Brian J. Ledwith

Potential DNA Vaccine Integration into Host Cell Genome

Studies have been designed to examine the potential integration of DNA vaccines into the host cell genome. This is of concern because of the possibility of insertional mutagenesis resulting in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes or the activation of oncogenes. The requirements for adequate testing were determined to be (1) a method to purify host cell genomic DNA from nonintegrated free plasmid, (2) a sensitive method to detect integrated plasmid in the purified genomic DNA, and (3) stringent methods to avoid contamination. These requirements were fulfilled by agarose-gel electrophoresis, the polymerase chain reaction, and separation of each activity with stringent handling procedures, respectively. An exploratory experiment was carried out in which mice were injected with 100 micrograms of vaccine plasmid DNA in each quadriceps. Examination of quadriceps and 12 other tissues at several time points failed to reveal any evidence of integration at a sensitivity level that could detect 1 to 7.5 integrations in 150,000 nuclei. A worst-case scenario determined that this would be at least 3 orders of magnitude below the spontaneous mutation frequency.

Plasmid DNA Vaccines: Tissue Distribution and Effects of DNA Sequence, Adjuvants and Delivery Method on Integration into Host DNA

A variety of factors could affect the frequency of integration of plasmid DNA vaccines into host cellular DNA, including DNA sequences within the plasmid, the expressed gene product (antigen), the formulation, delivery method, route of administration, and the type of cells exposed to the plasmid. In this report, we examined the tissue distribution and potential integration of plasmid DNA vaccines following intramuscular administration in mice and guinea pigs. We compared needle versus Biojector (needleless jet) delivery, examined the effect of aluminum phosphate adjuvants, compared the results of different plasmid DNA vaccines, and tested a gene (the human papilloma virus E7 gene) whose protein product is known to increase integration frequency in vitro. Six weeks following intramuscular injection, the vast majority of the plasmid was detected in the muscle and skin near the injection site; lower levels of plasmid were also detected in the draining lymph nodes. At early time points (1–7 days) after injection, a low level of systemic exposure could be detected. Occasionally, plasmid was detected in gonads, but it dissipated rapidly and was extrachromosomal – indicating a low risk of germline transmission. Aluminum phosphate adjuvant had no effect on the tissue distribution and did not result in a detectable increase in integration frequency. Biojector delivery, compared with needle injection, greatly increased the uptake of plasmid (particularly in skin at the injection site), but did not result in a detectable increase in integration frequency. Finally, injection of a plasmid DNA vaccine containing the human papilloma virus type 16 E7 gene, known to increase integration in vitro, did not result in detectable integration in mice. These results suggest that the risk of integration following intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA is low under a variety of experimental conditions.

Plasmid DNA vaccines: investigation of integration into host cellular DNA following intramuscular injection in mice.

The primary safety concern for DNA vaccines is their potential to integrate into the host cell genome. We describe an integration assay based on purification of high-molecular-weight genomic DNA away from free plasmid using gel electrophoresis, such that the genomic DNA can then be assayed for integrated plasmid using a sensitive PCR method. The assay sensitivity was approximately 1 plasmid copy/µg DNA (representing ∼150,000 diploid cells). Using this assay, we carried out integration studies of three different plasmid DNA vaccines, containing either the influenza hemagglutinin, influenza matrix or HIV gag gene. Six weeks after intramuscular injection, free plasmid was detected in treated muscle at levels ranging from approximately 1,000 to 4,000 copies/µg DNA. At 6 months, the plasmid levels ranged between 200 and 800 copies/µg DNA. Gel purification of genomic DNA revealed that essentially all of the detectable plasmid in treated quadriceps was extrachromosomal. If integration had occurred, the frequency was ≤1–8 integrations per 150,000 diploid cells, which would be at least three orders of magnitude below the spontaneous mutation rate. Our results suggest that the risk of mutation due to integration of plasmid DNA vaccines following intramuscular injection is negligible.

Induction of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by Peroxisome Proliferators and Non-tetradecanoylphorbol 12,13-Myristate-type Tumor Promoters in Immortalized Mouse Liver Cells

Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), the rate-limiting enzyme in prostaglandin synthesis, has been associated with growth regulation and carcinogenesis in several systems. COX-2 is known to be induced by cytokines and the skin tumor promoter 12-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-myristate (TPA). In the present study, we investigated the effects of several non-TPA-type tumor promoters on COX-2 expression in immortalized mouse liver cells. Specifically, we tested peroxisome proliferators (PPs), which are rodent liver tumor promoters that cause gross alterations in cellular lipid metabolism, the rodent liver tumor promoter phenobarbital, and the skin tumor promoters okadaic acid and thapsigargin. The PPs Wy-14643, mono-ethylhexyl phthalate, clofibrate, ciprofibrate ethyl ester, and eicosatetraynoic acid each caused large increases in COX-2 mRNA and protein, with maximal expression seen approximately 10 h after treatment of quiescent cells. COX-2 expression was also induced by thapsigargin, okadaic acid, and calcium ionophore A23187, but not by phenobarbital or the steroid PP dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Induction of COX-2 expression generally resulted in increased synthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). However, the PPs caused little or no increase in PGE2 levels, and they inhibited serum-induced PGE2 synthesis. Unlike non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the PPs do not directly inhibit cyclooxygenase enzyme activity in vitro Thus, PPs regulate prostaglandin metabolism via both positive (COX-2 induction) and inhibitory mechanisms. In summary, the strong induction of COX-2 expression by PPs, thapsigargin, and okadaic acid suggests a possible role for COX-2 in the growth regulatory activity of these non-TPA-type tumor promoters.

Peroxisome Proliferators Activate Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinases in Immortalized Mouse Liver Cells

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are a class of nongenotoxic carcinogens in the rodent liver. The induction of immediate-early gene expression in immortalized mouse liver cells by the PPs Wy-14,643, monoethylhexyl phthalate, ciprofibrate ethyl ester, and clofibrate suggested that they may be activating growth-regulatory signal transduction pathways. We report that incubation of quiescent ML457 cells with Wy-14,643 resulted in the appearance of two tyrosine-phosphorylated bands of approximately 44 and 42 kDa with maximal phosphorylation at 20 min. These two proteins were identified as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) ERK1 and ERK2 (also known as mitogen-activated protein kinases, or MAPKs). Stimulation of quiescent ML457 cells with monoethylhexyl phthalate, ciprofibrate ethyl ester, and clofibrate also resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2; however, the steroid PP dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, which does not induce immediate-early gene expression, did not induce phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2. Kinase activity of ERK1 and ERK2 was stimulated by the PPs, consistent with their phosphorylation. The PPs also induced phosphorylation of the upstream regulator MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK). Preincubation of quiescent cells with MEK inhibitor PD98059 blocked activation of ERK1 and ERK2 by the PPs, implicating MEK activation as a requirement for PP-induced ERK activation. In addition, pretreatment with PD98059 greatly reduced the PP-induced expression of immediate-early genes c-fos, egr-1, and to a lesser extent junB. Induction of ERK phosphorylation andjunB expression by Wy-14,643 was also seen in rat hepatocytes. These results attribute many of the effects of PPs on immediate-early gene expression to the activation of the MEK/ERK signal transduction pathway and add the PPs to the growing number of tumor promoters that modulate signaling proteins.

Peroxisome proliferators activate growth regulatory pathways largely via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-independent mechanisms

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) induce liver tumors in rodents through an unknown mechanism requiring PP-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha. Since PPs possess growth modulatory activities that may be important to their hepatocarcinogenicity, we aimed at dissociating the activation of growth signaling pathways from the PPARalpha-mediated response induced by PPs in cultured rat primary hepatocytes. Pretreatment with the differentiation-promoting agent dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) increased PPARalpha mRNA/protein and enhanced the expression of PPARalpha-regulated genes [fatty acyl Co-A oxidase (FACO), cytochrome P450 4A1 (CYP4A1)] induced by PPs. In contrast, DMSO reduced the expression of immediate early genes (IEG) expression (c-myc, c-jun, c-fos, junB, egr-1) and inhibited mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) and p38 phosphorylation. Furthermore, the inhibitors Tyrphostin and PD98059 dowregulated IEG/ERKs induction and slightly enhanced the FACO/CYP4A1 response induced by the PP WY-14,643. The stimulation of signal transduction pathways by PPs can be dissociated from PPARalpha activation, thus suggesting that PPs could activate growth regulatory pathways largely via PPARalpha-independent mechanisms.

