Brian Sharp

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in the Emergency Department: Case Series and Literature Review

Introduction Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) often has variable presentations and causes, with common radiographic features—namely posterior white matter changes on magnetic resonance (MRI). As MRI becomes a more frequently utilized imaging modality in the Emergency Department, PRES will become an entity that the Emergency Physician must be aware of and be able to diagnose. Case Report We report three cases of PRES, all of which presented to the emergency department of a single academic medical center over a short period of time, including a 53-year-old woman with only relative hypertension, a 69-year-old woman who ultimately died, and a 46-year-old woman who had a subsequent intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Conclusion PRES is likely much more common than previously thought and is a diagnosis that should be considered in a wide variety of emergency department patient presentations.

Mind the (knowledge) gap: The effect of a communication instrument on emergency department patients’ comprehension of and satisfaction with care

OBJECTIVES We developed a communication instrument to be used in the Emergency Department (ED) and hypothesized that use of this guide would increase patient comprehension of and satisfaction with care. METHODS This multi-site trial enrolled 643 patients in treatment and control groups. Comprehension of care was assessed by chart review and satisfaction measured via validated survey. RESULTS Use of the instrument was not associated with improvements in patient knowledge about their care, with a mean of 4.6 (95% CI: 4.8-5.8) comprehension defects in the control group and 4.4 (95% CI: 3.9-4.9) in the treatment group. There was no significant effect on patient satisfaction 76.4% versus 76.9%, p=0.34. Elderly patients in both groups were found to have 1.1 (p<0.01) more knowledge gaps than younger patients. CONCLUSION Patients frequently misunderstand medical care in the ED. Comprehension decreases with increasing age. An isolated communication instrument does not improve satisfaction with or understanding of the care received. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Providing a structured place for providers and patients to record details of care does not seem to improve satisfaction with or comprehension of care. Interventions that focus on communication skills and face time with patients may prove more effective.

The Impact of an Emergency Department Front-End Redesign on Patient-Reported Satisfaction Survey Results

Introduction For emergency department (ED) patients, delays in care are associated with decreased satisfaction. Our department focused on implementing a front-end vertical patient flow model aimed to decrease delays in care, especially care initiation. The physical space for this new model was termed the Flexible Care Area (FCA). The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of this intervention on patient satisfaction. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients discharged from our academic ED over a one-year period (7/1/2013–6/30/2014). Of the 34,083 patients discharged during that period, 14,075 were sent a Press-Ganey survey and 2,358 (16.8%) returned the survey. We subsequently compared these survey responses with clinical information available through our electronic health record (EHR). Responses from the Press-Ganey surveys were dichotomized as being “Very Good” (VG, the highest rating) or “Other” (for all other ratings). Data abstracted from the EHR included demographic information (age, gender) and operational information (e.g. – emergency severity index, length of stay, whether care was delivered entirely in the FCA, utilization of labs or radiology testing, or administration of opioid pain medications). We used Fisher’s exact test to calculate statistical differences in proportions, while the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to report odds ratios. Results Of the returned surveys, 62% rated overall care for the visit as VG. However, fewer patients reported their care as VG if they were seen in FCA (53.4% versus 63.2%, p=0.027). Patients seen in FCA were less likely to have advanced imaging performed (12% versus 23.8%, p=0.001) or labs drawn (24.8% vs. 59.1%, p=0.001). Length of stay (FCA mean 159 ±103.5 minutes versus non-FCA 223 ±117 minutes) and acuity were lower for FCA patients than non-FCA patients (p=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between patient-reported ratings of physicians or nurses when comparing patients seen in FCA vs. those not seen in FCA. Conclusion Patients seen through the FCA reported a lower overall rating of care compared to patients not seen in the FCA. This occurred despite a shorter overall length of stay for these patients, suggesting that other factors have a meaningful impact on patient satisfaction.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Management of Sepsis

Sepsis represents a unique clinical dilemma with regard to antimicrobial stewardship. The standard approach to suspected sepsis in the emergency department centers on fluid resuscitation and timely broad-spectrum antimicrobials. The lack of gold standard diagnostics and evolving definitions for sepsis introduce a significant degree of diagnostic uncertainty that may raise the potential for inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing. Intervention bundles that combine traditional quality improvement strategies with emerging electronic health record-based clinical decision support tools and rapid molecular diagnostics represent the most promising approach to enhancing antimicrobial stewardship in the management of suspected sepsis in the emergency department.

Development of an Emergency Department Trigger Tool Using a Systematic Search and Modified Delphi Process

Objective This study aimed to develop an emergency department (ED) trigger tool to improve the identification of adverse events in the ED and that can be used to direct patient safety and quality improvement. This work describes the first step toward the development of an ED all-cause harm measurement tool by experts in the field. Methods We identified a multidisciplinary group of emergency medicine safety experts from whom we solicited candidate triggers. We then conducted a modified Delphi process consisting of 4 stages as follows: (1) a systematic literature search and review, including an independent oversampling of review for inclusion, (2) solicitation of empiric triggers from participants, (3) a Web-based survey ranking triggers on specific performance constructs, and (4) a final in-person meeting to arrive at consensus triggers for testing. Results of each step were shared with participants between each stage. Results Among an initial 804 unique articles found using our search criteria, we identified 94 that were suitable for further review. Interrater reliability was high (κ = 0.80). Review of these articles yielded 56 candidate triggers. These were supplemented by 58 participant-submitted triggers yielding a total of 114 candidate triggers that were shared with team members electronically along with their definitions. Team members then voted on each measure via a Web-based survey, ranking triggers on their face validity, utility for quality improvement, and fidelity (sensitivity/specificity). Participants were also provided the ability to flag any trigger about which they had questions or they felt merited further discussion at the in-person meeting. Triggers were ranked by combining the first 2 categories (face validity and utility), and information on fidelity was reviewed for decision making at the in-person meeting. Seven redundant triggers were eliminated. At an in-person meeting including representatives from all facilities, we presented the 50 top-ranked triggers as well as those that were flagged on the survey by 2 or more participants. We reviewed each trigger individually, identifying 41 triggers about which there was a clear agreement for inclusion. Of the seven additional triggers that required subsequent voting via e-mail, 5 were adopted, arriving at a total of 46 consensus-derived triggers. Conclusions Our modified Delphi process resulted in the identification of 46 final triggers for the detection of adverse events among ED patients. These triggers should be pilot field tested to quantify their individual and collective performance in detecting all-cause harm to ED patients.

Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in Trauma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Trauma patients with a positive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) are often believed to be at high risk for the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Therefore some centers prophylaxis all BAC positive patients. This study prospectively measures the incidence of AWS among trauma patients admitted to the hospital who have consumed alcohol and determines their risk factors for AWS. Methods: A cohort of trauma patients admitted to a non-ICU hospital setting was prospectively monitored for the development of AWS during the first 10 days of hospitalization. The 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and questions about alcohol withdrawal history were administered on the first day and the revised Clinical Institute for Withdrawal of Alcohol Scale (CIWA-Ar) was administered daily. Results: 113 patients were followed through discharge or for the first 10 days of hospitalization. 74.3% (n = 84) reported drinking alcohol. Of the 89 patients with a measured BAC, 25 (28%) were positive. Mean BAC for positive patients was 187.7 mg/dl. No person who denied drinking had a measurable BAC or developed AWS. Among the 84 drinkers, 3 were diagnosed with AWS by CIWA-Ar (3.6% risk), giving an incidence rate of 1.4 episodes per 100 patient days. All patients developing AWS admitted to a previous history of AWS symptoms upon stopping drinking. All AWS patients drank at least 2-3 times per week compared to only 37% of drinkers who did not develop AWS (p = .05). Positive response to dependence items from the AUDIT were highly associated with AWS risk (67% AWS vs 16% non-AWS, p = .005). Implementation of a prophylaxis protocol for all positive BAC would have resulted in 88% (22/25) of BAC positive patients receiving unwarranted medication. Conclusion: AWS has a low incidence rate among intoxicated trauma patients admitted to a non-ICU setting. It is associated with frequent drinking and is found in patients who report dependence symptoms. Patients can reliably tell physicians whether they are at risk for AWS. Routine prophylaxis for positive BAC patients will likely result in substantial excess medication use.

By Default: The Effect of Prepopulated Prescription Quantities on Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department

Introduction Opioid prescribing patterns have come under increasing scrutiny with the recent rise in opioid prescriptions, opioid misuse and abuse, and opioid-related adverse events. To date, there have been limited studies on the effect of default tablet quantities as part of emergency department (ED) electronic order entry. Our goal was to evaluate opioid prescribing patterns before and after the removal of a default quantity of 20 tablets from ED electronic order entry. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study at a single academic, urban ED with 58,000 annual visits. We identified all adult patients (18 years or older) seen in the ED and discharged home with prescriptions for tablet forms of hydrocodone and oxycodone (including mixed formulations with acetaminophen). We compared the quantity of tablets prescribed per opioid prescription 12 months before and 10 months after the electronic order-entry prescription default quantity of 20 tablets was removed and replaced with no default quantity. No specific messaging was given to providers, to avoid influencing prescribing patterns. We used two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test, two-sample test of proportions, and Pearson’s chi-squared tests where appropriate for statistical analysis. Results A total of 4,104 adult patients received discharge prescriptions for opioids in the pre-intervention period (151.6 prescriptions per 1,000 discharged adult patients), and 2,464 post-intervention (106.69 prescriptions per 1,000 discharged adult patients). The median quantity of opioid tablets prescribed decreased from 20 (interquartile ration [IQR] 10–20) to 15 (IQR 10–20) (p<0.0001) after removal of the default quantity. While the most frequent quantity of tablets received in both groups was 20 tablets, the proportion of patients who received prescriptions on discharge that contained 20 tablets decreased from 0.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.48–0.52]) to 0.23 (95% CI [0.21–0.24]) (p<0.001) after default quantity removal. Conclusion Although the median number of tablets differed significantly before and after the intervention, the clinical significance of this is unclear. An observed wider distribution of the quantity of tablets prescribed after removal of the default quantity of 20 may reflect more appropriate prescribing patterns (i.e., less severe indications receiving fewer tabs and more severe indications receiving more). A default value of 20 tablets for opioid prescriptions may be an example of the electronic medical record’s ability to reduce practice variability in medication orders actually counteracting optimal patient care.

Premature Rupture of Membranes and Preterm Labor

Preterm labor and delivery are challenging obstetric complications for any emergency physician. In the United States, preterm delivery complicates approximately one in ten births and is the cause of at least 75% of neonatal deaths, not including congenital malformations. Although the causes are often unknown, emergency physicians should be familiar with predisposing risk factors. The rate of fetal and maternal morbidity can be reduced with accurate diagnosis of preterm labor, intervention to delay preterm delivery, timely administration of corticosteroids, and in certain cases magnesium sulfate and antibiotics. When preterm rupture of membranes occurs, several complications can occur including infection, premature delivery, placental abruption, and umbilical cord prolapse. The initial management in the emergency department involves an exam, obstetric ultrasound, labs, and cultures as indicated. Fetal malpresentations should be anticipated in the setting of preterm PROM with preterm labor. Considerations should be given immediately to transport to a tertiary care center with neonatal intensive care unit, especially if less than 34 weeks gestational age. Contraindications to transport include imminent delivery, fetal or maternal distress or unstable status, or if there is no safe transport to a referral center.

Precipitous Labor and Emergency Department Delivery

Precipitous or emergency department (ED) delivery is a stressful event that requires preparation to comfortably approach and safely manage—often including development of ED delivery checklists or kits and appropriate expedited consultant notification (i.e., paging lists). Complications are rare but include shoulder dystocia, prolapsed umbilical cord, and breech presentation. If a shoulder dystocia is encountered, an algorithm of maneuvers can be employed and should start with McRoberts maneuver and application of suprapubic pressure and proceed to include rotational or internal maneuvers. Management of a prolapsed umbilical cord should start with elevation of the presenting fetal part to alleviate pressure on the umbilical cord and expedited obstetric assistance for emergent cesarean section. Breech delivery is best managed by allowing the mother to deliver the fetus with no assistance in delivery until the umbilicus is visualized.

Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: Factors Associated with ED Revisits

Introduction Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) is a condition that commonly affects women in the first trimester of pregnancy. Despite frequently leading to emergency department (ED) visits, little evidence exists to characterize the nature of ED visits or to guide its treatment in the ED. Our objectives were to evaluate the treatment of NVP in the ED and to identify factors that predict return visits to the ED for NVP. Methods We conducted a retrospective database analysis using the electronic medical record from a single, large academic hospital. Demographic and treatment variables were collected using a chart review of 113 ED patient visits with a billing diagnosis of “nausea and vomiting in pregnancy” or “hyperemesis gravidarum.” Logistic regression analysis was used with a primary outcome of return visit to the ED for the same diagnoses. Results There was wide treatment variability of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy patients in the ED. Of the 113 patient visits, 38 (33.6%) had a return ED visit for NVP. High gravidity (OR 1.31, 95% CI [1.06–1.61]), high parity (OR 1.50 95% CI [1.12–2.00]), and early gestational age (OR 0.74 95% CI [0.60–0.90]) were associated with an increase in return ED visits in univariate logistic regression models, while only early gestational age (OR 0.74 95% CI [0.59–0.91]) was associated with increased return ED visits in a multiple regression model. Admission to the hospital was found to decrease the likelihood of return ED visits (p=0.002). Conclusion NVP can be difficult to manage and has a high ED return visit rate. Optimizing care with aggressive, standardized treatment in the ED and upon discharge, particularly if factors predictive of return ED visits are present, may improve quality of care and reduce ED utilization for this condition.