Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brian L. Sullivan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brian L. Sullivan.


PLOS Biology | 2011

eBird: Engaging Birders in Science and Conservation

Christopher L. Wood; Brian L. Sullivan; Marshall J. Iliff; Daniel Fink; Steve Kelling

How do you successfully engage an audience in a citizen-science project? The processes developed by eBird (www.ebird.org), a fast-growing web-based tool that now gathers millions of bird observations per month, offers a model.


Ecological Applications | 2015

Abundance models improve spatial and temporal prioritization of conservation resources

Alison Johnston; Daniel Fink; Mark D. Reynolds; Wesley M. Hochachka; Brian L. Sullivan; Nicholas E. Bruns; Eric Hallstein; Matt Merrifield; Sandi Matsumoto; Steve Kelling

Conservation prioritization requires knowledge about organism distribution and density. This information is often inferred from models that estimate the probability of species occurrence rather than from models that estimate species abundance, because abundance data are harder to obtain and model. However, occurrence and abundance may not display similar patterns and therefore development of robust, scalable, abundance models is critical to ensuring that scarce conservation resources are applied where they can have the greatest benefits. Motivated by a dynamic land conservation program, we develop and assess a general method for modeling relative abundance using citizen science monitoring data. Weekly estimates of relative abundance and occurrence were compared for prioritizing times and locations of conservation actions for migratory waterbird species in California, USA. We found that abundance estimates consistently provided better rankings of observed counts than occurrence estimates. Additionally, the relationship between abundance and occurrence was nonlinear and varied by species and season. Across species, locations prioritized by occurrence models had only 10-58% overlap with locations prioritized by abundance models, highlighting that occurrence models will not typically identify the locations of highest abundance that are vital for conservation of populations.


Science Advances | 2017

Dynamic conservation for migratory species

Mark D. Reynolds; Brian L. Sullivan; Eric Hallstein; Sandra Matsumoto; Steve Kelling; Matthew S. Merrifield; Daniel Fink; Alison Johnston; Wesley M. Hochachka; Nicholas E. Bruns; Matthew E. Reiter; Sam Veloz; Catherine M. Hickey; Nathan Elliott; Leslie A. Martin; John W. Fitzpatrick; Paul Spraycar; Gregory H. Golet; Christopher McColl; Scott A. Morrison

Citizen science, big data, and a habitat marketplace enable dynamic habitat for migratory birds in California’s Central Valley. In an era of unprecedented and rapid global change, dynamic conservation strategies that tailor the delivery of habitat to when and where it is most needed can be critical for the persistence of species, especially those with diverse and dispersed habitat requirements. We demonstrate the effectiveness of such a strategy for migratory waterbirds. We analyzed citizen science and satellite data to develop predictive models of bird populations and the availability of wetlands, which we used to determine temporal and spatial gaps in habitat during a vital stage of the annual migration. We then filled those gaps using a reverse auction marketplace to incent qualifying landowners to create temporary wetlands on their properties. This approach is a cost-effective way of adaptively meeting habitat needs for migratory species, optimizes conservation outcomes relative to investment, and can be applied broadly to other conservation challenges.


Ecological Applications | 2015

Documenting stewardship responsibilities across the annual cycle for birds on U.S. public lands.

Frank A. La Sorte; Daniel Fink; Wesley M. Hochachka; Jocelyn L. Aycrigg; Kenneth V. Rosenberg; Amanda D. Rodewald; Nicholas E. Bruns; Andrew Farnsworth; Brian L. Sullivan; Christopher L. Wood; Steve Kelling

In the face of global environmental change, the importance of protected areas in biological management and conservation is expected to grow. Birds have played an important role as biological indicators of the effectiveness of protected areas, but with little consideration given to where species occur outside the breeding season. We estimated weekly probability of occurrence for 308 bird species throughout the year within protected areas in the western contiguous USA using eBird occurrence data for the combined period 2004 to 2011. We classified species based on their annual patterns of occurrence on lands having intermediate conservation mandates (GAP status 2 and 3) administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). We identified species having consistent annual association with one agency, and species whose associations across the annual cycle switched between agencies. BLM and USFS GAP status 2 and 3 lands contained low to moderate proportions of species occurrences, with proportions highest for species that occurred year-round or only during the summer. We identified two groups of species whose annual movements resulted in changes in stewardship responsibilities: (1) year-round species that occurred on USFS lands during the breeding season and BLM lands during the nonbreeding season; and (2) summer species that occurred on USFS lands during the breeding season and BLM lands during spring and autumn migration. Species that switched agencies had broad distributions, bred on high-elevation USFS lands, were not more likely to be identified as species of special management concern, and migrated short (year-round species) to long distances (summer species). Our findings suggest cooperative efforts that address the requirements of short-distance migratory species on GAP status 2 lands (n = 20 species) and GAP status 3 lands (n = 24) and long-distance migratory species on GAP status 2 lands (n = 9) would likely benefit their populations. Such efforts may prove especially relevant for species whose seasonal movements result in associations with different environments containing contrasting global change processes and management mandates.


Archive | 2018

Bone biopsy protocol for advanced prostate cancer in the era of precision medicine.

Verena Sailer; Marc Schiffman; Myriam Kossai; Joanna Cyrta; Shaham Beg; Brian L. Sullivan; Bradley B. Pua; Kyungmouk Steve Lee; Adam D. Talenfeld; David M. Nanus; Scott T. Tagawa; Brian D. Robinson; Rema A. Rao; Chantal Pauli; Rohan Bareja; Luis S. Beltran; Kenneth Eng; Olivier Elemento; Andrea Sboner; Mark A. Rubin; Himisha Beltran; Juan Miguel Mosquera

Metastatic biopsies are increasingly being performed in patients with advanced prostate cancer to search for actionable targets and/or to identify emerging resistance mechanisms. Due to a predominance of bone metastases and their sclerotic nature, obtaining sufficient tissue for clinical and genomic studies is challenging.


Cancer | 2018

Bone biopsy protocol for advanced prostate cancer in the era of precision medicine: Bone Biopsy Protocol for NGS

Verena Sailer; Marc Schiffman; Myriam Kossai; Joanna Cyrta; Shaham Beg; Brian L. Sullivan; Bradley B. Pua; Kyungmouk Steve Lee; Adam D. Talenfeld; David M. Nanus; Scott T. Tagawa; Brian D. Robinson; Rema A. Rao; Chantal Pauli; Rohan Bareja; Luis S. Beltran; Kenneth Eng; Olivier Elemento; Andrea Sboner; Mark A. Rubin; Himisha Beltran; Juan Miguel Mosquera

Metastatic biopsies are increasingly being performed in patients with advanced prostate cancer to search for actionable targets and/or to identify emerging resistance mechanisms. Due to a predominance of bone metastases and their sclerotic nature, obtaining sufficient tissue for clinical and genomic studies is challenging.


Biological Conservation | 2009

eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences

Brian L. Sullivan; Christopher L. Wood; Marshall J. Iliff; Rick Bonney; Daniel Fink; Steve Kelling


Biological Conservation | 2014

The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science

Brian L. Sullivan; Jocelyn L. Aycrigg; Jessie H. Barry; Rick Bonney; Nicholas E. Bruns; Caren B. Cooper; Theo Damoulas; André A. Dhondt; Thomas G. Dietterich; Andrew Farnsworth; Daniel Fink; John W. Fitzpatrick; Thomas Fredericks; Jeff Gerbracht; Carla P. Gomes; Wesley M. Hochachka; Marshall J. Iliff; Carl Lagoze; Frank A. La Sorte; Matthew S. Merrifield; Will Morris; Tina Phillips; Mark D. Reynolds; Amanda D. Rodewald; Kenneth V. Rosenberg; Nancy M. Trautmann; Andrea Wiggins; David W. Winkler; Weng-Keen Wong; Christopher L. Wood


Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2010

A method for measuring the relative information content of data from different monitoring protocols

M. Arthur Munson; Rich Caruana; Daniel Fink; Wesley M. Hochachka; Marshall J. Iliff; Kenneth V. Rosenberg; Daniel Sheldon; Brian L. Sullivan; Christopher L. Wood; Steve Kelling


Journal of Biogeography | 2014

The role of atmospheric conditions in the seasonal dynamics of North American migration flyways

Frank A. La Sorte; Daniel Fink; Wesley M. Hochachka; Andrew Farnsworth; Amanda D. Rodewald; Kenneth V. Rosenberg; Brian L. Sullivan; David W. Winkler; Christopher L. Wood; Steve Kelling

Collaboration


Dive into the Brian L. Sullivan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge