Brian J. Aneskievich

Terminal differentiation in keratinocytes involves positive as well as negative regulation by retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors at retinoid response elements.

Terminal differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes is inhibited by 1 microM retinoic acid, a concentration which induces differentiation in a number of cell types, including F9 teratocarcinoma cells. The molecular basis for these opposing retinoid responses is unknown, although retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs) have been detected in both cell types. When F9 cells are stably transfected with a truncated RAR alpha lacking the E/F domain necessary for ligand binding and RAR/RXR dimerization, action at retinoid response elements is suppressed and cells produce a retinoic acid-resistant phenotype; i.e., they are blocked in differentiation (A. S. Espeseth, S. P. Murphy, and E. Linney, Genes Dev. 3:1647-1656, 1989). If retinoid receptors influence epidermal differentiation only in a negative fashion, then suppression of transactivation at retinoid response elements would be expected to enhance, rather than block, keratinocyte differentiation. In this study, we show that surprisingly, even though constitutive expression of an analogous truncated RAR gamma in keratinocytes specifically suppressed transactivation at retinoid response elements, keratinocytes were blocked, rather than enhanced, in their ability to undergo morphological and biochemical features of differentiation. These findings demonstrate a direct and hitherto unrecognized role for RARs and RXRs in positively as well as negatively regulating epidermal differentiation. Additionally, our studies extend those of Espeseth et al. (Genes Dev. 3:1647-1656, 1989), indicating a novel RAR function independent of the E/F domain.

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of α-Actinin in Activated Platelets

The integrin αIIbβ3 mediates tyrosine phosphorylation of a 105-kDa protein (pp105) in activated platelets. We have partially purified a 105-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated protein from platelets stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and obtained the sequence of an internal 12-mer peptide derived from this protein. The sequence was identical to human α-actinin sequences deposited in the Swiss Protein Database. α-Actinin, a 105-kDa protein in platelets, was subsequently purified from activated platelets by four sequential chromatographic steps. Fractions were analyzed by Western blotting and probed with α-actinin and anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. The distribution of α-actinin and pp105 overlapped throughout the purification. Furthermore, in the course of this purification, a 105-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated protein was only detected in fractions that contained α-actinin. The purified α-actinin protein was immunoprecipitated with antibodies to phosphotyrosine in the absence but not in the presence of phenyl phosphate. α-Actinin resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of activated platelet lysates was recognized by the antibodies to phosphotyrosine, whereas pretreatment of the platelets with bisindolylmaleimide, a protein kinase C inhibitor that prevents tyrosine phosphorylation of pp105, inhibited the reactivity of the antibodies to phosphotyrosine with α-actinin. Taken together, these data demonstrate that a fraction of α-actinin is tyrosine-phosphorylated in activated platelets.

Liganded RARα and RARγ interact with but are repressed by TNIP1

Nuclear receptor (NR) transcriptional activity is controlled by agonist binding and concomitant exchange of receptor-associating corepressor proteins for NR box-containing, receptor AF-2-targeting coactivator proteins. We report here that TNIP1 is an atypical NR coregulator. Requirements for TNIP1-RAR interaction-its NR boxes, ligand, and the receptors AF-2 domain-are characteristic of coactivators. However, TNIP1 reduces RAR activity. Repression is partially relieved by SRC1, suggesting interference with coactivator recruitment as a mechanism of TNIP1 repression. TNIP1 does not bind RXRalpha and RARalpha AF-2 domain, necessary for that receptors association with TNIP1, is insufficient to confer upon RXRalpha interaction with TNIP1. Preferential interaction of RARalpha over RARgamma with TNIP1 can be mapped to RARalpha ligand binding domain helices 5-9 and suggests regions outside the receptor helix 12 modulate interaction of NRs and NR box-containing corepressors. TNIP1 repression of RARs in the presence of RA places it in a small category of corepressors of agonist-bound NRs.

TNIP1 is a Corepressor of Agonist-Bound PPARs

Nuclear receptor (NR) coregulators include coactivators, contributing to holoreceptor transcriptional activity, and corepressors, mediating NR target gene silencing in the absence of hormone. We identified an atypical NR coregulator, TNFα-induced protein 3-interacting protein 1 (TNIP1), from a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) α screen of a human keratinocyte cDNA library. TNIP1s complex nomenclature parallels its additional function as an NF-κB inhibitor. Here we show TNIP1 is an atypical NR corepressor using two-hybrid systems, biochemical studies, and receptor activity assays. The requirements for TNIP1-PPAR interaction are characteristic for coactivators; however, TNIP1 partially decreases PPAR activity. TNIP1 has separable transcriptional activation and repression domains suggesting a modular nature to its overall effect. It may provide a means of lowering receptor activity in the presence of ligand without total loss of receptor function. TNIP1s multiple roles and expression in several cell types suggest its regulatory effect depends on its expression level and the expression of other regulators in NR and/or NF-κB signaling pathways. As a NR coregulator, TNIP1 targeting agonist-bound PPAR and reducing transcriptional activity offers control of receptor signaling not available from typical corepressors and may contribute to combinatorial regulation of transcription.

TNIP1, a Retinoic Acid Receptor Corepressor and A20-binding Inhibitor of NF-κB, Distributes to Both Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Locations

An increasingly wide range of functions, from repression of NF-κB signaling to protection from apoptosis, is being recognized for tumor necrosis factor α–induced protein 3-interacting protein 1 (TNIP1). The authors recently demonstrated TNIP1 interaction with and repression of liganded retinoic acid receptors, distinguishing it from the more typical NCoR and SMRT corepressors, which function only in the absence of ligand. To improve their understanding of TNIP1’s roles in physiologic and pathologic events, the authors examined its distribution in normal and malignant human tissues and cultured cells. They found cytoplasmic and nuclear TNIP1 in normal skin keratinocytes as it colocalized with retinoic acid receptor α, one of the nuclear receptors it corepresses. Nuclear and cytoplasmic TNIP1 was also found in the malignant keratinocytes of squamous cell carcinomas. Compared to adjacent normal tissues of other organs, TNIP1 staining and distribution varied with increased levels in esophageal cancer and marked decreases in prostate cancer. The varying levels and distribution of TNIP1 in normal and disease state tissues could be expected to affect processes in which TNIP1 is involved, such as NF-κB and nuclear receptor signaling, possibly contributing to the disease course or response to therapies targeting these key players of cell growth and differentiation.

Organotypic Modeling of Human Keratinocyte Response to Peroxisome Proliferators

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a diverse chemical group including hypolipidemic drugs and some fatty acids. Their stimulation of PP-activated receptors (PPARs) and subsequent control of gene expression regulates metabolism and differentiation in many cells. PPs have multiple opportunities to target human epidermal keratinocytes because of delivery through dietary, clinical, and/or topical exposure routes. PPAR knockout mice and PP treatment of mouse skin or human keratinocytes in monolayer culture have established some effects for PPs in cutaneous differentiation. However, incomplete epidermal maturation characteristic of monolayer keratinocytes and rodent-specific effects may limit our full understanding of human keratinocyte responses to PPs. To address these issues, we investigated PP influence on primary human keratinocytes in organotypic cultures that recapitulate biochemical markers of epidermis. We found that the PPARα agonists clofibrate, docasohexaenoic acid, and WY-14,643 produced mild to moderate keratinocyte hyperplasia, increased stratification (particularly of granular and cornified layers), and enhanced levels of the differentiation markers filaggrin, ABCA12, and phosphorylated HSP27. Several PP effects generated in the organotypic system, however, were distinct from those previously reported for rodent skin and human keratinocyte monolayer cultures, suggesting that the species and growth context of target cells can impact exposure outcomes. Given the utility of organotypic cultures for modeling the epidermis, studies in this system may bridge the gap between the rodent assays and clinical studies of human epidermal responses to PPs.

PPARγ and NF-κB regulate the gene promoter activity of their shared repressor, TNIP1.

Human TNFAIP3 interacting protein 1 (TNIP1) has diverse functions including support of HIV replication through its interaction with viral Nef and matrix proteins, reduction of TNFα-induced signaling through its interaction with NF-κB pathway proteins, and corepression of agonist-bound retinoic acid receptors and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR). The wide tissue distribution of TNIP1 provides the opportunity to influence numerous cellular responses in these roles and defining control of TNIP1 expression would be central to improved understanding of its impact on cell function. We cloned 6kb of the human TNIP1 promoter and performed predictive and functional analyses to identify regulatory elements. The promoter region proximal to the transcription start site is GC-rich without a recognizable TATA box. In contrast to this proximal ~500bp region, 6kb of the promoter increased reporter construct constitutive activity over five-fold. Throughout the 6kb length, in silico analysis identified several potential binding sites for both constitutive and inducible transcription factors; among the latter were candidate NF-κB binding sequences and peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs). We tested NF-κB and PPAR regulation of the endogenous TNIP1 gene and cloned promoter by expression studies, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and chromatin immunoprecipitations. We validated NF-κB sites in the TNIP1 promoter proximal and distal regions as well as one PPRE in the distal region. The ultimate control of the TNIP1 promoter is likely to be a combination of constitutive transcription factors and those subject to activation such as NF-κB and PPAR.

