Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brenda Banwell is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brenda Banwell.


Annals of Neurology | 2005

Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria

Chris H. Polman; Stephen C. Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D. Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J. Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian G. Weinshenker; Jerry S. Wolinsky

New evidence and consensus has led to further revision of the McDonald Criteria for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The use of imaging for demonstration of dissemination of central nervous system lesions in space and time has been simplified, and in some circumstances dissemination in space and time can be established by a single scan. These revisions simplify the Criteria, preserve their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, address their applicability across populations, and may allow earlier diagnosis and more uniform and widespread use. Ann Neurol 2011


Neurology | 2015

International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Dean M. Wingerchuk; Brenda Banwell; Jeffrey L. Bennett; Philippe Cabre; William M. Carroll; Tanuja Chitnis; Jérôme De Seze; Kazuo Fujihara; Benjamin Greenberg; Anu Jacob; Sven Jarius; Marco Aurélio Lana-Peixoto; Michael Levy; Jack H. Simon; Silvia Tenembaum; Anthony Traboulsee; Patrick Waters; Kay E. Wellik; Brian G. Weinshenker

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS) that is associated with serum aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG). Prior NMO diagnostic criteria required optic nerve and spinal cord involvement but more restricted or more extensive CNS involvement may occur. The International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND) was convened to develop revised diagnostic criteria using systematic literature reviews and electronic surveys to facilitate consensus. The new nomenclature defines the unifying term NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD), which is stratified further by serologic testing (NMOSD with or without AQP4-IgG). The core clinical characteristics required for patients with NMOSD with AQP4-IgG include clinical syndromes or MRI findings related to optic nerve, spinal cord, area postrema, other brainstem, diencephalic, or cerebral presentations. More stringent clinical criteria, with additional neuroimaging findings, are required for diagnosis of NMOSD without AQP4-IgG or when serologic testing is unavailable. The IPND also proposed validation strategies and achieved consensus on pediatric NMOSD diagnosis and the concepts of monophasic NMOSD and opticospinal MS.


Neurology | 2014

Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis The 2013 revisions

Fred D. Lublin; Stephen C. Reingold; Jeffrey Cohen; Gary Cutter; Per Soelberg Sørensen; Alan J. Thompson; Jerry S. Wolinsky; Laura J. Balcer; Brenda Banwell; Frederik Barkhof; Bruce F Bebo; Peter A. Calabresi; Michel Clanet; Giancarlo Comi; Robert J. Fox; Mark Freedman; Andrew D. Goodman; Matilde Inglese; Ludwig Kappos; Bernd C. Kieseier; John A. Lincoln; Catherine Lubetzki; Aaron E. Miller; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; John Petkau; Carlo Pozzilli; Richard A. Rudick; Maria Pia Sormani; Olaf Stüve

Accurate clinical course descriptions (phenotypes) of multiple sclerosis (MS) are important for communication, prognostication, design and recruitment of clinical trials, and treatment decision-making. Standardized descriptions published in 1996 based on a survey of international MS experts provided purely clinical phenotypes based on data and consensus at that time, but imaging and biological correlates were lacking. Increased understanding of MS and its pathology, coupled with general concern that the original descriptors may not adequately reflect more recently identified clinical aspects of the disease, prompted a re-examination of MS disease phenotypes by the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of MS. While imaging and biological markers that might provide objective criteria for separating clinical phenotypes are lacking, we propose refined descriptors that include consideration of disease activity (based on clinical relapse rate and imaging findings) and disease progression. Strategies for future research to better define phenotypes are also outlined.


Neurology | 2007

Consensus definitions proposed for pediatric multiple sclerosis and related disorders

Lauren B. Krupp; Brenda Banwell; Silvia Tenembaum

Background: The CNS inflammatory demyelinating disorders of childhood include both self-limited and lifelong conditions, which can be indistinguishable at the time of initial presentation. Clinical, biologic, and radiographic delineation of the various monophasic and chronic childhood demyelinating disorders requires an operational classification system to facilitate prospective research studies. Methods: The National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS) organized an International Pediatric MS Study Group (Study Group) composed of adult and pediatric neurologists and experts in genetics, epidemiology, neuropsychology, nursing, and immunology. The group met several times to develop consensus definitions regarding the major CNS inflammatory demyelinating disorders of children and adolescents. Results: Clinical definitions are proposed for pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), recurrent ADEM, multiphasic ADEM, neuromyelitis optica, and clinically isolated syndrome. These definitions are considered operational and need to be tested in future research and modified accordingly. Conclusion: CNS inflammatory demyelinating disorders presenting in children and adolescents can be defined and distinguished. However, prospective research is necessary to determine the validity and utility of the proposed diagnostic categories.


Multiple Sclerosis Journal | 2008

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach

Dh Miller; Brian G. Weinshenker; Massimo Filippi; Brenda Banwell; Jeffrey Cohen; Mark S. Freedman; Steven L. Galetta; Michael Hutchinson; R. T. Johnson; Ludwig Kappos; Jun-ichi Kira; Fred D. Lublin; Henry F. McFarland; Xavier Montalban; Hillel Panitch; J. R. Richert; Stephen C. Reingold; C.H. Polman

Background and objectives Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires exclusion of diseases that could better explain the clinical and paraclinical findings. A systematic process for exclusion of alternative diagnoses has not been defined. An International Panel of MS experts developed consensus perspectives on MS differential diagnosis. Methods Using available literature and consensus, we developed guidelines for MS differential diagnosis, focusing on exclusion of potential MS mimics, diagnosis of common initial isolated clinical syndromes, and differentiating between MS and non-MS idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Results We present recommendations for 1) clinical and paraclinical red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses to MS; 2) more precise definition of “clinically isolated syndromes” (CIS), often the first presentations of MS or its alternatives; 3) algorithms for diagnosis of three common CISs related to MS in the optic nerves, brainstem, and spinal cord; and 4) a classification scheme and diagnosis criteria for idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system. Conclusions Differential diagnosis leading to MS or alternatives is complex and a strong evidence base is lacking. Consensus-determined guidelines provide a practical path for diagnosis and will be useful for the non-MS specialist neurologist. Recommendations are made for future research to validate and support these guidelines. Guidance on the differential diagnosis process when MS is under consideration will enhance diagnostic accuracy and precision.


Multiple Sclerosis Journal | 2013

International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group criteria for pediatric multiple sclerosis and immune-mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders: revisions to the 2007 definitions.

Lauren B. Krupp; Marc Tardieu; Maria Pia Amato; Brenda Banwell; Tanuja Chitnis; Russell C. Dale; A. Ghezzi; Rogier Q. Hintzen; Andrew J. Kornberg; Daniela Pohl; Kevin Rostasy; Silvia Tenembaum; Evangeline Wassmer

Background: There has been tremendous growth in research in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and immune mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders since operational definitions for these conditions were first proposed in 2007. Further, the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (IPMSSG), which proposed the criteria, has expanded substantially in membership and in its international scope. Objective: The purpose of this review is to revise the 2007 definitions in order to incorporate advances in delineating the clinical and neuroradiologic features of these disorders. Methods: Through a consensus process, in which input was sought from the 150 members of the Study Group, criteria were drafted, revised and finalized. Final approval was sought through a web survey. Results: Revised criteria are proposed for pediatric acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, pediatric clinically isolated syndrome, pediatric neuromyelitis optica and pediatric MS. These criteria were approved by 93% or more of the 56 Study Group members who responded to the final survey. Conclusions: These definitions are proposed for clinical and research purposes. Their utility will depend on the outcomes of their application in prospective research.


Lancet Neurology | 2007

Multiple sclerosis in children: clinical diagnosis, therapeutic strategies, and future directions

Brenda Banwell; A. Ghezzi; Amit Bar-Or; Yann Mikaeloff; Marc Tardieu

The onset of multiple sclerosis (MS) in childhood poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly if the symptoms of the first demyelinating event resemble acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). MRI is an invaluable diagnostic tool but it lacks the specificity to distinguish ADEM from the first attack of MS. Advanced MRI techniques might have the required specificity to reveal whether the loss of integrity in non-lesional tissue occurs as a fundamental feature of MS. Although the onset of MS in childhood typically predicts a favourable short-term prognosis, some children are severely disabled, either physically or cognitively, and more than 50% are predicted to enter the secondary-progressive phase of the disease by the age of 30 years. Immunomodulatory therapies for MS and their safe application in children can improve long-term prognosis. Genetic and environmental factors, such as viral infection, might be uniquely amenable to study in paediatric patients with MS. Understanding the immunological consequences of these putative exposures will shed light on the early pathological changes in MS.


Lancet Neurology | 2007

Clinical features and viral serologies in children with multiple sclerosis: a multinational observational study

Brenda Banwell; Lauren B. Krupp; Julia Kennedy; Raymond Tellier; Silvia Tenembaum; Jayne Ness; Anita Belman; Alexei Boiko; Olga Bykova; Emmanuelle Waubant; Jean K. Mah; Cristina A. Stoian; Marcelo Kremenchutzky; Maria Rita Bardini; Martino Ruggieri; Mary Rensel; Jin S. Hahn; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; E. Ann Yeh; Kevin Farrell; Mark S. Freedman; Matti Iivanainen; Meri Sevon; Virender Bhan; Marie-Emmanuelle Dilenge; Derek Stephens; Amit Bar-Or

BACKGROUND The full spectrum of clinical manifestations and outcome, and the potential importance of regional or demographic features or viral triggers in paediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), has yet to be fully characterised. Our aim was to determine some of these characteristics in children with MS. METHODS 137 children with MS and 96 control participants matched by age and geographical region were recruited in a multinational study. They underwent structured clinical-demographic interviews, review of academic performance, physical examination, disability assessment (MS patients only), and standardised assays for IgG antibodies directed against Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, varicella zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus. FINDINGS MS was relapsing-remitting at diagnosis in 136 (99%) children. The first MS attack resembled acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) in 22 (16%) of the children, most under 10 years old (mean age 7.4 [SD 4.2] years). Children with ADEM-like presentations were significantly younger than were children with polyfocal (11.2 [4.5] years; p<0.0001) or monofocal (12.0 [3.8] years; p=0.0005) presentations. Permanent physical disability (EDSS>or=4.0) developed within 5 years in 15 (13%) of the 120 children for whom EDSS score was available. 23 (17%) had impaired academic performance, which was associated with increasing disease duration (p=0.02). Over 108 (86%) of the children with MS, irrespective of geographical residence, were seropositive for remote EBV infection, compared with only 61 (64%) of matched controls (p=0.025, adjusted for multiple comparisons). Children with MS did not differ from controls in seroprevalence of the other childhood viruses studied, nor with respect to month of birth, sibling number, sibling rank, or exposure to young siblings. INTERPRETATION Paediatric MS is a relapsing-remitting disease, with presenting features that vary by age at onset. MS in children might be associated with exposure to EBV, suggesting a possible role for EBV in MS pathobiology.


Nature Medicine | 2007

Self-antigen tetramers discriminate between myelin autoantibodies to native or denatured protein

Kevin C. O'Connor; Katherine McLaughlin; Philip L. De Jager; Tanuja Chitnis; Estelle Bettelli; Chenqi Xu; William H. Robinson; Sunil V Cherry; Amit Bar-Or; Brenda Banwell; Hikoaki Fukaura; Toshiyuki Fukazawa; Silvia Tenembaum; Susan J. Wong; Norma P. Tavakoli; Zhannat Idrissova; Vissia Viglietta; Kevin Rostasy; Daniela Pohl; Russell C. Dale; Mark S. Freedman; Lawrence Steinman; Guy J. Buckle; Vijay K. Kuchroo; David A. Hafler; Kai W. Wucherpfennig

The role of autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and other demyelinating diseases is controversial, in part because widely used western blotting and ELISA methods either do not permit the detection of conformation-sensitive antibodies or do not distinguish them from conformation-independent antibodies. We developed a sensitive assay based on self-assembling radiolabeled tetramers that allows discrimination of antibodies against folded or denatured myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) by selective unfolding of the antigen domain. The tetramer radioimmunoassay (RIA) was more sensitive for MOG autoantibody detection than other methodologies, including monomer-based RIA, ELISA or fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS). Autoantibodies from individuals with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) selectively bound the folded MOG tetramer, whereas sera from mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induced with MOG peptide immunoprecipitated only the unfolded tetramer. MOG-specific autoantibodies were identified in a subset of ADEM but only rarely in adult-onset MS cases, indicating that MOG is a more prominent target antigen in ADEM than MS.


Lancet Neurology | 2016

MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines

Massimo Filippi; Maria A. Rocca; O Ciccarelli; Nicola De Stefano; Nikos Evangelou; Ludwig Kappos; Alex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Mar Tintoré; J. L. Frederiksen; Claudio Gasperini; Jacqueline Palace; Daniel S. Reich; Brenda Banwell; Xavier Montalban; Frederik Barkhof

Summary In patients presenting with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can support and substitute clinical information for multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis demonstrating disease dissemination in space (DIS) and time (DIT) and helping to rule out other conditions that can mimic MS. From their inclusion in the diagnostic work-up for MS in 2001, several modifications of MRI diagnostic criteria have been proposed, in the attempt to simplify lesion-count models for demonstrating DIS, change the timing of MRI scanning for demonstrating DIT, and increase the value of spinal cord imaging. Since the last update of these criteria, new data regarding the application of MRI for demonstrating DIS and DIT have become available and improvement in MRI technology has occurred. State-of-the-art MRI findings in these patients were discussed in a MAGNIMS workshop, the goal of which was to provide an evidence-based and expert-opinion consensus on diagnostic MRI criteria modifications.

Collaboration


Dive into the Brenda Banwell's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas L. Arnold

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amit Bar-Or

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sridar Narayanan

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy Waldman

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniela Pohl

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tanuja Chitnis

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge