Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bret L. Hicken is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bret L. Hicken.


Pain | 2002

Interference due to pain following spinal cord injury: important predictors and impact on quality of life

John D. Putzke; J. Scott Richards; Bret L. Hicken; Michael J. DeVivo

&NA; Two studies were designed to examine important predictors of pain following spinal cord injury (SCI), and the impact of pain on self‐reported quality of life (QOL). Pain was defined as ‘interference in day‐to‐day activities secondary to pain’. In order to determine risk factors associated with the development of pain interference, Study 1 examined the predictive validity of multiple demographic, medical, and QOL variables at year 1 post‐SCI to self‐reported pain interference 2 years post‐injury. Results showed that middle age (30–59‐year‐olds), lower self‐reported mental health, and pain interference at 1 year post‐SCI were the most important unique predictors of pain interference 2 years post‐SCI. In Study 2, participants were separated into four groups; (1) those pain‐free at years 1 and 2, (2) those pain‐free at year 1 and in pain at year 2, (3) those in pain at year 1 and pain‐free at year 2, and (4) those in pain at years 1 and 2. Results showed that only those experiencing a change in pain interference status reported a change in QOL. More specifically, those developing pain interference (group 2) from year 1 to year 2 reported decreased life satisfaction, physical health, and mental health, whereas, those with resolving pain interference from year 1 to year 2 reported an increase in these same domains. Unexpectedly, change in pain interference status was unrelated to change in self‐reported handicap. Implications and future directions are discussed.


American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation | 2001

Bladder management and quality of life after spinal cord injury.

Bret L. Hicken; John D. Putzke; J. Scott Richards

Hicken BL, Putzke JD, Richards JS: Bladder management and quality of life after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:916–922 ObjectiveThis study examines the quality of life among individuals with spinal cord injury requiring assistance for bowel and bladder management vs. those with independent control of bowel and bladder. DesignTwo groups of 53 individuals each were matched case for case on age, education, sex, race, and lesion level. Outcome measures included the Satisfaction With Life Scale, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), and the SF-12. ResultsSatisfaction with life was significantly lower among dependent individuals with impaired bowel and bladder functioning as compared with individuals with independent bowel and bladder control. Similarly, dependent individuals reported greater self-reported handicap (CHART) than independent individuals in the areas of physical independence, mobility, and occupational functioning. However, dependent and independent individuals did not differ in the areas of social integration and economic self-sufficiency. Item analysis on the CHART item assessing number of social contacts initiated in the previous month suggested that dependent individuals may have difficulty initiating new social contacts. Independent individuals reported better overall physical health (SF-12) than dependent individuals. Mental health (SF-12), however, did not differ across groups. ConclusionsIndividuals with impaired bowel and bladder control reported lower quality of life on several domains compared with those with independent control of bowel and bladder. Though the two groups did not differ in self-reported social integration, dependent individuals may have greater difficulty creating new social relationships.


The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2003

Patient compliance with phlebotomy therapy for iron overload associated with hemochromatosis

Bret L. Hicken; Diane C. Tucker; James C. Barton

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate patient compliance with phlebotomy therapy of hemochromatosis-associated iron overload.METHODS:We reviewed medical records of white adults with hemochromatosis and iron overload diagnosed during medical care. We defined three elements of compliance: 1) achieving iron depletion (serum ferritin ≤ 20 ng/ml); 2) timeliness of phlebotomies on a weekly or biweekly schedule to achieve iron depletion; and 3) participation in therapy to maintain serum ferritin ≤ 50 ng/ml. We evaluated associations of timeliness of phlebotomy and participation in maintenance therapy with these variables: age at diagnosis, sex, pretreatment serum ferritin concentration, HFE genotype, units of blood removed to achieve iron depletion, and presence or absence of cirrhosis at diagnosis.RESULTS:A total of 118 patients were evaluable for iron depletion and 142 for maintenance therapy; 96.6% achieved iron depletion, and 33.1% and 43.2% followed weekly and biweekly schedules, respectively. Timeliness was not significantly associated with the variables we evaluated. In the first year of maintenance therapy, 84.0% of patients complied; the percentage of C282Y homozygotes complying was significantly greater than that of other patients. Average compliance with maintenance therapy decreased 6.8% annually; the mean follow-up after achieving iron depletion was 4.1 ± 2.8 yr (range 0.6–9.7 yr).CONCLUSION:Most patients with hemochromatosis diagnosed in medical care achieve iron depletion with phlebotomy; one-third tolerate and adhere to weekly phlebotomy. There is a constant rate of decline in the percentage of patients who comply with maintenance therapy.


