Brent Diekmann

Newer Antidepressants and Gabapentin for Hot Flashes: An Individual Patient Pooled Analysis

PURPOSE Nonhormonal treatment options have been investigated as treatments for hot flashes, a major clinical problem in many women. Starting in 2000, a series of 10 individual double-blind placebo-controlled studies has evaluated newer antidepressants and gabapentin for treating hot flashes. This current project was developed to conduct an individual patient pooled analysis of the data from these published clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient data were collected from the various study investigators who published their study results between 2000 and 2007. Between-study heterogeneity for study characteristics and patient populations was tested via chi2 tests before a pooled analysis. The primary end point, the change in hot flash activity from baseline to week 4, for each agent was calculated via both weighted and unweighted approaches, using the size of the study as the weight. Basic summary statistics were produced for hot flash score and frequency using the following three statistics: raw change, percent reduction, and whether or not a 50% reduction was achieved. RESULTS This study included seven trials of newer antidepressants and three trials of gabapentin. The optimal doses (defined by individual study results) of the newer antidepressants paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, and sertraline decreased hot flash scores by 41%, 33%, 13%, and 3% to 18% compared with the corresponding placebo arms, respectively. The three gabapentin trials decreased hot flashes by 35% to 38% compared with the corresponding placebo arms. CONCLUSION Some newer antidepressants and gabapentin, within 4 weeks of therapy initiation, decrease hot flashes more than placebo.

Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Three Doses of Citalopram for the Treatment of Hot Flashes: NCCTG Trial N05C9

PURPOSE Up to 75% of women experience hot flashes, which can negatively impact quality of life. As hot flash physiology is not definitively understood, it cannot be assumed that effective agents represent class effects. Therefore, there is a continued need for rigorous evaluation to identify effective nonhormonal options for hot flash relief. METHODS A randomized, double-blind trial evaluated citalopram at target doses of 10, 20, or 30 mg/d versus placebo for 6 weeks. Postmenopausal women with at least 14 bothersome hot flashes per week recorded hot flashes for 7 days before starting treatment and were then titrated to their target doses. The primary end point was the change from baseline to 6 weeks in hot flash score. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-four women were randomly assigned onto this study. Data for hot flash scores and frequencies showed significant improvement in hot flashes with citalopram over placebo, with no significant differences among doses. Reductions in mean hot flash scores were 2.0 (23%), 7.0 (49%), 7.7 (50%), and 10.7 (55%) for placebo and 10, 20, and 30 mg of citalopram, respectively (P <or= .002). Improvement in secondary outcomes, such as the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale, was statistically superior in the 20-mg arm. Citalopram was well-tolerated, with no significant negative adverse effects. CONCLUSION Citalopram is an effective, well-tolerated agent in managing hot flashes. There does not appear to be a significant dose response above 10 mg/d, but broader helpful effects of the agent appear to be more evident at 20 mg/d.

The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life

The objective of this study was to explore relations between patient role preferences during the cancer treatment decision‐making process and quality of life (QOL).

Newer antidepressants and gabapentin for hot flashes: a discussion of trial duration.

Objective: Information regarding the ideal length of hot flash trials is scarce. In the literature, hot flash trial durations have commonly varied from 4 to 12 weeks. This article is devoted to providing scientific data to better ascertain how long it is necessary to conduct hot flash trials with newer centrally acting agents. Methods: Individual participant data were collected from all known published, through December 2007, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trials regarding the use of newer antidepressants and gabapentin for hot flash relief. Trials that studied periods longer than 4 weeks were included for this project. Profile analysis was applied to the hot flash activity longitudinal data for each study individually, allowing a comparison of data collected for 6 to 12 treatment weeks versus data collected for only 4 treatment weeks. Results: Ten studies were identified, five of them fulfilled the eligibility criteria for this investigation, three evaluating gabapentin, and two newer antidepressants. Flatness tests from a profile analysis did not provide any evidence that hot flash activity increased or decreased between week 4 and time periods up to 12 weeks. Conclusions: Changes in hot flash scores from newer antidepressants and gabapentin are apparent within 4 weeks of therapy. Available data indicate that hot flash treatment efficacy, compared with that of placebo, remains stable for up to 12 weeks of follow-up.

Phase III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Gabapentin for the Prevention of Delayed Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy, NCCTG N08C3 (Alliance)

Despite targeted antiemetics, data support an unmet need related to the management of delayed nausea and vomiting (NV). Promising pilot data informed this phase III trial evaluating gabapentin for delayed NV from highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).