Brett A. Freedman

Liposomal bupivacaine incisional injection in single-level lumbar spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Postsurgical pain control is important in spine surgery as it can lead to earlier mobilization, decreased length of stay, decreased side effects from narcotic medications, and improved patient satisfaction. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an injectable formulation of bupivacaine, providing prolonged local anesthesia, up to 72 hours postinjection. Although, LB has been used with increasing frequency following other musculoskeletal procedures, specifically total joint replacements, its pre-emptive analgesic effect following lumbar microdiscectomy has hitherto not been reported. If administration of LB as a pre-emptive analgesic agent at the end of microdiscectomy resulted in reduced postoperative pain, then this could minimize adverse events related to narcotic pain medication use and improve acute clinical outcomes. PURPOSE The aim of the present study was to determine the comparative efficacy of infiltration of a standard dose and volume of LB in a comparative cohort analysis of single-level microdiscectomy procedures. DESIGN The present study made use of mixed prospective/retrospective observational cohort analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE Adult patients presenting with lumbar or sacral compressive disc disease treated with single-level microdiscectomy, at one institution utilizing a standard surgical technique. OUTCOME MEASURES Time spent on intravenous (IV) narcotics postoperatively (primary outcome), postoperative visual analog score (VAS), total morphine equivalent dose of narcotic pain medications, and 30-day emergency room visits for pain control were measured. METHODS Under an approved process improvement project, immediate outcome and process measures for a prospective cohort of 40 patients who received LB field blocks following single-level lumbar microdiscectomy were compared with a historical cohort of 40 patients who underwent the same surgical procedure but did not receive postsurgical infiltration of local anesthetic. All patients received a standard open surgical technique and postoperative convalescence protocol, which included overnight admission, oral narcotic pain medication as needed, scheduled IV ketorolac and IV narcotic pain medication for breakthrough. RESULTS Data from 80 subjects (67 males) operated on between January 2014 and 2015 were compared, including 40 cases, which occurred prior to using LB, and 40 cases after. There was no significant difference between mean age or body mass index (BMI) between groups. Patients who received LB infiltration spent significantly less time using IV narcotics in the postoperative period (LB patients 13.0±2.1 hours vs. non-LB patients 23.3±2.1 hours, p<.001). There was no significant difference noted between VAS at any point in the postoperative period, total injectable morphine equivalent doses, or 30-day emergency room visits for pain. CONCLUSIONS We found that patients who received LB field blocks required IV narcotic pain medication for a significantly decreased length of time (average delta=10.3 hours). Although this is a surrogate for earlier discharge, within the numbers studied, this did not translate into a significantdifference in VAS scores or total morphine equivalents. It is uncertain, if the independent effect of LB may have been masked by the multimodal postoperative pain control protocol in use. Further study is required to best understand the potential benefit of pre-emptive analgesia in elective spine surgery. Its impact would likely be more significant in more invasive procedures.

Perioperative complications in open versus percutaneous treatment of spinal fractures in patients with an ankylosed spine.

We compared open stabilization of vertebral fractures to percutaneous spinal fixation techniques in patients with a diagnosis of either ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). A retrospective review of patients known to have AS or DISH treated for spinal column fracture at a single institution between 1995 and 2011 was performed. Patients were analyzed by the type of fixation, divided into either a percutaneous group (PG) or an open group (OG). There were 41 patients identified with a spinal column fracture and history of AS or DISH who received surgical intervention. There were 17 (42%) patients with AS and 24 (58%) with DISH. Patients in the PG and OG cohorts presented with similar mechanisms of injury, Injury Severity Scale, number of vertebral fractures, number of additional injuries, and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification scores. Mean operative time (254.76minutes versus 334.67minutes, p=0.040), estimated blood loss (166.8 versus 1240.36mL, p<0.001), blood transfusion volume (178.32 versus 848.69mL, p<0.001), and time to discharge (9.58 days versus 16.73 days, p=0.008) were significantly less in the PG cohort. The rate of blood transfusion (36% versus 87.5%, p=0.001) and complications (56% versus 87%, p=0.045) were significantly less in the PG cohort. Percutaneous stabilization of fractures in patients with AS or DISH was associated with lower blood loss, shorter operative times and decreased need for transfusion, shorter hospitalization time and a lower perioperative complication rate.

Comparison of Outcomes for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with and Without Anterior Plate Fixation

Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To compare postoperative surgical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with and without plate fixation. Summary of Background Data. ACDF has evolved significantly over the years, including the placement of an anterior plate construct. Although promoting bony osseo-integration at the fusion site, there are a number of plate-related complications that can arise. The non-plating approach is less invasive, however, greater rates of cage subsidence have been associated with this model. Methods. We performed an electronic literature search for human studies that directly compared ACDF with and without anterior plate fixation. Outcomes of interest comprised of postoperative dysphagia, fusion success, and cage subsidence as well as patient reported outcomes, including the Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for both neck and arm pain. Results. A total of 15 studies (12 observational and 3 randomized controlled trials) and 893 patients (57% males) were included. Overall, ACDF with plate fixation was associated with significantly higher vertebral fusion rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–3.37), lower subsidence rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.18–0.52), and more favorable VAS-neck pain scores at last follow-up (mean difference [MD] 0.59, 95% CI −0.78 to −0.41). Conversely, ACDF procedures without plate fixation had marginally better long-term VAS-arm pain scores (mean difference [MD] 0.2, 95% CI 0.04–0.36). No difference was found with regards to dysphagia (OR 1.21, 95% CI, 0.57–2.56) and NDI (MD 0.06, 95% C.I −0.54 to 0.42). Conclusion. Available evidence, although limited, suggests superior surgical outcomes in ACDF procedures with anterior plate fixation (increased fusion, decreased subsidence) and slightly better VAS-neck pain scores at last follow-up. Future longitudinal, multicenter randomized controlled trials should be completed to validate any associations found in this study. Level of Evidence: 3

Predictors of discharge to a nonhome facility in patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion for degenerative spine disease

BACKGROUND Patients recovering from decompressive laminectomy without fusion may require assistance with activities of daily living and physical/occupational therapy upon hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE To examine comorbidities and perioperative characteristics of patients undergoing lumbar decompression for associations with discharge status using a multicenter database. METHODS A multicenter database was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. Patients admitted from home with degenerative spine disease for lumbar decompression without fusion were included. Thirty-day outcomes and operative characteristics were compared as a function of patient discharge using chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with discharge to a nonhome facility. RESULTS Of the 8627 patients included for analysis, 9.7% were discharged to a nonhome facility. On multivariable analysis, age (85+ vs <65, odds ratio [OR] 13.59), number of levels of decompression (3+ vs 1, OR 1.75), African American race vs Non-Hispanic or Hispanic White (OR 1.87), female vs male gender (OR 1.97), body mass index (BMI) (40+ vs 18.5-24.9, OR 1.74), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification status (4 vs 1 or 2, OR 2.35), hypertension (OR 1.29), dependent functional status (OR 3.92), diabetes (OR 1.47), smoking (OR 1.40), hematocrit (<35 vs 35+, OR 1.76), international normalized ratio (≥1.3 vs <1.3, OR 2.32), and operative time (3+ h vs <1 h, OR 5.34) were significantly associated with an increased odds of discharge to nonhome facilities. CONCLUSION Preoperative status and operative course variables can influence discharge disposition in lumbar decompression patients. Identifying specific factors that contribute to a greater likelihood of dismissal to skilled facility or rehabilitation unit can further inform both surgeons and patients during preoperative counseling and disposition planning.

An empiric analysis of 5 counter measures against surgical site infections following spine surgery—a pragmatic approach and review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Surgical site infections (SSI) following spine surgery are debilitating complications to patients and costly to the healthcare system. PURPOSE Review the impact and cost effectiveness of 5 SSI prevention interventions on SSI rates in an orthopedic spine surgery practice at a major quaternary healthcare system over a 10-year period. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE All of the surgical patients of the 5 spine surgeons in our department over a 10-year period were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES SSI rates per year, standardized infection ratios (SIR) for laminectomies and fusions during the most recent 3-year period, year of implementation, and frequency of use of the different interventions, cost of the techniques. METHODS The SSI prevention techniques described in this paper include application of intrawound vancomycin powder, wound irrigation with dilute betadine solution, preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate scrubs, preoperative screening with nasal swabbing, and decolonization of S. aureus, and perioperative antibiotic administration. Our institutions infection prevention and control data were analyzed for the yearly SSI rates for the orthopedic spine surgery department from 2006 to 2016. In addition, our orthopedic spine surgeons were polled to determine with what frequency and duration they have been using the different SSI prevention interventions. RESULTS SSI rates decreased from almost 6% per year the first year of observation to less than 2% per year in the final 6 years of this study. A SIR of less than 1.0 for each year was observed for laminectomies and fusions for the period from 2013 to 2016. All surgeons polled at our institution uniformly used perioperative antibiotics, Hibiclens scrub, and the nasal swab protocol since the implementation of these techniques. Some variability existed in the frequency and duration of betadine irrigation and application of vancomycin powder. A cost analysis demonstrated these methods to be nominal compared with the cost of treating a single SSI. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to reduce SSI rates in spine surgery with easy, safe, and cost-effective protocols, when implemented in a standardized manner.

Spinal Fusions in Active Military Personnel: Who Gets a Lumbar Spinal Fusion in the Military and What Impact Does It Have on Service Member Retention?

Introduction Back pain related to spinal degenerative disease is one of the most common causes of missed duty days and medical separation for active service members. While the topic of operative versus non-operative treatment of degenerative spine conditions in active military personnel has received more and much needed attention in the last few years, there remains a paucity of data examining the expanded demographics and clinical findings of those undergoing spinal fusion in which validated outcome measures are used to assess post-operative results. The purpose of this study was to define the characteristics and outcomes of spinal fusion surgery at U.S. military medical treatment facilities. Materials and Methods A cohort of 145 active military personnel undergoing spinal fusion at a single military medical center between 2008 and 2013 were examined in a retrospective fashion using data from primary source documentation recorded prospectively in the military electronic medical records and the image data repository for demographics, clinical/imaging findings and patient reported outcome scores at mean follow-up of 6 mo. Oswestery Disability Index (ODI) scores and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used as patient reported outcome measures. Soldier rank, active duty status, and service-connected disability percentage were also analyzed as military specific outcome measures. Results The typical solider undergoing spinal fusion was a Caucasian male serving in the U.S. Army. At last follow-up, there were statistically significant improvements in pre-operative to post-operative ODI and VAS scores. Younger age at the time of surgery was a negative predictor for post-operative VAS outcomes (p = 0.047). There were six reoperations in the cohort for neurologic symptoms and hardware migration. The majority of soldiers went on to medical retirement but a considerable number saw an increase in their rank prior to doing so. Those who ended their service in regular retirement and medical retirement went on to see 90.7% and 85% service-connected disability respectively. Discussion This investigation reports on the largest cohort of active military personnel undergoing spinal fusion. A variety of demographic information are reviewed to clarify the picture of soldiers at risk for needing a spinal fusion. While younger age was an independent risk factors for worsened VAS scores, no independent variable portended a worse ODI score at last follow-up. Despite improvements in objective measures such as VAS, ODI, and increases in rank, soldiers going on to retirement collected a dramatic service-connected disability percentage. Level of Evidence Level IV, Therapeutic.

Incidence of Osteoporosis-Related Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion:

