Brian A. McGovern

Treatment of ventricular tachycardia by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND Recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) is not responsive to antiarrhythmic drugs in the majority of patients, who therefore need therapy with nonpharmacological methods. We evaluated prospectively the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transcatheter radiofrequency (RF) ablation of VT in 21 selected patients with ischemic heart disease and VT. METHODS AND RESULTS Twenty-one patients with ischemic heart disease and recurrent, drug-refractory VT documented by 12-lead ECG were selected who had sufficient hemodynamic tolerance of VT to undergo transcatheter mapping. Documented clinical VT was reproduced by programmed cardiac stimulation (PCS), and the site of origin was localized by a combination of techniques, including pace mapping, activation-sequence mapping, recordings of middiastolic potentials, and application of resetting and entrainment principles. RF current at 55 V was applied (3.8 +/- 3.1 applications per patient) for as long as 30 seconds at a time to target sites. Twenty-four distinct clinical VTs (mean cycle length, 445 +/- 52 milliseconds) were mapped and ablated in 21 patients. In 17 of 21 patients (81%), the procedure was acutely successful, and the target clinical VT could no longer be induced by PCS after the procedure, whereas in 4 patients, clinical VT remained inducible. By contrast, VTs with shorter cycle length and different QRS morphology than the ablated VT could still be induced by PCS in 12 of 21 patients. One patient died in intractable congestive heart failure 10 days after the procedure, and the remaining 20 are alive at the end of the follow-up period. The majority of the patients continued to be treated with at least one additional mode of antiarrhythmic therapy; 12 patients were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs, and 9 patients received an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. During a mean follow-up period of 13.2 +/- 5.0 months, 9 of 20 patients (45%) had recurrent VT. In 4 patients, the recurrent VT was different than the previously ablated one. Clinical VT recurred in all 4 patients in whom RF ablation had been acutely unsuccessful. Four patients with recurrent VT underwent repeat RF ablation procedures that were acutely successful and had no further recurrence. CONCLUSION Transcatheter RF ablation is feasible but has only moderately high efficacy in a small, selected group of patients with ischemic heart disease and drug-refractory, highly frequent, hemodynamically tolerated, sustained VT. In the majority of the patients, this treatment technique is palliative rather than definitive, and many of the patients continue to require other methods of antiarrhythmic therapy.

Adenosine for Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia: Dose Ranging and Comparison with Verapamil: Assessment in Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trials

OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous adenosine in terminating acute episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. DESIGN Two prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate dose response in patients receiving adenosine and to compare the effects of adenosine with those of verapamil. PATIENTS A total of 359 patients with a tachycardia electrocardiographically consistent with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia were entered into the two protocols. Patients subsequently found to have arrhythmias other than paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia were excluded from the efficacy analysis. INTERVENTIONS The first protocol compared sequential intravenous bolus doses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mg of adenosine to equal volumes of saline. In the second protocol, patients received either 6 mg and, if necessary, 12 mg of adenosine or 5 mg and, if necessary, 7.5 mg of verapamil. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS When data are expressed in terms of cumulative response in eligible patients, intravenous adenosine terminated acute episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in 35.2%, 62.3%, 80.2%, and 91.4% of patients who received maximum doses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mg, respectively, in a four-dose sequence, whereas 8.9%, 10.7%, 14.3%, and 16.1% of patients responded to four sequential placebo doses (P less than 0.0001). In the second trial, cumulative response rates after 6 mg followed, if necessary, by 12 mg of adenosine were 57.4% and 93.4%, and after 5 mg followed, if necessary, by 7.5 mg of verapamil were 81.3% and 91.4%. The average time after injection to termination of tachycardia by adenosine was 30 seconds. Adenosine caused adverse effects in 36% of patients, but they lasted less than 1 minute and were usually mild. CONCLUSIONS Adenosine in graded doses up to 12 mg rapidly and effectively terminates acute episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in which the atrioventricular node is an integral part of the re-entrant circuit. The overall efficacy of adenosine is similar to that of verapamil, but its onset of action is more rapid. Adverse reactions to adenosine are common but are minor and brief.

Influence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the long-term prognosis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest not associated with acute myocardial infarction are at high risk for recurrent cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death. The impact of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on long-term prognosis in these patients is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS Three hundred thirty-one survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (age, 56 +/- 13.7 years) underwent electrophysiologically guided therapy. Implantable defibrillators were placed in 150 patients (45.3%), and 181 patients (54.7%) received pharmacological and/or surgical therapy alone. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 35.2 +/- 16.6% in defibrillator recipients and 45.3 +/- 18.2% in nondefibrillator patients. Median patient follow-up was 24 months in the defibrillator group and 46 months in the nondefibrillator group. In a proportional hazards model, the independent predictors of total cardiac mortality were left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 (relative risk, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.44 to 8.33; P = .0001), absence of an implantable defibrillator (relative risk, 2.70; confidence interval, 1.41 to 5.00; P = .017), and persistence of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 3.49; P = .045). The 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 were 94.3% and 69.6% with a defibrillator and 82.1% and 45.3% without a defibrillator, respectively. For patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or more, the 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality were 97.7% and 94.6% with a defibrillator and 95.4% and 86.9% without a defibrillator, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the implantable defibrillator is associated with a reduction in cardiac mortality, particularly in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: a Possible Cause of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

SUDDEN cardiac death accounts for approximately two thirds of the 600,000 annual deaths that are attributable to cardiac disease in the United States. Most of these deaths are instantaneous, occurr...

Sex Differences in Cardiac Arrest Survivors

BACKGROUND Important sex differences in the epidemiology of sudden death and in the results of electrophysiological testing in survivors of cardiac arrest have been identified. These differences are currently poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS Three hundred fifty-five consecutive survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (84 women and 271 men) referred for electrophysiologically guided therapy were analyzed retrospectively for sex differences in underlying pathology and predictors of outcome. Women were significantly less likely to have underlying coronary artery disease than men (45% versus 80%) and more likely to have other forms of heart disease or structurally normal hearts (P<.0001). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in women (0.46+/-0.18 versus 0.41+/-0.18, P<.05), and women were more likely to have no inducible arrhythmia at baseline electrophysiological testing (46% versus 27%, P=.002), although when the patients were stratified by coronary artery disease status, these sex differences were no longer present. The independent predictors of outcome differed between men and women. In men, a left ventricular ejection fraction of <0.40 was the most powerful independent predictor of total (relative risk, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 5.0; P<.0001) and cardiac (relative risk, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.9 to 13.5; P<.0001) mortality. In contrast, the presence of coronary artery disease was the only independent predictor of total (relative risk, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.5 to 13.4; P=.003) and cardiac (relative risk, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 15.6; P=.012) mortality in women. CONCLUSIONS Females survivors of cardiac arrest are less likely to have underlying coronary artery disease. The predictors of total and cardiac mortality differ between male and female survivors. Coronary artery disease status is the most important predictor in women, and impaired left ventricular function is the most important predictor in men.

Limitations and Late Complications of Third-Generation Automatic Cardioverter-Defibrillators

BACKGROUND This study examines the limitations and complex management problems associated with the use of tiered-therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND RESULTS The study group comprises the first 154 patients undergoing implantation of tiered-therapy ICDs at our institution. Pulse generators from three different manufacturers were used. In 39 patients, a complete nonthoracotomy lead system was used. The perioperative mortality was 1.3%. Of these 154 patients, 37% experienced late postoperative problems. Twenty-one patients required system revision within 36.5 months (mean, 8.57 +/- 11.3) of surgery. Reasons for revision were spurious shocks due to electrode fractures (3) or electrode adapter malfunction (2), inadequate signal from endocardial rate-sensing electrodes (3), superior vena cava or right ventricular coil migration (5), failure to correct tachyarrhythmias due to a postimplant rise in defibrillation threshold (5), or pulse generator failure (3). One of these patients required system removal for infection after revision of an endocardial lead. A further 32 patients received inappropriate shocks for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response or sinus tachycardia. Two of these patients also received shocks for ventricular tachycardia initiated by antitachycardia pacing triggered by atrial fibrillation. Ventricular pacing for bradycardia was associated with inappropriate shocks due to excessive autogain in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS Despite the major diagnostic and therapeutic advantages of tiered-therapy ICDs, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience hardware-related complications or receive inappropriate shocks.

Adverse reactions during treatment with amiodarone hydrochloride.

Amiodarone was administered to 80 patients with recurrent cardiac tachyarrhythmias previously resistant to drug treatment. Forty nine patients were treated for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and 31 for supra-ventricular arrhythmias. The mean (range six days to 51 months), permitting a total of 100 patient years of observation. Adverse reactions were observed in 69 patients. Severe side effects were encountered in 13: four patients developed interstitial pneumonitis, four patients developed incessant ventricular tachycardia, three patients taking amiodarone and digoxin sustained sinus node arrest with depression of escape foci, one patient developed hepatitis, and one patient developed hypercalcaemia with renal failure. Furthermore, a rise in the serum concentration of digoxin and potentiation of warfarin anticoagulation occurred in cases in which these agents were combined with amiodarone. Amiodarone was stopped in 14 patients because of side effects. Although amiodarone is effective in suppressing arrhythmias in most patients in whom extensive use of antiarrhythmic drugs has been unsuccessful, it is associated with diverse and serious toxicity. These observations suggest that at present the use of amiodarone should be reserved for patients with life threatening or seriously disabling arrhythmias in whom longer established drugs have been ineffective or are contraindicated.

Long-term clinical outcome of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation treated with amiodarone

The determinants of long-term clinical outcome were studied in 42 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) who were treated with amiodarone as the sole antiarrhythmic agent. Of the 42 patients, 11 (26%) either died suddenly or had recurrent, symptomatic, sustained VT during a mean follow-up period of 10 months (range 0.3 to 45). Of the 19 patients without inducible VT/VF during electrophysiologic study while receiving amiodarone, 1 patient died suddenly but no patient had recurrent VT/VF. Ten of the 23 patients (43%) with persistently inducible arrhythmia have died suddenly or have had recurrent VT/VF. Using survival and stepwise logistic regression analyses, 2 significant independent predictors of recurrent arrhythmia were identified; persistently inducible VT during electrophysiologic testing in patients receiving amiodarone therapy (p less than 0.002) and the left ventricular ejection fraction at rest (p less than 0.05). The predictive accuracy of the response to serial electrophysiologic testing during amiodarone therapy was 67%, the sensitivity was 58% and the specificity was 91%. Thus, serial electrophysiologic testing is useful for determining the prognosis in patients with inducible VT/VF treated with amiodarone.

Long-term infection rates associated with the pectoral versus abdominal approach to cardioverter- defibrillator implants

Infection is an uncommon (0% to 6.7%) but serious complication after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. All ICD primary implants, replacements, or revisions performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital between April 1983 and May 1999 were reviewed. A total of 21 ICD-related infections (1.2%) were identified among 1,700 procedures affecting 1.8% of the 1,170 patients who underwent a primary implant, a generator change, or a revision of their systems. The mean follow-up time was 35 +/- 33 months. Of the 959 patients with long-term follow-up, 19 of the 584 patients (3.2%) with abdominal and 2 of the 375 patients (0.5%) with pectoral systems developed ICD-related infections (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the infection rate among the 959 primary ICD implants and the 447 replacements or system revisions. Only 5 of the patients (24%) had systemic signs of infection, including fever (T>100.5) and elevated white blood count >12,000. Cultures from the wound revealed staphylococcal species in 16 patients (76%). Nineteen patients were treated with removal of the entire ICD system in addition to intravenous antibiotics for 2 to 4 weeks. A decrease in the incidence of ICD-related infection has occurred since the advent of transvenous pectoral systems. The main organism responsible for ICD infection is Staphylococcus. The mainstay of ICD infection management consists of complete removal of the entire implanted system.

Precipitation of cardiac arrest by verapamil in patients with Wolff-Parkinson―White syndrome

Abstract After the administration of verapamil for rapid tachycardias, five patients developed ventricular fibrillation or required urgent cardioversion. All episodes occurred in hospital emergency...