Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brian K. Bay is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brian K. Bay.


Experimental Mechanics | 1999

Digital volume correlation : Three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography

Brian K. Bay; T. S. Smith; D. P. Fyhrie; M. Saad

A three-dimensional extension of two-dimensional digital image correlation has been developed. The technique uses digital image volumes generated through high-resolution X-ray tomography of samples with microarchitectural detail, such as the trabecular bone tissue found within the skeleton. Image texture within the material is used for displacement field measurement by subvolume tracking. Strain fields are calculated from the displacement fields by gradient estimation techniques. Estimates of measurement precision were developed through correlation of repeat unloaded data sets for a simple sum-of-squares displacement-only correlation formulation. Displacement vector component errors were normally distributed, with a standard deviation of 0.035 voxels (1.22 μm). Strain tensor component errors were also normally distributed, with a standard deviation of approximately 0.0003. The method was applied to two samples taken from the thigh bone near the knee. Strains were effectively measured in both the elastic and postyield regimes of material behavior, and the spatial patterns showed clear relationships to the sample microarchitectures.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 1998

The Role of the Acetabular Labrum and the Transverse Acetabular Ligament in Load Transmission in the Hip

Gregory A. Konrath; Andrew J. Hamel; Steve A. Olson; Brian K. Bay; Neil A. Sharkey

We performed a biomechanical study of seventeen hip joints in the pelves of nine cadavera in order to assess the role that the acetabular labrum and the transverse acetabular ligament play in load transmission. The distribution of contact area and pressure between the acetabulum and the femoral head was measured with the hip in four different conditions: intact (seventeen hips), after removal of the transverse acetabular ligament (eight hips), after removal of the entire labrum (nine hips), and after removal of both the transverse acetabular ligament and the labrum (seventeen hips). The hip joint was loaded in simulated single-limb stance, and the measurements were made with use of pressure-sensitive film. A peripheral distribution of load was seen in the intact acetabula. This pattern was altered only minimally after removal of the transverse acetabular ligament or the labrum, or both. When both of these structures were removed, the only significant change was a decrease in the maximum pressure in the posterior aspect of the acetabulum (p = 0.02). No significant changes were detected with regard to the contact area, load, mean pressure, or maximum pressure in the anterior or superior aspect of the acetabulum under any testing condition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings indicate that removal of the transverse acetabular ligament or the labrum, or both, does not significantly increase pressure or load in the acetabulum and may not predispose the hip to premature osteoarthrosis.


Experimental Mechanics | 2002

Digital volume correlation including rotational degrees of freedom during minimization

Tait Smith; Brian K. Bay; Mark M. Rashid

Digital volume correlation is a new experimental technique that allows the measurement of the full-field strain tensor in three dimensions. We describe the addition of rotational degrees of freedom into the minimization problem for digital volume correlation in order to improve the overall performance of the strain measurement. A parameterization of rotations that is particularly suited to the minimization problem is presented, based on the angle-axis representation of finite rotations. The partial derivative of both a normalized cross-correlation coefficient and the sum-of-squares correlation coefficient are derived for use with gradient-based minimization algorithms. The addition of rotation is shown to greatly reduce the measurement error when even small amounts of rigid body rotation are present in an artificially rotated test volume. In an aluminum foam sample loaded in compression, including rotational degrees of freedom produced smoother contours of minimum principal strain. Renderings of the aluminum foam architecture in areas of low, medium and high rotation showed material deformation pattern in detail.


Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2003

Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation.

Kent Yinger; Jason Scalise; Steven A. Olson; Brian K. Bay; Christopher G. Finkemeier

