Brenda Butler

Prolongation of QT interval and antiarrhythmic action of bepridil

Studies were undertaken with bepridil, a new calcium blocker that prolongs the QT interval, to determine the antiarrhythmic and possible arrhythmogenic properties of this agent. The technique of programmed electrical stimulation was employed to evaluate bepridil in 15 patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Bepridil prevented VT induction in 7 of 15 patients. Bepridil prolonged the QT and refractoriness and a linear correlation could be demonstrated between the percent change in QTc and refractory period prolongation for the bepridil-protected group. Bepridil in one patient reduced by one the number of stimuli required to induce VT, but no spontaneous arrhythmias were noted. Bepridil thus possesses antiarrhythmic properties with a minimal proarrhythmic effect.

Antiarrhythmic effects of cibenzoline

Thirty-three patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias were referred for evaluation of their arrhythmias using programmed electrical stimulation to guide antiarrhythmic therapy. Cibenzoline succinate, a new antiarrhythmic agent, was compared to procainamide in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Cibenzoline was given intravenously, initially 1.0 mg/kg, then in 1 mg/kg increments to a maximum of 3.0 mg/kg, during electrophysiologic testing. The results were compared to procainamide, which was also administered intravenously to 1000 and then to 1500 mg. Cibenzoline provided protection against ventricular tachycardia induction in 16 of 33 patients. The PR interval increased 13%, QRS duration widened 26%, and QTc interval was prolonged by 7%. There was a 9% fall in mean arterial blood pressure. Procainamide prevented ventricular tachycardia induction in 21 out of 31 patients tested. The PR interval increased 11%, QRS duration widened 27%, and QTc interval prolonged by 8%. Cibenzoline was given orally to 13 patients for chronic treatment. Chronic oral cibenzoline therapy after a mean follow-up of 8.8 months caused a reduction of ventricular ectopy from 666 to 190 beats/hr. Ventricular tachycardia events decreased per Holter monitor recording from 6 to 0.6. Cibenzoline therapy was discontinued in 5 of 13 patients due to break-through arrhythmias (nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitor and recurrence of symptoms). Cibenzoline may be an effective antiarrhythmic agent in selected patients.

Evaluation of lorcainide in patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia

One hundred patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) on electrophysiologic studies underwent serial drug testing with procainamide, lidocaine and lorcainide to determine comparative efficacy. Acute intravenous administration was followed by repeat programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies on separate days for each antiarrhythmic agent. Lorcainide prevented VT induction in 69% of the 100 patients studied, procainamide in 50% of the 75 patients studied and lidocaine in 30% of 53 patients. After PES and serial drug testing, 46 patients were started on lorcainide, 9 on procainamide and 45 on other antiarrhythmic drug regimens. Eighty percent of the patients have remained on lorcainide therapy, whereas 47% have continued on other drug therapies started over 17.5-month mean follow-up period. Despite sleep-wake disturbances and a need for sedation at night, lorcainide therapy was well tolerated in this population and remained an effective antiarrhythmic agent with prolonged administration.

Enhancement of myocardial vulnerability by atrial fibrillation.

Certain groups are known to have an increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with atrial fibrillation may be at higher risk. The authors hypothesize that atrial fibrillation may increase myocardial vulnerability. To test this hypothesis, 37 dogs were studied using programmed electrical stimulation techniques to determine myocardial vulnerability as assessed by the ability to provoke ventricular tachycardia. Prior to atrial fibrillation, programmed electrical stimulation did not induce ventricular tachycardia. Aconitine was then topically applied to the right atrial appendage with care taken not to make contact with the ventricle. Application of aconitine caused atrial fibrillation with an increase in ventricular rate, but did not affect arterial blood pressure. Ventricular tachycardia was induced by programmed electrical stimulation studies in 25 of 26 dogs in atrial fibrillation. The enhanced vulnerability was noted following atrial fibrillation, not after aconitine application to the great veins, which did not cause atrial fibrillation. To further exclude the possibility that aconitine application may cause changes in ventricular threshold, atrial fibrillation was induced by pacing techniques in five dogs. Prior to atrial fibrillation induction, programmed electrical stimulation did not induce ventricular tachycardia. Following atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia could be repeatedly induced. Mean heart rate following atrial fibrillation increased, while pacing animals at this increment in rate did not change the noninducibility of dogs in sinus rhythm. Six patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia were studied to determine if AF lowered myocardial threshold to VT induction. Ventricular tachycardia could only be induced by PES techniques in four of five patients when the patients’ rhythm was AF (P < 0.05). This study suggests that atrial fibrillation lowers myocardial threshold for ventricular tachycardia induction and thus enhances myocardial vulnerability. The association of AF with a higher incidence of sudden death may be due to an enhanced electrical instability.

The effect of bepridil, verapamil, and quinidine in the prevention of ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation in the digitalized dog

Bepridil, a new antianginal agent, has calcium channel-blocking activity and antiarrhythmic properties. To test the efficacy of bepridil as an antidysrhythmic agent, we looked at its effect on the induction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in dogs, utilizing programmed electrical stimulation (PES). Incremental doses of bepridil up to 20 mg/kg were given to five nondigitalized dogs and verapamil up to 20 mg, and PES was performed at each dose. Both drugs were not found to facilitate arrhythmia induction. Seventeen dogs were chronically digitalized and following digitalization, VT could be induced in all animals by PES. Six dogs were given bepridil and PES was reperformed at each dose. An average of 1.8 mg/kg was found to protect against induction of VT. Five dogs received verapamil and none was protected (all had VT induced), while five of six dogs given quinidine were protected at an average dose of 15.4 mg/kg. Bepridil produced a significant decrease in heart rate. A significant correlation was found at the effective antiarrhythmic dose of bepridil between percentage change in the effective refractory period for the first extrastimulus (ERP S2) and QTc (r = 0.96), suggesting that a parallel and homogeneous prolongation in repolarization and refractoriness is essential for the antiarrhythmic effect of bepridil. Bepridil is thus an effective antiarrhythmic agent that affords protection against induction of VT, and this action is similar to the conventional class I antiarrhythmic agent, quinidine, while lacking in another calcium channel blocker, verapamil.

Studies on the possible mechanisms of lidoflazine arrhythmogenicity

Lidoflazine is a calcium channel blocking agent that is effective and safe in the treatment of angina pectoris, but has been reported to be associated with sudden death when administered for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. Studies were performed in dogs to determine if lidoflazine caused a rise in serum digoxin concentration that could cause arrhythmias or if it was directly arrhythmogenic. Dogs received chronic injections of digoxin and then digoxin in combination with lidoflazine. No increase in digoxin concentration was found. Dogs also underwent programmed electrical stimulation while not receiving medications and then after incremental doses of lidoflazine administered intravenously. Lidoflazine did not cause spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and did not lower the threshold of ventricular tachycardia induction. Combined administration of lidoflazine and digoxin did not facilitate arrhythmia induction. These studies do not support a digoxin-lidoflazine interaction or a direct arrhythmogenic action of lidoflazine.

The Efficacy of Cibenzoline in Preventing PES Induction of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Dog

Abstract: The electrophysiologic effects of cibenzoline were studied using programmed electrical stimulation (PES) techniques and were compared to those of quinidine. Cibenzoline, like the conventional class 1 agent quinidine, was effective in preventing arrhythmia induction. Twelve dogs were given 0.02 mg/kg digoxin intravenously for seven days to achieve a steady‐state digoxin level. On the eighth day, cibenzoline was administered in incremental doses (0.5 to 10.5 mg/kg) and PES was performed at 30‐minute intervals. A mean dose of 2.6 ± 0.8 mg/kg cibenzoline prevented ventricular tachycardia induction. At this dose, cibenzoline had no significant effect on mean arterial blood pressure, but PR interval increased by 17 ± 9 per cent, QRS duration by 27 ± 14 per cent, and the ventricular refractory period (ERP) for the first extra stimulus increased by 35 ± 9 per cent. A gradual decrease in heart rate and an increase in PR interval and QRS duration was caused by incremental doses of cibenzoline. In six additional animals, quinidine was administered in incremental doses (1 to 30 mg/kg) and PES performed at 30‐minute intervals. A mean of 15 ± 5 mg/kg prevented induction of ventricular tachycardia in five animals. No significant change in heart rate, PR, QRS, and ERP was found at the effective dose.

Long-term lorcainide therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia.

One hundred patients inducible at electrophysiologic studies underwent serial drug testing with procainamide, lidocaine, and lorcainide to determine comparative efficacy. Acute intravenous administration was followed by repeat programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies on separate days for each antiarrhythmic drug. Lorcainide prevented ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction in 69% of the 100 patients studied, procainamide was effective in 50% of the 75 patients studied, and lidocaine prevented VT induction in 30% of 53 patients. Following PES and serial drug testing, 46 patients were started on lorcainide, nine patients on procainamide, and 45 patients were started on other antiarrhythmic drug regimens. Seventy percent of the patients have remained on lorcainide therapy, while 47% have continued on other drug therapies started over a 20.5 +/- 3.2-month mean follow-up period. Despite sleep-wake disturbances and a need for sedation at night, lorcainide therapy was tolerated well in this population and remained an effective antiarrhythmic with prolonged administration.

False-Positive Urine Protein Reaction with Cibenzoline, a New Antiarrhythmic Agent

Abstract: Following treatment with cibenzoline, a new antiarrhythmic agent, 23 of 53 patients showed positive proteinuria reactions. In all cases, these results were obtained with bromphenol reagent strips. Subsequent exposure of serial dilutions of cibenzoline to these reagent strips showed positive protein reactions at concentrations as low as 1 mg/ml. Treatment of these same solutions with acetic acid‐sodium acetate heat coagulation technique produced negative findings. Specimens from 14 of the above patients were then retested employing both techniques, and in all cases the reagent strips produced positive results while the heat coagulation technique (or sulfosalicylic acid) produced negative results. Therefore, it appears that cibenzoline produces false‐positive proteinuria results when bromphenol reagent strips are employed for analysis.

Antiarrhythmic action of bethanidine

Studies were performed in 20 patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) to determine the efficacy of bethanidine compared with procainamide in preventing VT induced by programmed electrical stimulation. Before administering bethanidine, 5 to 10 mg/kg, the patients received 15 mg of protriptyline orally 24 and 2 hours before electrophysiologic studies to prevent the orthostatic hypotensive effects of bethanidine. Sustained VT (VT not spontaneously stopping) was induced in 8 and nonsustained VT (10 beats or more, terminating spontaneously) was induced in 4 patients. Bethanidine, 5 mg/kg, protected in 7 patients, and 10 mg/kg protected 1 additional patient. Procainamide, 1,000 and 1,500 mg intravenously, protected 8 of 16 patients. Bethanidine prevented VT induction in 50% of the patients not protected by procainamide. Bethanidine facilitated VT induction in 3 patients, while procainamide facilitated VT induction in 1 patient. Four patients with symptomatic VT have received bethanidine therapy for an average of 11 +/- 1.3 months, without clinical recurrence of their VT. Concomitant administration of protriptyline attenuated the acute hemodynamic changes caused by bethanidine and chronic combined therapy of protriptyline and bethanidine abolished the severe orthostatic changes in blood pressure caused by bethanidine. These studies show that bethanidine is effective in preventing VT induction and, thus, its use may not be restricted only to cases of primary ventricular fibrillation.