Brendan Larder

Short-cycle structured intermittent treatment of chronic HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy: Effects on virologic, immunologic, and toxicity parameters

Although continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is effective for many HIV-infected patients, it can be toxic and prohibitive in cost. By decreasing the total amount of time patients receive medications, intermittent HAART could reduce toxicity and cost. Therefore, we initiated a pilot study in which 10 HIV-infected individuals receiving effective therapy that resulted in levels of HIV RNA <50 copies per ml of plasma and CD4+ T cell counts >300 cells per mm3 of whole blood received repeated cycles of 7 days on HAART followed by 7 days off of HAART. Patients maintained suppression of plasma viremia for 32–68 weeks. There was no significant increase in HIV proviral DNA or replication-competent HIV in peripheral CD4+ T cells or HIV RNA in peripheral blood or lymph node mononuclear cells. There was no significant change in CD4+ T cell counts, no significant increase in CD4+ or CD8+ T cells expressing activation markers or producing IFN-γ in response to HIV, no increase in CD4+ T cell proliferation to p24 antigen, and no evidence for the development of resistance to HAART medications. There was a significant decrease in serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Thus, in this proof-of-concept study, short-cycle intermittent HAART maintained suppression of plasma viremia as well as HIV replication in reservoir sites while preserving CD4+ T cell counts. In addition, there was a decrease in serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Intermittent therapy may be an important strategy to reduce cost and toxicity for HIV-infected individuals.

Comparative Analysis of Two Commercial Phenotypic Assays for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

ABSTRACT Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates from 50 plasma specimens were analyzed for phenotypic susceptibility to licensed reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors by the Antivirogram and PhenoSense HIV assays. Twenty of these specimens were from recently seroconverted drug-naïve persons, and 30 were from patients who were the sources of occupational exposures to HIV-1; 16 of the specimens in the latter group were from drug-experienced patients. The phenotypic results of the Antivirogram and PhenoSense HIV assays were categorized as sensitive or reduced susceptibility on the basis of the cutoff values established by the manufacturers of each assay. Data for 12 to 15 drugs were available by both assays for 38 specimens and represented a total of 529 pairs of results. The two data sets had a 91.5% concordance by phenotypic category. The discordant results (n = 45) were distributed randomly among 26 specimens and included 28 results (62.2%) which were within a twofold difference of the assay cutoff values. None of the discordant results were associated with primary resistance mutations that predicted high-level (>20-fold) resistance. Discordant results were distributed equally among specimens from drug-experienced and drug-naïve individuals and were slightly higher for protease inhibitors than for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The findings of the present study demonstrate that the results of the Antivirogram and PhenoSense HIV assays correlate well, despite the use of different testing strategies.