Brenda Lomax

Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Combination with Flow Cytometry Improves Results of Cytogenetic Analysis of Spontaneous Abortions

More than 50% of spontaneous abortions (SAs) have abnormal chromosomes; the most common abnormalities are trisomy, sex chromosome monosomy, and polyploidy. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of SAs depends on tissue culturing and is associated with a significant tissue culture failure rate and contamination by maternally derived cells. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), in combination with flow cytometry (FCM), can detect numerical and unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormalities associated with SAs while avoiding the technical problems associated with tissue culture. Routine cytogenetic and CGH analysis was performed independently on tissue from 301 SAs. Samples shown to be chromosomally balanced by CGH were analyzed by FCM to determine ploidy. Of 253 samples successfully analyzed by both approaches, there was an absolute correlation of results in 235 (92.8%). Of the 18 cases with discrepancies between cytogenetic and CGH/FCM results, an explanation could be found in 17. Twelve samples produced a 46,XX karyotype by cytogenetics, whereas CGH/FCM demonstrated aneuploidy/polyploidy or a male genome, indicating maternal contamination of the tissue cultures. In two cases, where tetraploidy was demonstrated by cytogenetics and diploidy by FCM, tissue culture artifact is implied. In three cases, CGH demonstrated an aneuploidy, and cytogenetics demonstrated hypertriploidy. In one unexplainable case, aneuploidy demonstrated by CGH could not be detected by repeat CGH analysis, conventional cytogenetic, or FISH analysis. These results demonstrate that CGH supplemented with FCM can readily identify chromosomal abnormalities associated with SAs and, by avoiding maternal contamination and tissue culture artifacts, can do so with a lower failure rate and more accuracy than conventional cytogenetic analysis.

The utilization of interphase cytogenetic analysis for the detection of mosaicism.

This study describes a method for defining mosaic aneuploidy by interphase cytogenetics based on statistical limits established from control specimens. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to detect the number of copies of specific chromosomes in interphase nuclei from placental tissues of diploid controls and mosaic placentas. FISH was performed using probes D7Z1/D7Z2, D9Z1, D10Z1, and D18Z1, all purchased from Oncor, Inc. Statistical analysis of data obtained from diploid controls was used to determine the one-sided upper reference limit and corresponding 95% confidence interval for the proportion of cells with one and three signals for each of the probes used. The one-sided upper reference limits established the lower levels of monosomy and trisomy detectable using each of the four probes. These statistical parameters were then used to interpret the results obtained by FISH applied to the study of term placentas for the confirmation of prenatally diagnosed chromosomal mosaicism.

Screening of human placentas for chromosomal mosaicism using comparative genomic hybridization.

Detection of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) in term placental tissues is usually accomplished by conventional cytogenetic analysis of cultured chorionic stroma and direct preparations from trophoblast or, more recently, by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase nuclei. In this study, we describe the use of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for detection of chromosomal aneuploidy in term placentas and evaluate the sensitivity of this novel approach for CPM diagnosis in multiple placental samples acquired from five pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with CPM7 and CPM16. Each sample of placental villi was separated enzymatically into trophoblast and chorionic stroma, and the level of aneuploidy (three signals/nuclei) in each tissue was determined by FISH analysis, using centromeric DNA probes specific for chromosome 7 (D7Z1/Z2) or 16 (D16Z2). Aneuploidy levels ranged from 5.2-96.1% in the 11 tissues with CPM7 and 9.8-93% in the 29 tissues with CPM16. Subsequently, CGH analysis of DNA from the trophoblast and chorionic stroma of the same tissue sites detected the trisomic clone in all placental tissues with aneuploidy (16%, as determined by FISH analysis). Our results demonstrate the sensitivity of CGH analysis for detection of chromosomal aneuploidy mosaicism and support our contention that the CGH technique is the most effective cytogenetic method for screening term placentas for the presence of CPM.

Comparative Genomic Hybridization A New Tool for Reproductive Pathology

OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the effectiveness of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for analysis of reproductive pathology specimens in clinical cytogenetics laboratories. DESIGN A total of 856 CGH analyses were performed on various placental and fetal tissues derived from 368 specimens of spontaneous abortions and on placentas from 219 pregnancies with live-born infants. The live-born infants were clinically evaluated as normally developed, with either a normal birth weight or with intrauterine growth restriction; some live-born infants had an abnormal prenatal triple screen with normal cytogenetic results on amniotic fluid cell cultures. RESULTS Comparative genomic hybridization analysis was successfully performed on 856 samples from spontaneously aborted specimens and term placentas. Failure of analysis occurred in 1.6% of samples and was due to an insufficient amount of tissue for DNA extraction. Comparative genomic hybridization identified aneuploidy in 53% of spontaneous abortion samples and 3.1% of term placentas. CONCLUSIONS Comparative genomic hybridization analysis is a useful clinical tool for detection of aneuploidy in placental and fetal tissues. It provides a genome-wide screen while eliminating tissue culture failures, culture artifacts, and maternal cell contamination. We present practical guidelines for interpreting CGH profiles derived from human reproductive specimens.

Comparative genomic hybridization : A new approach to screening for intrauterine complete or mosaic aneuploidy

In the practice of clinical genetics chromosomal aneuploidy in both mosaic and nonmosaic forms has long been recognized as a cause of abnormal prenatal and postnatal development. Traditionally, cytogenetic analysis of cultured lymphocytes has been used as a standard test for detection of constitutional aneuploidies. As lymphocytes represent only one lineage, chromosomal mosaicism expressed in other tissues often remains undetected. The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization of molecular cytogenetic analysis for detection of chromosomal aneuploidy in placental tissues. Using placentas from 100 pregnancies with viable nonmalformed livebirths, both trophoblast and chorionic stroma were analyzed using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In all cases with an indication of chromosomal imbalance by CGH, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed to confirm the presence of aneuploidy. To differentiate between constitutional aneuploidy and confined placental mosaicism (CPM), amniotic membrane was analyzed by CGH and FISH techniques. Our results demonstrated five placentas with CPM for chromosomes 2, 4, 12, 13, and 18, respectively, and two constitutional nonmosaic aneuploidies (47,XXX and 47,XXY). Molecular cytogenetic studies of human placental tissues enables easy analysis of both embryonic (amnion) and extraembryonic (chorion) cell lineages. Detection at birth of chromosomal defects affecting intrauterine placental and fetal development is important because these chromosomal defects may continue to have an influence on postnatal development.

Craniosynostosis associated with distal 5q‐trisomy: Further evidence that extra copy of MSX2 gene leads to craniosynostosis

Distal 5q‐trisomy has been reported in less than 30 patients, with craniosynostosis present in five. We report two new patients with distal 5q‐trisomy craniosynostosis. Patient 1 had mild Kleeblattschädel with synostosis of multiple sutures together with wide and medially deviated thumbs and halluces, indicative of Pfeiffer syndrome. Cytogenetic and CGH analyses showed a karyotype of 46,XY,der(10)t(5;10)(q33;q26.3). Patient 2 had a prominent forehead and ridging of the metopic suture. Craniosynostosis of the metopic suture was shown by CT scan. Cytogenetic and CGH analyses disclosed a karyotype of 46,XX,der(17)t(5;17)(q35.1;p13.3). Of the 22 previously reported patients, all had microcephaly and 14 had an abnormal skull shape. Our results support the previous finding that distal 5q‐trisomy together with an extra copy of the MSX2 gene leads to abnormal closure of sutures and craniosynostosis.

Inverted duplication with terminal deletion of 5p and no cat‐like cry

We report on a 6‐year‐old boy referred for cytogenetics study. A few non‐specific features were observed in the newborn: hypotonia, failure to thrive, seizures, pre‐auricular skin tags. Cat‐like cry was not identified. No remarkable facial dysmorphism, gastrointestinal, respiratory or cardiac abnormalities were identified. At age 4 years, speech and motor skill delays were apparent. Karyotyping and FISH analysis revealed a de novo rearranged chromosome 5p, with subtelomeric deletion of 5p and a duplication of the cri‐du‐chat critical region. Array CGH using sub‐megabase resolution tiling‐set (SMRT) array followed by FISH analysis with labeled BACs showed a deletion of 5pter to 5p15.31 (0–6.9 Mb) and an inverted duplication of the greater part of 5p15.31 to the distal end of 5p14.3 (6.9–19.9 Mb). Although very rare, inverted duplications with terminal deletion (inv dup del) have been reported at different chromosomal ends. Our finding adds a second patient of inv dup del 5p to this growing list, and the potential causative mechanisms for this rearrangement are discussed. Review of the mapping information of cri‐du‐chat patients and the comparison with a previously reported patient suggested that the critical region for cat‐like cry is located within a 0.6 Mb region.

A 5-Mb microdeletion at 6q16.1-q16.3 with SIM gene deletion and obesity†

Jia-Chi Wang,* Lesley Turner, Brenda Lomax, and Patrice Eydoux Cytogenetics Laboratory, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Genetics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada Cytogenetics Laboratory, Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Detection of confined placental mosaicism in trisomy 18 conceptions using interphase cytogenetic analysis

Fluorescence in situ hybridization provides a rapid and accurate technique for detecting chromosomal aneuploidy. It is an excellent method for identifying mosaicism in placental tissues following prenatal diagnosis. Mosaicism, in the form of confined placental mosaicism, occurs im approximately 1%–2% of viable pregnancies studied by chorionic villus sampling at 9–11 weeks of gestation. It has been detected in pregnancies with both diploid and trisomic fetuses and appears to have an important effect on the intrauterine fetal survival. Using both standard cytogenetic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we have studied 12 placentas from pregnancies with trisomy 18 for the presence of chromosomal mosaicism. These included 2 that were spontaneously aborted, 5 that were terminated after prenatal diagnosis, and 4 that were delivered as either stillborn or liveborn. Significant levels of mosaicism, confined exclusively to cytotrophoblast, were detected in 7 pregnancies. This study demonstrates the usefulness of interphase cytogenetic analysis of uncultured tissues as an alternative method for the detection of mosaicism.

Molecular breakpoint mapping of 6q11‐q14 interstitial deletions in seven patients

Interstitial deletions involving 6q11‐q14 have been reported in less than 20 patients, with the breakpoints studied by G‐banding alone. We report on seven patients with 6q11‐q14 interstitial deletions of variable size. The breakpoints were studied by G‐banding, dual‐color BAC‐FISH and SNP array. The results showed the molecular breakpoints differed significantly from the ones obtained from G‐banding. The breakpoints studied by BAC‐FISH were consistent with the ones from SNP array. Some characteristics from this cohort are consistent with previous reports, but many typical features are lacking in our patients. The cardinal features of 6q11‐q14 interstitial deletions in this cohort include: umbilical hernia, hypotonia, short stature, characteristic facial features of upslanting palpebral fissures, low set and/or dysplastic ears, high arched palate, urinary tract anomalies, and skeletal/limb anomalies.