Study Design: Retrospective review. Objectives: This study investigates the prevalence of adverse postsurgical events, or osteoporosis-related complications (ORCs), following spinal fusion. Methods: Patients undergoing primary posterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion by 1 of 2 surgeons practicing at a single institution were analyzed from 2007 to 2014. ORCs were defined in one of the following categories: revision surgery, compression fracture, proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, or failure of instrumentation. Patients with a bone mineral density of the hips and/or spine performed within 1 year of the index procedure were included. Patients were stratified into normal bone density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis using WHO guidelines. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years at the time of surgery, with infection, malignancy, skeletal dysplasia, neuromuscular disorders, concomitant or staged anterior-posterior procedure, or fusion performed because of trauma. Results: Out of 140 patients included, the prevalence of normal bone density was 31.4% (44/140), osteopenia 58.6% (82/140), and osteoporosis 10.0% (14/140). There were no differences between groups for gender, age, body mass index, and interbody device rate. The overall prevalence of ORCs was 32.1% (45/140). By group, there was a prevalence of 22.7% (10/44), 32.9% (27/82), and 50.0% (7/14) for normal bone density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis, respectively. These differences were significantly higher for both the osteopenia and osteoporosis groups. Conclusions: Patients with T scores below −1.0 undergoing posterior lumbar fusion have an increased prevalence of ORCs. Consideration of bone density plays a crucial role in patient selection, medical management, and counseling patient expectations.

Does Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein 2 Affect Perioperative Blood Loss after Lumbar and Thoracic Spinal Fusion

Study Design Retrospective cohort design. Purpose This study aimed to determine whether recombinant human bone morphogenic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) reduces total perioperative blood loss during lumbar and thoracic fusion. Overview of Literature Previous studies on rhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone grafting in thoracic and lumbar fusions have yielded mixed results regarding reductions in blood loss and have largely neglected the postoperative period when analyzing total blood loss. Additionally, these studies have been limited by heterogeneity and sample size. Methods We analyzed the blood loss patterns of 617 consecutive adult patients undergoing lumbar and/or thoracic fusions requiring subfascial drain placement at a single institution from January 2009 to December 2016. Patients were divided into BMP and non-BMP cohorts, and a propensity score analysis was conducted to account for the differences between cohorts. Results At a per-level fused basis, the BMP group exhibited a significant reduction in the intraoperative (66.1 mL per-level fused basis; 95% confidence interval [CI], 127.9 to 4.25 mL; p=0.036) and total perioperative blood loss (100.7 mL per-level fused basis; 95% CI, 200.9 to 0.5 mL; p=0.049). However, no significant differences were observed in an analysis when not controlling for the number of levels or when examining the postoperative drain output. Conclusion RhBMP-2 appears to reduce both intraoperative and total blood loss during lumbar and thoracic fusions on a per-level fused basis. This total reduction in blood loss was achieved via intraoperative effects because RhBMP-2 had no significant effect on the postoperative drain output.

Does Subcutaneous Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Improve Immediate Postoperative Pain Control?

Study Design Retrospective case-control study using prospectively collected data. Purpose Evaluate the impact of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on postoperative pain management and narcotic use following standardized single-level low lumbar transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Overview of Literature Poor pain control after surgery has been linked with decreased pain satisfaction and increased economic burden. Unfortunately, opioids have many limitations and side effects despite being the primary treatment of postoperative pain. LB may be a form of pre-emptive analgesia used to reduce the use of postoperative narcotics as evidence in other studies evaluating its use in single-level microdiskectomies. Methods The infiltration of LB subcutaneously during wound closure was performed by a single surgeon beginning in July 2014 for all single-level lumbar TLIF spinal surgeries at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. This cohort was compared against a control cohort of patients who underwent the same surgery by the same surgeon in the preceding 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed on relevant variables including: morphine equivalents of narcotic medication used (primary outcome), length of hospitalization, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, and total time spent on a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Results A total of 30 patients were included in this study; 16 were in the intervention cohort and 14 were in the control cohort. The morphine equivalents of intravenous narcotic use postoperatively were significantly less in the LB cohort from day of surgery to postoperative day 3. Although the differences lost their statistical significance, the trend remained for total (oral and intravenous) narcotic consumption to be lower in the LB group. The patients who received the study intervention required an acute pain service consult less frequently (62.5% in LB cohort vs. 78.6% in control cohort). The amount of time spent on a PCA pump in the LB group was 31 hours versus 47 hours in the control group (p=0.1506). Conclusions Local infiltration of LB postoperatively to the subcutaneous tissues during closure following TLIF significantly decreased the amount of intravenous narcotic medication required by patients. Well-powered prospective studies are still needed to determine optimal dosing and confirm benefits of LB on total narcotic consumption and other measures of pain control following major spinal surgery.