Objective To determine relative stiffness of various methods of posterior pelvic ring internal fixation. Design Simulated single leg stance loading of OTA 61-Cl.2, a2 fracture model (unilateral sacroiliac joint disruption and pubic symphysis diastasis). Setting Orthopaedic biomechanic laboratory. Outcome Variables Pubic symphysis gapping, sacroiliac joint gapping, hemipelvis coronal plane rotation. Methods Nine different posterior pelvic ring fixation methods were tested on each of six hard plastic pelvic models. Pubic symphysis was plated. The pelvic ring was loaded to 1000N. Results All data were normalized to values obtained with posterior fixation with a single iliosacral screw. The types of fixation could be grouped into three categories based on relative stiffness of fixation: For sacroiliac joint gapping, group 1—fixation stiffness 0.8 and above (least stiff) includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), an isolated tension band plate (condition F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2—fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate stiffness) includes a tension band plate and an iliosacral screw (condition E), one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3—fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (greatest stiffness) includes two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), two iliosacral screws (condition B), and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). For sacroiliac joint rotation, group 1—fixation stiffness 0.8 and above includes a single iliosacral screw (conditions A and J), two anterior sacroiliac plates (condition D), a tension band plate in isolation or in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions E and F), and two sacral bars (condition H); group 2—fixation stiffness 0.6 to 0.8 (intermediate level of instability) includes either one or two sacral bars in combination with an iliosacral screw (conditions G and I); group 3—fixation stiffness 0.6 and below (stiffest fixation) consists of two iliosacral screws (condition B) and two anterior sacroiliac plates and an iliosacral screw (condition C). Discussion Under conditions of maximal instability with similar material properties between specimens, differences in stiffness of posterior pelvic ring fixation can be demonstrated. The choice of which method to use is multifactorial.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 1994

Median nerve displacement through the carpal canal

Robert M. Szabo; Brian K. Bay; Neil A. Sharkey; Chris Gaut

We determined the direct relationships between wrist position and displacement of the median nerve during active contraction of the flexor tendons at the wrist with an intact, transected transverse carpal ligament (TCL). Nine fresh cadavers were mounted in an apparatus to allow variable wrist position. Excursions of the tendons and displacement of the median nerve were measured by tracking markers with a video camera. Each limb was tested at 0 degree, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of wrist extension before and after release of the TCL. Excursion of the flexor tendons required for full finger flexion ranged from 2.3 to 3.1 cm (mean, 3 cm). Median nerve displacement ranged from 0.9 to 1.4 cm (mean, 1 cm). The relationship between median nerve and flexor tendon excursion was consistently linear. Finger motion alone allows for median nerve displacement after surgery in the carpal tunnel.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 1995

Biomechanical consequences of fracture and repair of the posterior wall of the acetabulum.

Steven A. Olson; Brian K. Bay; Michael W. Chapman; Neil A. Sharkey

We measured the distribution of contact area and pressure between the acetabulum and the femoral head of cadaveric pelves in three different conditions: intact, with an operatively created fracture of the posterior wall, and after anatomical reduction and fixation of the fracture with a buttress plate and interfragmentary screws. The study involved eight cadaveric hip joints from five pelves loaded to 2000 newtons in simulated single-limb stance. Measurements were made with pressure-sensitive film. The acetabulum was divided into three areas--the anterior wall, the superior aspect, and the posterior wall--for the analysis of the data. Creation of a fracture of the posterior wall was followed by an increase in contact area, maximum pressure, and contact force in the superior aspect of the acetabulum. A concomitant decrease in these parameters was observed in the anterior and posterior walls. Anatomical reduction and fixation of the fracture with a plate and screws did not restore the pattern of loading to pre-injury levels.


Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 1996

The effect of variable size posterior wall acetabular fractures on contact characteristics of the hip joint.

Steven A. Olson; Brian K. Bay; Andrew N. Pollak; Neil A. Sharkey; Toan Lee

The indications for open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures associated with a clinically stable hip joint are unclear. In previous work a large posterior wall defect (27% articular surface area) resulted in significant alteration of load transmission across the hip; specifically, there was a transition from evenly distributed loading along the acetabular articular surface to loading concentrated mainly in the superior portion of the articular surface during simulated single leg stance. However, the majority of posterior wall fractures involve a smaller amount of the articular surface. Posterior wall acetabular fractures not associated with instability of the hip are commonly treated nonoperatively. This practice does not account for the size of the posterior wall fracture. To study the biomechanical consequences of variably sized articular defects, a laboratory experiment was conducted evaluating three progressively larger posterior wall defects of the acetabulum during simulated single leg stance using superlow Fuji prescale film (Itochu International, New York): (a) 1/3 articular surface width through a 50 degrees arc along the posterior wall of the acetabulum, (b) 2/3, and (c) 3/3 articular width defects through the same 50 degrees arc along the posterior wall of the acetabulum. In the intact acetabulum, 48% of the total articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum. Twenty-eight percent of articular contact was in the anterior wall region of the acetabulum and 24% in the posterior wall region. After the 1/3 width posterior wall defect, 64% of the articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum (p = 0.0011). The 2/3 width posterior wall defect resulted in 71% of articular contact area being located in the superior acetabulum (p = 0.0006). After the 3/3 width posterior wall defect, 77% of articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum, significantly greater than the intact condition (p < 0.0001) and 1/3 width defect (p = 0.0222). The total absolute contact areas for all defect conditions were significantly less than the intact conditions. The results of this study reconfirm the observation that posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum significantly alter the articular contact characteristics in the hip during single leg stance. The relationship between defect size and changes in joint contact showed that the smallest defect resulted in the greatest alteration in joint contact areas, whereas larger defects resulted in minor increments of change in contact area. This finding is of concern because the clinical practice of managing acetabular fractures nonoperatively if the hip joint is stable is based on the supposition that the joint retains enough integrity to function without undue risk of late posttraumatic osteoarthritis. A better understanding of the natural history of stable posterior wall acetabular fractures is needed to ascertain whether some of these fractures merit operative repair.


Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 1998

Consequences of transverse acetabular fracture malreduction on load transmission across the hip joint.

David J. Hak; Andrew J. Hamel; Brian K. Bay; Neil A. Sharkey; Steven A. Olson

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the biomechanical behavior of gap and step malreductions in a model of transverse acetabular fracture. DESIGN Cadaver pelvis loading in simulated single-leg stance with intact acetabulum, after transverse acetabular fracture anatomically reduced, and after step and gap malreduction. Five transtectal transverse fractures; five juxtatectal transverse fractures. SETTING Quasi-static loading of the hip with simulated abductor mechanism to physiologic loads with pressure-sensitive film interposed in the joint to determine contact area and contact pressure within the hip joint. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT Hip joint contact parameters: contact area, peak and mean contact pressure, and load distribution. RESULTS Step malreduction of the transtectal transverse fracture resulted in significantly increased peak contact pressures (20.5 megapascals) in the superior acetabular articular surface as opposed to the intact acetabulum (9.1 megapascals). Gap malreduction of transtectal transverse fracture and step and gap malreduction of juxtatectal fracture did not result in significantly increased contact pressures in the hip. CONCLUSION Step malreduction of a transverse acetabular fracture in the superior articular surface results in abnormally high contact forces and may predispose to the development of posttraumatic arthritis.


Journal of Biomechanics | 1997

Statically equivalent load and support conditions produce different hip joint contact pressures and periacetabular strains

Brian K. Bay; Andrew J. Hamel; Steve A. Olson; Neil A. Sharkey

The hip is a common site of orthopaedic trauma and disease, and considerable research has been directed toward understanding the development of contact pressures within the joint. Virtually all experimental studies to date have employed proximal femurs compressed along the joint reaction force vector into acetabulae explanted from cadaver pelves. This approach presumes that deformations of the acetabulum are highly localized, and that the pelvis is functionally a rigid body. We have developed a methodology that uses intact pelves loaded through simulation of the abductor mechanism. A direct comparison of the two techniques revealed significantly different joint contact characteristics and periacetabular strains. Fuji film measurements of contact area and pressure were more widely distributed across the acetabulum for the intact pelvis, with significant pressure development in anterior and posterior regions. Contact patterns in the explanted acetabulae were concentrated in the superior portion of the joint. Principal strains from three rosette gages placed near the acetabular rim were also significantly different for the two testing techniques, but were not substantially altered by the presence of Fuji film within the joint. The results indicate that deformation of the entire pelvis and the manner in which loads are applied significantly affect development of contact pressures within the hip joint, and that Fuji film is a suitable technique for recording those patterns.


Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 1997

Biomechanics of the hip joint and the effects of fracture of the acetabulum.

Steven A. Olson; Brian K. Bay; Andrew J. Hamel

The biomechanical analysis of the normal and arthritic hip joint have been the subject of numerous publications in orthopaedics. Biomechanical investigations focusing on the effect of fractures of the acetabulum on the alteration of hip joint mechanics have been a recent development. This paper outlines currently available methodologies for simulating load across the hip, and as measuring articular contact and contact stresses. Results of investigations of posterior wall fractures and transverse fractures of the acetabulum are presented. Directions for future research in the area of mechanical investigations of acetabular fractures are discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Brian K. Bay's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil A. Sharkey

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew J. Hamel

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter D. Lee

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steve A. Olson

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge