Brian L. Crabtree

Pharmacy faculty workplace issues: Findings from the 2009-2010 COD-COF joint task force on faculty workforce

Many factors contribute to the vitality of an individual faculty member, a department, and an entire academic organization. Some of the relationships among these factors are well understood, but many questions remain unanswered. The Joint Task Force on Faculty Workforce examined the literature on faculty workforce issues, including the work of previous task forces charged by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP). We identified and focused on 4 unique but interrelated concepts: organizational culture/climate, role of the department chair, faculty recruitment and retention, and mentoring. Among all 4 resides the need to consider issues of intergenerational, intercultural, and gender dynamics. This paper reports the findings of the task force and proffers specific recommendations to AACP and to colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Iloperidone for the Management of Adults with Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND Iloperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic drug approved in May 2009 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in adults. It is a piperidinyl-benzisoxazole derivative with mixed serotonin (5HT2A) and D2 dopamine antagonist properties. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article was to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and role in treatment for iloperidone in schizophrenia. METHODS Scientific and clinical data were collected through searches of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the FDA, using the search term iloperidone, and limited to English-language articles. Reference lists were reviewed for additional publications. Dates included the beginning of the database through 2010. No limits were placed on study design. RESULTS In a 4-week Phase III trial, iloperidone 12 mg twice daily lowered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores to a significantly greater extent than did placebo (-12 vs -7.1; P < 0.01). The ziprasidone active control also separated from placebo (-12.3 vs -7.1; P < 0.05). A pooled analysis of 3 Phase III trials compared iloperidone in divided doses to placebo. The primary outcome was reduction in PANSS scores. Study 1 included iloperidone 4, 8, or 12 mg/d, haloperidol as an active control, and placebo. The PANSS reduction in the 12 mg/d group was significantly greater at end point versus baseline when compared with placebo (-9.9 vs -4.6; P = 0.047). Study 2 included iloperidone 4 to 8 mg/d or 10 to 16 mg/d, risperidone 4 to 8 mg/d, or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end point in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Improvement from baseline on all iloperidone doses was significantly greater than with placebo (4-8 mg/d group: -6.2, P = 0.012; 10-16 mg/d group: -7.2, P = 0.001; placebo, -2.5). Study 3 included iloperidone 12 to 16 mg/d, risperidone 6 to 8 mg/d, and placebo. The results on the primary efficacy variable, reduction in the BPRS score, was not significant for the 12 to 16 mg/d group versus placebo (-7.1 vs -5.0; P = 0.09), but was significant for the 20 to 24 mg/d iloperidone group (-8.6 vs -5.0; P = 0.01) and for the risperidone group (-11.5 vs 5.0; P < 0.001). A 52-week maintenance trial included iloperidone versus haloperidol as an active control. The primary efficacy variable was time to relapse. Comparison of mean time to relapse of the 2 arms showed no significant difference. The most common adverse events (AEs) associated with iloperidone were dizziness (5.1%-23.2%), dry mouth (5.2%-10.4%), somnolence (4%-13%), and dyspepsia (4.8%-7.8%). AEs appeared dose related. Prescribing information recommends a starting dosage of 1 mg twice daily and then titrated over 7 days to reach a target dosage of 12 to 24 mg/d. The titration is necessary to reduce the risk of orthostatic hypotension-related dizziness. CONCLUSIONS Data support that when titrated slowly to a therapeutic dosage, iloperidone is generally well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile, and is an effective treatment option in patients with schizophrenia. Its place in therapy and performance in a typical patient population remain to be established. Slow initial titration and twice-daily dosing are potential disadvantages.

Plasma Alpha-One Acid Glycoprotein and Haloperidol Concentrations in Schizophrenic Patients

Thirty six schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to placebo or haloperidol treatment for 6 weeks. Blood samples to measure plasma alpha-one acid glycoprotein (AAG), haloperidol and reduced haloperidol concentrations were obtained at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 6. Blood samples were obtained 10-12 h after the evening dose and prior to the morning dose. Haloperidol and reduced haloperidol was assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Plasma AAG levels were assayed by radial immunodiffusion. Patients were clinically assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 6. BPRS scores did not significantly decrease during placebo treatment, although a slight drop in plasma AAG levels was found. Haloperidol produced a significant decrease in BPRS scores and plasma AAG levels. Mean plasma haloperidol levels were 12.9 +/- 14.7 ng/ml at week 6. Significant correlations between decreasing BPRS scores and plasma AAG levels were not found with only a strong trend at week 2 (r = 0.445, p = 0.073). The role of AAG and psychotropic drug disposition in psychiatric patients requires further evaluation.