Brian D. Coley

Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children for non-cardiac applications: a review by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS)

The practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children is in the setting of off-label use or research. The widespread practice of pediatric contrast-enhanced US is primarily in Europe. There is ongoing effort by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS) to push for pediatric contrast-enhanced US in the United States. With this in mind, the main objective of this review is to describe the status of US contrast agent safety in non-cardiac applications in children. The five published studies using pediatric intravenous contrast-enhanced US comprise 110 children. There is no mention of adverse events in these studies. From a European survey 948 children can be added. In that survey six minor adverse events were reported in five children. The intravesical administration of US contrast agents for diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux entails the use of a bladder catheter. Fifteen studies encompassing 2,951 children have evaluated the safety of intravesical US contrast agents in children. A European survey adds 4,131 children to this group. No adverse events could be attributed to the contrast agent. They were most likely related to the bladder catheterization. The existing data on US contrast agent safety in children are encouraging in promoting the widespread use of contrast-enhanced US.

Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection therapy for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 12-year care experience

BackgroundIntra-articular corticosteroid injections are a safe and effective treatment for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The potential scope of care in ultrasound-guided corticosteroid therapy in children and a joint-based corticosteroid dose protocol designed to optimize interdisciplinary care are not found in the current literature.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to report the spectrum of care, technique and safety of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection therapy in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and to propose an age-weight-joint-based corticosteroid dose protocol.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 198 patients (ages 21 months to 28 years) referred for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with corticosteroid therapy. Symptomatic joints and tendon sheaths were treated as prescribed by the referring rheumatologist. An age-weight-joint-based dose protocol was developed and utilized for corticosteroid dose prescription.ResultsA total of 1,444 corticosteroid injections (1,340 joints, 104 tendon sheaths) were performed under US guidance. Injection sites included small, medium and large appendicular skeletal joints (upper extremity 497, lower extremity 837) and six temporomandibular joints. For patients with recurrent symptoms, 414 repeat injections were performed, with an average time interval of 17.7 months (range, 0.5–101.5 months) between injections. Complications occurred in 2.6% of injections and included subcutaneous tissue atrophy, skin hypopigmentation, erythema and pruritis.ConclusionUS-guided corticosteroid injection therapy provides dynamic, precise and safe treatment of a broad spectrum of joints and tendon sheaths throughout the entire pediatric musculoskeletal system. An age-weight-joint-based corticosteroid dose protocol is effective and integral to interdisciplinary care of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Head Trauma—Child

Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Computed tomography and shifts to alternate imaging modalities in hospitalized children

BACKGROUND: Many studies have demonstrated a rise in computed tomography (CT) utilization in children’s hospitals. However, CT utilization may be declining, perhaps due to awareness of potential hazards of pediatric ionizing radiation, such as increased risk of malignancy. The objective is to assess the trend in CT utilization in hospitalized children at freestanding children’s hospitals from 2004 to 2012 and we hypothesize decreases are associated with shifts to alternate imaging modalities. METHODS: Multicenter cross-sectional study of children admitted to 33 pediatric tertiary-care hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012. The rates of CT, ultrasound, and MRI for the top 10 All-Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRGs) for which CT was performed in 2004 were determined by billing data. Rates of each imaging modality for those top 10 APR-DRGs were followed through the study period. Odds ratios of imaging were adjusted for demographics and illness severity. RESULTS: For all included APR-DRGs except ventricular shunt procedures and nonbacterial gastroenteritis, the number of children imaged with any modality increased. CT utilization decreased for all APR-DRGs (P values < .001). For each of the APR-DRGs except seizure and infections of upper respiratory tract, the decrease in CT was associated with a significant rise in an alternative imaging modality (P values ≤ .005). CONCLUSIONS: For the 10 most common APR-DRGs for which children received CT in 2004, a decrease in CT utilization was found in 2012. Alternative imaging modalities for 8 of the diagnoses were used.

The simple sacral dimple: diagnostic yield of ultrasound in neonates

BackgroundAlthough spinal cord tethering is known to be associated with certain clinical syndromes and cutaneous stigmata, its incidence in healthy infants with simple sacral dimples has not been thoroughly evaluated.ObjectiveOur objective was to determine the frequency of tethered cord in otherwise healthy patients with simple sacral dimples.Materials and methodsWe reviewed the lumbar spine US reports of all healthy neonates referred for a simple sacral dimple during a 12-year period at two children’s hospitals. A sonogram was considered abnormal for a conus medullaris terminating below the L2–L3 disc space, decreased conus or nerve root motion, an abnormal filum terminale, or for the presence of an intraspinal mass, osseous dysraphism, or a sinus leading to the thecal sac. The medical records of patients with abnormal screening sonograms were reviewed to determine the final clinical outcome.ResultsDuring the study period 3,991 infants underwent screening sonography. Of these, 107 were excluded because of the presence of other medical conditions. Of the remaining 3,884 healthy infants, 133 (3.4%) had an abnormal sonogram. Five (0.13%) of these infants were lost to follow-up; 52 subsequently had normal follow-up imaging; 49 had a low conus without other signs of tethering; 18 had a fatty filum; 2 had decreased conus motion; 2 had both a low conus and a fatty filum. None of these infants underwent surgery. Only the remaining 5/3,884 (0.13%) infants underwent surgical intervention (95% CI: 0–0.27%), and 4/5 were found to have a tethered cord intraoperatively.ConclusionThe risk of significant spinal malformations in asymptomatic, healthy infants with an isolated simple sacral dimple is exceedingly low.

Effect of Nutritional Rehabilitation on Gastric Motility and Somatization in Adolescents with Anorexia

OBJECTIVE To examine gastric function, as well as the presence of somatic complaints, anxiety symptoms, and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) before and after nutritional rehabilitation. STUDY DESIGN Sixteen females with AN and 22 healthy controls with similar demographic profiles were included. Gastric emptying (measured as residual gastric volume) and gastric accommodation (measured as postprandial antral diameter) were assessed with abdominal ultrasonography. Participants completed the Childrens Somatization Inventory (CSI), the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders, and the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Rome III version. All testing was repeated 3-4 months later. RESULTS Body mass index in the AN group improved over time (P = .012). Fasting gastric parameters were similar in the 2 groups. Maximum postprandial antral diameter was significantly greater in controls compared with the AN group (P = .008). Only adolescents with AN demonstrated a significant increase in maximum postprandial diameter at repeat testing (P = .009). There was no difference in residual gastric volume between the 2 groups. Initial CSI scores were higher in adolescents with AN (P < .0001), including higher scores for nausea and abdominal pain. CSI scores were significantly lower in adolescents with AN (P = .035). Initial scores on the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders were significantly higher in adolescents with AN (P = .0005), but did not change over time. Adolescents with AN met significantly more criteria for FGIDs (P = .003). CONCLUSION Adolescents with AN have impaired gastric accommodation that improves after nutritional rehabilitation, have significantly more somatic complaints, and meet more criteria for anxiety disorders and FGIDs. After nutritional rehabilitation, somatization improves and FGIDs become less common, but symptoms of anxiety persist.

The creation of non-disease: an assault on the diagnosis of child abuse

The triad of subdural hematoma, retinal hemorrhage and multiple fractures in a child has been extensively documented to strongly suggest non-accidental trauma. Based on confessional evidence, a medical workup excluding diseases that can present with some of these abnormalities, and almost 50 years of scientific medical supportive literature, the diagnosis of abuse is being made with increasing medical certainty [1–7]. The medical community and particularly child protection professionals take extraordinary care before making a diagnosis of intentional, non-accidental trauma and strongly consider alternative diagnoses. The foundations of medical diagnosis and treatment should be firmly rooted. While there will always remain instances in which the evidence is less than perfect and several diagnostic possibilities are acceptable, it is dishonest and fraudulent to advocate a diagnosis denied by reasonable medical certainty. In this ploy, the protagonist says “there is controversy” but as Oliver Wendell Holmes noted, “controversy equalizes fools and wise men—and the fools know it” [8]. This is what is occurring in the diagnosis of child abuse. A small group of individuals has, during depositions and court room testimony [9, 10], perverted cases by using incomplete statements of the facts and unproven hypotheses to obscure the straightforward historical and physical findings utilized to make the diagnosis of child abuse [11–18]. These individuals have utilized unethical methods to create controversy when there should be none. The role of the medical profession is to protect today’s child and future children. The question is not “who did it?” but rather “did the child suffer from non-accidental trauma?” A remarkably informative course titled “Imaging of Child Abuse: Fact, Fiction and Responsible Action” (4–5 February 2012) was sponsored by The Society for Pediatric Radiology and directed by Drs. Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello and Paul K. Kleinman [19]. Perhaps the most encouraging aspect of the weekend was the active participation of scientists, lawyers, and physicians of various clinical expertise. The course was preceded by a 1-day discussion between the speakers and other invited experts. The following day-anda-half seminar (Table 1, course outline) presented the scientifically accepted methodology for the diagnosis of nonaccidental trauma with emphasis on the pathophysiology of various injuries, and covered areas where new data have changed our understanding (e.g., subdural hematoma can occur from bleeding dural veins and not only bridging veins) [20–22]. The differential diagnosis of the various injuries was emphasized and appropriate workup of these childrenwas presented. There is no controversy that child abuse is real and deadly. In 2009, approximately 150,000 children were confirmed with physical abuse and 1,770 died [23]. As a T. L. Slovis (*) Department of Pediatric Imaging, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3901 Beaubien Blvd., Detroit, MI 48201, USA e-mail: tslovis@med.wayne.edu

Limited Value of Plain Radiographs in Infant Torticollis

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to assess the frequency of clinically relevant findings from plain films of infants evaluated for torticollis. PATIENTS AND METHODS. After institutional review board approval, radiology records were searched for infants 0 to 12 months of age who underwent plain film study for torticollis or “head tilt.” Infants evaluated for trauma or Down syndrome were excluded. All of the studies were reviewed, demographic data was recorded, and any additional imaging studies were examined. RESULTS. A total of 502 patients (189 girls and 313 boys) were identified with an average age of 0.37 ± 0.2 years. Head tilt was to the left in two thirds of patients. Ten patients had abnormal findings reported. Six of these proved normal on subsequent studies (3 suspected occipital-C1 fusions, 2 suspected cervical fusions, and 1 suspected hemivertebra). Four patients had true bony vertebral abnormalities including absent left C7 pedicle, multiple fusion anomalies from C4 to T2, C3 hemivertebra and thoracic spine anomalies, and C4 hypoplasia. This last patient had abnormal kyphosis on physical examination and demonstrated instability with dynamic testing. Twenty-five additional patients with normal plain films underwent spine computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; all were normal. CONCLUSIONS. The true-positive yield of plain films in nontraumatic infant torticollis was low (4 of 502). There were more false-positive than true-positive results. A common rationale for imaging is to exclude craniocervical or other unstable abnormalities that might contraindicate physical therapy, seen in only 1 of the 502 cases. Close physical examination could safely eliminate most patients sent for radiography.

Emergency Department Use of Computed Tomography for Children with Ventricular Shunts

OBJECTIVES To quantify rates and variation in emergency department (ED) cranial computed tomography (CT) utilization in children with ventricular shunts, estimate radiation exposure, and evaluate the association between CT utilization and shunt revision. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of ED visits from 2003-2013 in children 0-18 years old with initial shunt placement in 2003. Data were examined from 31 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. Main outcomes were cranial CT performed during an ED visit, estimated cumulative effective radiation dose, and shunt revision within 7 days. Multivariable regression modeled the relationship between patient- and hospital-level covariates and CT utilization. RESULTS The 1319 children with initial shunt placed in 2003 experienced 6636 ED visits during the subsequent decade. A cranial CT was obtained in 49.4% of all ED visits; 19.9% of ED visits with CT were associated with a shunt revision. Approximately 6% of patients received ≥10 CTs, accounting for 37.2% of all ED visits with a CT. The mean number of CTs per patient varied nearly 20-fold across hospitals; the individual hospital accounted for the most variation in CT utilization. The median (IQR) cumulative effective radiation dose was 7.2 millisieverts (3.6-14.0) overall, and 33.4 millisieverts (27.2-43.8) among patients receiving ≥10 CTs. CONCLUSIONS A CT scan was obtained in half of ED visits for children with a ventricular shunt, with wide variability in utilization by hospitals. Strategies are needed to identify children at risk of shunt malfunction to reduce variability in CT utilization and radiation exposure in the ED.

Proceedings: Beyond Ultrasound First Forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology

&NA; The Beyond Ultrasound First Forum was conceived to increase awareness that the quality of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound can be improved, and is inconsistent throughout the country, likely due to multiple factors, including the lack of a standardized curriculum and competency assessment in ultrasound teaching. The forum brought together representatives from many professional associations; the imaging community including radiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and emergency medicine among others; in addition to government agencies, insurers, industry, and others with common interest in obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound. This group worked together in focus sessions aimed at developing solutions on how to standardize and improve ultrasound training at the resident level and beyond. A new curriculum and competency assessment program for teaching residents (obstetrics and gynecology, radiology, and any other specialty doing obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound) was presented, and performance measures of ultrasound quality in clinical practice were discussed. The aim of this forum was to increase and unify the quality of ultrasound examinations in obstetrics and gynecology with the ultimate goal of improving patient safety and quality of clinical care. This report describes the proceedings of this conference including possible approaches to resident teaching and means to improve the inconsistent quality of ultrasound examinations performed today.