Branka Vidrih

Platelet serotonin concentration and depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia

Depressive symptoms seem to be frequent in schizophrenia, but so far they have received less attention than other symptom domains. Impaired serotonergic neurotransmission has been implicated in the pathogenesis of depression and schizophrenia. The objectives of this study were to investigate platelet serotonin concentrations in schizophrenic patients with and without depressive symptoms, and to investigate the association between platelet serotonin concentrations and symptoms of schizophrenia, mostly depressive symptoms. A total of 364 patients were included in the study, 237 of which had significant depressive symptoms. Significant depressive symptoms were defined by the cut-off score of 7 or more on Calgary Depression Rating Scale (CDSS). Platelet serotonin concentrations were assessed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Prevalence of depression in patients with schizophrenia was 65.1%. Schizophrenic patients with depressive symptoms showed lower platelet serotonin concentrations (mean±SD; 490.6±401.2) compared to schizophrenic patients without depressive symptoms (mean±SD; 660.9±471.5). An inverse correlation was established between platelet serotonin concentration and depressive symptoms, with more severe symptoms being associated with lower platelet serotonin concentrations. Depressive symptoms in schizophrenic patients may be associated with reduced concentrations of platelet serotonin.

S115. SYMPTOM DOMAINS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA AND GENE POLYMORPHISMS

Abstract Background Dopamine and serotonin neurotransmission relies mostly on the action of four factors: serotonin and dopamine transporters (SERT and DAT) and enzymes monoaminooxidase A (MAO-A) and catechol-O-mehtyltransferase (COMT). The goal of this research was to closely examine schizophrenia symptom domains in relation to the investigated polymorphisms. Methods Study group was composed of 300 schizophrenic patients. Severity of schizophrenia was assessed by the Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), depressive symptoms were assessed with Calgary depression scale for schizophrenia (CDSS). SERT (5-HTTLPR), DAT (VNTR), COMT (Val158Met) and MAO-A (VNTR) gene polymorphisms were analyzed. Schizophrenia symptom dimensions were determined with multivariate statistical methods, while logistic regression and ANOVA were used to investigate the influence of a genotype on a symptom domain. Results Factor analysis of PANSS scale retained all 30 items and identified 5 separate factors (aggressive/impulsive, affective/depressive, cognitive, negative and positive symptoms). Analysis of CDSS scale revealed 2 separate factors (depression and suicidality). Statistically significant PANSS variables were those of aggressive/impulsive and negative symptoms, while suicidality was the only significant CDSS variable. Discussion Our PANSS scale factor analysis established 5 distinct factors. Previous factor analyses provided from 3, up to 7 different factors, but mostly 5 distinct ones: negative symptoms, positive symptoms, depressive symptoms, excitement and disorganization. That factor distribution corresponds to our findings in terms of identified number of factors, but seems to differ in terms of item distribution within those factors. When testing the influence of investigated gene polymorphisms on the variable of total PANSS score and five distinct factors we did not establish significant findings regarding four variables: total PANSS score, positive, cognitive and affective/depressive symptoms. While that is in line with majority of other investigations, SERT promoter polymorphism and COMT Val158Met gene polymorphism have been previously associated with depressive and positive symptoms. SERT and MAO-A polymorphisms separately had a significant effect on the variable of aggressive/impulsive symptoms, which has not been reported earlier. Furthermore, significant influence of COMT gene polymorphism was established for the variable of negative symptoms, which is a confirmation of some earlier reports, although there have been contrary findings. Previous reports of CDSS scale factor structure are limited to data from its initial validation to the few recent findings of its three-factor structure (depression, cognition and melancholy). We identified 2 separate factors using factor analysis, “depression” (which included seven out of nine items) and “suicidality”. To the best of our knowledge this is the first investigation of the putative association between any of the four investigated polymorphisms and depressive symptoms of schizophrenia measured by the CDSS scale. Ultimately, we did not establish a significant association of investigated gene polymorphisms and total CDSS score, as well as the “depression” factor. However, there was a significant association between the “suicidality” factor and SERT and MAO-A gene polymorphisms, as well as their interaction. The fact that the significant association was established for only one of the two obtained CDSS factors suggests that the association is subtle and, at least partially, explains rarely reported associations between investigated gene polymorphisms and schizophrenia symptom domains, which is especially true for depressive symptomatology.

Liposarcoma concurrence in a multiple sclerosis patient treated with interferon-beta 1b.

Patient self-reporting of adverse events is alternative approach and could provide valuable information. Data obtained from patients could be sometimes different from physicians but they are complementary, each providing clinically meaningful information. In this article we present a patient who has been suffering from multiple sclerosis, treated by Interferon Beta -1b (IFNB-1b) over the past 10 years. This self reported case of liposarcoma is suspected to be related to the concurrent treatment with IFNB-1b opens numerous questions. On the basis of data available yet, we cannot conclude that the use of IFNB - 1b is related with the occurrence of malign disease in this case, but our effort to communicate these concerns with the patient resulted in continuation of our co-operation with the patient and his willingness to continue with the same immunomodulatory agent. Relationship with patients based on mutual appreciation is crucial for compliance and prevention of future relapses of MS.