Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brian P. Chekal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brian P. Chekal.


Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2010

Development of a targeted polymorph screening approach for a complex polymorphic and highly solvating API

Anthony Michael Campeta; Brian P. Chekal; Yuriy A. Abramov; Paul Meenan; Mark J. Henson; Bing Shi; Robert A. Singer; Keith R. Horspool

Elucidation of the most stable form of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is a critical step in the development process. Polymorph screening for an API with a complex polymorphic profile can present a significant challenge. The presented case illustrates an extensively polymorphic compound with an additional propensity for forming stable solvates. In all, 5 anhydrous forms and 66 solvated forms have been discovered. After early polymorph screening using common techniques yielded mostly solvates and failed to uncover several key anhydrous forms, it became necessary to devise new approaches based on an advanced understanding of crystal structure and conformational relationships between forms. With the aid of this analysis, two screening approaches were devised which targeted high-temperature desolvation as a means to increase conformational populations and enhance overall probability of anhydrous form production. Application of these targeted approaches, comprising over 100 experiments, produced only the known anhydrous forms, without appearance of any new forms. The development of these screens was a critical and alternative approach to circumvent solvation issues associated with more conventional screening methods. The results provided confidence that the current development form was the most stable polymorph, with a low likelihood for the existence of a more-stable anhydrous form.


Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences | 2011

A Thermodynamic-Based Approach to Analyzing a Highly Solvating Polymorphic System: The Desolvation Window Method

Brian Samas; Christopher Seadeek; Anthony Michael Campeta; Brian P. Chekal

There are two major challenges in developing a solid form: (1) identifying the thermodynamically stable form and (2) determining the method used to crystallize that form. Often experiments performed to address these challenges have different objectives and use separate experimental techniques. The thermodynamically stable form is usually found on small scale, utilizing slurries or crystallizations. Subsequently, a crystallization process is developed to purge impurities and to increase yield and these experiments are typically conducted on medium to large scale (greater than 10  g). Axitinib, a research compound for the treatment of cancer, forms solvates in most solvents to which it is exposed, presenting a problem in discovering and making a desirable anhydrous phase. A method has been developed that will give the best chance of making a thermodynamic stable form of the anhydrous material, necessarily not a desolvated form. This approach relies on solvent mediated transformation (thermodynamic control), rather than crystallization or solid-to-solid phase desolvation (generally kinetic control). Experimental conditions (a desolvation window) to produce an anhydrous solid form for this compound that shows predominance for solvate formation is detailed.


Organic Process Research & Development | 2009

The Challenges of Developing an API Crystallization Process for a Complex Polymorphic and Highly Solvating System. Part I

Brian P. Chekal; Anthony Michael Campeta; Yuriy A. Abramov; Neil Feeder; Paul P. Glynn; Robert W. McLaughlin; Paul Meenan; Robert A. Singer


Archive | 2014

SOLID FORMS OF A SELECTIVE CDK4/6 INHIBITOR

Brian P. Chekal; Nathan D. Ide


Organic Process Research & Development | 2014

Development of an Efficient Pd-Catalyzed Coupling Process for Axitinib

Brian P. Chekal; Steven M. Guinness; Brett M. Lillie; Robert William Mclaughlin; Charles W. Palmer; Ronald J. Post; Janice E. Sieser; Robert A. Singer; Gregory W. Sluggett; Rajappa Vaidyanathan; Gregory J. Withbroe


Organic Process Research & Development | 2016

Palbociclib Commercial Manufacturing Process Development. Part III. Deprotection Followed by Crystallization for API Particle Property Control

Brian P. Chekal; Jason Ewers; Steven M. Guinness; Nathan D. Ide; Kyle R. Leeman; Ronald J. Post; Anil M. Rane; Karen Sutherland; Ke Wang; Mark Webster; Gregory J. Withbroe; John Draper; Denis Lynch; Marie McAuliffe; Joseph Keane


Archive | 2012

Crystalline and non- crystalline forms of tofacitinib, and a pharmaceutical composition comprising tofacitinib and a penetration enhancer

Brendan John Murphy; Timothy D. White; Brian P. Chekal; Phillip J. Johnson; Christopher James Foti; Leonid A. Margulis


Archive | 2008

Crystalline forms of 6- [2- (methylcarbamoyl) phenylsulfanyl] -3-e- [2- (pyridin-2-yl) ethenyl] indazole suitable for the treatment of abnormal cell growth in mammals

Anthony Michael Campeta; Brian P. Chekal; Robert William Mclaughling; Robert A. Singer


Archive | 2007

Processes for the preparation of 3-(4-(2,4-difluorobenzyloxy)-3-bromo-6-methyl-2-oxopyridin-1(2H)-yl)-N,4-dimethylbenzamide

Daniel Dukesherer; Michael Mao; Richard Vonder Embse; Gopi Yalamanchili; Rajappa Vaidyanathan; Brian P. Chekal; George Klemm; Ronald VanderRoest; Randy Geurink


Organic Process Research & Development | 2015

Development of the Commercial Route for the Manufacture of a 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitor PF-04191834

Brian P. Chekal; David B. Damon; Danny Lafrance; Kyle R. Leeman; Carlos Mojica; Andrew S. Palm; Michael St. Pierre; Janice E. Sieser; Karen Sutherland; Rajappa Vaidyanathan; John Van Alsten; Brian C. Vanderplas; Carrie Wager; Gerald A. Weisenburger; Gregory J. Withbroe; Shu Yu

Collaboration


Dive into the Brian P. Chekal's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge