Brian H. MacGillivray
Cranfield University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brian H. MacGillivray.
Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology | 2006
Brian H. MacGillivray; Paul D. Hamilton; J. E. Strutt; Simon J. T. Pollard
Financial pressures, regulatory reform, and sectoral restructuring are requiring water utilities to move from technically inclined, risk-averse management approaches toward more commercial, business-oriented practices. Risk analysis strategies and techniques traditionally applied to public health protection are now seeing broader application for asset management, assessing competition risks, and potential threats to the security of supplies. Water utility managers have to consider these risks alongside one another, employ a range of techniques, and devise business plans that prioritize resources on the basis of risk. We present a comprehensive review of risk analysis and management strategies for application in the water utility sector at the strategic, program, and operational levels of decision making.
Journal of Risk Research | 2007
Brian H. MacGillivray; J. V. Sharp; J. E. Strutt; Paul D. Hamilton; Simon J. T. Pollard
Risk management in the water utility sector is fast becoming explicit. Here, we describe application of a capability model to benchmark the risk management maturity of eight water utilities from the UK, Australia and the USA. Our analysis codifies risk management practice and offers practical guidance as to how utilities may more effectively employ their portfolio of risk analysis techniques for optimal, credible, and defensible decision making. For risk analysis, observed good practices include the use of initiation criteria for applying risk assessment techniques; the adoption of formalised procedures to guide their application; and auditing and peer reviews to ensure procedural compliance and provide quality assurance. Additionally, we have identified common weaknesses likely to be representative of the sector as a whole, in particular a need for improved risk knowledge management and education and training in the discipline.
Journal of Risk Research | 2007
Brian H. MacGillivray; J. V. Sharp; J. E. Strutt; Paul D. Hamilton; Simon J. T. Pollard
Risk management in the water utility sector is becoming increasingly explicit. However, due to the novelty and complexity of the discipline, utilities are encountering difficulties in defining and institutionalising their risk management processes. In response, the authors have developed a sector specific capability maturity methodology for benchmarking and improving risk management. The research, conducted in consultation with water utility practitioners, has distilled risk management into a coherent, process‐based framework. We identified eleven risk management processes, and eight key attributes with characterise the extent to which these processes are defined, controlled and institutionalised. Implementation of the model should enable utilities to more effectively employ their portfolio of risk analysis techniques for optimal, credible and defensible decision making.
Environment International | 2008
Brian H. MacGillivray; Simon J. T. Pollard
We present a model for benchmarking risk analysis and risk based decision making practice within organisations. It draws on behavioural and normative risk research, the principles of capability maturity modelling and our empirical observations. It codifies the processes of risk analysis and risk based decision making within a framework that distinguishes between different levels of maturity. Application of the model is detailed within the selected business functions of a water and wastewater utility. Observed risk analysis and risk based decision making practices are discussed, together with their maturity of implementation. The findings provide academics, utility professionals, and regulators a deeper understanding of the practical and theoretical underpinnings of risk management, and how distinctions can be made between organisational capabilities in this essential business process.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection | 2004
Simon J. T. Pollard; J. E. Strutt; Brian H. MacGillivray; Paul D. Hamilton; Steve E. Hrudey
Archive | 2006
Brian H. MacGillivray
Archive | 2006
Simon J. T. Pollard; J. E. Strutt; Brian H. MacGillivray; J. V. Sharp; Steve E. Hrudey; Paul D. Hamilton
Water Practice & Technology | 2006
Brian H. MacGillivray; Paul D. Hamilton; Steve E. Hrudey; L Reekie; Simon J. T. Pollard
Archive | 2007
Brian H. MacGillivray; J. V. Sharp; J. E. Strutt; Paul D. Hamilton; Simon J. T. Pollard
Archive | 2006
Simon J. T. Pollard; Brian H. MacGillivray; Paul D. Hamilton; Steve E. Hrudey; J. E. Strutt; J. V. Sharp; L Reekie