Scanning for transcription factor binding by a variant EMSA.

Detection of in vitro protein-DNA interaction is one of many investigational analyses for transcription factor regulation of gene promoters. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) has proven widely popular in this respect by integrating individual techniques (protein isolation, nucleic acid radiolabeling, and gel electrophoresis) into one protocol. However, relatively short DNA oligomers are often used which in many cases presupposes what one sequence out of a promoter of possibly thousands of base pairs is the candidate region interacting with a transcription factor. This can be an experimentally distressing situation when multiple putative binding sites of less than perfect consensus may be present making selection of any one or even a few potential sites uncertain or when one is seeking improved throughput as opposed to a one factor:one oligomer approach for in vitro testing of algorithm-predicted binding sites. We describe here our use and refinement of a variant EMSA that can employ multiple and relatively long (up to 1000 bp) probes of promoter sequence in one binding reaction for interaction with nuclear proteins in general and individual transcription factors in particular. We provide labeling and electrophoresis methods suitable for such probes and also highlight the mobility shift differences one can expect with the variant probe method.

Human TNFα-induced protein 3-interacting protein 1 (TNIP1) promoter activation is regulated by retinoic acid receptors.

Coregulator proteins play key roles in transcriptional control by members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Previously, we demonstrated that tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-induced protein 3-interacting protein 1 (TNIP1) is a corepressor of agonist-bound retinoic acid receptors (RARs). Additionally, TNIP1 has been shown to repress peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) and NF-κB activity and interact with HIV proteins nef and matrix. TNIP1 transcriptional regulation, however, is under studied. Here we show that under permissive epigenetic conditions, TNIP1 expression is induced by all trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Within a 6000 bp region of the human TNIP1 promoter we cloned, both proximal and distal promoter regions are RAR responsive with the latter having RA response elements (RAREs) recognizable by their sequence and functionality in native promoter and synthetic RARE luciferase constructs, EMSA, and ChIP assays. These findings suggest a feedback loop whereby RARs activate expression of TNIP1, which then attenuates their activity. Together with anticipated constitutive transcription factors and the previously described NF-κB-responsiveness of the proximal TNIP1 promoter, the expected combinatorial control of TNIP1 expression could likely modulate TNIP1s impact in any of its target pathways. The degree of control by RARs or other transcription factors would in turn depend on their cell-specific level of expression and/or activation from signals in the environment such as ATRA and TNFα.

Sp sites contribute to basal and inducible expression of the human TNIP1 (TNFα-inducible protein 3-interacting protein 1) promoter.

TNIP1 [TNFα (tumour necrosis factor α)-induced protein 3-interacting protein 1] is a co-repressor of RAR (retinoic acid receptor) and PPAR (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor). Additionally, it can reduce signalling stemming from cell membrane receptors such as those for TNFα and EGF (epidermal growth factor). Consequently, it influences a variety of receptor-mediated events as diverse as transcription, programmed cell death and cell cycling. Thus changes in TNIP1 expression levels are likely to affect multiple important biological end points. TNIP1 expression level changes have been linked to psoriasis and systemic sclerosis. As such, it is crucial to determine what controls its expression levels, starting with constitutive control of its promoter. Our analysis of the TNIP1 promoter revealed multiple transcription start sites in its GC-rich proximal regions along with two transcriptionally active Sp (specificity protein) sites, responsive to both Sp1 and Sp3. EMSA (electrophoretic mobility-shift assay) and ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation) demonstrated physical binding between Sp1 and Sp3 at these sites. A decrease in Sp1 protein levels via siRNA (short interfering RNA) or diminished Sp1 DNA binding by mithramycin decreased TNIP1 mRNA levels. This Sp-binding GC-rich region of the TNIP1 promoter also participates in transcriptional activation by ligand-bound RAR. Together, these results demonstrate newly identified regulators of TNIP1 expression and suggest possible transcription factor targets which in turn control TNIP1-related biological end points ranging from apoptosis to inflammatory diseases.