Ensuring the quality, potency and safety of vaccines during preclinical development.

There is an abundance of vaccines currently in development, with most of them exploring novel mechanisms, adjuvants and/or delivery systems not only for traditional prophylactic use, but also for therapeutic uses. As vaccines are generally administered to healthy individuals, ensuring their quality, potency and safety becomes crucial, especially prior to evaluation in humans. To ensure these key attributes, vaccine developers need to incorporate them as early in the development program as possible, starting in basic research and continuing through preclinical, clinical and postmarketing development. Fortunately for vaccine developers, ample guidance is available from various regulatory agencies to enlighten the long and arduous path of vaccine development. This review will highlight these regulatory expectations, and provide some clarity as to why they are in place.

Peroxisome proliferators and fatty acids negatively regulate liver X receptor-mediated activity and sterol biosynthesis

Peroxisome proliferators (PPs) are potent tumor promoters in rodents. The mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis requires the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha), but might also involve the PPARalpha independent alteration of signaling pathways that regulate cell growth. Here, we studied the effects of PPs on the mevalonate pathway, a critical pathway that controls cell proliferation. Liver X receptors (LXRs) are nuclear receptors that act as sterol sensors in the mevalonate pathway. In gene reporter assays in COS-7 cells, the basal activity of the LXR responsive reporter gene (LXRE-luc) was suppressed by 10 microM lovastatin and zaragozic acid A, suggesting that this activity was attributed to the activation of native LXRs, by endogenously produced mevalonate products. The potent PP and rodent tumor promoter, pirinixic acid (WY-14643) also inhibited LXR-mediated transcription in a dose related manner (approximate IC(50) of 100 microM). As did several other PPs including ciprofibric acid and mono-ethylhexylphthalate. Polyunsaturated and medium to long chain fatty acids at 100 microM were also potent inhibitors; the arachidonic acid analogue eicosatetraynoic acid being the most active (approximate IC(50) of 10 microM). Of the PPs and fatty acids tested, there was a strong correlation between the ability of these agents to suppress de novo sterol synthesis in a rat hepatoma cell line, H4IIEC3, and inhibit LXR-mediated transcription in COS-7 cells, but a discordance between these endpoints and PPARalpha activation and fatty acid acyl-CoA oxidase induction. Taken together, these results suggest that PPs and fatty acids negatively regulate the mevalonate pathway through a mechanism that is not entirely dependent on PPARalpha activation. Because of the importance of the mevalonate pathway in regulating cell proliferation, the modulation of this pathway by PPs and fatty acids might contribute to their actions on cell growth/differentiation.

Nonclinical testing of vaccines: Report from a workshop

Vaccine research and development is a heterogeneous and intensely active area, encompassing the development of many different kinds of novel preventive and therapeutic vaccines (eg, against infectious, allergic, and autoimmune diseases, cancer, etc). Included in this is the development of different types of vaccines (eg, DNA vaccines, novel routes of administration, novel adjuvants, and immune system modulation). This poses challenges regarding approaches to preclinical evaluation of these products. Published regulatory guidance has not always kept up with scientific advances and innovation in this area and, at the same time, many vaccine developers are interested in better understanding and meeting regulatory expectations. It was in this context that in June 2007 a workshop was organized and held in Amsterdam (DIA International Workshop on Nonclinical Testing of Vaccines) to discuss the nonclinical aspects of vaccine development. This article provides a short historical overview of preclinical testing of vaccines and reviews and summarizes the discussions held during the June 2007 meeting.