The Clinical Journal of Pain | 2002

Long-term use of gabapentin for treatment of pain after traumatic spinal cord injury.

John D. Putzke; J. Scott Richards; Laura Kezar; Bret L. Hicken; Timothy J. Ness

ObjectiveTo determine the long-term efficacy of gabapentin as a treatment of pain after spinal cord injury. DesignAll patients with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury treated with gabapentin were identified and followed up using a longitudinal observational design with two contact points (6 and 36 months after the trial) using a semi-structured interview. The first follow-up interview attempted to capture all 31 patients placed on therapeutic trial. The second follow-up interview attempted to capture those reporting a favorable response (n = 14) to the therapeutic trial at the first follow-up. ResultsOf the 27 patients contacted at the first follow-up (87% response rate), 6 (22%) discontinued the trial secondary to intolerable side effects; therefore, the pain analgesic effects of gabapentin in these patients could not be determined. Of the remaining 21 patients, 14 (67%) reported a favorable response (i.e., a 2 or greater point reduction on a 0–10 pain-rating scale). The second follow-up interview captured 11 (79% response rate) of the 14 patients reporting a favorable response at the first interview, and 91% (10 of 11 patients) continued to report that gabapentin was an effective analgesic. There was no evidence to suggest dosing difficulties due to tolerance over the 3-year period. Sedation, dizziness, and forgetfulness were the most common side effects. ConclusionsGabapentin may be an effective treatment of pain after spinal cord injury among those able to tolerate initial and long-term side effects.


Genetic Testing | 2003

Genetic testing for hemochromatosis: attitudes and acceptability among young and older adults.

Bret L. Hicken; David C. Calhoun; Diane C. Tucker

Hemochromatosis is a genetic disorder of iron overload common in persons of northern European descent. We examined attitudes about testing for hemochromatosis in 118 young adults (YA) (19.7 years +/- 1.9) and 50 older adults (OA) (58.5 years +/- 13.7). Participants read about hemochromatosis and two related tests: transferrin saturation measurement (iron test) and HFE genotyping (HFE test). Interest in each test and attitudes about genetic testing were assessed. More than 80% of all participants were willing to undergo either test, if offered. A majority preferred the iron test because of the information it provides about current health. A majority of participants identified at least one benefit of genetic testing, with improved health through early detection/prevention being most common. YA were more likely to report disadvantages of genetic testing (p < 0.001) and were more concerned about potential negative psychological effects (p < 0.005). OA were more concerned about potential discrimination (p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that young and older adults view genetic testing as beneficial and would accept HFE testing were it offered as part of a screening program.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2002

Predictors of life satisfaction: a spinal cord injury cohort study.

John D. Putzke; J. Scott Richards; Bret L. Hicken; Michael J. DeVivo


Rehabilitation Psychology | 2002

Alcohol Abuse History and Adjustment Following Spinal Cord Injury

Timothy R. Elliot; Monica Kurylo; Yuying Chen; Bret L. Hicken


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2002

Race: Predictor versus proxy variable? Outcomes after spinal cord injury

John D. Putzke; Bret L. Hicken; J. Scott Richards


Genetic Testing | 2004

Attitudes about and Psychosocial Outcomes of HFE Genotyping for Hemochromatosis

Bret L. Hicken; David A. Calhoun; James C. Barton; Diane C. Tucker


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2002

Reliability characteristics of the Donovan spinal cord injury pain classification system

J. Scott Richards; Bret L. Hicken; John D. Putzke; Timothy J. Ness; Laura Kezar

Collaboration


Dive into the Bret L. Hicken's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Scott Richards

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John D. Putzke

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Diane C. Tucker

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C. Barton

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Kezar

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. DeVivo

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy J. Ness

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aimee Foshee

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Monica Kurylo

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy R. Elliot

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge