Brian T. Valerian

Increased Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in IBD Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is a key hospital-level patient safety indicator. All risk factors for surgical site infection are not always taken into account and adjusted for. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the impact of IBD in comparison with diverticulitis and colorectal cancer on the national rates of surgical site infection. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried for all patients undergoing elective colectomy for colon cancer, diverticulitis, and IBD from 2008 through 2012. OUTCOME MEASURES: The association between surgical site infection and IBD patients was assessed. Patient demographics, rates of surgical site infection, wound class, return to operating room, and various patient characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association with surgical site infection. RESULTS: The query yielded 71,845 patients undergoing elective colectomy. Of these patients, 42,132 had colon cancer, 22,143 had diverticulitis, and 7570 had IBD. The rate of surgical site infection was 12.0% for colon cancer, 12.8% for diverticulitis, and 18.0% for IBD. Return to operating room within 30 days was 7.3% for IBD patients, 4.4% for patients with diverticulitis, and 4.9% for patients with colorectal cancer. Return to operating room within 30 days had the highest correlation to surgical site infection in both univariate and multivariable analysis. Other associative factors for surgical site infection common to both analyses included diabetes mellitus, smoking, open procedures, and obesity. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the data collection errors inherent to large databases, exclusion of emergent operations, and the inability to identify patients taking immunosuppressive agents. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD undergoing elective colectomy have significantly increased rates of surgical site infection, specifically deep and organ/space infections. Given this information, risk adjustment models for surgical site infection may need to include IBD in their calculation.

Extra nuchal‐type fibroma associated with elastosis, traumatic neuroma, a rare APC gene missense mutation, and a very rare MUTYH gene polymorphism: a case report and review of the literature*

We report a case of an extra nuchal‐type fibroma in a 51‐year‐old male suspected to have attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (Gardners syndrome), who presented with a longstanding buttock mass excised due to enlargement and pain. Histopathologically, lobules of haphazard, hypocellular, hyalinized collagen bundles replaced the dermis and subcutis and entrapped nerve bundles, mimicking Morton neuroma. Ramifying nerve twigs found around larger nerve fascicles showed the co‐existence of traumatic neuroma. Elastic tissue stain revealed elastosis characterized by large, arborizing fibers lying between and within the hyalinized collagen bundles. Modified Massons trichrome stain showed light blue staining of collagen bundles producing the hyalinized nodules with irregular, light red staining of collagen bundles at their periphery and within tumor collagen. Compression and/or degeneration of collagen and secondary elastosis with later entrapment by tumor collagen could explain this microscopic phenotype. By immunohistochemistry, tumor spindle cells expressed nuclear β‐catenin and cyclin D1, mostly within regions of fibrosis implicating activation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)‐Wnt pathway. Genetic analysis showed a missense mutation in APC gene (c.7504G>A, p.G2502S in exon 15) and a functional homozygous polymorphism in the MUTYH gene (c.36+325G>C, (IVS1+5G/C)). Nuchal‐type fibroma has been associated with Gardners syndrome and trauma. In this patient, genetic predisposition coupled with repetitive, localized trauma and collagen degeneration may have provided the stimulus for the development of extra nuchal‐type fibroma.

Complications and surgical outcomes after interhospital transfer vs direct admission in colorectal surgery: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis

BACKGROUND Interhospital transfer is common among patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine surgical outcomes after transfer vs direct admission in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2012 was used. Colorectal operations were selected, including both emergency and nonemergency cases. Transfers were compared with direct admissions using a complex comorbidity analysis model. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality, extended hospital length of stay, and complication rates. RESULTS The study included 121,040 admissions. After adjusting for multiple patient factors and comorbidities, nonemergency transfers still had higher mortality rates (RR = 1.20; P < .05), longer length of hospital stay (RR = 1.24; P < .05), and higher complication rates (RR = 1.18; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative hospital transfer is common among patients requiring colorectal surgery. Despite extensive propensity score matching, nonemergency transfers have higher rates of mortality, longer length of hospital stay, and higher overall complication rates compared with direct admissions. Transfer status is an important variable in hospital performance models and should be taken into consideration when analyzing hospital outcomes.

Risk of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND:Inflammatory bowel disease confers a hypercoagulable state. A large number of these patients require central venous access in the form of peripherally inserted central catheters for long-term intravenous therapies. Our clinical observations suggested that these patients had a higher incidence of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis than that of the general population. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between IBD and catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis. DESIGN:A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter line placement between 2009 and 2011. SETTING:This study was performed at a single-institution tertiary referral center. PATIENTS:All patients who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter line placement were identified. OUTCOME MEASURES:The risk of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis in IBD patients was assessed. This risk was compared with known risk factors such as malnutrition, malignancy, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use. Multivariate analysis was performed. Catheter size, indication for placement, and vein location of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis were identified in the IBD population. RESULTS:There were 7179 peripherally inserted central catheter lines placed during the study period; the overall incidence of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was 2.1% (148/7179). The incidence of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis among patients with IBD was 6.8% (9/132). The incidence of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis among non-IBD patients was 1.9% (139/7047) (relative risk, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.8–6.6; p < 0.001). The incidence of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was increased for patients with malnutrition (4.8%, 30/628, p < 0.001) and increasing age (95% CI, 1.01–1.12; p = 0.02). There was no increased incidence of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis for patients with diabetes mellitus (1.6%, 25/1574, p < 0.14), malignancy (2.8%, 30/1041, p = 0.06), or tobacco use (1.6%, 31/1938, p = 0.10). After multivariate analysis, IBD, malnutrition, and increasing age were found to be significant risk factors for the development of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis. LIMITATIONS:The inability to track the number of catheter days, the inaccuracy of administrative data, the lack of outpatient follow-up, and the small number of events in the study cohort were limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study to demonstrate IBD as an independent risk factor to the development of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis. The placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter line in IBD should be utilized selectively.

17. Emergency Laparoscopy

Laparoscopy is an effective modality for both diagnosing and treating intra-abdominal pathology. Advances in equipment, as well as the acquisition of advanced laparoscopic skills by more surgeons, has broadened the scope of laparoscopic surgery. With the proper equipment, training, skills, and patient selection, laparoscopy can be utilized in the emergent setting.