patients of group 2 had PRL values above normal. PROL-CTK was the method less influenced by the presence of bb-PRL since most of the subjects with macroprolactinemia had PRL levels either within the normal range or only marginally elevated. From the immunoassays tested, PROL-CTK was the system which was less correlated with the Nb2 bioassay in group 2 (r=0.252; NS). Our experience is that macroprolactinemia is an asymptomatic condition in most of the cases. Therefore, we suggest that the routine measurement of PRL should be done with methods that are only minimally affected by the presence of macroprolactin. Such an approach would obviate the use of extensive, frequently expensive and ultimately useless diagnostic tests that are needed to determine the cause of the hyperprolactinemia.

Mapping a new familial thyroid epithelial neoplasia susceptibility locus to chromosome 8p23.1-p22 by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism genome-wide linkage analysis.

CONTEXT Familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma (FNMTC) accounts for approximately 5% of all thyroid tumors. Genetic mapping studies have identified four different chromosomal regions predisposing to FNMTC: fPTC/PRN (1p13.2-1q22), NMTC1 (2q21), MNG1 (14q32), and TCO (19p13.2). OBJECTIVE Our objective was to map the gene predisposing to familial thyroid epithelial neoplasia in a large Portuguese family. METHODS AND RESULTS The clinical screening of a Portuguese family identified 11 members affected with benign thyroid lesions and five affected with thyroid carcinomas. Linkage analysis excluded the involvement of the fPTC/PRN, NMTC1, MNG1, and TCO loci. To map the gene predisposing to thyroid epithelial neoplasia in this family, a genome-wide linkage analysis was conducted, using DNA samples from 17 family members and high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays. A genome-wide significant evidence of linkage, to a single region on chromosome 8p23.1-p22 was obtained, with a maximum parametric haplotype-based LOD score of 4.41 (theta=0.00). Linkage analysis with microsatellite markers confirmed linkage to 8q23.1-p22, and recombination events delimited the minimal region to a 7.46-Mb span. Seventeen suggestive candidate genes located in the minimal region were excluded as susceptibility genes by mutational analysis. Allelic losses in the 8p23.1-p22 region were absent in seven thyroid tumors from family members, suggesting that the inactivation of a putative tumor suppressor gene may have occurred through other mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS Our results present evidence for the existence of a novel familial thyroid epithelial neoplasia susceptibility locus on chromosome 8p23.1-p22, providing the basis for the identification of a gene for this disease.

Mutational Analysis of Portuguese Families with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Reveals Large Germline Deletions

objective To determine the spectrum of MEN1 mutations in Portuguese kindreds, and identify mutation‐carriers.

Familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma (FNMTC): analysis of fPTC/PRN, NMTC1, MNG1 and TCO susceptibility loci and identification of somatic BRAF and RAS mutations.

Linkage analysis has identified four familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma (FNMTC) susceptibility loci: fPTC/PRN (1p13.2-1q22), NMTC1 (2q21), MNG1 (14q32) and TCO (19p13.2). To date, there is no evidence for the involvement of genes from the RAS/RAF signalling pathway in FNMTC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of the four susceptibility loci, and RAS/RAF signalling pathway genes, in FNMTC. In total, 8 FNMTC families, and 27 thyroid lesions from family members (22 papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs): 11 classic, 10 of the follicular variant and 1 of the mixed variant; 4 follicular thyroid adenomas (FTAs) and 1 nodular goitre (NG)), were evaluated for the involvement of the four susceptibility regions, using linkage and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses. BRAF and H-, N- and K-RAS mutations were also screened in the 27 lesions and patients. Linkage analysis in seven informative families showed no evidence for the involvement of any of the four candidate regions, supporting a genetic heterogeneity for FNMTC. Twenty tumours (74%), of which 18 were PTCs, showed no LOH at the four susceptibility loci. The remaining seven tumours (four PTCs, two FTAs and one NG) showed variable patterns of LOH. Fourteen tumours (52%) had somatic mutations: BRAF-V600E mutation was observed in 9 out of the 22 PTCs (41%); and H-RAS and N-RAS mutations were detected in 5 out of the 22 PTCs (23%). Our data suggest that the four candidate regions are not frequently involved in FNMTC and that the somatic activation of BRAF and RAS plays a role in FNMTC tumourigenesis.